- -

Determinación de las curvas IDF en Igueldo-San Sebastián. Comparación de diferentes métodos

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Determinación de las curvas IDF en Igueldo-San Sebastián. Comparación de diferentes métodos

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Lopez Rodriguez, JJ.; Delgado, O.; Campo, MÁ. (2018). Determinación de las curvas IDF en Igueldo-San Sebastián. Comparación de diferentes métodos. Ingeniería del Agua. 22(4):209-223. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2018.9480

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/111877

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Determinación de las curvas IDF en Igueldo-San Sebastián. Comparación de diferentes métodos
Otro titulo: Determination of the IDF curves in Igueldo-San Sebastián. Comparison of different methods
Autor: Lopez Rodriguez, Jose Javier Delgado, Oihane Campo, Miguel Ángel
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Intensity-duration-frequency curves (IDF) are a fundamental tool in hydrological engineering. The work presented in this manuscript was made with the 88-year precipitation series recorded every ten minutes at the ...[+]


[ES] Las curvas de intensidad-duración-frecuencia (IDF) son una herramienta fundamental en ingeniería hidrológica. Se ha partido de la serie de precipitación de 88 años registrada cada diez minutos en la estación meteorológica ...[+]
Palabras clave: Intensidad de precipitación , Curvas IDF , Hydrognomon , Modelo de Barlett-Lewis , Ecuación de Témez , Rainfall intensity , IDF curves , Modified Bartlett-Lewis model , Témez equation
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Fuente:
Ingeniería del Agua. (issn: 1134-2196 ) (eissn: 1886-4996 )
DOI: 10.4995/ia.2018.9480
Editorial:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2018.9480
Agradecimientos:
Los autores quieren expresar un especial agradecimiento a la Dirección de Obras Hidráulicas de la Diputación de Guipúzcoa y, en particular a Patxi Tamés y Andoni Da Silva, por la disponibilidad a la hora de facilitar los ...[+]
Tipo: Artículo

Localización


 

References

Blanchet, J., Ceresett, D., Molinié, G., Creutin, J. D. 2016. A regional GEV scale-invariant framework for Intensity-Duration-Frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.007

Bo, Z., Shafiqul, I. 1994. Aggregation-disaggregation properties of a stochastic rainfall model. Water Resources Research, 30(12), 3423-3435. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02026

Bougadi, J., Adamowski, K., 2006. Scaling model of a rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationship. Hydrological Processes, 20, 3747-3757. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6386 [+]
Blanchet, J., Ceresett, D., Molinié, G., Creutin, J. D. 2016. A regional GEV scale-invariant framework for Intensity-Duration-Frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.007

Bo, Z., Shafiqul, I. 1994. Aggregation-disaggregation properties of a stochastic rainfall model. Water Resources Research, 30(12), 3423-3435. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02026

Bougadi, J., Adamowski, K., 2006. Scaling model of a rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationship. Hydrological Processes, 20, 3747-3757. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6386

Buishnad. T.A. 1982. Some methods for testing the homogeneity of rainfall records. Juornal of Hydrology, 58, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90066-X

Cameron, D., Beven, K., Tawn, J. 2000. An evaluation of three stochastic rainfall models. Journal of Hydrology, 228, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00143-8

Campo, M., López, J., Rebolé, J., García, A. 2012. Rainfall stochastic models. European Geophysical Union General Assembly. April 22-27, Viena, Austria.

Cirauqui, J.C. 2008. Evaluación de modelos estocásticos para la agregación-desagregación de precipitaciones y su aplicación en la Comunidad Foral de Navarra. Trabajo Fin de Carrera. ETSI. Agrónomos. Universidad Pública de Navarra.

Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., Mays, L. 1988. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Inc. New York.

Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., Vijai , K. 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology, 158(3-4), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4

Georgakakos, K. P., Bras, R. L. 1984. A hydrologically useful station precipitation model. Water Resources Research, 20(11), 1585-1596. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i011p01585

Gyasi-Agyei, Y. 2005. Stochastic disaggregation of daily rainfall into one-hour time scale. Journal of Hydrology, 309(1-4), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.11.018

Heyman, D., Sobel, M. 1982. Stochastic Models in Operations Research. Stochastic Processes and Operating Characteristics, 1. McGraw-Hill.

Hutchinson, M., 1990. A point rainfall model based on a 3-state continuous Markov occurrence process. Journal of Hydrology, 114,(1-2), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90078-C

Khaliq, M. N., Quarda, T. J., Gachon, P., Susham, L. 2009. Identification of hydrological trends in the presence of serial and cross correlations: A review of selected methods and their application to annual flow regimes of Canadian rivers. Journal of Hydrology, 368(1-4), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.035

D. Koutsoyiannis. 2003. Rainfall disaggregation methods: Theory and applications. Proceedings, Workshop on Statistical and Mathematical Methods for Hydrological Analysis. Edited by D. Piccolo and L. Ubertini, Rome, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2840.8564

Koutsoyiannis, D. 2004a. Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: I. Theoretical investigation.. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 49(4), 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.575.54430

Koutsoyiannis, D. 2004b. Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: II. Empirical investigation of long rainfall records. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 49(4), 591-609. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.591.54424

Kozanis, S. C. 2010. Hydrognomon - open source software for the analysis of hydrological data. European Geophysical Union General Assembly 2010. Viena, Austria.

Lozano, P. 2016. Regimen precipitacional en el norte de Navarra y Guipúzcoa ¿Record peninsular y europeo? Nimbus: revista de climatología, meteorología y paisaje (17-18), 125-144.

Nguyen, V. T. V., Nguyen T. D., Wang, H. 1998. Regional estimation of short duration rainfall extremes. Water & Science Technology, 37(11), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1998.0425

Onof, C., Chandler, R., Kakou, A., Northrop, P., Wheater, H.S., V. Isham. 2000. Rainfall modelling using Poissoncluster processes: a review of developments. Stochastic Enviromental Research and Risk Assessment 14(6), 384-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004770000043

Onof, C., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. 2009. Quantification of anticipated future changes in high resolution design rainfall for urban areas. Atmospheric Research, 92(3), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.014

Partal, T., Kahya, E. 2011. Trend analysis in Turkish precipitation data. Hydrological Processes, 20(9), 2011-2026. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5993

Rao, A. R., Hamed, K. H. 2000. Flood frequency analysis. CRC Press, Londres, Reino Unido.

Ritschel, C., Ulbrich, U., Névir, P., Rust, H.W. 2017. Precipitation extremes on multiple time scales - Bartlett-Lewis Rectangular Pulse Model and Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 6501-6517. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6501-2017

Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D., Isham, V. 1988. A Point Process Model for Rainfall: Further Developments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 417(1853), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1988.0061

Saez, J. A., Gómez Piñeiro, J. 1999. Geografía e Historia de Donostia - San Sebastian. Instituto Geográfico Vasco "Andrés de Urdaneta".

Salsón, S., García, R. 1998. Desagregación de lluvias para aplicaciones en simulaciones de sistemas de recursos hidráulicos. Ciencia y técnica de la ingeniería civil, 145, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900196

Sivakumar, B., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H.V., Gao, H. 2001. A chaotic approach to rainfall disaggregation. Water Resources Research 37(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900196

Tayanc, M., Dalfes, M. Karaka y O. Yenigün. 1998. A comparative assessment of different methods for detecting inhomogeneities in Turkish temperature data set. International Journal of Climatology, 18(5), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199804)18:5%3C561::AID-JOC249%3E3.0.CO;2-Y

Témez, J. 1978. Cálculo Hidrometeorológico de caudales máximos en pequeñas cuencas naturales. Alanmer S.A., Madrid, España.

Verhoest, N. E., Vandenberghe, S., Cabus, P., Onof, C. 2010. Are stochastic point rainfall models able to preserve extreme. Hydrological Processes, 24, 3439-3445. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7867

Winjgaard, J. R., Kisin Tank, A. M., Konnen, G. P. 2003. Homogeneityof 20th century European daily temperature and precipitation series. International Journal of Climatology, 23, 679-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.906

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem