- -

Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: Molina;García-Aro ...
Tamaño: 903.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Molina González, José Luis es_ES
dc.contributor.author García-Arostegui, J.L es_ES
dc.contributor.author Bromley, John es_ES
dc.contributor.author Benavente, Jose es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-17T12:51:14Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-17T12:51:14Z
dc.date.issued 2011 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0920-4741 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/140945
dc.description.abstract [EN] Participatory methods provide an increasingly accepted path to integrated water assessment. This research describes an interdisciplinary exercise of scenario design and modelling, which provides a methodology to couple hard science numerical modelling approaches with the involvement of key water actors and socioeconomic issues. A decision support system based on probabilistic methods (Bayesian networks) is the tool chosen for dealing with the interdisciplinary issues involved in this aquifer. Given the long-standing conflicts in the area, modelling work largely focuses on carrying out an impact assessment produced by different scenarios established under the light of the mandatory objectives established by the European Union Water Framework Directive. This methodology is applied to a semi-arid aquifer located in SE Spain (Serral-Salinas) that represents an extreme case of intensive groundwater use. Irrigation has been a catalyst for welfare in the area for the past 40 years, despite the resulting large groundwater drawdown and continuous rise of groundwater pumping energy costs. Modelling results suggest that only a drastic change in the abstraction regime can produce a solution to long term sustainability of the aquifers. In addition, the impact assessment advises that such objectives are unlikely to be met due to the high economic costs of this action. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following people and organizations: Prof. Marino from the Land, Water and Air department of University California-Davis (UCD) for his help during the visit at UCD in 2009 and his contributions for this study; Spanish, Danish and English partners of the NEWATER project, for their cooperation with Geological Survey of Spain (IGME) and with this research; the OUCE for its great support during the academic visit of the first author; Segura River Basin Authority (CHS) for its cooperation with Geological Survey of Spain (IGME), all the stakeholders who have collaborated in this research and finally the commercial package HUGIN that was the software used for this study. The authors gratefully lacknowledge the interest and economic support from Euromediterranean Water Institute (Murcia Region, Spain), aimed to the continuation and future development of these research lines. The study has been partially supported by the European Community 7th Framework Project GENESIS (226536) on groundwater systems and from the subprogram Juan de la Cierva (2010) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation as well as from the Plan Nacional I+D+i 2008-2011 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (subprojects CGL2009-13238-C02-01 and CGL2009-13238-C02-02). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Water Resources Management es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Aquifers management es_ES
dc.subject Decision support systems es_ES
dc.subject Impacts assessment es_ES
dc.subject Participatory modelling es_ES
dc.subject Water framework directive es_ES
dc.subject Decision supports es_ES
dc.subject Economic costs es_ES
dc.subject European Union Water Framework es_ES
dc.subject Groundwater drawdown es_ES
dc.subject Groundwater pumping es_ES
dc.subject Groundwater use es_ES
dc.subject Hard science es_ES
dc.subject Impact assessments es_ES
dc.subject Integrated assessment es_ES
dc.subject Long-term sustainability es_ES
dc.subject Numerical modelling es_ES
dc.subject Participatory methods es_ES
dc.subject Probabilistic methods es_ES
dc.subject Scenario design es_ES
dc.subject Semi arid es_ES
dc.subject Water assessment es_ES
dc.subject Aquifers es_ES
dc.subject Artificial intelligence es_ES
dc.subject Bayesian networks es_ES
dc.subject Decision making es_ES
dc.subject Hydrogeology es_ES
dc.subject Inference engines es_ES
dc.subject Rating es_ES
dc.subject Water conservation es_ES
dc.subject Water levels es_ES
dc.subject Groundwater resources es_ES
dc.subject Aquifer es_ES
dc.subject Decision support system es_ES
dc.subject European Union es_ES
dc.subject Irrigation es_ES
dc.subject Numerical model es_ES
dc.subject Participatory approach es_ES
dc.subject Probability es_ES
dc.subject Sustainability es_ES
dc.subject Water management es_ES
dc.subject Spain es_ES
dc.title Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/226536/EU/Groundwater and dependent Ecosystems: NEw Scientific basIS on climate change and land-use impacts for the update of the EU Groundwater Directive/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//CGL2009-13238-C02-01/ES/Generación y simulación de escenarios futuros de hidrología superficial y subterránea (GESHYDRO)/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//CGL2009-13238-C02-02/ES/Modelos hidroeconómicos para adaptar la gestión de sistemas de recursos hídricos al cambio climático (HYDROECOCLIMATE)/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Molina González, JL.; García-Arostegui, J.; Bromley, J.; Benavente, J. (2011). Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling. Water Resources Management. 25(13):3343-3370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 3343 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 3370 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 25 es_ES
dc.description.issue 13 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\192021 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modelling. Academic, London, p 381 es_ES
dc.description.references Antunes P, Santos R, Videira N (2006) Participatory decision making for sustainable development; the use of mediated modelling techniques. L Use Policy 23:44–52 es_ES
dc.description.references Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Sci Total Environ 365:105–122 es_ES
dc.description.references Borsuk ME, Stow CA, Reckhow KH (2004) A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, uncertainty analysis. Ecol Model 173:219–239 es_ES
dc.description.references Bradley C (2002) Simulation of the annual water table dynamics of a floodplain wetl, Narborough Bog, UK. J Hydrol 261(1–4):150–172 es_ES
dc.description.references Bromley J (2005) Guidelines for the use of Bayesian networks as a participatory tool for water resource management, based on the results of the MERIT project. Centre for Ecology Hydrology, Wallingford es_ES
dc.description.references Bromley J, Jackson N, Clymer O, Giacomello A, Jensen F (2005) The use of Hugin to develop Bayesian network as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environ Modell Softw 20:231–242 es_ES
dc.description.references Cain J (2001) Planning improvements in natural resources management. Centre for Ecology Hydrology, Wallingford es_ES
dc.description.references Carbognin L, Gatto P, Mozzi G et al ( 1984) Venice subsidence case history 93. In: Pol JF (ed) Guidebook to studies of l subsidence due to ground-water withdrawal. International Hydrological Programme, working group 84, Chelsea, pp 161–174. http://wwwrcamnlwrusgsgov/rgws/Unesco/PDF-Chapters/Chapter9-3pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Carmona G, Varela C, Bromley J (2011) The use of participatory object-oriented Bayesian networks and agro-economic models for groundwater management in Spain. Water Resour Manag 25:1509–1524. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9757-y es_ES
dc.description.references Castelletti A, Soncini-Sessa R (2007) Bayesian Networks participatory modelling in water resource management. Environ Modell Softw 22:1075–1088 es_ES
dc.description.references Chebud YA, Melesse AM (2009) Numerical modelling of the groundwater flow system of the Gumera sub-basin in Lake Tana basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol Process 23:3694–3704 es_ES
dc.description.references Cheng AD, Cheng T (2005) Heritage early history of the boundary element method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 29:268–302 es_ES
dc.description.references Chiang HW (2005) 3D groundwater modelling with PMWIN, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 411 es_ES
dc.description.references Chiang HW, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN. Springer, Berlin es_ES
dc.description.references Custodio E (2002) Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeol J 10:254–277. doi: 101007/s10040-002-0188-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Downs TJ, Mazari H, Domínguez-Mora M, Buffet IH (2000) Sustainability of least cost policies for meeting Mexico City’s future water dem. Water Resour Res 36(8):2321–2329. doi: 101029/1999WR900234 es_ES
dc.description.references EC 2000/60/ Directive of the European Parliament of the Council, establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal 327 European Commission, Brussels, Belgium es_ES
dc.description.references Farmani R, Henriksen HJ, Savic D (2009) An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for optimum management of groundwater contamination. Environ Modell Softw 24(3):303–310 es_ES
dc.description.references Feitelson E (2006) Impediments to the management of shared aquifers: a political economy perspective. Hydrogeol J 14(3):319–329 es_ES
dc.description.references ganETxl (2007) Available at: http://wwwprojectsexacuk/cws/ganetxl , last visited May 2007 es_ES
dc.description.references Garrido A, Martinez-Santos P, Llamas MR (2006) Groundwater irrigation its implications for water policy in semiarid countries: the Spanish experience. Hydrog J 14(3):340–349 es_ES
dc.description.references Gedeon M, Wemaere I, Marivoet J (2007) Regional groundwater model of northeast Belgium. J Hydrol 335(1–2):133–139 es_ES
dc.description.references Geurts JLA, Joldersma C (2001) Methodology for participatory policy analysis. Eur J Oper Res 128:300–310 es_ES
dc.description.references Glicken J (2000) Getting stakeholder participation “right”: a discussion of participatory processes possible pitfalls. Environ Sci Policy 3:305–310 es_ES
dc.description.references Harbaugh AW, McDonald MG (1996) Programmer’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flowmodel: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-486, p 220 es_ES
dc.description.references Hare M, Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integr Assess 3(1):50–62 es_ES
dc.description.references Henriksen HJ, Barlebo HC (2007) Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management. J Environ Manag 88(4):1025–1036. doi: 101016/jjenvman200705009 es_ES
dc.description.references Henriksen HJ, Rasmussen P, Brt G, Von Bülow D, Jensen F (2007) Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environ Modell Softw 22:1101–1113 es_ES
dc.description.references Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Holberg AL, Ferr N, Gigsbeer P, Scholten H (2009) Harmonised principles for public participation in quality assurance of integrated water resources modelling. Water Resour Manag 23:2539–2554 es_ES
dc.description.references Ibáñez J, Martínez J, Puigdefrabregas J (2008) Assessing overexploitation in Mediterranean aquifers using system stability condition analysis. Ecol Model 218:260–266 es_ES
dc.description.references Jakeman AJ, Letchter RA (2003) Integrated assessment modelling: features, principles examples for catchment management. Environ Modell Softw 18:491–501 es_ES
dc.description.references Janssen W, Goldworthy P (1996) Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: conceptual practical implications. Agric syst 51:259–279 es_ES
dc.description.references Jensen FV (1996) An introduction to Bayesian networks. UCL, London es_ES
dc.description.references Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian network decision graphs. Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg es_ES
dc.description.references Koundouri P (2004) Potential for groundwater management: Gisser-Sanchez effect reconsidered. Water Resour Res 40:6. doi: 101029/2003WR002164 es_ES
dc.description.references Lin YC, Medina M (2003) Incorporating transient storage in conjunctive stream–aquifer modelling. Adv Water Resour 26(9):1001–1019 es_ES
dc.description.references Little LR, Kuikka S, Punt AE, Pantus F, Davies CR, Mapstone BD (2004) Information flow among fishing vessels modelled using a Bayesian network. Environ Modell Softw 19:27–34 es_ES
dc.description.references Llamas MR, Custodio E (2003) Intensive use of groundwater: challenges opportunities AA. Balkema, Lisse, p 478 es_ES
dc.description.references Malekmohammadi B, Kerachian R, Zahraie B (2009) Developing monthly operating rules for a cascade system of reservoirs: application of Bayesian networks. Environ Modell Softw 24(12):1420–1432 es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez-Cortina L, Cruces J (2005) The analysis of the intensive use of groundwater in the Upper Guadiana basin, central Spain by using a numerical model. In: Sauquillo A, Capilla J, Martinez-Cortina L, Sanchez- Villa X (eds) Groundwater intensive use. Balkema, Leiden, pp 285–294 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinez-Santos P, Martinez-Alfaro PE, Murillo JM (2004) A method to estimate the artificial recharge capacity of the Crestatx aquifer (Majorca, Spain). Env Geol 47(8):1155–1161 es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez-Santos P, Llamas R, Martínez-Alfaro P (2008) Environ Modell Softw 23:1145–1162 es_ES
dc.description.references McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Technical report, US Geol Survey, Reston, VA es_ES
dc.description.references Molina JL (2009) Integrated aquifers management in semiarid regions, altiplano water system case study (Murcia, SE Spain). Thesis dissertation. ISBN 978-84-692-3851-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL (2006) Intensive aquifers exploitation its impacts: a case study in Serral-Salinas (Murcia-Alicante). Boletín Geológico y Minero 117:597–599 es_ES
dc.description.references Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL (2007) Identificación preliminar de impactos del uso intensivo del agua subterránea en el sureste español: Acuífero Serral-Salinas (Murcia-Alicante). Boletín Geológico y Minero 118:597–599 es_ES
dc.description.references Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL, Benavente J, Varela C, De la Hera A, López-Geta JA (2009) Aquifers overexploitation in SE Spain: a proposal for the integrated analysis of water management. Water Resour Manage 23:2737–2760 es_ES
dc.description.references Moore JE (2002) Effects of groundwater mining on aquiferscase histories Denver CO, Tucson AZ, Chicago IL, Central Valley CA Las Vegas NV, Groundwater Human Development. In: Bocanegra E, Martínez D, Massone H (Eds) Red book. IAH, Mar del Plata, pp 419–422 es_ES
dc.description.references Morgan MG, Dowlatabadi H (1996) Learning from integrated assessment of climate change. Clim Chang 34:337–368 es_ES
dc.description.references Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2):179–197 es_ES
dc.description.references Newton AC, Stewart GB, Diaz A, Golicher D, Pullin AS (2007) Bayesian Belief Networks as a tool for evidence based conservation management. J Nat Conserv 15(2):144–160 es_ES
dc.description.references Ortiz-Zamora D, Ortega-Guerrero A (2010) Evolution of long-term l subsidence near Mexico City: review, field investigations, predictive simulations. Water Resour Res 46:W01513. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007398 es_ES
dc.description.references Park J, Seaton RAF (1996) Integrative research sustainable agriculture. Agric Syst 50:81–100 es_ES
dc.description.references Parker P, Letcher R, Jakeman AJ (2002) Progress in integrated assessment modelling. Environ Modell Softw 17:209–217 es_ES
dc.description.references Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA es_ES
dc.description.references Praveena SM, Aris A (2010) Groundwater resources assessment using numerical model: a case study in low-lying coastal area. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:135–146 es_ES
dc.description.references Prommer H, Barry DA, Davis GB (2002) Modelling of physical reactive processes during biodegradation of a hydrocarbon plume under transient groundwater flow conditions. J Contam Hydrol 59(1–2):113–131 es_ES
dc.description.references Refsgaard JC, Van Der Sluijs JP, Hojberg AL, Vanrolleghem PA (2007) Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process framework guidance. Environ Modell Softw 22(11):1543–1556 es_ES
dc.description.references Risbey J, Klikar MA, Patwardhan A (1996) Assessing integrated assessments. Clim Change 34:369–395 es_ES
dc.description.references Rogers P, Llamas MR, Martinez-Cortina L (2006) Water crisis: myth or reality? Taylor & Francis, London, p 331 es_ES
dc.description.references Rothman DS, Robinson JB (1997) Growing pains: a conceptual framework for considering integrated assessments. Environ Monit Assess 46:23–43 es_ES
dc.description.references Rotmans J, Van Asselt M (1996) Integrated assessment: growing child on its way to maturity. An editorial essay. Clim Chang 34:327–336 es_ES
dc.description.references Sadoddin A, Letcher R, Jakeman A, Newham LTH (2005) A Bayesian decision network approach for assessing the ecological impacts of salinity management. Math Comput Simul 69(1–2):162–176 es_ES
dc.description.references Said A (2006) The implementation of a Bayesian network for watershed management decisions. Water Resour Manag 20:591–605 es_ES
dc.description.references Salem OA (2005) Aquifer overexploitation in Libya—the Gefara plain case. Groundw Intensive Use 7:127–136. IAH (ed) es_ES
dc.description.references Samper J, Huguet LL, Ares J (1999) Visual Balan Tutorial V 20 Interactive code to making hydrological balances recharge estimation. ENRESA, Madrid es_ES
dc.description.references Schlager E (2006) Challenges of governing groundwater in US western states. Hydrog J 14(3):350–360 es_ES
dc.description.references Scibek J, Allen DM (2006) Comparing modelled responses of two high-permeability, unconfined aquifers to predicted climate change. Global Planet Change 50(1–2):50–62 es_ES
dc.description.references Ticehurst JL, Newham LTH, Rissik D, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2006) A Bayesian network approach for assessing the sustainability of coastal lakes in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Modell Softw 22(8):1129–1139 es_ES
dc.description.references Tsur Y, Zemel A (2004) Endangered aquifers: groundwater management under threats of catastrophic events. Water Resour Res 40:6. doi: 101029/2003WR002168 es_ES
dc.description.references Van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modeling. A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington es_ES
dc.description.references Varela C, Blanco I, Carmona G, Esteve P (2007) Field work report in the Upper Guadiana basin (Spain). In: Varela C (ed) Report of the NeWater project, New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management Under Uncertainty. Available at www.newaterinfo es_ES
dc.description.references Varis O, Fraboulet-Jussila S (2002) Water resources development in the Lower Senegal River Basin: conflicting interests, environmental concerns policy options. Water Res Dev 18:245–260 es_ES
dc.description.references Videira N, Antunes P, Santos R, Gamito S (2003) Participatory modelling in environmental decision-making: the ria Formosa natural park case study. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 5(3):421–447 es_ES
dc.description.references World Commission on Environment Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford es_ES
dc.description.references Xepapadeas A, Koundouri P (2004) Introduction to special section on Groundwater Economics Policy. Water Resour Res 40:6. doi: 101029/2003WR002158 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem