- -

A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through google scholar citations: the case of Bibliometrics

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through google scholar citations: the case of Bibliometrics

Show full item record

Martín-Martín, A.; Orduña Malea, E.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2018). A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through google scholar citations: the case of Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. 114(3):1251-1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2587-4

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/145987

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through google scholar citations: the case of Bibliometrics
Author: Martín-Martín, Alberto Orduña Malea, Enrique Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Comunicación Audiovisual, Documentación e Historia del Arte - Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual, Documentació i Història de l'Art
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] This article describes a procedure to generate a snapshot of the structure of a specific scientific community and their outputs based on the information available in Google Scholar Citations (GSC). We call this method ...[+]
Subjects: Academic profiles , Google Scholar Citations , Bibliometrics , Scientometrics , Informetrics , Webometrics , Altmetrics , Academic search engines , Scientific disciplines , MADAP method
Copyrigths: Reserva de todos los derechos
Source:
Scientometrics. (issn: 0138-9130 )
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2587-4
Publisher:
Springer-Verlag
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2587-4
Project ID:
MECD/FPU2013/05863
UPV/PAID-10-14
Thanks:
Funding was provided by Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (FPU2013/05863), Universitat Politècnica de València (PAID-10-14).
Type: Artículo

References

Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343–351.

Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404–426.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1–52. [+]
Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343–351.

Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404–426.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1–52.

Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2012). Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social Web. In É. Archambault, Y. Gingras, & V. Larivière (Eds.). Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (STI 2012) (pp. 99–109).

Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

Bensman, S. J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 93–155.

Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227.

Bonitz, M. (1982). Scientometrie, bibliometrie, informetrie. Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen, 96(2), 19–24.

Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3–72.

Bornmann, L., Thor, A., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2016). The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2778–2789.

Braun, T. (1994). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics… and beyond? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 373–537.

Broadus, R. N. (1987a). Early approaches to bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(2), 127–129.

Broadus, R. N. (1987b). Toward a definition of ‘bibliometrics’. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379.

Brookes, B. C. (1988). Comments on the scope of bibliometrics. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88. Select proceedings of the first international conference on bibliometrics and theoretical aspects of information retrieval (pp. 29–41). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Brookes, B. C. (1990). Biblio-, Sciento-, Infor-metrics??? What are we talking about? In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 89/90. Selection of Papers Submitted for the Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 31–43). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1–7.

De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Maryland: Scarecrow Press.

Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2014). The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 446–454.

Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227(5259), 669–671.

Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1994). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics … and beyond? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 375–384.

Godin, B. (2006). On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 109–133.

Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163.

Hertzel, D. H. (1987). History of the development of ideas in bibliometrics. In A. Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (pp. 144–219). New York: Marcel Dekker.

Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314.

Jacsó, P. (2005). Google Scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29(2), 208–214.

Jacsó, P. (2008). Google scholar revisited. Online information review, 32(1), 102–114.

Jacsó, P. (2012). Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: Is it too little, too late? Online Information Review, 36(1), 126–141.

Kramer, B., & Bosman, J. (2015). 101 innovations in scholarly communication—The changing research workflow. Available at https://101innovations.wordpress.com .

Larivière, V. (2012). The decade of metrics? Examining the evolution of metrics within and outside LIS. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(6), 12–17.

Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997–1016.

Lawani, S. M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri, 31(1), 294–315.

Lin, J., & Fenner, M. (2013). Altmetrics in evolution: Defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics. Information Standards Quarterly, 25(2), 20–26.

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, Juan M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016). A two-sided academic landscape: Snapshot of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar (1950–2013). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39(4), e149.

Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Harzing, A. W., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents? Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 152–163.

McCain, K. W. (2010). The view from Garfield’s shoulders: Tri-citation mapping of Eugene Garfield’s citation image over three successive decades. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57, 261–270.

Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.

Mikki, S., Zygmuntowska, M., Gjesdal, Ø. L., & Al Ruwehy, H. A. (2015). Digital presence of Norwegian Scholars on academic network sites—Where and who are they?’. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142709.

Milojević, S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Information metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity? Scientometrics, 95(1), 141–157.

Mingers, J., & Meyer, M. (2017). Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1111–1121.

Mingers, J., O’Hanley, J. R., & Okunola, M. (2017). Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1627–1643.

Narin, F., & Moll, J. K. (1977). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 12, 35–58.

Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2015). Bibliometric evolution: Is the journal of the association for information science and technology transforming into a specialty Journal? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 1082–1085.

Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2015). Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 931–949.

Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Ayllón, Juan M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016a). La revolución Google Scholar: Destapando la caja de Pandora académica. Granada: UNE.

Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2016b). The next bibliometrics: ALMetrics (Author Level Metrics) and the multiple faces of author impact. El Profesional de la Información, 25(3), 485–496.

Ortega, Jose L. (2015a). How is an academic social site populated? A demographic study of Google Scholar Citations population. Scientometrics, 104(1), 1–18.

Ortega, Jose L. (2015b). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39–49.

Ortega, Jose L., & Aguillo, Isidro F. (2012). Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google Scholar Citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2370–2377.

Ortega, Jose L., & Aguillo, Isidro F. (2013). Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 394–403.

Ortega, Jose L., & Aguillo, Isidro F. (2014). Microsoft academic search and google scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1149–1156.

Otlet, P. (1934). Traité de documentation: Le livre sur le livre, théorie et pratique. Brussels: Editiones Mundaneum.

Peritz, B. (1984). On the careers of terminologies; The case of bibliometrics. Libri, 34(1), 233–242.

Portal, S. G. (1994). Principios teóricos y metodológicos de los estudios métricos de la información. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 8, 23–32.

Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7).

Prins, A. A. M., Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, Paul F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264–270.

Ranganathan, S. R. (1969). Documentation Research and Training Centre: Annual Seminar (7) (1969): Subject analysis for document finding systems: Quantification and librametric studies: Management of translation service (pp. 285–301). Bangalore: Documentation Research and Training Centre.

Sengupta, I. N. (1992). Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: an overview. Libri, 42(2), 75–98.

Shapiro, Fred R. (1992). Origins of Bibliometrics, Citation Indexing, and Citation Analysis: The Neglected Legal Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(5), 337–339.

Small, H. (2017). A tribute to Eugene Garfield: Information innovator and idealist. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 599–612.

Stuart, D. (2014). Web metrics for library and information professionals. London: Facet publishing.

Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1992). An introduction to informetrics. Information Processing and Management, 28(1), 1–3.

Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605–621.

Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Diego: Morgan & Claypool.

Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 81–135.

Van Raan, A. (1997). Scientometrics: State-of-the-art. Scientometrics, 38(1), 205–218.

White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119–186.

White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, C. S. (1999). Informetrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 107–247.

Wouters, P. (2017). Eugene Garfield (1925–2017). Nature, 543(7642), 492.

[-]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record