- -

Grading versus Reliability: how Academia perspectives evaluation on MOOCs

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Grading versus Reliability: how Academia perspectives evaluation on MOOCs

Show full item record

Moura, A.; Cordeiro, MN. (2018). Grading versus Reliability: how Academia perspectives evaluation on MOOCs. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. doi:10.4995/HEAD18.2018.8121

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/109565

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Grading versus Reliability: how Academia perspectives evaluation on MOOCs
Author:
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have experienced in recent years a significant growth in courses'offer and the number of enrolled students. Nevertheless, the controversy regarding if its quality is reliable, namely ...[+]
Subjects: Higher Education , Learning , Educational systems , Teaching , MOOC , Grading , Peer-review , Evaluation
Copyrigths: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
ISBN: 9788490486900
Source:
4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAD'18).
DOI: 10.4995/HEAD18.2018.8121
Publisher:
Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
Publisher version: http://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/HEAD/HEAD18/paper/view/8121
Conference name: Fourth International Conference on Higher Education Advances
Conference place: Valencia, Spain
Conference date: Junio 20-22,2018
Thanks:
This work had the financial support of Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT/MEC) through national funds and co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020 (Projects UID/QUI/50006/2013 and POCI/01/014 ...[+]
Type: Comunicación en congreso Capítulo de libro
URL: http://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/HEAD/HEAD18

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record