Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Boronat-Soler, Tamara | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-09T11:44:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-09T11:44:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-12-27 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/115023 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] The aim of this project is to analyze and classify in subareas the journals of the D15 field of ANECA which are in JCR and Scopus simultaneously. This classification will be performed identifying and defining the set of management subareas applying the classification of several sources. Subsequently, the journals will be searched in JCR and Scopus and an unified list will be created. The resulting list will be classified analyzing the content of the web page information and if required, analyzing the topic of the last two articles of published. Finally, the classification obtained will be compared with the one offered by JCR and Scopus. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | [ES] Este trabajo va a hacer un estudio y clasificación por sub-área de las revistas del campo D15 de ANECA que están en JCR y Scopus simultáneamente. Para ello identificaremos la lista de sub-áreas de management y las definiremos (integrando las clasificaciones de varias fuentes). Posteriormente se buscarán las revistas en JCR y Scopus, se creará una lista unificada y las clasificaremos haciendo un análisis de contenido de la información de la página web (y en caso de duda analizando la temática de los artículos de los dos últimos números regulares publicados por la revista). Por último, compararemos nuestra clasificación en sub-áreas con la que hacen JCR y Scopus y sacaremos conclusiones. | es_ES |
dc.language | Español | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Working Papers on Operations Management | |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Clasificación | es_ES |
dc.subject | Revistas | es_ES |
dc.subject | Gestión | es_ES |
dc.subject | JCR | es_ES |
dc.subject | Scopus | es_ES |
dc.subject | Classification | es_ES |
dc.subject | Journals | es_ES |
dc.subject | Management | es_ES |
dc.title | Which are the leading journals in Human Resources Management and Operations Management in the Web of Science and Scopus databases? Design and application of a classification method | es_ES |
dc.title.alternative | ¿Cuáles son las revistas principales en gestión de Recursos Humanos y Dirección de Operaciones en las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus? Diseño y aplicación de un procedimiento para clasificarlas | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2019-01-08T13:31:39Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10763 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Boronat-Soler, T. (2018). Which are the leading journals in Human Resources Management and Operations Management in the Web of Science and Scopus databases? Design and application of a classification method. Working Papers on Operations Management. 9(2):127-181. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10763 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | SWORD | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10763 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 127 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 181 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 9 | |
dc.description.issue | 2 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1989-9068 | |
dc.description.references | Barman, S., Hanna, M. D., & LaForge, R. L. (2001). Perceived relevance and quality of POM journals: A decade later. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00060-7 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Caligiuri, P. M. (1999). The ranking of scholarly journals in international human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3), 5 5-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851999340468 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cantin, M., Munoz, M., & Roa, I. (2015). Comparison between Impa t Factor, Eigenfactor Sco e, and SCImago Journal Rank Indicator in Anatomy and Morphology Journals. International Journal of Morphology, 33(3), 1183-1188. https://doi.org/10. 067/S0717-95022015000300060 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chapman, K., & Ellinger, A. E. (2009). Constructing Impact Factors To Measure the Influence of Supply Chain Management and Logistics Journals. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00119.x | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623- 2628. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-107938 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Garcia-Pachon, E., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2014). A comparison of the impact factor and the scimago journal rank index in respiratory system journals. Archivos De Bronconeumologia, 50(7), 308- 309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2013.10.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Harzing, A. (2009). A Google Scholar H-Index for Journals : An Alternative Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics & Business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00076 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kianifar, H., Sadeghi, R., & Zarifmahmoudi, L. (2014). Comparison between impact factor, eigenfactor metrics, and scimago journal rank indicator of pediatric neurology journals. Acta informatica medica: AIM: journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina: casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 22(2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.103-106 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2018). Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the web of science and scopus data? WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, Vol 9(1), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8989 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Markoulli, M. P., Lee, C. I. S. G., Byington, E., & Felps, W. A. (2 17). Mapping Human Resource Management: Reviewing the field and charting future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 367-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.10.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Martínez Jurado, P. J., & Moyano Fuentes, J. (2017). Aprendiendo a enseñar lean management mediante juegos: Revisión sistemática de la literatura learning to teach lean management through games: Systematic literature review. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 8 (special issue), 164-170. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7199 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2011). Research in operations management teaching: Trends and challenges. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 507-548. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p507-548 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Identifying Research Fields Within Business and Management: A Journal Cross-Citation Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, early view(0), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.113 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Olson, J. E. (2005). Top-25-business-school professors rate journals in operations management and related fields. Interfaces, 35(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0149 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pindek, S., Kessler, S. R., & Spector, P. E. (2017). A quantitative and qualitative review of what meta-analyses have contributed to our understanding of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pinto, M. J. A., & Mendes, J. V. (2017). Operational practices of lean manufacturing: Potentiating environmental improvements. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10(4 Special Issue), 550-580. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2268 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ramin, S., & Shirazi, A. S. (2012). Comparison between impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nuclear Medicine Review, 15(2), 132-136. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.103-106 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2013). An improved method for assessing the impact of management journals. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 37-54. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Salvador-Oliván, J. A., & Agustín-Lacruz, C. (2015). Correlation between bibliometric indicators in web of science y scopus journals. Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion, 25(2), 341-359. doi:10.5209/rev_RGID. 015.v25.n2.51241 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sanchez, L., & Blanco, B. (2014). Three decades of continuous improvement. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9-10), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.856547 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schoepfel, J., & Prost, H. (2009). Comparison of scimago journal rank indicator (sjr) with jcr journal impact factor (if) for French journals. Psychologie Francaise, 54(4), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2009.07.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sicilia, M. A., Sanchez-Alonso, S., & Garcia-Barriocanal, E. (2011). Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases: The case of computer science. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 698-704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Siebelt, M., Siebelt, T., Pilot, P., Bloem, R. M., Bhandari, M., & Poolman, R. W. (2010). Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journal compared for impact factor and scimago. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Stonebraker, J. S., Gil, E., Kirkwood, C. W., & Handfield, R. B. (2012). Impact factor as a metric to assess journals where OM research is published. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1-2), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.05.002 | es_ES |