Extended Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (E-FAHP): A General Approach

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Politécnica Superior de Alcoy
dc.contributor.affiliationGrupo de Investigación de Economía Internacional y Desarrollo
dc.contributor.authorReig-Mullor, Javieres_ES
dc.contributor.authorPla Santamaría, David
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Bernabeu, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T04:31:32Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T04:31:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-11es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) methodologies have witnessed a growing development from the late 1980s until now, and countless FAHP based applications have been published in many fields including economics, finance, environment or engineering. In this context, the FAHP methodologies have been generally restricted to fuzzy numbers with linear type of membership functions (triangular numbers-TN-and trapezoidal numbers-TrN). This paper proposes an extended FAHP model (E-FAHP) where pairwise fuzzy comparison matrices are represented by a special type of fuzzy numbers referred to as (m,n)-trapezoidal numbers (TrN (m,n)) with nonlinear membership functions. It is then demonstrated that there are a significant number of FAHP approaches that can be reduced to the proposed E-FAHP structure. A comparative analysis of E-FAHP and Mikhailov's model is illustrated with a case study showing that E-FAHP includes linear and nonlinear fuzzy numbers.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationReig-Mullor, J.; Pla Santamaría, D.; Garcia-Bernabeu, A. (2020). Extended Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (E-FAHP): A General Approach. Mathematics. 8(11):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112014es_ES
dc.description.issue11es_ES
dc.description.referencesChai, J., Liu, J. N. K., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872-3885. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040es_ES
dc.description.referencesTavana, M., Zareinejad, M., Di Caprio, D., & Kaviani, M. A. (2016). An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and SWOT method for outsourcing reverse logistics. Applied Soft Computing, 40, 544-557. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesMedasani, S., Kim, J., & Krishnapuram, R. (1998). An overview of membership function generation techniques for pattern recognition. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 19(3-4), 391-417. doi:10.1016/s0888-613x(98)10017-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesMedaglia, A. L., Fang, S.-C., Nuttle, H. L. W., & Wilson, J. R. (2002). An efficient and flexible mechanism for constructing membership functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(1), 84-95. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00157-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesMikhailov, L. (2003). Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3), 365-385. doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(02)00383-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesAppadoo, S. S. (2014). Possibilistic Fuzzy Net Present Value Model and Application. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-11. doi:10.1155/2014/865968es_ES
dc.description.referencesMikhailov, L., & Tsvetinov, P. (2004). Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing, 5(1), 23-33. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2004.04.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesHepu Deng. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. FUZZ-IEEE’99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315). doi:10.1109/fuzzy.1999.793038es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1-3), 229-241. doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(83)80082-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesBuckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesChang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesEnea, M., & Piazza, T. (2004). Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3(1), 39-62. doi:10.1023/b:fodm.0000013071.63614.3des_ES
dc.description.referencesKrejčí, J., Pavlačka, O., & Talašová, J. (2016). A fuzzy extension of Analytic Hierarchy Process based on the constrained fuzzy arithmetic. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(1), 89-110. doi:10.1007/s10700-016-9241-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesCakir, O., & Canbolat, M. S. (2008). A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1367-1378. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.041es_ES
dc.description.referencesIsaai, M. T., Kanani, A., Tootoonchi, M., & Afzali, H. R. (2011). Intelligent timetable evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3718-3723. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.030es_ES
dc.description.referencesBüyüközkan, G., & Güleryüz, S. (2016). A new integrated intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach for product development partner selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 383-395. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.038es_ES
dc.description.referencesZheng, G., Zhu, N., Tian, Z., Chen, Y., & Sun, B. (2012). Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Safety Science, 50(2), 228-239. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.042es_ES
dc.description.referencesCalabrese, A., Costa, R., & Menichini, T. (2013). Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3747-3755. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.081es_ES
dc.description.referencesIshizaka, A., & Nguyen, N. H. (2013). Calibrated fuzzy AHP for current bank account selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3775-3783. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.089es_ES
dc.description.referencesSomsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 198-210. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesChan, H. K., Wang, X., & Raffoni, A. (2014). An integrated approach for green design: Life-cycle, fuzzy AHP and environmental management accounting. The British Accounting Review, 46(4), 344-360. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesTan, R. R., Aviso, K. B., Huelgas, A. P., & Promentilla, M. A. B. (2014). Fuzzy AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering involving quantitative and qualitative aspects. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(5), 467-475. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesRezaei, J., Fahim, P. B. M., & Tavasszy, L. (2014). Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(18), 8165-8179. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesSong, Z., Zhu, H., Jia, G., & He, C. (2014). Comprehensive evaluation on self-ignition risks of coal stockpiles using fuzzy AHP approaches. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 32, 78-94. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2014.08.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesDong, M., Li, S., & Zhang, H. (2015). Approaches to group decision making with incomplete information based on power geometric operators and triangular fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7846-7857. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesMangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2015). Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 375-390. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesMosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54-65. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesLupo, T. (2016). A fuzzy framework to evaluate service quality in the healthcare industry: An empirical case of public hospital service evaluation in Sicily. Applied Soft Computing, 40, 468-478. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesTuljak-Suban, D., & Bajec, P. (2018). The Influence of Defuzzification Methods to Decision Support Systems Based on Fuzzy AHP with Scattered Comparison Matrix: Application to 3PLP Selection as a Case Study. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 26(03), 475-491. doi:10.1142/s021848851850023xes_ES
dc.description.referencesAkbar, M. A., Shameem, M., Mahmood, S., Alsanad, A., & Gumaei, A. (2020). Prioritization based Taxonomy of Cloud-based Outsource Software Development Challenges: Fuzzy AHP analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 95, 106557. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106557es_ES
dc.description.referencesJung, H. (2011). A fuzzy AHP–GP approach for integrated production-planning considering manufacturing partners. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5833-5840. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.039es_ES
dc.description.referencesShaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8182-8192. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.149es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbdullah, L., & Zulkifli, N. (2015). Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(9), 4397-4409. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.021es_ES
dc.description.referencesAkkaya, G., Turanoğlu, B., & Öztaş, S. (2015). An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(24), 9565-9573. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.061es_ES
dc.description.referencesKutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61-67. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044es_ES
dc.description.referencesBüyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2341-2354. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061es_ES
dc.description.referencesTaylan, O., Bafail, A. O., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Kabli, M. R. (2014). Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Applied Soft Computing, 17, 105-116. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesPatil, S. K., & Kant, R. (2014). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in Supply Chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(2), 679-693. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.093es_ES
dc.description.referencesSun, L., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Dong, H., & Hussain, F. K. (2016). Cloud-FuSeR: Fuzzy ontology and MCDM based cloud service selection. Future Generation Computer Systems, 57, 42-55. doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.11.025es_ES
dc.description.referencesAr, I. M., Erol, I., Peker, I., Ozdemir, A. I., Medeni, T. D., & Medeni, I. T. (2020). Evaluating the feasibility of blockchain in logistics operations: A decision framework. Expert Systems with Applications, 158, 113543. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113543es_ES
dc.description.referencesYalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 350-364. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024es_ES
dc.description.referencesChang, S.-C., Tsai, P.-H., & Chang, S.-C. (2015). A hybrid fuzzy model for selecting and evaluating the e-book business model: A case study on Taiwan e-book firms. Applied Soft Computing, 34, 194-204. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, N., & Zhao, H. (2016). Performance evaluation of eco-industrial thermal power plants by using fuzzy GRA-VIKOR and combination weighting techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 169-183. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.113es_ES
dc.description.referencesMandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., & Benkovic, S. (2014). Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic Modelling, 43, 30-37. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.036es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, Y., Liu, X., & Chen, Y. (2012). Supplier selection using axiomatic fuzzy set and TOPSIS methodology in supply chain management. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 11(2), 147-176. doi:10.1007/s10700-012-9117-xes_ES
dc.description.referencesKaya, Ö., Alemdar, K. D., & Çodur, M. Y. (2020). A novel two stage approach for electric taxis charging station site selection. Sustainable Cities and Society, 62, 102396. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102396es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, J.-F., Hsieh, H.-N., & Do, Q. H. (2015). Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach. Applied Soft Computing, 28, 100-108. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.050es_ES
dc.description.referencesJavanbarg, M. B., Scawthorn, C., Kiyono, J., & Shahbodaghkhan, B. (2012). Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 960-966. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.095es_ES
dc.description.referencesChe, Z. H., Wang, H. S., & Chuang, C.-L. (2010). A fuzzy AHP and DEA approach for making bank loan decisions for small and medium enterprises in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 7189-7199. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesKrejčí, J. (2015). Additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices and multiplicative fuzzy priorities. Soft Computing, 21(12), 3177-3192. doi:10.1007/s00500-015-2000-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesXu, Z., & Liao, H. (2014). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 749-761. doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2013.2272585es_ES
dc.description.referencesMikhailov, L. (2000). A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(3), 341-349. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin14es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume8es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/math8112014es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn2227-7390es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/162236
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofMathematicses_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\421624es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/math8112014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0888-613X(98)10017-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00157-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00383-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1155/2014/865968es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2004.04.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/FUZZY.1999.793038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/B:FODM.0000013071.63614.3des_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10700-016-9241-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.041es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.042es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.081es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.089es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jlp.2014.08.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.22111/IJFS.2015.1839es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1142/S021848851850023Xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106557es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.039es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.149es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.021es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.061es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.093es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.future.2015.11.025es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113543es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.113es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.036es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10700-012-9117-xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102396es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.050es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.095es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s00500-015-2000-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2272585es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectAHPes_ES
dc.subjectFuzzy AHPes_ES
dc.subjectFuzzy numberses_ES
dc.subject(m,n)-trapezoidal numberses_ES
dc.subjectMCDMes_ES
dc.subject.classificationECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDADes_ES
dc.subject.classificationECONOMIA APLICADAes_ES
dc.titleExtended Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (E-FAHP): A General Approaches_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier185443
person.identifier185582
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1563-3997
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3181-7745
relation.isAuthorOfPublication60a83d2e-7a74-4579-a5a0-dee058e9852b
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdc0156d9-2cff-4ab9-adff-2c5705e09156
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery60a83d2e-7a74-4579-a5a0-dee058e9852b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication1562846a-1e62-49bb-a253-92b3901edd08
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication96a57980-3fe4-46f5-8a98-7c3aac322fc5
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd46f0240-0b8a-403b-ba97-3a0ef170a4f6
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1562846a-1e62-49bb-a253-92b3901edd08
upv.uuidb56901eb-7927-4d82-a90b-effc44ff4549es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Reig-Mullor;Pla;Garcia-Bernabeu - Extended Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (E-FAHP): A General A....pdf
Tamaño:
772.72 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial
[object Object] Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos, conferencias, monografías