- -

Marking Schemes for an Authentic Group Project, Trial by Statistics - A Case Study

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Marking Schemes for an Authentic Group Project, Trial by Statistics - A Case Study

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Bryceson, Kim es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-11T08:40:27Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-11T08:40:27Z
dc.date.issued 2020-04-30
dc.identifier.isbn 9788490488119
dc.identifier.issn 2603-5871
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/146083
dc.description.abstract [EN] This study is an analysis of two different marking schemes for an ‘authentic’ Group Project worth 50% of a first year undergraduate university agribusiness course at The University of Queensland (UQ). A number of different marking schemes for the Group Project had been trialled over the last ten years in an effort to obtain an equitable method of marking individual students doing the Group Project. In 2019, a marking scheme for the Group Project that had been successfully used previously was advertised for 2019 prior to the commencement of semester. However, issues during the semester within some of the Groups meant that students requested a Peer Evaluation marking scheme be employed. Eventually, for a class of 105 students, both marking schemes were used in assessing students’ work and a Pearson Correlation coefficient was run on the results of the final project mark to determine how equivalent the two marking schemes were. A good correlation (0.75) between the two schemes was returned, which was also reflected in a good correlation in the comparison for the final overall mark for the whole course (0.87). These statistical results suggest that there is a good argument for the existing marking scheme to continue to be used rather than a peer evaluation, which can have behavioural issues associated with it that are difficult to resolve. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'20)
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Higher Education es_ES
dc.subject Learning es_ES
dc.subject Educational systems es_ES
dc.subject Teaching es_ES
dc.subject Authentic es_ES
dc.subject Group Project es_ES
dc.subject Marking Scheme es_ES
dc.subject Peer evaluation es_ES
dc.subject Correlation coefficients es_ES
dc.title Marking Schemes for an Authentic Group Project, Trial by Statistics - A Case Study es_ES
dc.type Capítulo de libro es_ES
dc.type Comunicación en congreso es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/HEAd20.2020.11159
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Bryceson, K. (2020). Marking Schemes for an Authentic Group Project, Trial by Statistics - A Case Study. En 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'20). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. (30-05-2020):847-855. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd20.2020.11159 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OCS es_ES
dc.relation.conferencename Sixth International Conference on Higher Education Advances es_ES
dc.relation.conferencedate Junio 02-05,2020 es_ES
dc.relation.conferenceplace València, Spain es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/HEAD/HEAd20/paper/view/11159 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 847 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 855 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.issue 30-05-2020
dc.relation.pasarela OCS\11159 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem