Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market

dc.contributor.affiliationCentro de Investigación en Gestión de Empresas (CEGEA)
dc.contributor.affiliationFacultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales
dc.contributor.authorMateos-Ronco, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorPeiró Torralba, Nieveses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-05T04:33:07Z
dc.date.available2020-12-05T04:33:07Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-02es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The art market operates in a very different way from conventional economic markets, ranging from its behaviors of supply and demand, the trading of goods, and the economic agents intervening in it. In addition, it is a highly unregulated market, with very little standardized information in economic terms. This paper focuses on art galleries, which are the most influential intermediaries in the Spanish primary contemporary fine-art market and perform a role that goes beyond the mere distribution of works of art. This study develops and applies a prospective methodology based on the subjective information compiled by experts, known as the Delphi method, to identify and evaluate the factors that determine the current situation and future outlook for Spanish contemporary art galleries. The results show, on one hand, that the method employed constitutes a valid option to provide reliable information. In addition, they show that the survival of these organizations will depend on their ability to adapt to the changing conditions of the economic environment, reactivating and internationalizing demand, and redirecting their business model towards sustainable management by implementing appropriate business management models and techniques.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationMateos-Ronco, A.; Peiró Torralba, N. (2019). Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market. Sustainability. 11(2):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020541es_ES
dc.description.issue2es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaumol, W. J. (1985). Unnatural Value: Or Art Investment as Floating Crap Game. Journal of Arts Management and Law, 15(3), 47-60. doi:10.1080/07335113.1985.9942162es_ES
dc.description.referencesGinsburgh, V., & Jeanfils, P. (1995). Long-term comovements in international markets for paintings. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 538-548. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00060-des_ES
dc.description.referencesChanel, O. (1995). Is art market behaviour predictable? European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 519-527. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00058-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesGérard-Varet, L.-A. (1995). On pricing the priceless: Comments on the economics of the visual art market. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 509-518. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00057-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesHolub, H. W., Hutter, M., & Tappeiner, G. (1993). Light and shadow in art price computation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 17(1), 49-69. doi:10.1007/bf00820767es_ES
dc.description.referencesBeckert, J., & Rössel, J. (2013). THE PRICE OF ART. European Societies, 15(2), 178-195. doi:10.1080/14616696.2013.767923es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchönfeld, S., & Reinstaller, A. (2007). The effects of gallery and artist reputation on prices in the primary market for art: a note. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(2), 143-153. doi:10.1007/s10824-007-9031-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbdullah, A., Khadaroo, I., & Napier, C. J. (2018). Managing the performance of arts organisations: Pursuing heterogeneous objectives in an era of austerity. The British Accounting Review, 50(2), 174-184. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesKomarova, N., & Velthuis, O. (2017). Local contexts as activation mechanisms of market development: contemporary art in emerging markets. Consumption Markets & Culture, 21(1), 1-21. doi:10.1080/10253866.2017.1284065es_ES
dc.description.referencesLandeta, J., Matey, J., Ruíz, V., & Galter, J. (2008). Results of a Delphi survey in drawing up the input–output tables for Catalonia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(1), 32-56. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesHayes, T. (2007). Delphi study of the future of marketing of higher education. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 927-931. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesOkoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaguire, J. S., & Matthews, J. (2012). Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 551-562. doi:10.1177/1367549412445762es_ES
dc.description.referencesJOY*, A., & SHERRY, JR.‡, J. F. (2003). Disentangling the paradoxical alliances between art market and art world. Consumption Markets & Culture, 6(3), 155-181. doi:10.1080/1025386032000153759es_ES
dc.description.referencesMateos-Ronco, A., & Server Izquierdo, R. J. (2011). Drawing up the official adjustment rules for damage assessment in agricultural insurance: Results of a Delphi survey for fruit crops in Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1542-1556. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesWebler, T., Levine, D., Rakel, H., & Renn, O. (1991). A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 253-263. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90040-mes_ES
dc.description.referencesSTRAUSS, H. J., & ZEIGLER, L. H. (1975). The Delphi Technique and Its Uses In Social Science Research*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(4), 253-259. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1975.tb00574.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesRowe, G., Wright, G., & Bolger, F. (1991). Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 235-251. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-ies_ES
dc.description.referencesWoudenberg, F. (1991). An evaluation of Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 40(2), 131-150. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90002-wes_ES
dc.description.referencesTuroff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149-171. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesLandeta, J., Barrutia, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1629-1641. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesNowack, M., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2011). Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: Quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1603-1615. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesRowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1487-1490. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesRowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375. doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00018-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesDajani, J. S., Sincoff, M. Z., & Talley, W. K. (1979). Stability and agreement criteria for the termination of Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13(1), 83-90. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(79)90007-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesChaffin, W. W., & Talley, W. K. (1980). Individual stability in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16(1), 67-73. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(80)90074-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesRowe, G., Wright, G., & McColl, A. (2005). Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(4), 377-399. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.03.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesCurioni, S. B., & Rizzi, E. M. R. (2016). Two realms in confrontation: consensus or discontinuity? An exploratory study on the convergence of critical assessment and market evaluation in the contemporary art system. Museum Management and Curatorship, 31(5), 440-459. doi:10.1080/09647775.2016.1227571es_ES
dc.description.referencesEstadística de Financiación y Gasto Público en Cultura http://www.culturaydeporte.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas/cultura/mc/culturabase/gasto-publico/resultados-gasto-publico.htmles_ES
dc.description.referencesPrinz, A., Piening, J., & Ehrmann, T. (2014). The success of art galleries: a dynamic model with competition and information effects. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(2), 153-176. doi:10.1007/s10824-014-9217-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesWróblewski, Ł., Dziadzia, B., & Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2018). Sustainable Management of the Offer of Cultural Institutions in the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services—Barriers and Conditions. Sustainability, 10(9), 3253. doi:10.3390/su10093253es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin15es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su11020541es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/156521
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilityes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\381519es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11020541es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/07335113.1985.9942162es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0014-2921(94)00060-Des_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0014-2921(94)00058-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0014-2921(94)00057-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/BF00820767es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/14616696.2013.767923es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10824-007-9031-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/10253866.2017.1284065es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/1367549412445762es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/1025386032000153759es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0040-1625(91)90040-Mes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/j.2162-6057.1975.tb00574.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-Ies_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0040-1625(91)90002-Wes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0040-1625(79)90007-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0040-1625(80)90074-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2004.03.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/09647775.2016.1227571es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10824-014-9217-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/su10093253es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectContemporary art marketes_ES
dc.subjectArt gallerieses_ES
dc.subjectSustainable managementes_ES
dc.subjectDelphi methodes_ES
dc.subjectForesight studyes_ES
dc.subject.classificationECONOMIA, SOCIOLOGIA Y POLITICA AGRARIAes_ES
dc.subject.ods08.- Fomentar el crecimiento económico sostenido, inclusivo y sostenible, el empleo pleno y productivo, y el trabajo decente para todoses_ES
dc.titleSustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Marketes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier25603
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1185-1885
relation.isAuthorOfPublication193fc4a1-5aeb-4954-8130-e79766bdc320
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery193fc4a1-5aeb-4954-8130-e79766bdc320
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9e2a7086-2dd4-4053-87ab-7f04c42bd45d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication67c03db1-c7ed-41d2-8506-f61e5b5de340
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication1562846a-1e62-49bb-a253-92b3901edd08
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9e2a7086-2dd4-4053-87ab-7f04c42bd45d
upv.uuidb9886b54-e166-42c6-bbbe-6531f1e74907es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Mateos-Ronco;Peiró - Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for th....pdf
Tamaño:
284.61 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial