Embodied Energy Optimization of Buttressed Earth-Retaining Walls with Hybrid Simulated Annealing

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Investigación de Ciencia y Tecnología del Hormigón
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Mecánica de los Medios Continuos y Teoría de Estructuras
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Muñoz, D.
dc.contributor.authorMartí Albiñana, José Vicente
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Josées_ES
dc.contributor.authorYepes, V.
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Estatal de Investigaciónes_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Regional Development Fundes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidadeses_ES
dc.contributor.funderFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chilees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T04:32:04Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T04:32:04Z
dc.date.issued2021-02es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The importance of construction in the consumption of natural resources is leading structural design professionals to create more efficient structure designs that reduce emissions as well as the energy consumed. This paper presents an automated process to obtain low embodied energy buttressed earth-retaining wall optimum designs. Two objective functions were considered to compare the difference between a cost optimization and an embodied energy optimization. To reach the best design for every optimization criterion, a tuning of the algorithm parameters was carried out. This study used a hybrid simulated optimization algorithm to obtain the values of the geometry, the concrete resistances, and the amounts of concrete and materials to obtain an optimum buttressed earth-retaining wall low embodied energy design. The relation between all the geometric variables and the wall height was obtained by adjusting the linear and parabolic functions. A relationship was found between the two optimization criteria, and it can be concluded that cost and energy optimization are linked. This allows us to state that a cost reduction of €1 has an associated energy consumption reduction of 4.54 kWh. To achieve a low embodied energy design, it is recommended to reduce the distance between buttresses with respect to economic optimization. This decrease allows a reduction in the reinforcing steel needed to resist stem bending. The difference between the results of the geometric variables of the foundation for the two-optimization objectives reveals hardly any variation between them. This work gives technicians some rules to get optimum cost and embodied energy design. Furthermore, it compares designs obtained through these two optimization objectives with traditional design recommendations.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationMartínez-Muñoz, D.; Martí Albiñana, JV.; García, J.; Yepes, V. (2021). Embodied Energy Optimization of Buttressed Earth-Retaining Walls with Hybrid Simulated Annealing. Applied Sciences. 11(4):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041800es_ES
dc.description.issue4es_ES
dc.description.referencesCasals, X. G. (2006). Analysis of building energy regulation and certification in Europe: Their role, limitations and differences. Energy and Buildings, 38(5), 381-392. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.05.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesSartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007). Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 249-257. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesReap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008). A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(4), 290-300. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0008-xes_ES
dc.description.referencesReap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008). A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(5), 374-388. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesDixit, M. K., Fernández-Solís, J. L., Lavy, S., & Culp, C. H. (2010). Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 42(8), 1238-1247. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.016es_ES
dc.description.referencesHernandez, P., & Kenny, P. (2010). From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB). Energy and Buildings, 42(6), 815-821. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesChang, Y., Ries, R. J., & Lei, S. (2012). The embodied energy and emissions of a high-rise education building: A quantification using process-based hybrid life cycle inventory model. Energy and Buildings, 55, 790-798. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.019es_ES
dc.description.referencesRamesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592-1600. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesFay, R., Treloar, G., & Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study. Building Research & Information, 28(1), 31-41. doi:10.1080/096132100369073es_ES
dc.description.referencesZastrow, P., Molina-Moreno, F., García-Segura, T., Martí, J. V., & Yepes, V. (2017). Life cycle assessment of cost-optimized buttress earth-retaining walls: A parametric study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1037-1048. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.085es_ES
dc.description.referencesOrr, J., Bras, A., & Ibell, T. (2017). Effectiveness of design codes for life cycle energy optimisation. Energy and Buildings, 140, 61-67. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.085es_ES
dc.description.referencesShadram, F., & Mukkavaara, J. (2019). Exploring the effects of several energy efficiency measures on the embodied/operational energy trade-off: A case study of swedish residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 183, 283-296. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.026es_ES
dc.description.referencesAzarafza, M., Feizi-Derakhshi, M.-R., & Azarafza, M. (2017). Computer modeling of crack propagation in concrete retaining walls: A case study. Computers and Concrete, 19(5), 509-514. doi:10.12989/cac.2017.19.5.509es_ES
dc.description.referencesMergos, P. E. (2018). Seismic design of reinforced concrete frames for minimum embodied CO 2 emissions. Energy and Buildings, 162, 177-186. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.039es_ES
dc.description.referencesPark, H. S., Hwang, J. W., & Oh, B. K. (2018). Integrated analysis model for assessing CO2 emissions, seismic performance, and costs of buildings through performance-based optimal seismic design with sustainability. Energy and Buildings, 158, 761-775. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.070es_ES
dc.description.referencesYepes, V., Dasí-Gil, M., Martínez-Muñoz, D., López-Desfilis, V. J., & Martí, J. V. (2019). Heuristic Techniques for the Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Pedestrian Bridges. Applied Sciences, 9(16), 3253. doi:10.3390/app9163253es_ES
dc.description.referencesYoon, Y.-C., Kim, K.-H., Lee, S.-H., & Yeo, D. (2018). Sustainable design for reinforced concrete columns through embodied energy and CO2 emission optimization. Energy and Buildings, 174, 44-53. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesMinoglou, M. K., Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., & Papagiannopoulos, G. A. (2013). Heuristic optimization of cylindrical thin-walled steel tanks under seismic loads. Thin-Walled Structures, 64, 50-59. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2012.12.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesPan, Q., Yi, Z., Yan, D., & Xu, H. (2019). Pseudo-Static Analysis on the Shifting-Girder Process of the Novel Rail-Cable-Shifting-Girder Technique for the Long Span Suspension Bridge. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 5158. doi:10.3390/app9235158es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalasbaneh, A. T., & Marsono, A. K. B. (2020). Applying multi-criteria decision-making on alternatives for earth-retaining walls: LCA, LCC, and S-LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(11), 2140-2153. doi:10.1007/s11367-020-01825-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesYeo, D., & Gabbai, R. D. (2011). Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energy and Buildings, 43(8), 2028-2033. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesYu, R., Zhang, D., & Yan, H. (2017). Embodied Energy and Cost Optimization of RC Beam under Blast Load. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 1-8. doi:10.1155/2017/1907972es_ES
dc.description.referencesPenadés-Plà, V., García-Segura, T., & Yepes, V. (2019). Accelerated optimization method for low-embodied energy concrete box-girder bridge design. Engineering Structures, 179, 556-565. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.015es_ES
dc.description.referencesForaboschi, P., Mercanzin, M., & Trabucco, D. (2014). Sustainable structural design of tall buildings based on embodied energy. Energy and Buildings, 68, 254-269. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesCamp, C. V., & Akin, A. (2012). Design of Retaining Walls Using Big Bang–Big Crunch Optimization. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(3), 438-448. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000461es_ES
dc.description.referencesKayabekir, A. E., Arama, Z. A., Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli, S. M., & Geem, Z. W. (2020). Eco-Friendly Design of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls: Multi-objective Optimization with Harmony Search Applications. Sustainability, 12(15), 6087. doi:10.3390/su12156087es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía, J., Yepes, V., & Martí, J. V. (2020). A Hybrid k-Means Cuckoo Search Algorithm Applied to the Counterfort Retaining Walls Problem. Mathematics, 8(4), 555. doi:10.3390/math8040555es_ES
dc.description.referencesYepes, V., Martí, J. V., & García, J. (2020). Black Hole Algorithm for Sustainable Design of Counterfort Retaining Walls. Sustainability, 12(7), 2767. doi:10.3390/su12072767es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía, J., Martí, J. V., & Yepes, V. (2020). The Buttressed Walls Problem: An Application of a Hybrid Clustering Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. Mathematics, 8(6), 862. doi:10.3390/math8060862es_ES
dc.description.referencesCatalonia Institute of Construction Technology BEDEC ITEC Materials Databasehttps://metabase.itec.cat/vide/es/bedeces_ES
dc.description.referencesYepes, V., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F., Alcala, J., & Villalba, P. (2012). CO2-Optimization Design of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls Based on a VNS-Threshold Acceptance Strategy. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 26(3), 378-386. doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000140es_ES
dc.description.referencesMolina-Moreno, F., García-Segura, T., Martí, J. V., & Yepes, V. (2017). Optimization of buttressed earth-retaining walls using hybrid harmony search algorithms. Engineering Structures, 134, 205-216. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.042es_ES
dc.description.referencesYepes, V., Alcala, J., Perea, C., & González-Vidosa, F. (2008). A parametric study of optimum earth-retaining walls by simulated annealing. Engineering Structures, 30(3), 821-830. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.023es_ES
dc.description.referencesKirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671-680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671es_ES
dc.description.referencesMedina, J. R. (2001). Estimation of Incident and Reflected Waves Using Simulated Annealing. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 127(4), 213-221. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(2001)127:4(213)es_ES
dc.description.referencesGlauber, R. J. (1963). Time‐Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 4(2), 294-307. doi:10.1063/1.1703954es_ES
dc.description.referencesSoke, A., & Bingul, Z. (2006). Hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated annealing for two-dimensional non-guillotine rectangular packing problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 19(5), 557-567. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2005.12.003es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Business, along with FEDER funding (DIMALIFE Project: BIA2017-85098-R) and the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities for David Martínez-Muñoz University Teacher Training Grant (FPU18/01592). They would also like to emphasize that José García was supported by the Grant CONICYT/FONDECYT/INICIACION/11180056.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin16es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app11041800es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/163291
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Scienceses_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\428703es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FONDECYT//11180056/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/BIA2017-85098-R/ES/DISEÑO Y MANTENIMIENTO OPTIMO ROBUSTO Y BASADO EN FIABILIDAD DE PUENTES E INFRAESTRUCTURAS VIARIAS DE ALTA EFICIENCIA SOCIAL Y MEDIOAMBIENTAL BAJO PRESUPUESTOS RESTRICTIVOS/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU//FPU18%2F01592/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11041800es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.05.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11367-008-0008-xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/096132100369073es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.085es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.085es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.026es_ES
dc.relation.references10.12989/cac.2017.19.5.509es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.039es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.070es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/app9163253es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.tws.2012.12.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/app9235158es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11367-020-01825-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1155/2017/1907972es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.015es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000461es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/su12156087es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/math8040555es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/su12072767es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/math8060862es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000140es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.042es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.023es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.220.4598.671es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2001)127:4(213)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1063/1.1703954es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engappai.2005.12.003es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectHeuristic optimizationes_ES
dc.subjectEnergy savingses_ES
dc.subjectSustainable constructiones_ES
dc.subjectButtressed earth-retaining wallses_ES
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERIA DE LA CONSTRUCCIONes_ES
dc.subject.ods09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovaciónes_ES
dc.titleEmbodied Energy Optimization of Buttressed Earth-Retaining Walls with Hybrid Simulated Annealinges_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
opencost.amount.paid2420es_ES
person.identifier494554
person.identifier1013
person.identifier1831
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6906-3830
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2435-4095
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5488-6001
relation.isAuthorOfPublication59396365-0a7a-4f65-852c-de5003cb1e7a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4c79754c-2002-490a-9a8e-96719b612e5e
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa22f18c1-15c7-4ce6-9182-e1fe67261b12
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4c79754c-2002-490a-9a8e-96719b612e5e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication4076efbf-6ee0-4436-a575-d70919e80f7a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationbb7a9c47-f90e-44d5-bb8a-f29ddde89da9
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
upv.uuidf68e5efd-83cf-4fa5-8548-c9a84fd393f7es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Martínez-Muñoz;Martí;García - Embodied Energy Optimization of Buttressed Earth-Retaining Walls wi....pdf
Tamaño:
1.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial