- -

The Logic of Gift: Inspiring behavior in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The Logic of Gift: Inspiring behavior in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Baviera;English;G ...
Tamaño: 442.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: 2016 BEQ - The Logic ...
Tamaño: 180.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Baviera, Tomás es_ES
dc.contributor.author English, William es_ES
dc.contributor.author Guillén-Parra, Manuel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-22T03:33:01Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-22T03:33:01Z
dc.date.issued 2016-04 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1052-150X es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/152823
dc.description.abstract [EN] Giving without the expectation of reward is difficult to understand in organizational contexts. In opposition to a logic based on self-interest or a sense of duty, a "logic of gift" has been proposed as a way to understand the phenomenon of free, unconditional giving. However, the rationale behind, and effects of, this logic have been under-explored. This paper responds by first clarifying the three logics of action¿the logic of exchange, the logic of duty, and the logic of gift¿and then explains how their balanced integration promises to enhance organizational life and outcomes. Having explicated the unique character and contributions of the logic of gift, the paper further suggests practical implications for management. Encouraging the logic of gift fosters more humane relationships within organizations and to enable individuals to be generous in ways that inspire trust and promote creativity. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship We would like to thank the Center for Business Ethics at Bentley University, which supported Tomas Baviera with a research fellowship from October 2012 to March 2013 during which he began working on this manuscript. Prof. Pamela Carpenter was extremely helpful in revising the early drafts of the text, and Prof. Jeffrey Moriarty provided invaluable comments on the final draft. Manuel Guillen is likewise thankful for the support of Bentley University's Center for Business Ethics, which has regularly hosted him as a visiting scholar, and for the support of the Real Colegio Complutense at Harvard University, where he worked on this manuscript as a research fellow in 2013 and 2014. Finally, we would like to thank our three anonymous reviewers whose feedback and insights dramatically improved the text. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Business Ethics Quarterly es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Logic of gift es_ES
dc.subject Logic of duty es_ES
dc.subject Logic of exchange es_ES
dc.subject Benevolence es_ES
dc.subject Gratitude es_ES
dc.subject Unconditionality es_ES
dc.subject.classification COMERCIALIZACION E INVESTIGACION DE MERCADOS es_ES
dc.title The Logic of Gift: Inspiring behavior in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1017/beq.2016.26 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Baviera, T.; English, W.; Guillén-Parra, M. (2016). The Logic of Gift: Inspiring behavior in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly. 26(2):159-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.26 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.26 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 159 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 180 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 26 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\357254 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Bentley University es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Harvard University es_ES
dc.description.references Flynn, F. J. (2003). HOW MUCH SHOULD I GIVE AND HOW OFTEN? THE EFFECTS OF GENEROSITY AND FREQUENCY OF FAVOR EXCHANGE ON SOCIAL STATUS AND PRODUCTIVITY. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 539-553. doi:10.2307/30040648 es_ES
dc.description.references Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. doi:10.1037/h0054346 es_ES
dc.description.references Game, A., & Metcalfe, A. (1970). Presence of the Gift. Cultural Studies Review, 16(1). doi:10.5130/csr.v16i1.1441 es_ES
dc.description.references Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7(special), 24-52. doi:10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24 es_ES
dc.description.references Grant, A., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or Benefactor. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033-1039. doi:10.1177/0956797612439424 es_ES
dc.description.references Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It’s Construct Clean-Up Time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85-97. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2 es_ES
dc.description.references Melé, D. (2003). Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77-88. doi:10.1023/a:1023298710412 es_ES
dc.description.references Frankl, V. E. (1966). Self-Transcendence as a Human Phenomenon. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 6(2), 97-106. doi:10.1177/002216786600600201 es_ES
dc.description.references Inzer, L. D., & Crawford, C. B. (2005). A Review of Formal and Informal Mentoring. Journal of Leadership Education, 4(1), 31-50. doi:10.12806/v4/i1/tf2 es_ES
dc.description.references Maes, H. (2004). Modesty, Asymmetry, and Hypocrisy. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 38(4), 485-497. doi:10.1007/s10790-005-3335-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617 es_ES
dc.description.references Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). MARGINAL MENTORING: THE EFFECTS OF TYPE OF MENTOR, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP, AND PROGRAM DESIGN ON WORK AND CAREER ATTITUDES. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177-1194. doi:10.2307/1556344 es_ES
dc.description.references Faldetta, G. (2011). The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(S1), 67-77. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1188-z es_ES
dc.description.references Bock L . 2015. Can Google’s rules transform your workplace? Knowledge@Wharton . http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/how-googles-rules-can-work-in-your-office/. Accessed 25 September 2015. es_ES
dc.description.references Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G. (2011). ‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 63-75. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0749-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Caligiuri, P., Mencin, A., & Jiang, K. (2013). Win-Win-Win: The Influence of Company-Sponsored Volunteerism Programs on Employees, NGOs, and Business Units. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 825-860. doi:10.1111/peps.12019 es_ES
dc.description.references McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. doi:10.1037/14359-000 es_ES
dc.description.references Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, Careers, and Callings: People’s Relations to Their Work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21-33. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2162 es_ES
dc.description.references Myerson R. B . 2007. Perspectives on mechanism design in economic theory . http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2007/myerson_lecture.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 es_ES
dc.description.references North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. doi:10.1515/9781400829484 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, L., & Higgins, C. (2001). Corporate Volunteering. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2001(4), 79-90. doi:10.9774/gleaf.4700.2001.wi.00008 es_ES
dc.description.references Ames, D. R., Flynn, F. J., & Weber, E. U. (2004). It’s the Thought That Counts: On Perceiving How Helpers Decide to Lend a Hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 461-474. doi:10.1177/0146167203261890 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Ackere, A. (1993). The principal/agent paradigm: Its relevance to various functional fields. European Journal of Operational Research, 70(1), 83-103. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90234-e es_ES
dc.description.references Pirson, M. A., & Lawrence, P. R. (2009). Humanism in Business – Towards a Paradigm Shift? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 553-565. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0239-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Montes, L. (2003). Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(1), 63-90. doi:10.1080/1042771032000058325 es_ES
dc.description.references Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161. doi:10.2307/2092623 es_ES
dc.description.references Godbout, J. T. (1998). The moral of the gift. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(4), 557-570. doi:10.1016/s1053-5357(98)80007-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Grant, A. M. (2012). Giving Time, Time After Time: Work Design and Sustained Employee Participation in Corporate Volunteering. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 589-615. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0280 es_ES
dc.description.references Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122-141. doi:10.1037/a0013079 es_ES
dc.description.references Wright, R. F. (2000). Strategies for avoiding the micro management trap. Management Decision, 38(5), 362-364. doi:10.1108/00251740010340544 es_ES
dc.description.references Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2006). Worker Motivations, Job Satisfaction, and Loyalty in Public and Nonprofit Social Services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 225-248. doi:10.1177/0899764006287207 es_ES
dc.description.references Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75-91. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.16132558 es_ES
dc.description.references Solomon, R. C. (1998). The Moral Psychology of Business: Care and Compassion in the Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 515-533. doi:10.2307/3857435 es_ES
dc.description.references Guillén, M., Ferrero, I., & Hoffman, W. M. (2014). The Neglected Ethical and Spiritual Motivations in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 803-816. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1985-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Adloff, F., & Mau, S. (2006). Giving Social Ties, Reciprocity in Modern Society. European Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 93-123. doi:10.1017/s000397560600004x es_ES
dc.description.references Marion, J.-L., & Kosky, J. L. (2002). Being Given. doi:10.1515/9780804785723 es_ES
dc.description.references Grant, A. M., Dutton, J. E., & Rosso, B. D. (2008). Giving Commitment: Employee Support Programs and The Prosocial Sensemaking Process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 898-918. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.34789652 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem