Understanding Interactions between Design Team Members of Construction Projects Using Social Network Analysis

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.affiliationGrupo de Gestión del Proceso Proyecto-Construcción
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, Rodrigo F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMourgues, Claudioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlarcón, Luis F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPellicer, Eugenio
dc.contributor.funderPontificia Universidad Católica de Chilees_ES
dc.contributor.funderFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chilees_ES
dc.contributor.funderComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Chilees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-17T04:31:52Z
dc.date.available2021-02-17T04:31:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Social network analysis (SNA) has not been used to study design project teams in which the full interactions have become more complex (formal and informal) because the team members are from different companies and there is no colocation. This work proposes a method to understand the interactions in the design teams of construction projects using SNA metrics and the sociograms generated within temporary organizations. This study includes three stages: (1) a literature review of the dimensions of interactions within work teams and the application of SNA to the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry; (2) a proposal of an interaction network method for construction project design teams; and (3) an analysis of a pilot project. Interaction networks were defined in two categories: general interactions and commitment management. For each network, metric indicators were defined for the analysis. The pilot project showed high levels of consistency among team responses. The proposed method allows an analysis of the entire work team and of each individual team member. The method also makes it possible to analyze the work team from a global perspective by carrying out a joint analysis of two or more networks.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationHerrera, RF.; Mourgues, C.; Alarcón, LF.; Pellicer, E. (2020). Understanding Interactions between Design Team Members of Construction Projects Using Social Network Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 146(6):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001841es_ES
dc.description.issue6es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlarcón D. M. I. M. Alarcón and L. F. Alarcón. 2013. “Social network analysis: A diagnostic tool for information flow in the AEC industry.” In Proc. 21st Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2013 947–956. Fortaleza Brazil: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlarcón, L. F., Ashley, D. B., de Hanily, A. S., Molenaar, K. R., & Ungo, R. (2011). Risk Planning and Management for the Panama Canal Expansion Program. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(10), 762-771. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000317es_ES
dc.description.referencesAl Hattab, M., & Hamzeh, F. (2015). Using social network theory and simulation to compare traditional versus BIM–lean practice for design error management. Automation in Construction, 52, 59-69. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesAustin, R. B., Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., & de la Garza, J. M. (2016). Identifying and Prioritizing Best Practices to Achieve Flash Track Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(2), 04015077. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001061es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaiden, B. K., Price, A. D. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2006). The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 13-23. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesCash, P., Dekoninck, E. A., & Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2017). Supporting the development of shared understanding in distributed design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 28(3), 147-170. doi:10.1080/09544828.2016.1274719es_ES
dc.description.referencesCastillo, T., Alarcón, L. F., & Pellicer, E. (2018). Influence of Organizational Characteristics on Construction Project Performance Using Corporate Social Networks. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(4), 04018013. doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000612es_ES
dc.description.referencesCastillo, T., Alarcón, L. F., & Salvatierra, J. L. (2018). Effects of Last Planner System Practices on Social Networks and the Performance of Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(3), 04017120. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001443es_ES
dc.description.referencesCraft, R. C., & Leake, C. (2002). The Pareto principle in organizational decision making. Management Decision, 40(8), 729-733. doi:10.1108/00251740210437699es_ES
dc.description.referencesDainty, A. R. J., Briscoe, G. H., & Millett, S. J. (2001). Subcontractor perspectives on supply chain alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 19(8), 841-848. doi:10.1080/01446190110089727es_ES
dc.description.referencesDave B. S. Kubler K. Främling and L. Koskela. 2014. “Addressing information flow in lean production management and control in construction.” In Proc. 22nd Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 581–592. Oslo Norway: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFlores J. J. C. Ruiz D. Alarcón L. F. Alarcón J. L. Salvatierra and I. Alarcón. 2014. “Improving connectivity and information flow in lean organizations—Towards an evidence-based methodology.” In Proc. 22nd Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2014 1109–1120. Oslo Norway: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHerrera R. F. C. Mourgues and L. F. Alarcón. 2018. “Assessment of lean practices performance and social networks in Chilean airport projects.” In Proc. 26th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2018 603–613. Chennai India: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHickethier G. I. D. Tommelein and B. Lostuvali. 2013. “Social network analysis of information flow in an IPD-project design organization.” In Proc. 21st Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2013 319–328. Fortaleza Brazil: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHoppe, B., & Reinelt, C. (2010). Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 600-619. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesKarp, N. C., Hauer, K. E., & Sheu, L. (2019). Trusted to Learn: a Qualitative Study of Clerkship Students’ Perspectives on Trust in the Clinical Learning Environment. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(5), 662-668. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04883-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesKereri, J. O., & Harper, C. M. (2019). Social Networks and Construction Teams: Literature Review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4), 03119001. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001628es_ES
dc.description.referencesKleinsmann, M., Deken, F., Dong, A., & Lauche, K. (2012). Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(7), 485-506. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.619499es_ES
dc.description.referencesKnotten, V., Lædre, O., & Hansen, G. K. (2017). Building design management – key success factors. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(6), 479-493. doi:10.1080/17452007.2017.1345718es_ES
dc.description.referencesLong D. and P. Arroyo. 2018. “Language moods and improving project performance.” In Proc. 26th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2018 495–504. Chennai India: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLove, P. E. D., Irani, Z., Cheng, E., & LI, H. (2002). A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chain. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 9(1), 2-15. doi:10.1046/j.1365-232x.2002.00225.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesMedina-Mora R. T. Winograd R. Flores and F. Flores. 1992. “The action workflow approach to workflow management technology.” In Proc. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 92 281–288. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNg, S. T., & Tang, Z. (2010). Labour-intensive construction sub-contractors: Their critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 732-740. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesOluwatayo, A. A., & Amole, D. (2013). Ownership, structure, and performance of architectural firms. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2(1), 94-106. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2012.12.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesOviedo-Haito, R. J., Jiménez, J., Cardoso, F. F., & Pellicer, E. (2014). Survival Factors for Subcontractors in Economic Downturns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(3), 04013056. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000811es_ES
dc.description.referencesParis, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052-1075. doi:10.1080/00140130050084879es_ES
dc.description.referencesPhelps A. F. 2012. “Behavioral factors influencing lean information flow in complex projects.” In Proc. 20th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2012. San Diego: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPriven V. and R. Sacks. 2013. “Social network development in Last Planner System implementations.” In Proc. 21st Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 2013 474–485. Fortaleza Brazil: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPryke, S. (2012). Social Network Analysis in Construction. doi:10.1002/9781118443132es_ES
dc.description.referencesRahmawati Y. C. Utomo N. Anwar N. P. Negoro and C. B. Nurcahyo. 2014. “A framework of knowledge management for successful group decision in design process.” In Proc. 2014 IEEE Conf. on Open Systems 60–65. Subang Malaysia: IEEE.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRojas, M. J., Herrera, R. F., Mourgues, C., Ponz-Tienda, J. L., Alarcón, L. F., & Pellicer, E. (2019). BIM Use Assessment (BUA) Tool for Characterizing the Application Levels of BIM Uses for the Planning and Design of Construction Projects. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2019/9094254es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchöttle A. S. Haghsheno and F. Gehbauer. 2014. “Defining cooperation and collaboration in the context of lean construction.” In Proc. 22nd Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 1269–1280. Oslo Norway: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchröpfer, V. L. M., Tah, J., & Kurul, E. (2017). Mapping the knowledge flow in sustainable construction project teams using social network analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(2), 229-259. doi:10.1108/ecam-08-2015-0124es_ES
dc.description.referencesScott, J. (2017). Social Network Analysis. doi:10.4135/9781529716597es_ES
dc.description.referencesSearle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438es_ES
dc.description.referencesSegarra L. R. F. Herrera L. F. Alarcón and E. Pellicer. 2017. “Knowledge management and information flow through social networks analysis in Chilean architecture firms.” In Proc. 25th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction 413–420. Heraklion Greece: International Group for Lean Construction.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSonnenwald, D. H. (1996). Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17(3), 277-301. doi:10.1016/0142-694x(96)00002-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesSvalestuen F. K. Frøystad F. Drevland S. Ahmad J. Lohne and O. Lædre. 2015. “Key elements to an effective building design team.” In Proc. Int. Conf. on Project Management 838–843. Sapporo Japan: Elsevier.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSydow, J., & Braun, T. (2018). Projects as temporary organizations: An agenda for further theorizing the interorganizational dimension. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 4-11. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesTurner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1-8. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00020-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesValentine, M. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2015). Measuring Teamwork in Health Care Settings. Medical Care, 53(4), e16-e30. doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31827feef6es_ES
dc.description.referencesWesz, J. G. B., Formoso, C. T., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2018). Planning and controlling design in engineered-to-order prefabricated building systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(2), 134-152. doi:10.1108/ecam-02-2016-0045es_ES
dc.description.referencesWong, P. S. P., Demertjis, M., Hardie, M., & Lo, C. yiu. (2014). The effect of unlearning on organisational learning behaviour and performance in construction contracting organisations. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 6(3), 197. doi:10.1504/ijpom.2014.065256es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, L., & Ashuri, B. (2018). BIM log mining: Discovering social networks. Automation in Construction, 91, 31-43. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.009es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge the help and support provided by GEPUC and GEPRO SpA., which provided access to data collection for this study. In addition, the authors acknowledge financial support from FONDECYT (1181648) and the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Rodrigo Herrera acknowledges financial support for Ph.D. studies from VRI of PUC and CONICYT-PCHA/National Doctorate/2018-21180884.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin13es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume146es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001841es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0733-9364es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/161597
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineerses_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Construction Engineering and Managementes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\408828es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CONICYT//2018-21180884/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FONDECYT//1181648/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001841es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000317es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001061es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/09544828.2016.1274719es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000612es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001443es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/00251740210437699es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01446190110089727es_ES
dc.relation.references10.24928/2018/0493es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11606-019-04883-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001628es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/09544828.2011.619499es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/17452007.2017.1345718es_ES
dc.relation.references10.24928/2018/0541es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1046/j.1365-232X.2002.00225.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1145/143457.143530es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.foar.2012.12.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000811es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00140130050084879es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/9781118443132es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ICOS.2014.7042410es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1155/2019/9094254es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/ECAM-08-2015-0124es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4135/9781529716597es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/CBO9781139173438es_ES
dc.relation.references10.24928/2017/0244es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0142-694X(96)00002-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.636es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feef6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/ECAM-02-2016-0045es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1504/IJPOM.2014.065256es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.009es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectInteractiones_ES
dc.subjectInteraction metricses_ES
dc.subjectSociogramses_ES
dc.subjectInformation flowes_ES
dc.subjectDesign teamses_ES
dc.subjectSocial networkses_ES
dc.subject.classificationPROYECTOS DE INGENIERIAes_ES
dc.subject.ods09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovaciónes_ES
dc.titleUnderstanding Interactions between Design Team Members of Construction Projects Using Social Network Analysises_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier1848
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9100-0644
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7cb77cbd-8cdc-4b87-aed3-039755a16dea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7cb77cbd-8cdc-4b87-aed3-039755a16dea
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication38c096ba-a68f-4127-8845-f6156608d94d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
upv.uuide1cf0a90-6788-4d3a-9a4e-ff36700ee011es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Herrera;Mourgues;Alarcón - Understanding Interactions between Design Team Members of Construction....pdf
Tamaño:
888.4 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
HerreraEtAl-COENG-146-6-2020.pdf
Tamaño:
1.49 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial