- -

Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus data?

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus data?

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 8989-37208-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 3.482Mb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Marin-Garcia, Juan A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-13T07:05:42Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-13T07:05:42Z
dc.date.issued 2018-06-29
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/107194
dc.description.abstract [EN] This protocol justifies the relevance of the research questions that will be posed in future research that will address whether there are differences between the classifications of scientific journals depending on the impact factor indicators that are used: WoS (JCR ), and Scopus (CiteScore and SJR) and, if any, to what may be due. At the same time, the process to be followed to capture and analyze the data that will allow us to respond to the stated objectives is described in detail. Finally, the results of a pilot analysis focused on the 21 top journals of International Human Resources Management according to Caligiuri (1999) are presented. In it, we can verify that the correlation between JCR and CiteScore is practically perfect and that the quartiles of Scopus represent in a much more appropriate way than those of JCR the classification of these 21 as top journals of the category. It is still pending to carry out the complete investigation to verify if these results are generalizable to the field of economic and business sciences in global or to other sub-areas of this field. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] En este protocolo se justifica la pertinencia y relevancia de las preguntas de investigación que se van a plantear en una investigación futura que tratará si existen diferencias entre las clasificaciones de las revistas científicas dependiendo de los indicadores de factor de impacto que se manejen: WoS (JCR) y Scopus (CiteScore y SJR) y, en caso de haberlas, a qué puede ser debido. Al mismo tiempo, se describe de manera detallada el proceso a seguir para capturar y analizar los datos que nos permitirán responder a los objetivos planteados. Finalmente, se presentan los resultados de un análisis piloto centrado en las 21 revistas principales de Gestión de Recursos Humanos según Caligiuri (1999). En él, podemos comprobar que la correlación entre JCR y CiteScore es prácticamente perfecta y que los cuartiles de Scopus representan de manera mucho más adecuada que los de JCR la clasificación de estas 21 como revistas principales de la categoría. Queda pendiente realizar la investigación completa para comprobar si estos resultados son generalizables al campo de ciencias económicas y empresariales en global o a otras sub-áreas de ése campo. es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Working Papers on Operations Management
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Protocol es_ES
dc.subject Journal ranking es_ES
dc.subject Citaton analysis es_ES
dc.subject OM-Collaboration es_ES
dc.subject Impact factor es_ES
dc.subject Top journals es_ES
dc.subject Protocolo es_ES
dc.subject Revistas de impacto es_ES
dc.subject Análisis de citas es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometría es_ES
dc.title Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus data? es_ES
dc.title.alternative Protocolo: ¿existe acuerdo o desacuerdo entre los índices de impacto absolutos y relativos obtenidos a partir de los datos de Web of Science y Scopus? es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2018-09-12T12:55:11Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8989
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Marin-Garcia, JA.; Alfalla-Luque, R. (2018). Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus data?. Working Papers on Operations Management. 9(1):53-80. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8989 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8989 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 53 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 80 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 9
dc.description.issue 1
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9068
dc.description.references Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18 es_ES
dc.description.references Akbulut, M., & Akca, S. (2017) Popularity or prestige?: The case of jasist rank. Journal of Scientometric Research, 6(3), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.6.3.21 es_ES
dc.description.references Ameen, E. C., & Guffey, D. M. (2017). A citation analysis and review of research issues and methodologies in advances in accounting education: Teaching and curriculum innovations Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations (Vol. 21, pp. 1-25) https://doi.org/10.1108/S1085-462220170000021002 es_ES
dc.description.references ANECA. (Noviembre 2017). Méritos evaluables para la acreditación nacional para el acceso a los cuerpos docentes universitarios: https://www.mecd.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/dms/mecd/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/catalogo/general/educacion/academia/ficha/academia/criterios-sociales-juridicas.pdf (accedido 29 enero 2017) es_ES
dc.description.references Balatsky, E. V., & Ekimova, N. A. (2017). Competition of economic journals in russia: Results of the three waves of ranking. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, 12(6), 178-201. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2017-6-09 es_ES
dc.description.references Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? - a comparison of wos, scopus and google scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y es_ES
dc.description.references Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Lin, A. (2007). Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.08.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Barker, K. (2007). The uk research assessment exercise: The evolution of a national research evaluation system. Research Evaluation, 16(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X190674 es_ES
dc.description.references Barman, S., Hanna, M. D., & LaForge, R. L. (2001). Perceived relevance and quality of pom journals: A decade later. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00060-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Bartol, T., Budimir, G., Dekleva-Smrekar, D., Pusnik, M., & Juznic, P. (2014). Assessment of research fields in scopus and web of science in the view of national research evaluation in slovenia. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1491-1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Basu, A., Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K., & Singh, V. K. (2016). Designing a composite index for research performance evaluation at the national or regional level: Ranking central universities in india. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1171-1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1935-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Batiz-Lazo, B., Eskandari, R., & Goddard, J. (2015). Online publishing and citation success in the accounting, business and economic history of spain, 1997-2011. Investigaciones De Historia Economica, 11(3), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihe.2014.07.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of marketing, 67(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.123.18610 es_ES
dc.description.references Beed, C., & Beed, C. (1996). Measuring the quality of academic journals: The case of economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18(3), 369-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490078 es_ES
dc.description.references Beets, S. D., Lewis, B. R., & Brower, H. H. (2016). The quality of business ethics journals: An assessment based on application. Business & Society, 55(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313478974 es_ES
dc.description.references Bettencourt, L. A., & Houston, M. B. (2001). The impact of article method type and subject area on article citations and reference diversity in jm, jmr, and jcr. Marketing Letters, 12(4), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012272305777 es_ES
dc.description.references Bonner, S. E., Hesford, J. W., Van der Stede, W. A., & Young, S. M. (2006). The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(7), 663-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.06.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Bontis, N., & Serenko, A. (2009). A follow-up ranking of academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931134 es_ES
dc.description.references Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (car). Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 84-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490908 es_ES
dc.description.references Caligiuri, P. M. (1999). The ranking of scholarly journals in international human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3), 515-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851999340468 es_ES
dc.description.references Cantin, M., Munoz, M., & Roa, I. (2015). Comparison between impact factor, eigenfactor score, and scimago journal rank indicator in anatomy and morphology journals. International Journal of Morphology, 33(3), 1183-1188. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000300060 es_ES
dc.description.references Carreras, J. (2011). Evaluation of teaching and faculty promotion (viii). University spanish legislation (f): Quality of teaching and complementary retributions (1st part). Educacion Medica, 14(4), 199- 205. https://doi.org/10.4321/S157-18132011000400002 es_ES
dc.description.references Chan, K. C., Chan, K. C., Seow, G. S., & Tam, K. (2009). Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6-7), 875-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.12.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Chan, K. C., Fung, H. G., & Yau, J. (2013). Predominant sources and contributors of influential business ethics research: Evidence and implications from a threshold citation analysis. Business Ethics-a European Review, 22(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12024 es_ES
dc.description.references Chan, K. C., Lai, P., & Liano, K. (2012). A threshold citation analysis in marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 134-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211189211 es_ES
dc.description.references Chan, K. C., & Liano, K. (2009). Threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions and researchers in accounting. Accounting and Finance, 49(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00254.x es_ES
dc.description.references Chapman, K., & Ellinger, A. E. (2009). Constructing impact factors to measure the influence of supply chain management and logistics journals. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 197-+. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00119.x es_ES
dc.description.references Chatha, K. A., Butt, I., & Tariq, A. (2015). Research methodologies and publication trends in manufacturing strategy a content analysis based literature review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(4), 487-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2012-0285 es_ES
dc.description.references Chow, C. W., Haddad, K., Singh, G., & Wu, A. (2008). A citation analysis of the top-ranked management and financial accounting journals. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 1(1), 29-44. es_ES
dc.description.references Delgado, F. J., & Fernández-Llera, R. (2012). Sobre la evaluación del profesorado universitario (especial referencia a ciencias económicas y jurídicas). 2012, 35(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.2.861 es_ES
dc.description.references Di Vaio, G., & Weisdorf, J. L. (2010). Ranking economic history journals: A citation-based impact-adjusted analysis. Cliometrica, 4(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-009-0039-y es_ES
dc.description.references Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing & Management, 47(1), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002 es_ES
dc.description.references DuBois, F. L., & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490929 es_ES
dc.description.references Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of scimago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. Faseb Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-107938 es_ES
dc.description.references Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619 es_ES
dc.description.references Fu, S. C., & Chan, K. M. (2014). Ranking of orthopaedic journals: A challenge to the citation-based metrics. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 2(3), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.03.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Galán, A., & Zych, I. (2011). Analysis of the criteria of the national commission for the evaluation of research activity (cneai) for the concession of the research incentives in education. Bordon, 63(2), 117-139. es_ES
dc.description.references García-Lillo, F., Úbeda-García, M., & Marco-Lajara, B. (2015). The intellectual structure of human resource management research: A bibliometric study of the international journal of human resourcemanagement, 2000-2012. Revista Europea de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa, 24(3), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.07.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Garcia-Pachon, E., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2014). A comparison of the impact factor and the scimago journal rank index in respiratory system journals. Archivos De Bronconeumologia, 50(7), 308-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2013.10.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Haddad, K., Singh, G., Sciglimpaglia, D., & Chan, H. (2014). To what extent do articles published in other than "top journals" have impact on marketing? European Journal of Marketing, 48(1-2), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2010-0592 es_ES
dc.description.references Harris, C. (2008). Ranking the management journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(4), 373-409. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.39.4.373 es_ES
dc.description.references Harzing, A.-W. (2008). On becoming a high impact jour al in international business and management. European Journal of International Management, 2(2), 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2008.017763 es_ES
dc.description.references Harzing, A.-W., & van der Wal, R. (2009). A google scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20953 es_ES
dc.description.references Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google scholar, scopus and the web of science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Hole, A. R. (2017). Ranking economics journals using data from a national research evaluation exercise. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 79(5), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12185 es_ES
dc.description.references Hoobler, J. M., & Johnson, N. B. (2004). An analysis of current human resource management publications. Personnel Review, 33(6), 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480410561547 es_ES
dc.description.references Jiménez-Contreras, E., Robinson-García, N., & Cabezas-Clavijo, A. (2011). Productivity and impact of spanish researchers: Reference thresholds within scientific areas. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, 34(4), 505-525. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2011.4.828 es_ES
dc.description.references Jobber, D., & Simpson, P. (1 88). A citation analysis of selected marketing journals. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(2), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(88)90065-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Kastrinos, N., & Katsoulacos, Y. (1995). Towards a national system of research evaluation in greece. Research Evaluation, 5(1), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/5.1.63 es_ES
dc.description.references Kianifar, H., Sadeghi, R., & Zarifmahmoudi, L. (2014). Comparison between impact factor, eigenfactor metrics, and scimago journal rank indicator of pediatric neurology journals. Acta informatica medica: AIM: journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina: casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 22(2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.103-106 es_ES
dc.description.references Law, R., & Van Der Veen, R. (2008). The popularity of prestigious hospitality journals: A google scholar approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110810852113 es_ES
dc.description.references Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (snip) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(11), 2365-2369. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21371 es_ES
dc.description.references Losilla, J. M., Navarro, J. B., Palmer, A., Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2005). Análisis de datos. Del contraste de hipótesis al modelado estadístico. Barcelona: Edicions a Petició. es_ES
dc.description.references Lowe, A., & Locke, J. (2005). Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: Results of a web- based survey of british accounting academics. Accounting Organizations and Society, 30(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Aragonés Beltran, P., & Melón, G. (2014). Intra-rater and inter-rater consistency of pair wise comparison in evaluating the innovation competency for university students. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 5(2), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v5i2.3220 es_ES
dc.description.references Markoulli, M., Lee, C. I. S. G., Byington, E., & Felps, W. A. (2017). Mapping human resource management: Reviewing the field and charting future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 367-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.10.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of hr analytics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699 es_ES
dc.description.references Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2011). Research in operations management teaching: Trends and challenges. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 507-548. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p507-548 es_ES
dc.description.references Medina-López, C., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2012). Una sistematización de los instrumentos de medida de la calidad de la investigación (a systematization of instruments to measure the quality of research). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 3(1), 28- 45. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v3i1.1104 es_ES
dc.description.references Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of lis faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677 es_ES
dc.description.references Merigo, J. M., Rocafort, A., & Aznar-Alarcon, J. P. (2016). Bibliometric overview of business & economics research. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(3), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.807868 es_ES
dc.description.references Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Identifying research fields within business and management: A journal cross-citation analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(8), 1370-1384. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.113 es_ES
dc.description.references Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of web of science and scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Moussa, S., & Touzani, M. (2010). Ranking marketing journals using the google scholar-based hg-index. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001 es_ES
dc.description.references O'Leary, D. (2008). On the relationship between citations and appearances on "top 25" download lists in the international journal of accounting information systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.02.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Olson, J. E. (2005). Top-25-business-school professors rate journals in operations management and related fields. Interfaces, 35(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0149 es_ES
dc.description.references Petersen, C. G., Aase, G. R., & Heiser, D. R. (2011). Journal ranking analyses of operations management research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(4), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119533 es_ES
dc.description.references Pindek, S., Kessler, S. R., & Spector, P. E. (2017). A quantitative and qualitative review of what meta-analyses have contributed to our understanding of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Pislyakov, V. (2009). Comparing two "thermometers": Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to journal citation reports and scopus. Scientometrics, 79(3), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2016-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Quintas-Froufe, N. (2016). Quality indicators for scientific publications in the social sciences in spain: A comparative analysis between evaluation agencies. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34(1), 259-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.1.210191 es_ES
dc.description.references Ramin, S., & Sarraf Shirazi, A. (2012). Comparison between impact factor, scimago journal rank indicator and eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nuclear medicine review. Central& Eastern Europe, 15( ), 132-136. es_ES
dc.description.references Rao, S., Iyengar, D., & Goldsby, T. J. (2013). On the measurement and benchmarking of research impact among active logistics scholars. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(10), 814-832. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2012-0207 es_ES
dc.description.references Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2009). Measuring the impact of accounting journals using google scholar and the g-index. British Accounting Review, 41(4), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2009.10.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2012). Assessing international journal impact: The case of marketing. European Business Review, 24(1), 58- 7 https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341211191553 es_ES
dc.description.references Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2013). An improved method for assessing the impact of management journals. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 37-54. es_ES
dc.description.references Ruiz-Pérez, R., López-Cózar, E. D., & Jiménez-Contreras E. (2010). Principles and criteria used by the national evaluation committee of research activity (cneai-spain) for the assessment of scientific publications: 1989-2009. Psicothema, 22(4), 898-908. es_ES
dc.description.references Russ-Eft, D. (2008). Ssci, isi, jcr, jif, if, and journal quality. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(3), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1235 es_ES
dc.description.references Salgado, J. F., & Páez, D. (2007). Scientific productivity and hirsch's h index of Spanish social psychology: Convergence between productivity indexes and comparison with other areas. Psicothema, 19(2), 179-189. es_ES
dc.description.references Salvador-Oliván, J. A., & Agustín-Lacruz, C. (2015). Correlation between bibliometric indicators in web of science y scopus journals. Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion, 25(2), 341-359. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2015.v25.n2.51241 es_ES
dc.description.references Schöpfel, J., & Prost, H. (2009). Comparison of scimago journal rank indicator (sjr) with jcr journal impact factor (if) for french journals. Psychologie Francaise, 54(4), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2009.07.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Segalla, M. (2009). Will you cite me? The emerging strategy of academic publishing. European Journal of International Management, 3(4), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2009.028847 es_ES
dc.description.references Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931125 es_ES
dc.description.references Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315231 es_ES
dc.description.references Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2017). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 675-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0490 es_ES
dc.description.references Shugan, S. M. (2003). Editorial: Journal rankings: Save the outlets for your research. Marketing Science, 22(4), 437-441. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.22.4.437.24904 es_ES
dc.description.references Sicilia, M. A., Sanchez-Alonso, S., & Garcia-Barriocanal, E. (2011). Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases: The case of computer science. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Siebelt, M., Siebelt, T., Pilot, P., Bloem, R. M., Bhandari, M., & Poolman, R. W. (2010). Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for impact factor and scimago. BMC Muscul skeletal Disorders, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Stonebraker, J. S., Gil, E., Kirkwood, C. W., & Handfield, R. B. (2012). Impact factor as a metric to assess journals where om research is published. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1-2), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Svensson, G. (2006). The paradoxnoia of top journal(s) of top in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 40(11-12), 1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610702740 es_ES
dc.description.references Tadajewski, M. (2016). Academic labour, journal ranking lists and the politics of knowledge production in marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(1-2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1120508 es_ES
dc.description.references Theussl, S., Reutterer, T., & Hornik, K. (2014). How to derive consensus among various marketing journal rankings? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Tsay, M. Y. (2012). An overview of the journal impact indicators. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 49(2). es_ES
dc.description.references Viladrich Segués, M. C., & Doval Dieguez, E. (2011). Medición: Fiabilidad y validez. Bellaterra: Laboratori d'Estadística Aplicada i de Modelització (UAB). es_ES
dc.description.references Vokurka, R. J. (1996). The relative importance of journals used in operations management research: A citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 14(4), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00092-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Walters, W. H. (2017). Citation-based journal rankings: Key questions, metrics, and data sources. IEEE Access, 5, 22036-22053. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2761400 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarifmahmoudi, L., Jamali, J., & Sadeghi, R. (2015). Google scholar journal metrics: Comparison with impact factor and scimago journal rank indicator for nuclear medicine journals. Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 23(1), 8-14. es_ES
dc.description.references Zhou, Y. B., Lü, L., & Li, M. (2012). Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14. - https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033033 es_ES
dc.description.references Zinkhan, G. M., & Leigh, T. W. (1999). Assessing the quality ranking of the journal of advertising, 1986- 1997. Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1999.10673583 es_ES
dc.description.references Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem