- -

Development and validation of Spanish version of FINCODA: an instrument for self-assessment of innovation competence of workers or candidates for Jobs

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Development and validation of Spanish version of FINCODA: an instrument for self-assessment of innovation competence of workers or candidates for Jobs

Show simple item record

Files in this item

dc.contributor.author Marin-Garcia, Juan A. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-09T11:56:19Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-09T11:56:19Z
dc.date.issued 2018-12-27
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/115025
dc.description.abstract [EN] This work will take the innovation transversal competence a skill to create, introduce, adapt and/or apply a beneficial novelty anywhere in an organization. We consider that innovation competences are a multidimensional construct that represents the skills required in all main process steps, from devising ideas, filtering, modeling and selecting them, to putting them into practice and comparing to see if they add value.In this research we aim to validate the long Spanish version (62 items) of the FINCODA innovation questionnaire (Andreu Andres et al., 2018; Marin-Garcia et al., 2016a) and to check if the medium-length version composition (34 items), that derive from a multi-cultural sample (Butter & van Beest, 2017), is stable with an independent sample of Spanish students. We will also propose a short version from the Soft Skills Scale (SSS17) (Marin-Garcia, 2019), based on single-items of all dimensions, which we will compare with other transversal competences by analyzing the relations among them. Data were obtained from self-perceptions (the evaluated person completes the questionnaire) with Likert/rating scales (Marin-Garcia et al., 2015) of innovation competence dimensions. This questionnaire is devised to be used for processes that select/evaluate the people who opt for a job post, regardless of them recently obtaining university degrees or being professionals.We examined the main published questionnaires used to measure the innovation competence. The validation of only a few has been published, while no validation has been published in Spanish. We also describe in detail the validation process that we will follow, the employed measuring instrument (by giving a detailed explanation of how the FINCODA questionnaire was built, and by specifying the measuring model and SSS17, F62 and F34 questionnaire items in their English and Spanish versions), the characteristics of the sample of 329 voluntary students, and the analysis procedure following SPSS and smartPLS.The results show how the measurement model of the long FINCODA questionnaire version presents content validity (relevance and comprehensiveness) and internal consistency (with analysis considering constructs to be either common factors or composites). Nonetheless, the discriminant validity of the constructs could not be demonstrated with the employed sample. Our analyses did not confirm the medium-length version put forward by other authors’ previous research. So, we will consider that versions F62 and F34 are pending to be analyzed with new independent samples, as is the proposal of the new F34 version obtained by more robust methods. The multidimensionality assumption of the innovation construct also needs revising. Having a short innovation scale with 10-15 items at the most is also recommendable. All this is considered future research in the present work. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Este trabajo ha sido realizado con la financiación de la Unión Europea ["FINCODA" proyecto 554493-EPP1-2014-1-FI-EPPKA2-KA] (The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents Which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein). es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation EC/554493-EPP-1-2014-1-FI-EPPKA2-KA es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Working Papers on Operations Management
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Innovación es_ES
dc.subject Validación de escalas es_ES
dc.subject Competencias transversales es_ES
dc.subject Creatividad es_ES
dc.subject Pensamiento crítico es_ES
dc.subject Iniciativa es_ES
dc.subject Trabajo en equipo es_ES
dc.subject PLS es_ES
dc.subject Constructos formativos es_ES
dc.subject Modelo de medida es_ES
dc.subject Compuestos es_ES
dc.subject Measurement model es_ES
dc.subject Composites es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Scale validation es_ES
dc.subject Soft skills es_ES
dc.subject Transversal competencies es_ES
dc.subject Creativity es_ES
dc.subject Critical thinking es_ES
dc.subject Initiative es_ES
dc.subject Teamwork es_ES
dc.subject Formative constructs es_ES
dc.title Development and validation of Spanish version of FINCODA: an instrument for self-assessment of innovation competence of workers or candidates for Jobs es_ES
dc.title.alternative Desarrollo y validación de la versión castellana de FINCODA: un instrumento de autoevaluación de la competencia de innovación de trabajadores o de candidatos a puestos de trabajo es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2019-01-08T13:31:27Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10800
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Marin-Garcia, JA. (2018). Development and validation of Spanish version of FINCODA: an instrument for self-assessment of innovation competence of workers or candidates for Jobs. Working Papers on Operations Management. 9(2):182-215. doi:10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10800 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10800 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 182 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 215 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 9
dc.description.issue 2
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9068
dc.contributor.funder European Commission es_ES
dc.relation.references Abramis, D. J. (1994). Relationship of job stressors to job performance: Linear or an inverted-u? PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 75(1), 547-558. es_ES
dc.relation.references https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.547 es_ES
dc.relation.references Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167. es_ES
dc.relation.references American Management Association. (2012). Critical skills survey. https://www.amanet.org/training/articles/ama-2012-critical-skills-survey.aspx: American Management Association. es_ES
dc.relation.references Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128 es_ES
dc.relation.references Andreu-Andrés, M. Á., Marin-García, J. A., & García-Carbonell, A. (2017). El barómetro incode como herramienta de autoevaluación de las competencias de innovación. REDU Revista de Educación Universitaria, 15(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2017.7746 es_ES
dc.relation.references Andreu Andres, M. A., Garcia-Carbonell, A., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., & Watts, F. (2018). Contrasting innovation competence fincoda model in software engineering: Narrative review. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(4), 715-734. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2656 es_ES
dc.relation.references Anzengruber, J., & Goetz, M. A. (2018). The cognitive and the action-oriented elements of competence along the innovation process - evidence from r&d teams in the medical equipment sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424013 es_ES
dc.relation.references Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.631648 es_ES
dc.relation.references Ato, M., & Vallejo, G. (2011). Los efectos de terceras variables en la investigación psicológica. Anales de Psicología, 27(2), 550-561. es_ES
dc.relation.references Azañedo, C. M., Fernandez-Abascal, E. G., & Barraca, J. (2017). The short form of the via inventory of strengths. Psicothema, 29(2), 254-260. doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.225 es_ES
dc.relation.references Berdrow, I., & Evers, F. T. (2011). Bases of competence: A framework for facilitating reflective learner-centered educational environments. Journal of Management Education, 35(3), 406-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562909358976 es_ES
dc.relation.references Burch, G. S. J., Pavelis, C., & Port, R. L. (2008). Selecting for creativity and innovation: The relationship between the innovation potential indicator and the team selection inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(2), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00422.x es_ES
dc.relation.references Butter, R., & van Beest, W. (2017). Psychometric validation of a tool for innovation competencies development and assessment using a mixed-method design. Paper presented at the Internal research report of HU. es_ES
dc.relation.references Cerinsek, G., & Dolinsek, S. (2009). Identifying employees' innovation competency in organisations. Internation Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2009.022811 es_ES
dc.relation.references Chatenier, E. D., Verstegen, J. A. A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R and D Management, 40(3), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.x es_ES
dc.relation.references Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17(4), 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1704_3 es_ES
dc.relation.references Conference Board of Canada. (2013). General innovation skills aptitude test (gisat 2.0). Retrieved from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/cbi/innovationskills.aspx es_ES
dc.relation.references De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2008). Innovative work behaviour: Meassurement and validaton (1467-8691). es_ES
dc.relation.references De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x es_ES
dc.relation.references Doval Dieguez, E., & Viladrich Segués, M. C. (2011). Desarrollo y adaptación de cuestionarios en el ámbito de la salud. Bellaterra: Laboratori d'Estadística Aplicada i de Modelització (UAB). es_ES
dc.relation.references Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. (2009). The innovator's DNA. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 60+-60+. es_ES
dc.relation.references Goffin, K., & Mitchell, R. (2010). Innovation management. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04752-6 es_ES
dc.relation.references Gómez-Gasquet, P., Verdecho, M. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., & Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2018). Formative assessment framework proposal for transversal competencies: Application to analysis and problem-solving competence. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(2), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2504 es_ES
dc.relation.references González Pernía, J. L., & Pe-a-Legazkue, I. (2007). Determinantes de la capacidad de innovación de los negocios emprendedores en espa-a. Economia Industrial(363), 129-147. es_ES
dc.relation.references Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem). 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage. es_ES
dc.relation.references Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556 es_ES
dc.relation.references Henseler, J. (2017). User manual adanco 2.0.1 (1st ed.). Kleve: Composite Modeling GmbH & Co. es_ES
dc.relation.references Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016a). Using pls path modeling in new technology research : Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 es_ES
dc.relation.references Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016b). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304 es_ES
dc.relation.references Hoai Nam, T., Phong Tuan, N., & Van Minh, N. (2017). Critical successful factors for innovation in vietnamese firms. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10(3), 522-544. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2020 es_ES
dc.relation.references Hülsmann, M., Tilebein, M., Cordes, P., & Stolarski, V. (2017). Cognitive diversity of top management teams as a competence-based driver of innovation capability Strategy and communication for innovation: Integrative perspectives on innovation in the digital economy (pp. 77-88) es_ES
dc.relation.references Isaksson, K. (2007). Psychological contracts across employment situations (psycones). Brussels. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/100123961EN6.pdf: European Commission. es_ES
dc.relation.references Jabri, M. (1991). The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 31, 783-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316449105100417 es_ES
dc.relation.references Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology(73), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038 es_ES
dc.relation.references Jarvis, C.-B., MacKenzie, S.-B., & Podsakoff, P.-M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806 es_ES
dc.relation.references Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self‐efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.32 es_ES
dc.relation.references Keinänen, M., & Oksanen, A. (2017). Students' perception of learning innovation competences in activity-based learning environment. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja, 19(4), 48-61. es_ES
dc.relation.references Keinänen, M., Ursin, J., & Nissinen, K. (2018). How to measure students' innovation competences in higher education: Evaluation of an assessment tool in authentic learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.007 es_ES
dc.relation.references Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622 es_ES
dc.relation.references Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660 es_ES
dc.relation.references Klippel, A. F., Petter, C. O., & Antunes, J. (2008). Management innovation, a way for mining companies to survive in a globalized world. Paper presented at the Utilities Policy European Regulatory Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.09.001 es_ES
dc.relation.references Lehto, A., Kairisto-Mertanene, L., & Penttilä, T. (2011). Towards innovation pedagogy. A new approach to teaching and learning for universities of applied sciences. Turku: Turku University of Apllied Sciences. es_ES
dc.relation.references Losilla, J. M., Navarro, J. B., Palmer, A., Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2005). Análisis de datos. Del contraste de hipótesis al modelado estadístico. Barcelona: Edicions a Petició. es_ES
dc.relation.references Luke, R. (2013). Measuring innovation skills acquired by college and polytechnic students through applied research. Technology Innovation Management Review(October), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/735 es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2019). Development and validation of spanish version of soft skills scale (sss17sp). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 10(in press). es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Machuca, J. A. D. (2018). A triple-a supply chain measurement model: Validation and analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(10), 976-994. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2018-0233 es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Andreu Andres, M. A., Atares-Huerta, L., Aznar-Mas, L. E., Garcia-Carbonell, A., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., Watts, F. (2016a). Propossal of framework for innovation competencies development and assessment (fincoda). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6472 es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Atares-Huerta, L., & Aznar-Mas, L. E. (2017). ¿cuántas competencias transversales podemos diferenciar en un auto-diagnóstico? Paper presented at the IN-RED Congreso Nacional de Innovación Educativa y de Docencia en Red, UPV. Valencia, 13 y 14 de junio 2017. es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Aznar-Mas, L. E., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2011). Innovation types and talent managment for innovation. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 2(2), 25-31. es_ES
dc.relation.references https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v2i2.926 es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Perello-Marin, M. R., & Canos-Daros, L. (2009). Proposal of skills for the bachelor degree of industrial engineering in the context of the new curriculum. Intangible Capital, 5(4), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2009.v5n4.p387-406 es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., González, E., Carrasco, M., & Ros, D. (2016b). Action planning intervention to identify how to improve selection processes for internships. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6549 es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Perez-Pe-alver, M. J., & Watts, F. (2013). How to assess innovation competence in services: The case of university students. Direccion y Organizacion(50), 48-62. es_ES
dc.relation.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Ramirez Bayarri, L., & Atares-Huerta, L. (2015). Protocol: Comparing advantages and disadvantages of rating scales, behavior observation scales and paired comparison scales for behavior assessment of competencies in workers. A systematic literature review. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 2(6), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4032 es_ES
dc.relation.references Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model : The influence of perceived user resources. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86-112. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506730 es_ES
dc.relation.references Matthews, R. A., Diaz, W. M., & Cole, S. G. (2003). The organizational empowerment scale. Personnel Review, 32(3), 297-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310467624 es_ES
dc.relation.references Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). Cosmin methodology for systematic reviews of patient‐reported outcome measures (proms). User manual. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Public Health research institute es_ES
dc.relation.references Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., . . . De Vet, H. C. (2010). The cosmin checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC medical research methodology, 10(1), 22. es_ES
dc.relation.references https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22 es_ES
dc.relation.references Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., . . . De Vet, H. C. (2012). The cosmin checklist manual. es_ES
dc.relation.references Morente, F., & Ferràs, X. (2017). Innovation management from the inside: An approach from attention and everyday praxis. Intangible Capital, 13(3), 640-667. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.1004. es_ES
dc.relation.references https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1004 es_ES
dc.relation.references Munro, D., & Watt, D. (2014). Skills for business innovation success: It's people who innovate: Conference Board of Canada, es_ES
dc.relation.references Ozkaya, A. (2010). R&d teams competencies, innovation, and growth with knowledge information flow. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 416-429. doi:10.1109/TEM.2009.2037737 es_ES
dc.relation.references https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2037737 es_ES
dc.relation.references Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004 es_ES
dc.relation.references Patterson, F. (1999). The innovation potential indicator. Manual and user's guide. Oxford: OPP Ltd. es_ES
dc.relation.references Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Characteristics & behaviours of innovative people in organisations. City University, London: NESTA Policy and Research Unit (NPRU). es_ES
dc.relation.references Pérez Pe-alver, M. J., Aznar Mas, L. E., & Montero Fleta, B. (2018). Identification and classification of behavioural indicators to assess innovation competence. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2552 es_ES
dc.relation.references Prieto, M. I., & Pérez-Santana, M. P. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199 es_ES
dc.relation.references Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 es_ES
dc.relation.references Prinsen, C. A. C., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., . . . Terwee, C. B. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "core outcome set" - a practical guideline. Trials, 17(1), 449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2 es_ES
dc.relation.references Ramirez Bayarri, L., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Atares-Huerta, L. (2016). How has been assessed the innovation competency in companies and universities? WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 140-167. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6886 es_ES
dc.relation.references Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001 es_ES
dc.relation.references Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. (2012). A critical look at the use of pls-sem in mis quarterly. Mis Quarterly, 36(1), ii-xiv. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402 es_ES
dc.relation.references Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Available at http://www.smartpls.com es_ES
dc.relation.references Saiz, L., Pérez-Miguel, D., & Manzanedo-del Campo, M. Á. (2018). The knowledge absorptive capacity to improve the cooperation and innovation in the firm. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(2), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2505 es_ES
dc.relation.references Sanchez, L., Blanco, B., & Marín-García, J. A. (2017). Protocol: Validation of the incode barometer to measure the innovation competence through the rasch measurement theory. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 8(Special Issue), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7190 es_ES
dc.relation.references Santos, G. J. (2006). Card sort technique as a qualitative substitute for quantitative exploratory factor analysis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610680867 es_ES
dc.relation.references Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with pls and cbsem: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998-4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007 es_ES
dc.relation.references Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students, 7/e. Essex: Pearson Education. es_ES
dc.relation.references Schepers, P., & van den Berg, P. T. (2007). Social factors of work-environment creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9035-4 es_ES
dc.relation.references Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management Journal, 37(3), 580--607. es_ES
dc.relation.references Spiegelaere, S. D., & Gyes, G. V. (2012). Innovative work behavior: Concept & measurement. ISPIM Conference Proceedings, 1-1. es_ES
dc.relation.references Sternberg, R. J., & Matthew, C. T. (2006). Leading innovation through collaboration. In M. M. Beyerlein, S. T. Beyerlein, & F. A. Kennedy (Eds.), Innovation through collaboration (advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, volume 12) (pp. 27-52): Emerald Group Publishing Limited es_ES
dc.relation.references Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do big five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 37(7), 941-956. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941 es_ES
dc.relation.references ter Haar, P. (2018). Measuring innovation: A state of the science review of existing approaches. Intangible Capital, 14(3), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1254 es_ES
dc.relation.references Terwee, C., Jansma, E., Riphagen, I., & de Vet, H. W. (2009). Development of a methodological pubmed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5 es_ES
dc.relation.references Upasna, A. A., Sumita, D., Stacy, B. B., & Shivganesh, B. (2012). Linking lmx, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063 es_ES
dc.relation.references Urbach, N., & Ahleman, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 1-39. es_ES
dc.relation.references Viladrich Segués, M. C., & Doval Dieguez, E. (2011). Medición: Fiabilidad y validez. Bellaterra: Laboratori d'Estadística Aplicada i de Modelització (UAB). es_ES
dc.relation.references Voorhees, C., Brady, M., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4 es_ES
dc.relation.references Watts, F., Garcia-Carbonell, A., & Andreu Andrés, M. A. (2013). Innovation competencies development: Incode barometer and use guide. Turku: Turku University od Applied Sciences. es_ES
dc.relation.references Watts, F., Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Carbonell, A., & Aznar-Mas, L. E. (2012). Validation of a rubric to assess innovation competence. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 3(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v3i1.1159 es_ES
dc.relation.references Waychal, P., Mohanty, R. P., & Verma, A. (2011). Determinants of innovation as a competence: An empirical study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(2), 192-211. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2011.038781 es_ES
dc.relation.references West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. es_ES
dc.relation.references Williams, B., & Figueiredo, J. (2014). Lessons from an innovation-leader and tools to learn them. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(4), 932-960. es_ES
dc.relation.references https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1135 es_ES
dc.relation.references World Economic Forum. (2016). Global challenge insight report: The future of jobs. Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. January 2016. Geneva: REF 010116. es_ES
dc.relation.references Yeh, C. C., & Ku, E. C. S. (2019). Process innovation capability and subsequent collaborative team performance in travel planning: A knowledge exchange platform perspective. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1328667 es_ES
dc.relation.references Yu Kyoung, P., Ji Hoon, S., Seung Won, Y., & Jungwoo, K. (2013). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1/2), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2013-0040 es_ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record