The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Organización de Empresas
dc.contributor.affiliationFacultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales
dc.contributor.affiliationGrupo de Cluster Innovación
dc.contributor.authorHervás Oliver, Jose Luis
dc.contributor.authorRojas, Ronaldes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Blanca-Mariaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCervelló Royo, Roberto Elías
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-10T15:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstract[EN] Purpose: This paper aims to present a focus for identifying the convergence between the theory of the intellectual capital of nations and that of the National Systems of Innovation from the literature of innovation systems, with the aim of providing a more robust theoretical framework to explore the drivers of intangibles and the policies which foster competitiveness through the development of the national intellectual capital platforms. Design/methodology/approach: Selecting 28 indicators which best fit the analyzed theoretic principles and taking into account the member countries of the European Union as a sample (15) with the data taken from the IMD, a simple analysis of the seven-year (2000-2006) window was carried out to compare the intangibles pointed out in the two aforementioned perspectives. Findings: The homogeneity of the results using models of measurement of intellectual capital of countries with those obtained through the models of the National Systems of Innovation prove the considerable convergence between these two theoretic fields, validating the hypotheses proposed in the study. Research limitations/implications: The system provided is not an exhaustive use of all the available measures and countries. A more comprehensive practical application on more countries and indicators would be necessary to validate the model. Practical implications: The study has implications for the business, politicians and academia. The study opens new lines of research in the sense that it advocates a theoretical approximation and the integration of the abundant literature on the National Systems of Innovation as basic drivers to explain the intangibles at a macro level, their management and politics related to the maintaining and renewal of said assets of intellectual capital. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, so far no study analyzing this convergence has been designed or published. This paper extends and adds robustness to the national IC measurement model to help policymakers and scholars. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationHervás Oliver, JL.; Rojas, R.; Martins, B.; Cervelló Royo, RE. (2011). The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 12(1):111-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097935es_ES
dc.description.issue1es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00108-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesBenner, C. (2003). Learning Communities in a Learning Region: The Soft Infrastructure of Cross-Firm Learning Networks in Silicon Valley. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(10), 1809-1830. doi:10.1068/a35238es_ES
dc.description.referencesBergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesBontis, N. (2004). National Intellectual Capital Index. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 13-39. doi:10.1108/14691930410512905es_ES
dc.description.referencesBontis, N., Chua Chong Keow, W., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100. doi:10.1108/14691930010324188es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrusco, S. (1986), “Small firms and industrial districts: the experience of Italy”,Economia Internazionale, Vol. 39 Nos 2‐4, pp. 98‐103.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEDVINSSON, L., & STENFELT, C. (1999). Intellectual Capital of Nations — for Future Wealth Creation. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 4(1), 21-33. doi:10.1108/eb029051es_ES
dc.description.referencesEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesFagerberg, J. (1987). A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy, 16(2-4), 87-99. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesFagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesFoss, N. J. (1996). Higher-order industrial Capabilities and competitive advantage. Journal of Industry Studies, 3(1), 1-20. doi:10.1080/13662719600000001es_ES
dc.description.referencesFurman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00152-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesHarrison, B. (1992). Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? Regional Studies, 26(5), 469-483. doi:10.1080/00343409212331347121es_ES
dc.description.referencesHekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584-594. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesLuis Hervas‐Oliver, J., & Dalmau‐Porta, J. I. (2007). Which IC components explain national IC stocks? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 444-469. doi:10.1108/14691930710774867es_ES
dc.description.referencesLuis Hervas Oliver, J., & Dalmau Porta, J. I. (2006). How to measure IC in clusters: empirical evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(3), 354-380. doi:10.1108/14691930610681456es_ES
dc.description.referencesKlein, P.A. (2000), “National statistics, portrait of the value floor”,Journal of Economy, No. 34, pp. 445‐52.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLawson, C. (1999). Towards a competence theory of the region. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 151-166. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.151es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091-1114. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00132-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133-1156. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1133::aid-smj74>3.0.co;2-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaskell, P. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167-185. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.167es_ES
dc.description.referencesNelson, R. R. (2008). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy, 37(1), 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesPeteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140303es_ES
dc.description.referencesRomer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. doi:10.1086/261725es_ES
dc.description.referencesRondé, P., & Hussler, C. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does really matter? Research Policy, 34(8), 1150-1172. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesRusso, M. (1997), “Relazioni tra imprese e svolupo locale”,Economia e Politica Industriale, Vol. 93, pp. 105‐37.es_ES
dc.description.referencesStåhle, P., & Bounfour, A. (2008). Understanding dynamics of intellectual capital of nations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(2), 164-177. doi:10.1108/14691930810870283es_ES
dc.description.referencesStåhle, P. and Pöyhönene, A. (2005), “Intellectual capital and national competitiveness: a critical examination. Case Finland”,Proceedings of 6th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM), University of Limerick, ECKM.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYeh‐Yun Lin, C., & Edvinsson, L. (2008). National intellectual capital: comparison of the Nordic countries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 525-545. doi:10.1108/14691930810913140es_ES
dc.description.referencesPorter, M. (1998), “Clusters and the new economics of competition”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76 No. 6, pp. 77‐90.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is part of the project ECO2010-17318 (ECON) "Análisis de la Innovación Empresarial a través de la Capacidad de Absorción Tecnológica...", Dirección General de Investigación y Gestión del Plan Nacional de I+D+i, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spanish Government. The authors are also thankful for financial support provided by the Institu Ignaci Villalonga d'Economia i Empresa, València. The usual disclaimers apply.
dc.description.upvformatpfin131es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio111es_ES
dc.description.volume12es_ES
dc.embargo.lift10000-01-01
dc.embargo.termsforeveres_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/14691931111097935
dc.identifier.issn1469-1930
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/38057
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherEmeraldes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Intellectual Capitales_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2010-17318/ES/ANALISIS DE LA INNOVACION EMPRESARIAL A TRAVES DE LA CAPACIDAD DE ABSORCION TECNOLOGICA Y LA INTERACCION EMPRESA-CLUSTERS INDUSTRIALES: MEDICION DE LA INFLUENCIA MICRO EN LO M/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097935es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1068/a35238es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/14691930410512905es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/14691930010324188es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/eb029051es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/13662719600000001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00343409212331347121es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/14691930710774867es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/14691930610681456es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00213624.2000.11506283es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/cje/23.2.151es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1133::AID-SMJ74>3.0.CO;2-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/cje/23.2.167es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/smj.4250140303es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1086/261725es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/14691930810870283es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/14691930810913140es_ES
dc.relation.senia41445
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsCerradoes_ES
dc.subjectEuropean Uniones_ES
dc.subjectInnovationes_ES
dc.subjectIntellectual capitales_ES
dc.subjectNational cultureses_ES
dc.subject.classificationECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDADes_ES
dc.titleThe overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systemses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier262140
person.identifier6053
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6438-5497
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8304-4177
relation.isAuthorOfPublication21a1d99a-d3c8-42e8-a732-0de66f6956a4
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione82a938e-b14a-45f5-a884-efb067ee384f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery21a1d99a-d3c8-42e8-a732-0de66f6956a4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9896fc87-ff50-437a-b078-a1b41c000298
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication67c03db1-c7ed-41d2-8506-f61e5b5de340
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication1562846a-1e62-49bb-a253-92b3901edd08
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationda29e930-5793-4a30-824d-c5ff165db21e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9896fc87-ff50-437a-b078-a1b41c000298
upv.uuidedc6d5cb-7bb6-4d88-bbd6-2210cd15e76aes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Hervás-Oliver;Rojas;Cervelló - The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems.pdf
Tamaño:
241.57 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial