- -

A proposal for cost-related and market-oriented train running charges

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A proposal for cost-related and market-oriented train running charges

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Calvo;De;De - A ...
Tamaño: 705.3Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: A proposal for ...
Tamaño: 469.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Calvo, F. es_ES
dc.contributor.author De Oña, J. es_ES
dc.contributor.author De Oña, R. es_ES
dc.contributor.author López-Maldonado, Griselda es_ES
dc.contributor.author Garach, L. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-09-18T03:36:43Z
dc.date.available 2020-09-18T03:36:43Z
dc.date.issued 2014-05-19 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0308-1060 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/150369
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper examines some key aspects of a charging system for promoting railway transport, including charges reflecting a clear relationship with costs (transparency) and charges reflecting the quality of the infrastructure manager¿s service. Train running charges recover track-related costs and can help to develop a charging system that meets these requirements. To orient train running charges to the market, a method for processing track maintenance and renewal costs is proposed whereby the quality of the service provided by an infrastructure is measured according to its utility to the railway undertaking. To achieve transparency, a single indicator is used for cost planning and the subsequent levying of costs on railway undertakings. The paper includes an example of how proposed train running charges would be calculated according to data from 14 European countries. The example shows that short-distance trains generate the lowest maintenance and renewal costs, followed by long-distance trains and freight trains. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Fomento [grant number PT-2007-056-05CCPP]. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Transportation Planning and Technology es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Train running charges es_ES
dc.subject Railway charging system es_ES
dc.subject Track costs management es_ES
dc.subject Maintenance and renewal costs es_ES
dc.subject Rail costing es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA E INFRAESTRUCTURA DE LOS TRANSPORTES es_ES
dc.title A proposal for cost-related and market-oriented train running charges es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/03081060.2014.897127 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MFOM//PT-2007-056-05CCPP/ES/TARIFO - Determinación de metodologías de TARificación por uso de Infraestructura Ferroviaria acordes con los Objetivos de política de transportes/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería e Infraestructura de los Transportes - Departament d'Enginyeria i Infraestructura dels Transports es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Calvo, F.; De Oña, J.; De Oña, R.; López-Maldonado, G.; Garach, L. (2014). A proposal for cost-related and market-oriented train running charges. Transportation Planning and Technology. 37(4):354-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2014.897127 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2014.897127 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 354 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 372 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 37 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\350477 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Fomento es_ES
dc.description.references Baumgartner, J. P. 2001. “Prices and Costs in the Railway Sector.” Laboratoire d'Intermodalité des Transports et de Planification. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. Accessed February 4. http://litep.epfl.ch–2014 es_ES
dc.description.references Calvo, F., and J. de Oña. 2012a. “An Approach to Mark-Ups through Capacity Charges.”Proceedings of the ICE – Transport. Accessed February 4. http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/content/article/10.1680/tran.11.00050. es_ES
dc.description.references Calvo, F., & De Oña, J. (2012). Are rail charges connected to costs? Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 28-33. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Calvo, F., de Oña, J., López, G., Garach, L., & de Oña, R. (2013). Rail track costs management for efficient railway charges. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, 166(6), 325-335. doi:10.1680/tran.11.00001 es_ES
dc.description.references Calvo, F., de Oña, J., & Nash, A. (2007). Proposed Infrastructure Pricing Methodology for Mixed-Use Rail Networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1995(1), 9-16. doi:10.3141/1995-02 es_ES
dc.description.references CENIT, TIS PT, IWW, and HERRY. 2007. “RailCalc. Calculation of Charges for the Use of Rail Infrastructure.” Prepared for the European Commission Directorate General for Energy and Transport. Accessed February 4. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/rail/legislation/doc/railcalc_discussion_paper_final.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport). 2005. “Charges for the Use of Infrastructure in ECMT Railways.” Draft final report. ECMT/CS/CF(2005)1/REV1. Accessed February 4. http://lnweb90.worldbank.org/ECA/Transport.nsf/ECADocByUnid/2CF8BE276F63A37D85256FB20043A05D?Opendocument. es_ES
dc.description.references EPFL (Ecole Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne). 2003. “IMPROVERAIL: IMPROVEd Tools for RAILway Capacity and Access Management.” Accessed February 4. http://litep.epfl.ch. es_ES
dc.description.references Network Rail. 2006. “Usage Costs – Assessment Methodology.” Draft for consultation. Accessed February 4. http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%20documents/regulatory%20documents/access%20charges%20reviews/consultations%20on%20future%20charging/variable%20track%20access%20charges/g-%20usage%20costs%20methodology%20sept%2006.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Nyström, B., & Söderholm, P. (2010). Selection of maintenance actions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): decision-making in railway infrastructure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 6(4), 467-479. doi:10.1080/15732470801990209 es_ES
dc.description.references ORR (Office of Rail Regulation). 2005. “Revision of Variable Usage and Electrification Asset Usage Charges: Final Report.” Accessed February 4. http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/bah_variable-usage-initial-report_jan05.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Quinet, E. (2003). Short term adjustments in rail activity: the limited role of infrastructure charges. Transport Policy, 10(1), 73-79. doi:10.1016/s0967-070x(02)00047-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Thomas, J. 2002. “EU Task Force on Rail Infrastructure Charging: Summary Findings on Best Practice in Marginal Cost Pricing.” IMPRINT-EUROPE. Implementing Reform in Transport. Effective Use of Research on Pricing in Europe. A European Commission-funded Thematic Network (2001–2004). Accessed February 4. www.imprint-eu.org/public/Presentations/imprint3_Thomas.ppt. es_ES
dc.description.references UIC (International Union of Railways). 2008. “Lasting Infrastructure Cost Benchmarking (LICB).” Summary Report. Accessed February 4. http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article582. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem