- -

Innovation pedagogy – learning through active multidisciplinary methods

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Innovation pedagogy – learning through active multidisciplinary methods

Show full item record

Kairisto-Mertanen, L.; Räsänen, M.; Lehtonen, J.; Lappalainen, H. (2012). Innovation pedagogy – learning through active multidisciplinary methods. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 10(1):67-86. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6122

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/141068

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Innovation pedagogy – learning through active multidisciplinary methods
Secondary Title: Pedagogía de la Innovación – aprendiendo con métodos activos multidisciplinares
Author: Kairisto-Mertanen, Liisa Räsänen, Meiju Lehtonen, Jouko Lappalainen, Harri
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] Traditionally, the role of education has been to give knowledge‐based readiness, which later would be applied in practice to various innovation processes in working life. Innovation pedagogy introduces how the ...[+]


[ES] Tradicionalmente, el papel de la educación ha sido el de proporcionar una preparación basada en el conocimiento, que más tarde será aplicada en la práctica de diferentes procesos de innovación en la vida laboral. ...[+]
Subjects: Innovation pedagogy , Active learning , Learning methods , Innovation competencies , Pedagogía de la Innovación , Aprendizaje activo , Métodos de aprendizaje , Competencias de innovación
Copyrigths: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Source:
REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. (issn: 1887-4592 ) (eissn: 1887-4592 )
DOI: 10.4995/redu.2012.6122
Publisher:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6122
Type: Artículo

References

Brady, L. (1996). Outcome‐based Education: a critique, in The Curriculum Journal, Vol 7 (1), Spring, 5‐16.

Buss, D. (2008). Secret Destinations, in Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol 45 (3), August, 303‐308.

Davies, A. (2002). Writing learning outcomes and assessment criteria in art and design, available at www.arts.ac.uk/docs/citad_learningoutcomes.pdf pp. 522‐529. (Accessed 15 May 2011). [+]
Brady, L. (1996). Outcome‐based Education: a critique, in The Curriculum Journal, Vol 7 (1), Spring, 5‐16.

Buss, D. (2008). Secret Destinations, in Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol 45 (3), August, 303‐308.

Davies, A. (2002). Writing learning outcomes and assessment criteria in art and design, available at www.arts.ac.uk/docs/citad_learningoutcomes.pdf pp. 522‐529. (Accessed 15 May 2011).

Finland's National Innovation Strategy (2008). http://www.tem.fi/files /19704/Kansallinen_innovaatiostrategia_12062008.pdf.

Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P. & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

Harden, R. M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference, in Medical Teacher, Vol. 24 (2), 151‐155.

Harden. R. M., Crosby, J. R. & Davis, M. H. (1999). An Introduction to Outcome Based Education, in AMEE Guide No. 14, part 1. Medical Teacher

Hussey, T. & Smith, P. (2008). Learning outcomes: a conceptual analysis, in Teaching in Higher Education, Vol 13 (1), February, 107‐115.

Kairisto‐Mertanen, L.; Kanerva‐Lehto, H.; Penttilä, T. (2009). Kohti innovatiopedagogiikkaa - Uusi lähestymistapa ammattikorkeakoulujen opetukseen ja oppimiseen. Turun ammattikorkeakoulun raportteja 92, Tampereen yliopistopaino, Tampere.

Kairisto‐Mertanen, L.; Penttilä, T. & Putkonen, A. (2010). Embedding innovation skills in learning, in Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Universities, ed. Marja‐Liisa Neuvonen‐Rauhala; Series C Articles, reports and other current publications, part 72, Lahti University of Applied Sciences; Tampereen yliopistopaino, Tampere.

Kairisto‐Mertanen, L.; Penttilä, T. & Nuotio, J. (2011). On the definition of innovation competencies, in Innovations for Competence Management, Conference proceedings. eds. Torniainen; Ilona, Mahlamäki‐Kultanen, Seija, Nokelainen Petri & Paul Ilsley; Series C, reports and other current publications, part 83, Lahti University of Applied Sciences, Esa print Oy.

Kanerva‐Lehto, H.; Lehtonen, J.; Jolkkonen, A. & Riihiranta, J. (2011). Research Hatchery - a Concept for Combining Learning, Development and Research. In Towards Innovation pedagogy. A new approach to teaching and learning in universities of applied sciences, ed. by Lehto, A., Kairisto‐Mertanen L., Penttilä, T. TUAS Reports 100. Turku University of Applied Sciences.

Kanerva‐Lehto, H. & Lehtonen, J. (ed.) 2007. Tutkimuspaja - oppimista ja kehittämistä. Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences 54. Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences.

Lehtonen, J., Kanerva‐Lehto, H. & Koivisto, J. 2006. Tutkimuspaja mahdollisuutena yhdistää opetus ja T&K. Comments from Turku University of Applied Sciences 24. Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences.

Kettunen, J. (2011). Innovation pedagogy for universities of applied sciences, in Creative Education, 2(1), pp. 56‐62.

Kettunen, J. (2010). Strategy process in higher education, in Journal of Institutional Research, 15(1), 16‐27.

Kettunen, J. (2009). Innovaatiopedagogiikka, Kever‐verkkolehti, 8(2), available at http://ojs.seamk.fi/index.php/kever/article/view/1123/1000. (Accessed 24 June 2011).

Lyytinen, S. (2011). Project Hatchery - interdisciplinary learning through project methods, In Towards Innovation pedagogy. A new approach to teaching and learning in universities of applied sciences, ed. by Lehto, A., Kairisto‐Mertanen L., Penttilä, T. TUAS Reports 100. Turku University of Applied Sciences.

Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P.and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re‐Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. London: Polity Press.

Nowotny H., Scott P. & Gibbons M. (2003). 'Mode 2' Revisited: The New production of Knowledge. Minerva 41(3), 179 - 194.

Nusche, D. (2008). Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: A comparative review of selected practices, in OECD Education Working Paper No. 15. Paris: OECD.

Penttilä, T.; Kairisto‐Mertanen, L. & Putkonen, A. (2011). Messages of innovation pedagogy, In Towards Innovation pedagogy. A new approach to teaching and learning in universities of applied sciences, ed. by Lehto, A., Kairisto‐Mertanen L., Penttilä, T. TUAS Reports 100. Turku University of Applied Sciences.

Proitz, T. S. (2010). Learning outcomes: What are they? Who defines them? When and where are they defined, in Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22, 119‐137.

Putkonen, A.; Kairisto‐Mertanen, L.; Penttilä, T. (2010). Enhancing engineering students' innovation skills through innovation pedagogy - experiences in Turku University of Applied Scieces, In International Conference on Engineering Education ICEE‐2010, July 18‐22, 2010, Gliwice, Poland.

Rogers E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth edition. New York: Free Press.

Schumpeter J. A. (2003). Entrepreneurship, Style and Vision. Backhaus, J. G. (ed.) Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Spady, W. (1988). "Organizing for the results: The basis of authentic restructuring and reform", in Educational Leadership, 4‐8.

Spitzberg, B. (1983). Communication competence as knowledge, skills and impression, in Communication Education, Vol. 32, July, 323‐329.

[-]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record