Abstract:
|
[EN] What are the risk factors that undermine the conservation of fortified architecture? What are the future
prospects of a heritage that is not always adequately protected and valued? These are the questions
posed by ...[+]
[EN] What are the risk factors that undermine the conservation of fortified architecture? What are the future
prospects of a heritage that is not always adequately protected and valued? These are the questions
posed by castles, towers, fortresses that seem to have lost the meaning of their existence, for having
failed in their original function. Certainly the abandonment involves an inevitable lack of maintenance
with the inevitable decay due to natural causes with slow action and prolonged over time. But even bad
restorations conducted without the necessary historical-critical awareness and the necessary technical
skills can irreversibly cancel documents of art and history, as well as “material testimonies of civilization value”. It is a heritage of multiple criticalities that offers an extraordinary opportunity for contemporary design aiming at conservation. Innumerable problems are posed by fortified architectures, first
and foremost the accessibility, but also their management, which cannot but take into account the very
close typology-function relationship and where, however, the old utilization is no longer possible. Unquestionably the first step is represented by the knowledge of these singular architectures, in the becoming of historical processes, which is an unavoidable moment on which the choices aiming at conservation and valorisation depend. Emblematic from this point of view are some case studies investigated in
Puglia which pose the problem of maximum conservative attention and desirable enhancement, pursued
with the promotion of knowledge and the assurance of the best conditions of use, provided that the new
function is respectful of the identity of the object of study, of its use vocations and attentive to the needs
and expectations of the community.
[-]
|