- -

Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Molina González, JL.; García-Arostegui, J.; Bromley, J.; Benavente, J. (2011). Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling. Water Resources Management. 25(13):3343-3370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/140945

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling
Autor: Molina González, José Luis García-Arostegui, J.L Bromley, John Benavente, Jose
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Participatory methods provide an increasingly accepted path to integrated water assessment. This research describes an interdisciplinary exercise of scenario design and modelling, which provides a methodology to couple ...[+]
Palabras clave: Aquifers management , Decision support systems , Impacts assessment , Participatory modelling , Water framework directive , Decision supports , Economic costs , European Union Water Framework , Groundwater drawdown , Groundwater pumping , Groundwater use , Hard science , Impact assessments , Integrated assessment , Long-term sustainability , Numerical modelling , Participatory methods , Probabilistic methods , Scenario design , Semi arid , Water assessment , Aquifers , Artificial intelligence , Bayesian networks , Decision making , Hydrogeology , Inference engines , Rating , Water conservation , Water levels , Groundwater resources , Aquifer , Decision support system , European Union , Irrigation , Numerical model , Participatory approach , Probability , Sustainability , Water management , Spain
Derechos de uso: Cerrado
Fuente:
Water Resources Management. (issn: 0920-4741 )
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1
Editorial:
Springer-Verlag
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/226536/EU/Groundwater and dependent Ecosystems: NEw Scientific basIS on climate change and land-use impacts for the update of the EU Groundwater Directive/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//CGL2009-13238-C02-01/ES/Generación y simulación de escenarios futuros de hidrología superficial y subterránea (GESHYDRO)/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//CGL2009-13238-C02-02/ES/Modelos hidroeconómicos para adaptar la gestión de sistemas de recursos hídricos al cambio climático (HYDROECOCLIMATE)/
Agradecimientos:
The authors gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following people and organizations: Prof. Marino from the Land, Water and Air department of University California-Davis (UCD) for his help during the visit at ...[+]
Tipo: Artículo

References

Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modelling. Academic, London, p 381

Antunes P, Santos R, Videira N (2006) Participatory decision making for sustainable development; the use of mediated modelling techniques. L Use Policy 23:44–52

Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Sci Total Environ 365:105–122 [+]
Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modelling. Academic, London, p 381

Antunes P, Santos R, Videira N (2006) Participatory decision making for sustainable development; the use of mediated modelling techniques. L Use Policy 23:44–52

Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Sci Total Environ 365:105–122

Borsuk ME, Stow CA, Reckhow KH (2004) A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, uncertainty analysis. Ecol Model 173:219–239

Bradley C (2002) Simulation of the annual water table dynamics of a floodplain wetl, Narborough Bog, UK. J Hydrol 261(1–4):150–172

Bromley J (2005) Guidelines for the use of Bayesian networks as a participatory tool for water resource management, based on the results of the MERIT project. Centre for Ecology Hydrology, Wallingford

Bromley J, Jackson N, Clymer O, Giacomello A, Jensen F (2005) The use of Hugin to develop Bayesian network as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environ Modell Softw 20:231–242

Cain J (2001) Planning improvements in natural resources management. Centre for Ecology Hydrology, Wallingford

Carbognin L, Gatto P, Mozzi G et al ( 1984) Venice subsidence case history 93. In: Pol JF (ed) Guidebook to studies of l subsidence due to ground-water withdrawal. International Hydrological Programme, working group 84, Chelsea, pp 161–174. http://wwwrcamnlwrusgsgov/rgws/Unesco/PDF-Chapters/Chapter9-3pdf

Carmona G, Varela C, Bromley J (2011) The use of participatory object-oriented Bayesian networks and agro-economic models for groundwater management in Spain. Water Resour Manag 25:1509–1524. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9757-y

Castelletti A, Soncini-Sessa R (2007) Bayesian Networks participatory modelling in water resource management. Environ Modell Softw 22:1075–1088

Chebud YA, Melesse AM (2009) Numerical modelling of the groundwater flow system of the Gumera sub-basin in Lake Tana basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol Process 23:3694–3704

Cheng AD, Cheng T (2005) Heritage early history of the boundary element method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 29:268–302

Chiang HW (2005) 3D groundwater modelling with PMWIN, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 411

Chiang HW, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN. Springer, Berlin

Custodio E (2002) Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeol J 10:254–277. doi: 101007/s10040-002-0188-6

Downs TJ, Mazari H, Domínguez-Mora M, Buffet IH (2000) Sustainability of least cost policies for meeting Mexico City’s future water dem. Water Resour Res 36(8):2321–2329. doi: 101029/1999WR900234

EC 2000/60/ Directive of the European Parliament of the Council, establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal 327 European Commission, Brussels, Belgium

Farmani R, Henriksen HJ, Savic D (2009) An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for optimum management of groundwater contamination. Environ Modell Softw 24(3):303–310

Feitelson E (2006) Impediments to the management of shared aquifers: a political economy perspective. Hydrogeol J 14(3):319–329

ganETxl (2007) Available at: http://wwwprojectsexacuk/cws/ganetxl , last visited May 2007

Garrido A, Martinez-Santos P, Llamas MR (2006) Groundwater irrigation its implications for water policy in semiarid countries: the Spanish experience. Hydrog J 14(3):340–349

Gedeon M, Wemaere I, Marivoet J (2007) Regional groundwater model of northeast Belgium. J Hydrol 335(1–2):133–139

Geurts JLA, Joldersma C (2001) Methodology for participatory policy analysis. Eur J Oper Res 128:300–310

Glicken J (2000) Getting stakeholder participation “right”: a discussion of participatory processes possible pitfalls. Environ Sci Policy 3:305–310

Harbaugh AW, McDonald MG (1996) Programmer’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flowmodel: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-486, p 220

Hare M, Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integr Assess 3(1):50–62

Henriksen HJ, Barlebo HC (2007) Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management. J Environ Manag 88(4):1025–1036. doi: 101016/jjenvman200705009

Henriksen HJ, Rasmussen P, Brt G, Von Bülow D, Jensen F (2007) Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environ Modell Softw 22:1101–1113

Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Holberg AL, Ferr N, Gigsbeer P, Scholten H (2009) Harmonised principles for public participation in quality assurance of integrated water resources modelling. Water Resour Manag 23:2539–2554

Ibáñez J, Martínez J, Puigdefrabregas J (2008) Assessing overexploitation in Mediterranean aquifers using system stability condition analysis. Ecol Model 218:260–266

Jakeman AJ, Letchter RA (2003) Integrated assessment modelling: features, principles examples for catchment management. Environ Modell Softw 18:491–501

Janssen W, Goldworthy P (1996) Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: conceptual practical implications. Agric syst 51:259–279

Jensen FV (1996) An introduction to Bayesian networks. UCL, London

Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian network decision graphs. Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg

Koundouri P (2004) Potential for groundwater management: Gisser-Sanchez effect reconsidered. Water Resour Res 40:6. doi: 101029/2003WR002164

Lin YC, Medina M (2003) Incorporating transient storage in conjunctive stream–aquifer modelling. Adv Water Resour 26(9):1001–1019

Little LR, Kuikka S, Punt AE, Pantus F, Davies CR, Mapstone BD (2004) Information flow among fishing vessels modelled using a Bayesian network. Environ Modell Softw 19:27–34

Llamas MR, Custodio E (2003) Intensive use of groundwater: challenges opportunities AA. Balkema, Lisse, p 478

Malekmohammadi B, Kerachian R, Zahraie B (2009) Developing monthly operating rules for a cascade system of reservoirs: application of Bayesian networks. Environ Modell Softw 24(12):1420–1432

Martínez-Cortina L, Cruces J (2005) The analysis of the intensive use of groundwater in the Upper Guadiana basin, central Spain by using a numerical model. In: Sauquillo A, Capilla J, Martinez-Cortina L, Sanchez- Villa X (eds) Groundwater intensive use. Balkema, Leiden, pp 285–294

Martinez-Santos P, Martinez-Alfaro PE, Murillo JM (2004) A method to estimate the artificial recharge capacity of the Crestatx aquifer (Majorca, Spain). Env Geol 47(8):1155–1161

Martínez-Santos P, Llamas R, Martínez-Alfaro P (2008) Environ Modell Softw 23:1145–1162

McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Technical report, US Geol Survey, Reston, VA

Molina JL (2009) Integrated aquifers management in semiarid regions, altiplano water system case study (Murcia, SE Spain). Thesis dissertation. ISBN 978-84-692-3851-6

Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL (2006) Intensive aquifers exploitation its impacts: a case study in Serral-Salinas (Murcia-Alicante). Boletín Geológico y Minero 117:597–599

Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL (2007) Identificación preliminar de impactos del uso intensivo del agua subterránea en el sureste español: Acuífero Serral-Salinas (Murcia-Alicante). Boletín Geológico y Minero 118:597–599

Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL, Benavente J, Varela C, De la Hera A, López-Geta JA (2009) Aquifers overexploitation in SE Spain: a proposal for the integrated analysis of water management. Water Resour Manage 23:2737–2760

Moore JE (2002) Effects of groundwater mining on aquiferscase histories Denver CO, Tucson AZ, Chicago IL, Central Valley CA Las Vegas NV, Groundwater Human Development. In: Bocanegra E, Martínez D, Massone H (Eds) Red book. IAH, Mar del Plata, pp 419–422

Morgan MG, Dowlatabadi H (1996) Learning from integrated assessment of climate change. Clim Chang 34:337–368

Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2):179–197

Newton AC, Stewart GB, Diaz A, Golicher D, Pullin AS (2007) Bayesian Belief Networks as a tool for evidence based conservation management. J Nat Conserv 15(2):144–160

Ortiz-Zamora D, Ortega-Guerrero A (2010) Evolution of long-term l subsidence near Mexico City: review, field investigations, predictive simulations. Water Resour Res 46:W01513. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007398

Park J, Seaton RAF (1996) Integrative research sustainable agriculture. Agric Syst 50:81–100

Parker P, Letcher R, Jakeman AJ (2002) Progress in integrated assessment modelling. Environ Modell Softw 17:209–217

Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA

Praveena SM, Aris A (2010) Groundwater resources assessment using numerical model: a case study in low-lying coastal area. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:135–146

Prommer H, Barry DA, Davis GB (2002) Modelling of physical reactive processes during biodegradation of a hydrocarbon plume under transient groundwater flow conditions. J Contam Hydrol 59(1–2):113–131

Refsgaard JC, Van Der Sluijs JP, Hojberg AL, Vanrolleghem PA (2007) Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process framework guidance. Environ Modell Softw 22(11):1543–1556

Risbey J, Klikar MA, Patwardhan A (1996) Assessing integrated assessments. Clim Change 34:369–395

Rogers P, Llamas MR, Martinez-Cortina L (2006) Water crisis: myth or reality? Taylor & Francis, London, p 331

Rothman DS, Robinson JB (1997) Growing pains: a conceptual framework for considering integrated assessments. Environ Monit Assess 46:23–43

Rotmans J, Van Asselt M (1996) Integrated assessment: growing child on its way to maturity. An editorial essay. Clim Chang 34:327–336

Sadoddin A, Letcher R, Jakeman A, Newham LTH (2005) A Bayesian decision network approach for assessing the ecological impacts of salinity management. Math Comput Simul 69(1–2):162–176

Said A (2006) The implementation of a Bayesian network for watershed management decisions. Water Resour Manag 20:591–605

Salem OA (2005) Aquifer overexploitation in Libya—the Gefara plain case. Groundw Intensive Use 7:127–136. IAH (ed)

Samper J, Huguet LL, Ares J (1999) Visual Balan Tutorial V 20 Interactive code to making hydrological balances recharge estimation. ENRESA, Madrid

Schlager E (2006) Challenges of governing groundwater in US western states. Hydrog J 14(3):350–360

Scibek J, Allen DM (2006) Comparing modelled responses of two high-permeability, unconfined aquifers to predicted climate change. Global Planet Change 50(1–2):50–62

Ticehurst JL, Newham LTH, Rissik D, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2006) A Bayesian network approach for assessing the sustainability of coastal lakes in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Modell Softw 22(8):1129–1139

Tsur Y, Zemel A (2004) Endangered aquifers: groundwater management under threats of catastrophic events. Water Resour Res 40:6. doi: 101029/2003WR002168

Van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modeling. A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington

Varela C, Blanco I, Carmona G, Esteve P (2007) Field work report in the Upper Guadiana basin (Spain). In: Varela C (ed) Report of the NeWater project, New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management Under Uncertainty. Available at www.newaterinfo

Varis O, Fraboulet-Jussila S (2002) Water resources development in the Lower Senegal River Basin: conflicting interests, environmental concerns policy options. Water Res Dev 18:245–260

Videira N, Antunes P, Santos R, Gamito S (2003) Participatory modelling in environmental decision-making: the ria Formosa natural park case study. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 5(3):421–447

World Commission on Environment Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Xepapadeas A, Koundouri P (2004) Introduction to special section on Groundwater Economics Policy. Water Resour Res 40:6. doi: 101029/2003WR002158

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem