- -

A Novel Method for Depicting Academic Disciplines through Google Scholar citations: the Case of Bibliometrics

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A Novel Method for Depicting Academic Disciplines through Google Scholar citations: the Case of Bibliometrics

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Martín-Martín;Ord ...
Tamaño: 1.411Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: 1.1.1_62 MADAP.pdf
Tamaño: 1.087Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Martín-Martín, Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author Orduña Malea, Enrique es_ES
dc.contributor.author Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-11T03:33:12Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-11T03:33:12Z
dc.date.issued 2018-03 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0138-9130 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/145987
dc.description.abstract [EN] This article describes a procedure to generate a snapshot of the structure of a specific scientific community and their outputs based on the information available in Google Scholar Citations (GSC). We call this method multifaceted analysis of disciplines through academic profiles (MADAP). The international community of researchers working in Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics, and Altmetrics was selected as a case study. The records of the top 1000 most cited documents by these authors according to GSC were manually processed to fill any missing information and deduplicate fields like the journal titles and book publishers. The results suggest that it is feasible to use GSC and the MADAP method to produce an accurate depiction of the community of researchers working in Bibliometrics (both specialists and occasional researchers) and their publication habits (main publication venues such as journals and book publishers). Additionally, the wide document coverage of Google Scholar (specially books and book chapters) enables more comprehensive analyses of the documents published in a specific discipline than were previously possible with other citation indexes, finally shedding light on what until now had been a blind spot in most citation analyses. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Funding was provided by Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (FPU2013/05863), Universitat Politècnica de València (PAID-10-14). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Scientometrics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Academic profiles es_ES
dc.subject Google Scholar Citations es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometrics es_ES
dc.subject Scientometrics es_ES
dc.subject Informetrics es_ES
dc.subject Webometrics es_ES
dc.subject Altmetrics es_ES
dc.subject Academic search engines es_ES
dc.subject Scientific disciplines es_ES
dc.subject MADAP method es_ES
dc.subject.classification BIBLIOTECONOMIA Y DOCUMENTACION es_ES
dc.title A Novel Method for Depicting Academic Disciplines through Google Scholar citations: the Case of Bibliometrics es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11192-017-2587-4 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MECD//FPU2013%2F05863/ES/FPU2013%2F05863/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UPV//PAID-10-14/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Comunicación Audiovisual, Documentación e Historia del Arte - Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual, Documentació i Història de l'Art es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Martín-Martín, A.; Orduña Malea, E.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2018). A Novel Method for Depicting Academic Disciplines through Google Scholar citations: the Case of Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. 114(3):1251-1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2587-4 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2587-4 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1251 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1273 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 114 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\374442 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte es_ES
dc.description.references Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343–351. es_ES
dc.description.references Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404–426. es_ES
dc.description.references Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1–52. es_ES
dc.description.references Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2012). Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social Web. In É. Archambault, Y. Gingras, & V. Larivière (Eds.). Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (STI 2012) (pp. 99–109). es_ES
dc.description.references Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. London: McGraw-Hill Education. es_ES
dc.description.references Bensman, S. J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 93–155. es_ES
dc.description.references Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. es_ES
dc.description.references Bonitz, M. (1982). Scientometrie, bibliometrie, informetrie. Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen, 96(2), 19–24. es_ES
dc.description.references Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3–72. es_ES
dc.description.references Bornmann, L., Thor, A., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2016). The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2778–2789. es_ES
dc.description.references Braun, T. (1994). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics… and beyond? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 373–537. es_ES
dc.description.references Broadus, R. N. (1987a). Early approaches to bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(2), 127–129. es_ES
dc.description.references Broadus, R. N. (1987b). Toward a definition of ‘bibliometrics’. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. es_ES
dc.description.references Brookes, B. C. (1988). Comments on the scope of bibliometrics. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88. Select proceedings of the first international conference on bibliometrics and theoretical aspects of information retrieval (pp. 29–41). Amsterdam: Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Brookes, B. C. (1990). Biblio-, Sciento-, Infor-metrics??? What are we talking about? In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 89/90. Selection of Papers Submitted for the Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 31–43). Amsterdam: Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1–7. es_ES
dc.description.references De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Maryland: Scarecrow Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2014). The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 446–454. es_ES
dc.description.references Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227(5259), 669–671. es_ES
dc.description.references Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1994). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics … and beyond? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 375–384. es_ES
dc.description.references Godin, B. (2006). On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 109–133. es_ES
dc.description.references Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163. es_ES
dc.description.references Hertzel, D. H. (1987). History of the development of ideas in bibliometrics. In A. Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (pp. 144–219). New York: Marcel Dekker. es_ES
dc.description.references Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. es_ES
dc.description.references Jacsó, P. (2005). Google Scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29(2), 208–214. es_ES
dc.description.references Jacsó, P. (2008). Google scholar revisited. Online information review, 32(1), 102–114. es_ES
dc.description.references Jacsó, P. (2012). Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: Is it too little, too late? Online Information Review, 36(1), 126–141. es_ES
dc.description.references Kramer, B., & Bosman, J. (2015). 101 innovations in scholarly communication—The changing research workflow. Available at https://101innovations.wordpress.com . es_ES
dc.description.references Larivière, V. (2012). The decade of metrics? Examining the evolution of metrics within and outside LIS. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(6), 12–17. es_ES
dc.description.references Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997–1016. es_ES
dc.description.references Lawani, S. M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri, 31(1), 294–315. es_ES
dc.description.references Lin, J., & Fenner, M. (2013). Altmetrics in evolution: Defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics. Information Standards Quarterly, 25(2), 20–26. es_ES
dc.description.references Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, Juan M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016). A two-sided academic landscape: Snapshot of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar (1950–2013). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39(4), e149. es_ES
dc.description.references Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Harzing, A. W., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents? Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 152–163. es_ES
dc.description.references McCain, K. W. (2010). The view from Garfield’s shoulders: Tri-citation mapping of Eugene Garfield’s citation image over three successive decades. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57, 261–270. es_ES
dc.description.references Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125. es_ES
dc.description.references Mikki, S., Zygmuntowska, M., Gjesdal, Ø. L., & Al Ruwehy, H. A. (2015). Digital presence of Norwegian Scholars on academic network sites—Where and who are they?’. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142709. es_ES
dc.description.references Milojević, S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Information metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity? Scientometrics, 95(1), 141–157. es_ES
dc.description.references Mingers, J., & Meyer, M. (2017). Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1111–1121. es_ES
dc.description.references Mingers, J., O’Hanley, J. R., & Okunola, M. (2017). Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1627–1643. es_ES
dc.description.references Narin, F., & Moll, J. K. (1977). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 12, 35–58. es_ES
dc.description.references Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2015). Bibliometric evolution: Is the journal of the association for information science and technology transforming into a specialty Journal? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 1082–1085. es_ES
dc.description.references Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2015). Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 931–949. es_ES
dc.description.references Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Ayllón, Juan M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016a). La revolución Google Scholar: Destapando la caja de Pandora académica. Granada: UNE. es_ES
dc.description.references Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2016b). The next bibliometrics: ALMetrics (Author Level Metrics) and the multiple faces of author impact. El Profesional de la Información, 25(3), 485–496. es_ES
dc.description.references Ortega, Jose L. (2015a). How is an academic social site populated? A demographic study of Google Scholar Citations population. Scientometrics, 104(1), 1–18. es_ES
dc.description.references Ortega, Jose L. (2015b). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39–49. es_ES
dc.description.references Ortega, Jose L., & Aguillo, Isidro F. (2012). Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google Scholar Citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2370–2377. es_ES
dc.description.references Ortega, Jose L., & Aguillo, Isidro F. (2013). Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 394–403. es_ES
dc.description.references Ortega, Jose L., & Aguillo, Isidro F. (2014). Microsoft academic search and google scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1149–1156. es_ES
dc.description.references Otlet, P. (1934). Traité de documentation: Le livre sur le livre, théorie et pratique. Brussels: Editiones Mundaneum. es_ES
dc.description.references Peritz, B. (1984). On the careers of terminologies; The case of bibliometrics. Libri, 34(1), 233–242. es_ES
dc.description.references Portal, S. G. (1994). Principios teóricos y metodológicos de los estudios métricos de la información. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 8, 23–32. es_ES
dc.description.references Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). es_ES
dc.description.references Prins, A. A. M., Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, Paul F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264–270. es_ES
dc.description.references Ranganathan, S. R. (1969). Documentation Research and Training Centre: Annual Seminar (7) (1969): Subject analysis for document finding systems: Quantification and librametric studies: Management of translation service (pp. 285–301). Bangalore: Documentation Research and Training Centre. es_ES
dc.description.references Sengupta, I. N. (1992). Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: an overview. Libri, 42(2), 75–98. es_ES
dc.description.references Shapiro, Fred R. (1992). Origins of Bibliometrics, Citation Indexing, and Citation Analysis: The Neglected Legal Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(5), 337–339. es_ES
dc.description.references Small, H. (2017). A tribute to Eugene Garfield: Information innovator and idealist. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 599–612. es_ES
dc.description.references Stuart, D. (2014). Web metrics for library and information professionals. London: Facet publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1992). An introduction to informetrics. Information Processing and Management, 28(1), 1–3. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605–621. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Diego: Morgan & Claypool. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 81–135. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Raan, A. (1997). Scientometrics: State-of-the-art. Scientometrics, 38(1), 205–218. es_ES
dc.description.references White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119–186. es_ES
dc.description.references White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355. es_ES
dc.description.references Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Wilson, C. S. (1999). Informetrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 107–247. es_ES
dc.description.references Wouters, P. (2017). Eugene Garfield (1925–2017). Nature, 543(7642), 492. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem