- -

Restricting inbreeding while maintaining selection response for weight gain in Mus musculus

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Restricting inbreeding while maintaining selection response for weight gain in Mus musculus

Show full item record

Moreno, A.; Salgado, C.; Piqueras, P.; Gutiérrez, JP.; Toro Ibáñez, MA.; Ibáñez-Escriche, N.; Nieto, B. (2011). Restricting inbreeding while maintaining selection response for weight gain in Mus musculus. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 128(4):276-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00933.x

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/138735

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Restricting inbreeding while maintaining selection response for weight gain in Mus musculus
Author: Moreno, A. Salgado, C. Piqueras, P. Gutiérrez, J. P. Toro Ibáñez, M. A. Ibáñez-Escriche, Noelia Nieto, B.
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ciencia Animal - Departament de Ciència Animal
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] An experiment with mice was designed to test the relative efficiency of three selection methods that help to minimize the rate of inbreeding during selection. A common house mice (Mus musculus) population was selected ...[+]
Subjects: Inbreeding , Mice , Minimum coancestry , Selection , Weight gain , Weighted selection
Copyrigths: Cerrado
Source:
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. (issn: 0931-2668 )
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00933.x
Publisher:
Blackwell Publishing
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00933.x
Project ID:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//AGL2008-00794/ES/SELECCION PARA EL CARACTER VARIABILIDAD DEL PESO AL NACIMIENTO EN MUS MUSCULUS/
Thanks:
This paper was partially funded by a grant from the Spanish Government (AGL2008-00794).
Type: Artículo

References

Avendaño, S., Villanueva, B., & Woolliams, J. A. (2003). Expected increases in genetic merit from using optimized contributions in two livestock populations of beef cattle and sheep1. Journal of Animal Science, 81(12), 2964-2975. doi:10.2527/2003.81122964x

Bijma, P., Van Arendonk, J. A., & Woolliams, J. A. (2001). Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes. Journal of Animal Science, 79(4), 840. doi:10.2527/2001.794840x

CABALLERO, A., & TORO, M. A. (2000). Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetical Research, 75(3), 331-343. doi:10.1017/s0016672399004449 [+]
Avendaño, S., Villanueva, B., & Woolliams, J. A. (2003). Expected increases in genetic merit from using optimized contributions in two livestock populations of beef cattle and sheep1. Journal of Animal Science, 81(12), 2964-2975. doi:10.2527/2003.81122964x

Bijma, P., Van Arendonk, J. A., & Woolliams, J. A. (2001). Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes. Journal of Animal Science, 79(4), 840. doi:10.2527/2001.794840x

CABALLERO, A., & TORO, M. A. (2000). Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetical Research, 75(3), 331-343. doi:10.1017/s0016672399004449

Caballero, A., Santiago, E., & Toro, M. A. (1996). Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Animal Science, 62(3), 431-442. doi:10.1017/s1357729800014971

Colleau, J. J., & Tribout, T. (2008). Optimized management of genetic variability in selected pig populations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 125(5), 291-300. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00738.x

Eisen, E. J., & Prasetyo, H. (1988). Estimates of Genetic Parameters and Predicted Selection Responses for Growth, Fat and Lean Traits in Mice. Journal of Animal Science, 66(5), 1153. doi:10.2527/jas1988.6651153x

Falconer, D. S. (1953). Selection for large and small size in mice. Journal of Genetics, 51(3), 470-501. doi:10.1007/bf02982939

Fernandez, B. J., & Toro, M. A. (1999). The use of mathematical programming to control inbreeding in selection schemes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 116(6), 447-466. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.1999.00196.x

Gaskins, C. T., Snowder, G. D., Westman, M. K., & Evans, M. (2005). Influence of body weight, age, and weight gain on fertility and prolificacy in four breeds of ewe lambs1. Journal of Animal Science, 83(7), 1680-1689. doi:10.2527/2005.8371680x

Geyer, C. J. (1992). Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Statistical Science, 7(4), 473-483. doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137

GRUNDY, B., VILLANUEVA, B., & WOOLLIAMS, J. A. (1998). Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genetical Research, 72(2), 159-168. doi:10.1017/s0016672398003474

Hill W.G. 1986 Population size and design of breeding programmes

Hill, W. G. (2011). Can more be learned from selection experiments of value in animal breeding programmes? Or is it time for an obituary? Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 128(2), 87-94. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00913.x

Hill, W. G., & Caballero, A. (1992). Artificial Selection Experiments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23(1), 287-310. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.001443

Kearney, J. F., Wall, E., Villanueva, B., & Coffey, M. P. (2004). Inbreeding Trends and Application of Optimized Selection in the UK Holstein Population. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(10), 3503-3509. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73485-2

Malik, R. C. (1984). Genetic and Physiological Aspects of Growth, Body Composition and Feed Efficiency in Mice: A Review. Journal of Animal Science, 58(3), 577-590. doi:10.2527/jas1984.583577x

Meuwissen, T. H. (1997). Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science, 75(4), 934. doi:10.2527/1997.754934x

Nieto, B., Salgado, C., & Toro, M. A. (1986). Optimization of artificial selections response. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 103(1-5), 199-204. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.1986.tb00082.x

Rios, J. G., Nielsen, M. K., & Dickerson, G. E. (1986). Selection for Postweaning Gain in Rats: II. Correlated Response in Reproductive Performance. Journal of Animal Science, 63(1), 46-53. doi:10.2527/jas1986.63146x

Robertson, A. (1961). Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genetical Research, 2(2), 189-194. doi:10.1017/s0016672300000690

Sonesson A.K. Woolliams J.A. Meuwissen T.H.E. 2010 Maximising genetic gain whilst controlling rates of genomic inbreeding using genomic optimum contribution selection

Toro, M. A., & Nieto, B. M. (1984). A simple method for increasing the response to artificial selection. Genetical Research, 44(3), 347-349. doi:10.1017/s0016672300026574

Toro, M., & Pérez-Enciso, M. (1990). Optimization of selection response under restricted inbreeding. Genetics Selection Evolution, 22(1), 93. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-22-1-93

Toro, M. A., Nieto, B., & Salgado, C. (1988). A note on minimization of inbreeding in small-scale selection programmes. Livestock Production Science, 20(4), 317-323. doi:10.1016/0301-6226(88)90026-7

Toro, M. A., Silio, L., Rodrigañez, J., & Dobao, M. T. (1988). Inbreeding and family index selection for prolificacy in pigs. Animal Science, 46(1), 79-85. doi:10.1017/s0003356100003135

Villanueva B. Pong-Wong R. Woolliams J.A. Avendaño S. 2004 Managing genetic resources in selected and conserved populations BSAS Publications

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record