New Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding Using Continuous Synthetic Simulation Supported by Regional Precipitation and Non-Systematic Flood Data

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Gráfica
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.affiliationCentro de Investigación en Tecnologías Gráficas
dc.contributor.authorBeneyto-Ibáñez, Carles
dc.contributor.authorAranda Domingo, José Ángel
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Gerardoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFrancés, F.
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Estatal de Investigaciónes_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Regional Development Fundes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividades_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T04:31:37Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T04:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2020-11es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Stochastic weather generators combined with hydrological models have been proposed for continuous synthetic simulation to estimate return periods of extreme floods. Yet, this approach relies upon the length and spatial distribution of the precipitation input data series, which often are scarce, especially in arid and semiarid regions. In this work, we present a new approach for the estimation of extreme floods based on the continuous synthetic simulation method supported with inputs of (a) a regional study of extreme precipitation to improve the calibration of the weather generator (GWEX), and (b) non-systematic flood information (i.e., historical information and/or palaeoflood records) for the validation of the generated discharges with a fully distributed hydrological model (TETIS). The results showed that this complementary information of extremes allowed for a more accurate implementation of both the weather generator and the hydrological model. This, in turn, improved the flood quantile estimates, especially for those associated with return periods higher than 50 years but also for higher quantiles (up to approximately 500 years). Therefore, it has been proved that continuous synthetic simulation studies focused on the estimation of extreme floods should incorporate a generalized representation of regional extreme rainfall and/or non-systematic flood data, particularly in regions with scarce hydrometeorological records.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationBeneyto, C.; Aranda Domingo, JÁ.; Benito, G.; Francés, F. (2020). New Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding Using Continuous Synthetic Simulation Supported by Regional Precipitation and Non-Systematic Flood Data. Water. 12(11):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113174es_ES
dc.description.issue11es_ES
dc.description.referencesStedinger, J. R., & Griffis, V. W. (2008). Flood Frequency Analysis in the United States: Time to Update. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13(4), 199-204. doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2008)13:4(199)es_ES
dc.description.referencesFrancés, F. (1998). Using the TCEV distribution function with systematic and non-systematic data in a regional flood frequency analysis. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 12(4), 267-283. doi:10.1007/s004770050021es_ES
dc.description.referencesMerz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2009). Process controls on the statistical flood moments - a data based analysis. Hydrological Processes, 23(5), 675-696. doi:10.1002/hyp.7168es_ES
dc.description.referencesStedinger, J. R., & Cohn, T. A. (1986). Flood Frequency Analysis With Historical and Paleoflood Information. Water Resources Research, 22(5), 785-793. doi:10.1029/wr022i005p00785es_ES
dc.description.referencesBotero, B. A., & Francés, F. (2010). Estimation of high return period flood quantiles using additional non-systematic information with upper bounded statistical models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(12), 2617-2628. doi:10.5194/hess-14-2617-2010es_ES
dc.description.referencesCohn, T. A., England, J. F., Berenbrock, C. E., Mason, R. R., Stedinger, J. R., & Lamontagne, J. R. (2013). A generalized Grubbs-Beck test statistic for detecting multiple potentially influential low outliers in flood series. Water Resources Research, 49(8), 5047-5058. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20392es_ES
dc.description.referencesEmmanuel, I., Payrastre, O., Andrieu, H., & Zuber, F. (2017). A method for assessing the influence of rainfall spatial variability on hydrograph modeling. First case study in the Cevennes Region, southern France. Journal of Hydrology, 555, 314-322. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesPathiraja, S., Westra, S., & Sharma, A. (2012). Why continuous simulation? The role of antecedent moisture in design flood estimation. Water Resources Research, 48(6). doi:10.1029/2011wr010997es_ES
dc.description.referencesGrimaldi, S., Nardi, F., Piscopia, R., Petroselli, A., & Apollonio, C. (2021). Continuous hydrologic modelling for design simulation in small and ungauged basins: A step forward and some tests for its practical use. Journal of Hydrology, 595, 125664. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125664es_ES
dc.description.referencesCameron, D. ., Beven, K. ., Tawn, J., Blazkova, S., & Naden, P. (1999). Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty). Journal of Hydrology, 219(3-4), 169-187. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(99)00057-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesEagleson, P. S. (1972). Dynamics of flood frequency. Water Resources Research, 8(4), 878-898. doi:10.1029/wr008i004p00878es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrocca, L., Liersch, S., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., & Volk, M. (2013). Application of a model-based rainfall-runoff database as efficient tool for flood risk management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(8), 3159-3169. doi:10.5194/hess-17-3159-2013es_ES
dc.description.referencesCowpertwait, P., Ocio, D., Collazos, G., de Cos, O., & Stocker, C. (2013). Regionalised spatiotemporal rainfall and temperature models for flood studies in the Basque Country, Spain. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(2), 479-494. doi:10.5194/hess-17-479-2013es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoughton, W., & Droop, O. (2003). Continuous simulation for design flood estimation—a review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18(4), 309-318. doi:10.1016/s1364-8152(03)00004-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesSoltani, A., & Hoogenboom, G. (2003). Minimum data requirements for parameter estimation of stochastic weather generators. Climate Research, 25, 109-119. doi:10.3354/cr025109es_ES
dc.description.referencesVerdin, A., Rajagopalan, B., Kleiber, W., & Katz, R. W. (2014). Coupled stochastic weather generation using spatial and generalized linear models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29(2), 347-356. doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0911-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesCavanaugh, N. R., Gershunov, A., Panorska, A. K., & Kozubowski, T. J. (2015). The probability distribution of intense daily precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(5), 1560-1567. doi:10.1002/2015gl063238es_ES
dc.description.referencesFurrer, E. M., & Katz, R. W. (2008). Improving the simulation of extreme precipitation events by stochastic weather generators. Water Resources Research, 44(12). doi:10.1029/2008wr007316es_ES
dc.description.referencesEvin, G., Favre, A.-C., & Hingray, B. (2018). Stochastic generation of multi-site daily precipitation focusing on extreme events. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(1), 655-672. doi:10.5194/hess-22-655-2018es_ES
dc.description.referencesMetzger, A., Marra, F., Smith, J. A., & Morin, E. (2020). Flood frequency estimation and uncertainty in arid/semi-arid regions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125254. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125254es_ES
dc.description.referencesZaman, M. A., Rahman, A., & Haddad, K. (2012). Regional flood frequency analysis in arid regions: A case study for Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 475, 74-83. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.054es_ES
dc.description.referencesMerz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2008). Flood frequency hydrology: 1. Temporal, spatial, and causal expansion of information. Water Resources Research, 44(8). doi:10.1029/2007wr006744es_ES
dc.description.referencesMerz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2008). Flood frequency hydrology: 2. Combining data evidence. Water Resources Research, 44(8). doi:10.1029/2007wr006745es_ES
dc.description.referencesBenito, G., Sanchez-Moya, Y., Medialdea, A., Barriendos, M., Calle, M., Rico, M., … Machado, M. (2020). Extreme Floods in Small Mediterranean Catchments: Long-Term Response to Climate Variability and Change. Water, 12(4), 1008. doi:10.3390/w12041008es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaker, V. R. (1987). Paleoflood hydrology and extraordinary flood events. Journal of Hydrology, 96(1-4), 79-99. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(87)90145-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesBallesteros-Cánovas, J. A., Sanchez-Silva, M., Bodoque, J. M., & Díez-Herrero, A. (2013). An Integrated Approach to Flood Risk Management: A Case Study of Navaluenga (Central Spain). Water Resources Management, 27(8), 3051-3069. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0332-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesFrances, F., Salas, J. D., & Boes, D. C. (1994). Flood frequency analysis with systematic and historical or paleoflood data based on the two-parameter general extreme value models. Water Resources Research, 30(6), 1653-1664. doi:10.1029/94wr00154es_ES
dc.description.referencesStedinger, J. R., & Baker, V. R. (1987). Surface water hydrology: Historical and paleoflood information. Reviews of Geophysics, 25(2), 119. doi:10.1029/rg025i002p00119es_ES
dc.description.referencesSimón, J. L., Pérez-Cueva, A. J., & Calvo-Cases, A. (2013). Tectonic beheading of fluvial valleys in the Maestrat grabens (eastern Spain): Insights into slip rates of Pleistocene extensional faults. Tectonophysics, 593, 73-84. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2013.02.026es_ES
dc.description.referencesCamarasa Belmonte, A. M., & Segura Beltrán, F. (2001). Flood events in Mediterranean ephemeral streams (ramblas) in Valencia region, Spain. CATENA, 45(3), 229-249. doi:10.1016/s0341-8162(01)00146-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesLlasat, M. C., & Puigcerver, M. (1990). Cold air pools over Europe. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 42(3-4), 171-177. doi:10.1007/bf01314823es_ES
dc.description.referencesHerrera, S., Fernández, J., & Gutiérrez, J. M. (2015). Update of the Spain02 gridded observational dataset for EURO-CORDEX evaluation: assessing the effect of the interpolation methodology. International Journal of Climatology, 36(2), 900-908. doi:10.1002/joc.4391es_ES
dc.description.referencesMachado, M. J., Medialdea, A., Calle, M., Rico, M. T., Sánchez-Moya, Y., Sopeña, A., & Benito, G. (2017). Historical palaeohydrology and landscape resilience of a Mediterranean rambla (Castellón, NE Spain): Floods and people. Quaternary Science Reviews, 171, 182-198. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.07.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesFrancés, F., Vélez, J. I., & Vélez, J. J. (2007). Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 332(1-2), 226-240. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.032es_ES
dc.description.referencesPapastathopoulos, I., & Tawn, J. A. (2013). Extended generalised Pareto models for tail estimation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 143(1), 131-143. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2012.07.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesEl Libro de la Provincia de Castellonhttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/14914es_ES
dc.description.referencesCunnane, C. (1978). Unbiased plotting positions — A review. Journal of Hydrology, 37(3-4), 205-222. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(78)90017-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesGringorten, I. I. (1963). A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. Journal of Geophysical Research, 68(3), 813-814. doi:10.1029/jz068i003p00813es_ES
dc.description.referencesNash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282-290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesHAKTANIR, T., & HORLACHER, H. B. (1993). Evaluation of various distributions for flood frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 38(1), 15-32. doi:10.1080/02626669309492637es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, X., & Hossain, F. (2019). Understanding Future Safety of Dams in a Changing Climate. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(8), 1395-1404. doi:10.1175/bams-d-17-0150.1es_ES
dc.description.referencesLamb, R., Faulkner, D., Wass, P., & Cameron, D. (2016). Have applications of continuous rainfall–runoff simulation realized the vision for process‐based flood frequency analysis? Hydrological Processes, 30(14), 2463-2481. doi:10.1002/hyp.10882es_ES
dc.description.referencesBenito, G., & Thorndycraft, V. R. (2005). Palaeoflood hydrology and its role in applied hydrological sciences. Journal of Hydrology, 313(1-2), 3-15. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesLam, D., Thompson, C., Croke, J., Sharma, A., & Macklin, M. (2017). Reducing uncertainty with flood frequency analysis: The contribution of paleoflood and historical flood information. Water Resources Research, 53(3), 2312-2327. doi:10.1002/2016wr019959es_ES
dc.description.referencesFuller, W. E. (1914). Flood Flows. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 77(1), 564-617. doi:10.1061/taceat.0002552es_ES
dc.description.referencesApplied hydrology. (1968). Journal of Hydrology, 6(2), 224-225. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(68)90169-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesSangal, B. P. (1983). Practical Method of Estimating Peak Flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109(4), 549-563. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1983)109:4(549)es_ES
dc.description.referencesFathzadeh, A., Jaydari, A., & Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R. (2016). Comparison of different methods for reconstruction of instantaneous peak flow data. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 23(1), 41-49. doi:10.1080/10798587.2015.1120991es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the research projects TETISCHANGE (RTI2018-093717-B-100) and EPHIMED (CGL2017-86839-C3-1-R), both cofounded with FEDER European funds.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin16es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume12es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w12113174es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/164218
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofWateres_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\421779es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CGL2017-86839-C3-1-R/ES/EVALUACION Y MODELACION DE LA RESPUESTA ECO-HIDROLOGICA Y SEDIMENTARIA EN CUENCAS MEDITERRANEAS PARA LA ADAPTACION AL CAMBIO CLIMATICO Y AMBIENTAL/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093717-B-I00/ES/MEJORAS DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y DE LAS CAPACIDADES DE MODELIZACION PARA LA PROGNOSIS DE LOS EFECTOS DEL CAMBIO GLOBAL EN UNA CUENCA HIDROLOGICA/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/w12113174es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:4(199)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s004770050021es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/hyp.7168es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/WR022i005p00785es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5194/hess-14-2617-2010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/wrcr.20392es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/2011WR010997es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125664es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00057-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/WR008i004p00878es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5194/hess-17-3159-2013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5194/hess-17-479-2013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00004-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3354/cr025109es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s00477-014-0911-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/2015GL063238es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/2008WR007316es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5194/hess-22-655-2018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125254es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.054es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/2007WR006744es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/2007WR006745es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/w12041008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0022-1694(87)90145-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11269-013-0332-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/94WR00154es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/RG025i002p00119es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.tecto.2013.02.026es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00146-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/BF01314823es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/joc.4391es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.07.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.032es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jspi.2012.07.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0022-1694(78)90017-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/JZ068i003p00813es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/02626669309492637es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0150.1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/hyp.10882es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/2016WR019959es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/taceat.0002552es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0022-1694(68)90169-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:4(549)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/10798587.2015.1120991es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectWeather generatores_ES
dc.subjectPalaeofloodes_ES
dc.subjectRegional extreme precipitation studyes_ES
dc.subjectEphemeral riveres_ES
dc.subjectFully distributed hydrologyes_ES
dc.subjectFlood quantileses_ES
dc.subjectRambla de la Viudaes_ES
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERIA HIDRAULICAes_ES
dc.subject.classificationEXPRESION GRAFICA EN LA INGENIERIAes_ES
dc.titleNew Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding Using Continuous Synthetic Simulation Supported by Regional Precipitation and Non-Systematic Flood Dataes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier308891
person.identifier37612
person.identifier2212
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6457-1150
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1173-4969
relation.isAuthorOfPublication93806e3a-4d29-4352-be66-f0d9d7ec223f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb963f1b1-a06b-4924-ae4d-16f8e9d9b113
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5d8e1d59-3bdc-420c-8c9b-2382b499e013
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery93806e3a-4d29-4352-be66-f0d9d7ec223f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa85b84b2-0acd-4ee6-b459-9ac77856ac7e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication937991bf-5e71-4f67-ae2a-1fb780a35167
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication2f39452a-045c-40a4-8e2e-0bd413949e4e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
upv.uuidd9b91c65-cab5-4184-85ee-b446aa0a928aes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Beneyto;Aranda;Benito - New Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding UsingContinuous Synthetic Simul....pdf
Tamaño:
2.6 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial