Structural discrimination of robustness in transcriptional feedforward loops for pattern formation

dc.contributor.authorRodrigo, Guillermoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorElena Fito, Santiago Fcoes_ES
dc.contributor.funderGeneralitat Valencianaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovaciónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-30T14:09:42Z
dc.date.available2013-04-30T14:09:42Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-14
dc.description.abstractSignaling pathways are interconnected to regulatory circuits for sensing the environment and expressing the appropriate genetic profile. In particular, gradients of diffusing molecules (morphogens) determine cell fate at a given position, dictating development and spatial organization. The feedforward loop (FFL) circuit is among the simplest genetic architectures able to generate one-stripe patterns by operating as an amplitude detection device, where high output levels are achieved at intermediate input ones. Here, using a heuristic optimization-based approach, we dissected the design space containing all possible topologies and parameter values of the FFL circuits. We explored the ability of being sensitive or adaptive to variations in the critical morphogen level where cell fate is switched. We found four different solutions for precision, corresponding to the four incoherent architectures, but remarkably only one mode for adaptiveness, the incoherent type 4 (I4-FFL). We further carried out a theoretical study to unveil the design principle for such structural discrimination, finding that the synergistic action and cooperative binding on the downstream promoter are instrumental to achieve absolute adaptive responses. Subsequently, we analyzed the robustness of these optimal circuits against perturbations in the kinetic parameters and molecular noise, which has allowed us to depict a scenario where adaptiveness, parameter sensitivity and noise tolerance are different, correlated facets of the robustness of the I4-FFL circuit. Strikingly, we showed a strong correlation between the input (environment-related) and the intrinsic (mutation-related) susceptibilities. Finally, we discussed the evolution of incoherent regulations in terms of multifunctionality and robustness.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationRodrigo, G.; Elena Fito, SF. (2011). Structural discrimination of robustness in transcriptional feedforward loops for pattern formation. PLoS ONE. 6:16904-16904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016904es_ES
dc.description.referencesWolpert, L. (1969). Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 25(1), 1-47. doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(69)80016-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesAshe, H. L. (2006). The interpretation of morphogen gradients. Development, 133(3), 385-394. doi:10.1242/dev.02238es_ES
dc.description.referencesReeves, G. T., Muratov, C. B., Schüpbach, T., & Shvartsman, S. Y. (2006). Quantitative Models of Developmental Pattern Formation. Developmental Cell, 11(3), 289-300. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlon, U. (2007). Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(6), 450-461. doi:10.1038/nrg2102es_ES
dc.description.referencesBasu, S., Gerchman, Y., Collins, C. H., Arnold, F. H., & Weiss, R. (2005). A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation. Nature, 434(7037), 1130-1134. doi:10.1038/nature03461es_ES
dc.description.referencesEntus, R., Aufderheide, B., & Sauro, H. M. (2007). Design and implementation of three incoherent feed-forward motif based biological concentration sensors. Systems and Synthetic Biology, 1(3), 119-128. doi:10.1007/s11693-007-9008-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesSohka, T., Heins, R. A., Phelan, R. M., Greisler, J. M., Townsend, C. A., & Ostermeier, M. (2009). An externally tunable bacterial band-pass filter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10135-10140. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901246106es_ES
dc.description.referencesMangan, S., & Alon, U. (2003). Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(21), 11980-11985. doi:10.1073/pnas.2133841100es_ES
dc.description.referencesIshihara, S., Fujimoto, K., & Shibata, T. (2005). Cross talking of network motifs in gene regulation that generates temporal pulses and spatial stripes. Genes to Cells, 10(11), 1025-1038. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00897.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesKim, D., Kwon, Y.-K., & Cho, K.-H. (2008). The biphasic behavior of incoherent feed-forward loops in biomolecular regulatory networks. BioEssays, 30(11-12), 1204-1211. doi:10.1002/bies.20839es_ES
dc.description.referencesKaplan, S., Bren, A., Dekel, E., & Alon, U. (2008). The incoherent feed‐forward loop can generate non‐monotonic input functions for genes. Molecular Systems Biology, 4(1), 203. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.43es_ES
dc.description.referencesMangan, S., Itzkovitz, S., Zaslaver, A., & Alon, U. (2006). The Incoherent Feed-forward Loop Accelerates the Response-time of the gal System of Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular Biology, 356(5), 1073-1081. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesGoentoro, L., Shoval, O., Kirschner, M. W., & Alon, U. (2009). The Incoherent Feedforward Loop Can Provide Fold-Change Detection in Gene Regulation. Molecular Cell, 36(5), 894-899. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.018es_ES
dc.description.referencesShoval, O., Goentoro, L., Hart, Y., Mayo, A., Sontag, E., & Alon, U. (2010). Fold-change detection and scalar symmetry of sensory input fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(36), 15995-16000. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002352107es_ES
dc.description.referencesBasu, S., Mehreja, R., Thiberge, S., Chen, M.-T., & Weiss, R. (2004). Spatiotemporal control of gene expression with pulse-generating networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(17), 6355-6360. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307571101es_ES
dc.description.referencesMacía, J., Widder, S., & Solé, R. (2009). Specialized or flexible feed-forward loop motifs: a question of topology. BMC Systems Biology, 3(1). doi:10.1186/1752-0509-3-84es_ES
dc.description.referencesKoshland, D., Goldbeter, A., & Stock, J. (1982). Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. Science, 217(4556), 220-225. doi:10.1126/science.7089556es_ES
dc.description.referencesSontag, E. D. (2010). Remarks on feedforward circuits, adaptation, and pulse memory. IET Systems Biology, 4(1), 39-51. doi:10.1049/iet-syb.2008.0171es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarkai, N., & Leibler, S. (1997). Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature, 387(6636), 913-917. doi:10.1038/43199es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlon, U., Surette, M. G., Barkai, N., & Leibler, S. (1999). Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature, 397(6715), 168-171. doi:10.1038/16483es_ES
dc.description.referencesLevchenko, A., & Iglesias, P. A. (2002). Models of Eukaryotic Gradient Sensing: Application to Chemotaxis of Amoebae and Neutrophils. Biophysical Journal, 82(1), 50-63. doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75373-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesMa, W., Trusina, A., El-Samad, H., Lim, W. A., & Tang, C. (2009). Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation. Cell, 138(4), 760-773. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesPapatsenko, D., & Levine, M. (2005). Quantitative analysis of binding motifs mediating diverse spatial readouts of the Dorsal gradient in the Drosophila embryo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(14), 4966-4971. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409414102es_ES
dc.description.referencesBecskei, A., & Serrano, L. (2000). Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature, 405(6786), 590-593. doi:10.1038/35014651es_ES
dc.description.referencesYi, T.-M., Huang, Y., Simon, M. I., & Doyle, J. (2000). Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(9), 4649-4653. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4649es_ES
dc.description.referencesThattai, M., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2002). Attenuation of Noise in Ultrasensitive Signaling Cascades. Biophysical Journal, 82(6), 2943-2950. doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75635-xes_ES
dc.description.referencesOzbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Kurtser, I., Grossman, A. D., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2002). Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nature Genetics, 31(1), 69-73. doi:10.1038/ng869es_ES
dc.description.referencesPedraza, J. M. (2005). Noise Propagation in Gene Networks. Science, 307(5717), 1965-1969. doi:10.1126/science.1109090es_ES
dc.description.referencesGhosh, B., Karmakar, R., & Bose, I. (2005). Noise characteristics of feed forward loops. Physical Biology, 2(1), 36-45. doi:10.1088/1478-3967/2/1/005es_ES
dc.description.referencesÇağatay, T., Turcotte, M., Elowitz, M. B., Garcia-Ojalvo, J., & Süel, G. M. (2009). Architecture-Dependent Noise Discriminates Functionally Analogous Differentiation Circuits. Cell, 139(3), 512-522. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.046es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarroll, S. B. (1990). Zebra patterns in fly embryos: Activation of stripes or repression of interstripes? Cell, 60(1), 9-16. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90711-mes_ES
dc.description.referencesSchroeder, M. D., Pearce, M., Fak, J., Fan, H., Unnerstall, U., Emberly, E., … Gaul, U. (2004). Transcriptional Control in the Segmentation Gene Network of Drosophila. PLoS Biology, 2(9), e271. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020271es_ES
dc.description.referencesCotterell, J., & Sharpe, J. (2010). An atlas of gene regulatory networks reveals multiple three‐gene mechanisms for interpreting morphogen gradients. Molecular Systems Biology, 6(1), 425. doi:10.1038/msb.2010.74es_ES
dc.description.referencesSavageau, M. A. (1977). Design of molecular control mechanisms and the demand for gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 74(12), 5647-5651. doi:10.1073/pnas.74.12.5647es_ES
dc.description.referencesVon Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M., & Odell, G. M. (2000). The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature, 406(6792), 188-192. doi:10.1038/35018085es_ES
dc.description.referencesBintu, L., Buchler, N. E., Garcia, H. G., Gerland, U., Hwa, T., Kondev, J., & Phillips, R. (2005). Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 15(2), 116-124. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2005.02.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesTsang, J., Zhu, J., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2007). MicroRNA-Mediated Feedback and Feedforward Loops Are Recurrent Network Motifs in Mammals. Molecular Cell, 26(5), 753-767. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.018es_ES
dc.description.referencesRodrigo, G., Carrera, J., & Jaramillo, A. (2007). Genetdes: automatic design of transcriptional networks. Bioinformatics, 23(14), 1857-1858. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm237es_ES
dc.description.referencesRodrigo, G., Carrera, J., & Elena, S. F. (2010). Network design meets in silico evolutionary biology. Biochimie, 92(7), 746-752. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2010.04.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesGregor, T., Wieschaus, E. F., McGregor, A. P., Bialek, W., & Tank, D. W. (2007). Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient. Cell, 130(1), 141-152. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.026es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion grant BFU-2009-06993. GR is the recipient of a graduate fellowship from the Generalitat Valenciana (BFPI-2007-160). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_EN
dc.description.upvformatpfin16904es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio16904es_ES
dc.description.volume6es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0016904
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC3038866en_EN
dc.identifier.pmid21340024en_EN
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/28359
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencees_ES
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONEes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//BFU2009-06993/ES/Biologia Evolutiva Y De Sistemas De La Emergencia De Fitovirus De Rna/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//BFPI-2007-160/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0016904es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0022-5193(69)80016-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1242/dev.02238es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nrg2102es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nature03461es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11693-007-9008-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.0901246106es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.2133841100es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00897.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/bies.20839es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/msb.2008.43es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.1002352107es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.0307571101es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/1752-0509-3-84es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.7089556es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1049/iet-syb.2008.0171es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/43199es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/16483es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75373-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.0409414102es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/35014651es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.97.9.4649es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75635-Xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/ng869es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.1109090es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1088/1478-3967/2/1/005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.046es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0092-8674(90)90711-Mes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1371/journal.pbio.0020271es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/msb.2010.74es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.74.12.5647es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/35018085es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.gde.2005.02.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/bioinformatics/btm237es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biochi.2010.04.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.026es_ES
dc.relation.senia218181
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.titleStructural discrimination of robustness in transcriptional feedforward loops for pattern formationes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuidc9c253c8-007f-4c8a-b023-80610e55c778es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
structural discrimination.pdf
Tamaño:
413.68 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format