Comparison of three plants in a surface flow constructed wetland treating eutrophic water in a Mediterranean climate

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.authorHernández Crespo, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorOliver Rajadel, Nuriaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBixquert, J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGargallo Bellés, Saraes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartín Monerris, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T08:05:01Z
dc.date.available2016-06-21T08:05:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2493-9es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this study is to examine the suitability of three plants, Typha spp., Phragmites spp. and Iris pseudacorus, in a free-water surface constructed wetland created to treat eutrophic water from Lake Albufera (Valencia, Spain), a wetland of international importance. The growth, coverage and nutrient content of the three plants were studied, and chemical analyses were performed according to standard methods. The maximum standing crops measured for each plant were 1.9, 18.2 and 3.3 kg m(-2), respectively, and their average nutrient concentrations were 2.1, 1.2 and 1.7 g P kg(-1) and 12.1, 11.7 and 10.1 g N kg(-1), respectively. A multiple harvest of Iris pseudacorus revealed that the removal of nutrients could be increased up to 50% for N and 100% for P compared with a single harvest. Biomass decomposition assays showed high values for five-day biochemical oxygen demand (115-207 mg O-2 g(-1), depending on the plant and its age) and a substantial release of phosphorus, up to 100% of that contained in the biomass, highlighting the need to remove the litter fall. This study provides key aspects for vegetation selection and management (planting and harvesting) in a novel application of constructed wetlands to enhance water quality and biodiversity.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationHernández Crespo, C.; Oliver Rajadel, N.; Bixquert, J.; Gargallo Bellés, S.; Martín Monerris, M. (2015). Comparison of three plants in a surface flow constructed wetland treating eutrophic water in a Mediterranean climate. Hydrobiologia. 774(1):183-192. doi:10.1007/s10750-015-2493-9es_ES
dc.description.issue1es_ES
dc.description.referencesÁlvarez, J. A. & E. Bécares, 2006. Seasonal decomposition of Typha latifolia in a free-water surface constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering 28: 99–105.es_ES
dc.description.referencesArroyo, P., I. Blanco, R. Cortijo, E. L. Calabuig & G. Ansola, 2013. Twelve-Year performance of a constructed wetland for municipal wastewater treatment: water quality improvement, metal distribution in wastewater, sediments, and vegetation. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 224: 1762.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAsaeda, T., L. H. Nam, P. Hietz, N. Tanaka & S. Karunaratnex, 2002. Seasonal fluctuations in live and dead biomass of Phragmites australis as described by a growth and decomposition model: implications of duration of aerobic conditions for litter mineralization and sedimentation. Aquatic Botany 73: 223–229.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBřezinova, T. & J. Vymazal, 2015. Nitrogen standing stock in Phragmites australis growing in constructed wetlands – Do we evaluate it correctly? Ecological Engineering 74: 286–289.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrix, H., 1999. The European research project on reed die-back and progression (EUREED). Limnologica 29: 5–10.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCheng, X. Y., W. Y. Chen, B. H. Gu, X. C. Liu, F. Chen, Z. H. Chen, X. Y. Zhou, Y. X. Li, H. Huang & Y. J. Chen, 2009. Morphology, ecology, and contaminant removal efficiency of eight wetland plants with different root systems. Hydrobiologia 623: 77–85.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCiria, M. P., M. L. Solano & P. Soriano, 2005. Role of macrophyte Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and assessment of its potential as a biomass fuel. Biosystems Engineering 92: 535–544.es_ES
dc.description.referencesComín, F. A., J. A. Romero, O. Hernández & M. Menéndez, 2001. Restoration of wetlands from abandoned rice fields for nutrient removal, and biological community and landscape diversity. Restoration Ecology 9: 201–208.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCoveney, M. F., D. L. Stites, E. F. Lowe, L. E. Battoe & R. Conrow, 2002. Nutrient removal from eutrophic lake water by wetland filtration. Ecological Engineering 19: 141–159.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDe Meester, S., J. Demeyer, F. Velghe, A. Peene, H. Van Langenhove & J. Dewulf, 2012. The environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion as a biomass valorization technology. Bioresource Technology 121: 396–403.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDunne, E. J., M. F. Coveney, E. R. Marzolf, V. R. Hoge, R. Conrow, R. Naleway, E. F. Lowe & L. E. Battoe, 2012. Efficacy of a large-scale constructed wetland to remove phosphorus and suspended solids from Lake Apopka, Florida. Ecological Engineering 42: 90–100.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFisher, J., C. J. Stratford & S. Buckton, 2009. Variation in nutrient removal in three wetland blocks in relation to vegetation composition, inflow nutrient concentration and hydraulic loading. Ecological Engineering 35: 1387–1394.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGigante, D., C. Angiolini, F. Landucci, F. Maneli, B. Nisi, O. Vaselli, R. Venanzoni & L. Lastrucci, 2014. New occurrence of reed bed decline in southern Europe: do permanent flooding and chemical parameters play a role? Comptes Rendus Biologies 337: 487–498.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, L., Y. Li, D. K. Biswas, Y. Nian & G. Jiang, 2008. Potential of constructed wetlands in treating the eutrophic water: evidence from Taihu Lake of China. Bioresource Tecnology 99: 1656–1663.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, X. N., H. L. Song, W. Li, X. W. Lu & O. Nishimura, 2010. An integrated ecological floating-bed employing plant, freshwater clam and biofilm carrier for purification of eutrophic water. Ecological Engineering 36: 382–390.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLonghi, D., M. Bartoli & P. Viaroli, 2008. Decomposition of four macrophytes in wetland sediments: organic matter and nutrient decay and associated benthic processes. Aquatic Botany 89: 303–310.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaddison, M., T. Mauring, K. Remm, M. Lesta & Ü. Mander, 2009. Dynamics of Typha latifolia L. populations in treatment wetlands in Estonia. Ecological Engineering 35: 258–269.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMinisterio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (MAPA). 1986. Métodos oficiales de análisis, vol. 3. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartín, M., N. Oliver, C. Hernández-Crespo, S. Gargallo & M. C. Regidor, 2013. The use of free water surface constructed wetland to treat the eutrophicated waters of lake L’Albufera de Valencia (Spain). Ecological Engineering 50: 52–61.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMenéndez, M., M. Martínez, O. Hernández & F. Comín, 2001. Comparison of leaf decomposition in two mediterranean rivers: a large eutrophic river and an oligotrophic stream (S Catalonia, NE Spain). International Review of Hydrobiology 86: 475–486.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMitsch, W. J., 1995. Restoration of our lakes and rivers with wetlands – an important application of ecological engineering. Water Science and Technology 31: 167–177.es_ES
dc.description.referencesQiu, Z. C., M. Wang, W. L. Lai, F. H. He & Z. H. Chen, 2011. Plant growth and nutrient removal in constructed monoculture and mixed wetlands related to stubble attributes. Hydrobiologia 661: 251–260.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRodrigo, M. A., M. Martín, C. Rojo, S. Gargallo, M. Segura & N. Oliver, 2013. The role of eutrophication reduction of two small man-made Mediterranean lagoons in the context of a broader remediation system: effects on water quality and plankton contribution. Ecological Engineering 61: 371–382.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSheng-Bing, H., Y. Li, K. Hai-Nan, L. Zhi-Ming, W. De-Yi & H. Zhan-Bo, 2007. Treatment efficiencies of constructed wetlands for eutrophic landscape river water. Pedosphere 17: 522–528.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSuzuki, T., N. Ariyawathie & Y. Kurihara, 1989. Amplification of Total Dry Matter, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal from Stands of Phragmites Australis by Harvesting and Reharvesting Regenerated Shoots. In Hammer, D. A. (ed.), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI: 530–535.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTang, X., S. Huang, M. Scholz & J. Li, 2009. Nutrient removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands treating eutrophic river water: assessment of plants, intermittent artificial aeration and polyhedron hollow polypropylene balls. Water Air Soil Pollution 197: 61–73.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTanner, C. C., 1996. Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems – a comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species. Ecological Engineering 7: 59–83.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVera, P. & M. Giménez, 2013. Colonización y evolución inicial de la comunidad de paseriformes en un humedal restaurado del Este de la península ibérica. Revista de anillamiento 31–32: 61–72.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVymazal, J., 2011. Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review. Hydrobiologia 674: 133–156.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVymazal, J., 2013. Emergent plants used in free water surface constructed wetlands: a review. Ecological Engineering 61: 582–592.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVymazal, J. & L. Kröpfelová, 2005. Growth of Phragmites australis and Phalaris arundinacea in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czesch Republic. Ecological Engineering 25: 606–621.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVymazal, J., L. Kröpfelová, J. Švehla & J. Štíchová, 2010. Can multiple harvest of aboveground biomass enhance removal of trace elements in constructed wetlands receiving municipal swage? Ecological Engineering 36: 939–945.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWright, R. M. & J. A. McDonnell, 1986. Macrophyte growth in shallow streams: biomass model. Journal of Environmental Engineering 112: 967–982.es_ES
dc.description.referencesXie, Y., D. Yu & B. Ren, 2004. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus availability on the decomposition of aquatic plants. Aquatic Botany 80: 29–37.es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, C. B., J. Wang, W. L. Liu, S. X. Zhu, H. L. Ge, S. X. Chang, J. Chang & Y. Ge, 2010. Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering 36: 62–68.es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhao, Y., X. Xia & Z. Yang, 2013. Growth and nutrient accumulation of Phragmites australis in relation to water level variation and nutrient loadings in a shallow lake. Journal of Environmental Sciences 25: 16–25.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin192es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio183es_ES
dc.description.volume774es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10750-015-2493-9
dc.identifier.issn0018-8158
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/66231
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag (Germany)es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofHydrobiologiaes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2493-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.05.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11270-013-1762-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0304-3770(02)00027-Xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0075-9511(99)80033-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10750-008-9649-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.08.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002201.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0925-8574(02)00037-Xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.109es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.01.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.05.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.crvi.2014.05.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.03.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.06.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.029es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/1522-2632(200107)86:4/5<475::AID-IROH475>3.0.CO;2-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0273-1223(95)00369-Xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10750-010-0530-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60062-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11270-008-9791-zes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0925-8574(95)00066-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10750-011-0738-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.06.023es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.04.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1986)112:5(967)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.07.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60004-7es_ES
dc.relation.senia306110es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectLake Albuferaes_ES
dc.subjectTancat de la Pipaes_ES
dc.subjectEutrophic wateres_ES
dc.subjectPlantses_ES
dc.subjectMultiple harvestes_ES
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERIA HIDRAULICAes_ES
dc.subject.classificationTECNOLOGIA DEL MEDIO AMBIENTEes_ES
dc.titleComparison of three plants in a surface flow constructed wetland treating eutrophic water in a Mediterranean climatees_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier61616
person.identifier1016
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6727-0481
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7464-9505
relation.isAuthorOfPublication34ac53bc-bcec-420b-a947-eb004dd50c9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2d6af8ac-2408-4d80-9c96-4c4f6db6b013
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery34ac53bc-bcec-420b-a947-eb004dd50c9f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication937991bf-5e71-4f67-ae2a-1fb780a35167
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
upv.uuidc6a411de-c19e-413b-8609-67c284b69368es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Hernandez-Crespo 2016 eproof version autor.pdf
Tamaño:
808.25 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
-Hernández;Oliver;Javier - Comparison of three plants in a surface flow constructed wetland treati....pdf
Tamaño:
787.25 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial