Comportamiento de los edificios de HA con tabiquería durante el sismo de Lorca de 2011: aplicación del método FAST

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Martínez, Fernandoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPérez-García, Agustínes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDe Luca, Flaviaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorVerderame, Gerardo Marioes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-16T17:19:10Z
dc.date.available2015-10-16T17:19:10Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.description.abstract[EN] A back analysis aimed at the evaluation of reinforced concrete frame buildings performance during the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake is provided by applying FAST method. This is a simplified approach for the estimation of largescale vulnerability of RC moment resisting frame buildings. It accounts for the structural contribution of non-structural masonry infills. Lorca earthquake showed a Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) three times higher with respect to that recommended by local design code. However, damage observed seldom included building collapses. Characteristics of the seismic event and features of the local building stock are studied aimed at showing, through the application of FAST, whether the low amount of collapses could be a consequence of the additional contribution provided by infills, despite their non-structural role in local code design framework. FAST damage scenario showed a fair agreement with observed damage, providing a confirmation on the structural role played by masonry infills.en_EN
dc.description.abstract[ES] Se ofrece una hipótesis de comportamiento de los edificios porticados de hormigón armado de Lorca ante el terremoto de 2011, mediante la aplicación del método FAST, procedimiento de estimación simplificada de la vulnerabilidad a gran escala de dichos edificios contando con la contribución estructural de la tabiquería de fábrica. Este terremoto tuvo una aceleración de pico (PGA) tres veces superior a la básica de proyecto; sin embargo, se caracterizó por la práctica ausencia de colapsos. Se estudian las propiedades del evento sísmico y las particularidades de la edificación para, a través de la aplicación de FAST, tratar de confirmar que dicha ausencia de colapsos pudiera deberse a la contribución estructural de la tabiquería, a pesar de no ser proyectada con ese fin ni regulada por las sucesivas regulaciones normativas. Los resultados obtenidos confirman en buena medida dicha hipótesis, siendo el nivel medio de daño previsto consistente con el escenario real.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationGómez-Martínez, F.; Pérez-García, A.; De Luca, F.; Verderame, GM. (2015). Comportamiento de los edificios de HA con tabiquería durante el sismo de Lorca de 2011: aplicación del método FAST. Informes de la Construcción. 67(537):1-14. doi:10.3989/ic.12.110es_ES
dc.description.issue537es_ES
dc.description.references(4) De Miguel, J.L. (2011). Lorca. Madrid: Departamento de Estructuras - ETSAM.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDe Luca, F., Verderame, G. M., Gómez-Martínez, F., & Pérez-García, A. (2013). The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(5), 1999-2026. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9500-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesRicci, P., De Luca, F., & Verderame, G. M. (2010). 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9(1), 285-305. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9204-8es_ES
dc.description.references(8) Ricci, P. (2010). Seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings (Tesis). Nápoles, Italia: Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVerderame, G. M., De Luca, F., Ricci, P., & Manfredi, G. (2010). Preliminary analysis of a soft-storey mechanism after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(8), 925-944. doi:10.1002/eqe.1069es_ES
dc.description.referencesHermanns, L., Fraile, A., Alarcón, E., & Álvarez, R. (2013). Performance of buildings with masonry infill walls during the 2011 Lorca earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(5), 1977-1997. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9499-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesBenavent-Climent, A., Escobedo, A., Donaire-Avila, J., Oliver-Saiz, E., & Ramírez-Márquez, A. L. (2013). Assessment of expected damage on buildings subjected to Lorca earthquake through an energy-based seismic index method and nonlinear dynamic response analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(5), 2049-2073. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9513-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesManfredi, G., Prota, A., Verderame, G. M., De Luca, F., & Ricci, P. (2013). 2012 Emilia earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete buildings response. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(5), 2275-2298. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9512-xes_ES
dc.description.references(14) Grunthal, G. (Ed.). (1998). Cahiers du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie,Vol. 7, 99 pp. Luxembourg: European Macroseismic Scale 1998.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVidic, T., Fajfar, P., & Fischinger, M. (1994). Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 23(5), 507-521. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290230504es_ES
dc.description.referencesDolce, M., Cardone, D., Ponzo, F. C., & Valente, C. (2005). Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(14), 1687-1717. doi:10.1002/eqe.501es_ES
dc.description.referencesKircher, C. A., Nassar, A. A., Kustu, O., & Holmes, W. T. (1997). Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation. Earthquake Spectra, 13(4), 663-682. doi:10.1193/1.1585974es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorzi, B., Pinho, R., & Crowley, H. (2008). Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 30(3), 804-820. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021es_ES
dc.description.referencesDol?ek, M., & Fajfar, P. (2004). Inelastic spectra for infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33(15), 1395-1416. doi:10.1002/eqe.410es_ES
dc.description.referencesRicci, P., Verderame, G. M., & Manfredi, G. (2011). Analytical investigation of elastic period of infilled RC MRF buildings. Engineering Structures, 33(2), 308-319. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesManfredi, G. (2001). Evaluation of seismic energy demand. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30(4), 485-499. doi:10.1002/eqe.17es_ES
dc.description.references(26) CEN. (2004). European Standard EN 1998-1:2003. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normaliation.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFardis, M. N. (2009). Seismic Design, Assessment and Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings. Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9842-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesVielma, J. C., Barbat, A. H., & Oller, S. (2009). Seismic safety of low ductility structures used in Spain. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(1), 135-155. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9127-4es_ES
dc.description.references(34) Astiz, M.A., Marí, A., Perepérez, B. (2005). Conceptos específicos del proyecto de estructuras en zonas sísmicas. Hormigón y acero, 237.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRicci, P., De Risi, M. T., Verderame, G. M., & Manfredi, G. (2013). Influence of infill distribution and design typology on seismic performance of low- and mid-rise RC buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(5), 1585-1616. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9453-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesDe Luca, F., & Verderame, G. M. (2013). A practice-oriented approach for the assessment of brittle failures in existing reinforced concrete elements. Engineering Structures, 48, 373-388. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.038es_ES
dc.description.references(38) Crowley, H., Pinho, R. (2010). Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(2):223-235.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNavarro, M., García-Jerez, A., Alcalá, F. J., Vidal, F., & Enomoto, T. (2013). Local site effect microzonation of Lorca town (SE Spain). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(5), 1933-1959. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9491-yes_ES
dc.description.references(40) Galasso, C., Cosenza, E., Maddaloni, G. (2011). Statistical analysis of reinforcing steel properties for seismic design of RC structures. En Actas de la 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Ohrid, Macedonia.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorzi, B., & Elnashai, A. S. (2000). Refined force reduction factors for seismic design. Engineering Structures, 22(10), 1244-1260. doi:10.1016/s0141-0296(99)00075-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesColangelo, F. (2011). A simple model to include fuzziness in the seismic fragility curve and relevant effect compared with randomness. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(5), 969-986. doi:10.1002/eqe.1169es_ES
dc.description.references(46) Mainstone, R.J. (1970). On the stiffnesses and strengths of infilled frames. En Proceedings of the institution of civil engineering, IV:57-90.es_ES
dc.description.references(47) De Luca, F., Verderame, G.M., Manfredi, G. (2013). FAST vulnerability approach: a simple solution for damage assessment of RC infilled buildings. En Actas del Vienna Congress on Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. Viena.es_ES
dc.description.references(48) De Luca F., Verderame, G.M., Gómez Martínez, F. (2013). Fast vulnerability approach: a simple solution for seismic reliability of RC infilled buildings. En Actas del XV Convegno della Associazione Nazionale Italiana di Ingegneria Sismica. Padua, Italia.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBenavent-Climent, A., Cahís, X., & Vico, J. M. (2009). Interior wide beam-column connections in existing RC frames subjected to lateral earthquake loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2), 401-420. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9144-3es_ES
dc.description.references(50) CEN. (2005). European Standard EN 1998-1:2005. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation. Brussels.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin14es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume67es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3989/ic.12.110
dc.identifier.eissn1988-3234
dc.identifier.issn0020-0883
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/56122
dc.languageEspañoles_ES
dc.publisherConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofInformes de la Construcciónes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.12.110es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-013-9500-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-010-9204-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/eqe.1069es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-013-9499-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-013-9513-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-013-9512-xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/eqe.4290230504es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/eqe.501es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1193/1.1585974es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/eqe.410es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/eqe.17es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-1-4020-9842-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-009-9127-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-013-9453-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-013-9491-yes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00075-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/eqe.1169es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10518-009-9144-3es_ES
dc.relation.senia294090es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial (by-nc)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectLorca earthquakees_ES
dc.subjectVulnerabilityes_ES
dc.subjectInfillses_ES
dc.subjectDamage stateses_ES
dc.subjectBrittle failurees_ES
dc.subjectSeismic code NCSE-02es_ES
dc.subjectFASTes_ES
dc.subjectTerremoto de Lorcaes_ES
dc.subjectVulnerabilidades_ES
dc.subjectTabiqueríaes_ES
dc.subjectNivel de dañoes_ES
dc.subjectRotura frágiles_ES
dc.subjectNCSE-02.es_ES
dc.subject.classificationMECANICA DE LOS MEDIOS CONTINUOS Y TEORIA DE ESTRUCTURASes_ES
dc.titleComportamiento de los edificios de HA con tabiquería durante el sismo de Lorca de 2011: aplicación del método FASTes_ES
dc.title.alternativeInfilled RC buildings performances during the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake: application of FAST approaches_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuidde7b8e2f-e225-46e6-b14a-5206bdd78da4es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Gómez-Martínez;Pérez-García - Comportamiento de los edificios de HA con tabiquería durante el sis....pdf
Tamaño:
5.48 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial
[object Object] Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos, conferencias, monografías