- -

Ontological supports of knowledge: knowledge creation and analytical knowledge

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Ontological supports of knowledge: knowledge creation and analytical knowledge

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Akehurst, Gary es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rueda Armengot, Carlos es_ES
dc.contributor.author Vivas López, Salvador es_ES
dc.contributor.author Palacios Marqués, Daniel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2018-04-19T12:38:04Z
dc.date.available 2018-04-19T12:38:04Z
dc.date.issued 2011 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0025-1747 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/100711
dc.description.abstract [EN] Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine, from the perspective of different theoretical approaches, the relationship that exists between different ontological supports of knowledge and knowledge itself (the way it is created and its characteristics). Design/methodology/approach: The paper proposes two different types of knowledge (knowledge of concrete situations and abstract knowledge) and two approaches (the constructivist view and the cognitive view) and provides a general classification of the different knowledge types. Second, it examines the underlying ontological support-knowledge creation, characteristics or types of knowledge relationship in different approaches. Finally, conclusions are drawn that show how the conception of ontological support conditions the way in which knowledge is conceived. Findings: The results of the paper consist of making explicit the ontological support-knowledge creation, characteristics or types of knowledge relationship in different approaches; and enabling understanding of the fact that the ideas one has about knowledge (how it is created or what its characteristics are) come from one's beliefs about the supports in, or in interaction with, which it is created. Research limitations/implications: The implications for the different approaches to knowledge theory are important. The study proposes a change with regard to how one considers the ontological supports of knowledge. The limitation of the paper lies in the fact that this proposal needs to be presented in a more extensive format, through a series of different papers and analyses. Originality/value: The originality of the paper stems from the fact that it focuses on the ontological supports of knowledge and highlights the idea that the conception of these supports leads to a particular way of conceiving knowledge. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Management Decision es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge engineering es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge management es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Ontological supports of knowledge: knowledge creation and analytical knowledge es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/00251741111109106 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111109106 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 183 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 194 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 49 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\40899 es_ES
dc.description.references Baggio, R., & Cooper, C. (2010). Knowledge transfer in a tourism destination: the effects of a network structure. The Service Industries Journal, 30(10), 1757-1771. doi:10.1080/02642060903580649 es_ES
dc.description.references Boisot, M., & Child, J. (1999). Organizations as Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: The Case of China. Organization Science, 10(3), 237-252. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.237 es_ES
dc.description.references Child, J. (1997). Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1), 43-76. doi:10.1177/017084069701800104 es_ES
dc.description.references Crossan, M.M., Lane, H.W. and White, R.E. (1999), “An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 522‐37. es_ES
dc.description.references Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. doi:10.1086/467037 es_ES
dc.description.references Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. doi:10.1086/467038 es_ES
dc.description.references Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24345254 es_ES
dc.description.references Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232-248. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771 es_ES
dc.description.references Hayek, F.A. (1945), “The use of knowledge in society”, American Economic Review, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 1‐18. es_ES
dc.description.references Hedlund, G. (2007). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 73-90. doi:10.1002/smj.4250151006 es_ES
dc.description.references McLeod, M. T., Vaughan, D. R., & Edwards, J. (2010). Knowledge networks in the tourism sector of the Bournemouth, Poole, and Christchurch conurbation: preliminary analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 30(10), 1651-1667. doi:10.1080/02642060903580664 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinez-Fernandez, C. (2009). Knowledge-intensive service activities in the success of the Australian mining industry. The Service Industries Journal, 30(1), 55-70. doi:10.1080/02642060802317820 es_ES
dc.description.references Mir, R., & Watson, A. (2000). Strategic management and the philosophy of science: the case for a constructivist methodology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 941-953. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<941::aid-smj141>3.0.co;2-d es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka, I. (1991), “The knowledge‐creating company”, Harvard Business Review, November/December, pp. 96‐104. es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of «Ba»: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54. doi:10.2307/41165942 es_ES
dc.description.references Pechlaner, H., & Bachinger, M. (2010). Knowledge networks of innovative businesses: an explorative study in the region of Ingolstadt. The Service Industries Journal, 30(10), 1737-1756. doi:10.1080/02642060903580722 es_ES
dc.description.references Perrow, C. (1967). A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 194. doi:10.2307/2091811 es_ES
dc.description.references Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485-501. doi:10.1002/smj.4250070602 es_ES
dc.description.references Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 No. 3, pp. 79‐91. es_ES
dc.description.references Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 45-62. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171106 es_ES
dc.description.references Spender, J. C. (2007). Data, meaning and practice: how the knowledge-based view can clarify technology’s relationship with organisations. International Journal of Technology Management, 38(1/2), 178. doi:10.1504/ijtm.2007.012435 es_ES
dc.description.references Spender, J.-C. (2008). Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Whence and Whither? Management Learning, 39(2), 159-176. doi:10.1177/1350507607087582 es_ES
dc.description.references Tolstoy, D. (2010). Knowledge combination in networks: evidence from the international venturing of four small biotech firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(2), 183-202. doi:10.1007/s11365-010-0148-x es_ES
dc.description.references Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 11-25. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171104 es_ES
dc.description.references Viljamaa, A., Kolehmainen, J., & Kuusisto, J. (2009). For and against? An exploration of inadvertent influences of policies on KIBS industries in the Finnish policy setting. The Service Industries Journal, 30(1), 71-84. doi:10.1080/02642060802238513 es_ES
dc.description.references Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357. doi:10.2307/2393372 es_ES
dc.description.references Yin, X., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The strategy/governance structure fit relationship: theory and evidence in franchising arrangements. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 365-383. doi:10.1002/smj.389 es_ES
dc.description.references Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H. (1972), “Production, information cost and economic organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 62 No. 5, pp. 777‐95. es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem