Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Visbal-Cadavid, Delimiro | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Martínez-Gómez, Mónica | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Guijarro, Francisco | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-23T03:31:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-23T03:31:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-08-11 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/153048 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] This paper presents the results of an efficiency study of Colombian public universities in 2012, conducted using the methodology of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the models CCR, BCC and SBM under output orientation. The main objective is to determine technical, pure technical, scale and mix efficiencies using data acquired from the Ministry of National Education. An analysis of the results shows the extent to which outputs of inefficient Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) could be improved and the possible cause of this inefficiency. The universities were also ranked using a Pareto efficient cross-efficiency model and a study was made of changes to overall productivity between 2011 and 2012. The results showed Tolima, Caldas and UNAD to be the best-performing universities, with Universidad del Pacífico as the worst performer. Malmquist index was applied to analyze the change in productivity from 2011 to 2012. The Universidad de La Guajira showed great improvement in technical efficiency between 2011 and 2012. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Monica Martinez-Gomez has been funded by the research project GVA/20161004: Project of Conselleria d'Educacio, Investigacio, Cultura i Esport de la Generalitat Valenciana, through the project "Validacion de la competencia transversal de innovacion mediante un modelo de Medida formativo" | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sustainability | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Higher education | es_ES |
dc.subject | Data envelopment analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Efficiency | es_ES |
dc.subject | Cross-efficiency | es_ES |
dc.subject | Malmquist index | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDAD | es_ES |
dc.title | Assessing the Efficiency of Public Universities through DEA. A Case Study | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/su9081416 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV%2F2016%2F004/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Visbal-Cadavid, D.; Martínez-Gómez, M.; Guijarro, F. (2017). Assessing the Efficiency of Public Universities through DEA. A Case Study. Sustainability. 9(8):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081416 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081416 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 19 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 9 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 8 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2071-1050 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\341852 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Generalitat Valenciana | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2013). Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12), 1810-1830. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.2 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mayston, D. J. (2017). Convexity, quality and efficiency in education. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 446-455. doi:10.1057/jors.2015.91 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Palomares-Montero, D., García-Aracil, A., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2008). Assessment of Higher Education Institutions: A Bibliographic Review of Indicatorsâ Systems. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 31(2). doi:10.3989/redc.2008.v31.i2.425 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Witte, K. D., & López-Torres, L. (2017). Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 339-363. doi:10.1057/jors.2015.92 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2016). Measuring Efficiency in Higher Education: An Empirical Study Using a Bootstrapped Data Envelopment Analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 22(1), 11-33. doi:10.1007/s11294-015-9558-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Agasisti, T., & Bianco, A. D. (2009). Measuring efficiency of Higher Education institutions. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 10(5/6), 443. doi:10.1504/ijmdm.2009.026687 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Agasisti, T., Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2016). Evaluating the efficiency of Italian public universities (2008–2011) in presence of (unobserved) heterogeneity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 55, 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2016.06.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Da Silva e Souza, G., & Gomes, E. G. (2015). Management of agricultural research centers in Brazil: A DEA application using a dynamic GMM approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 819-824. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.027 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gökşen, Y., Doğan, O., & Özkarabacak, B. (2015). A Data Envelopment Analysis Application for Measuring Efficiency of University Departments. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 226-237. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00024-6 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Katharaki, M., & Katharakis, G. (2010). A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4-5), 115-128. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.11.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Podinovski, V. V., & Wan Husain, W. R. (2015). The hybrid returns-to-scale model and its extension by production trade-offs: an application to the efficiency assessment of public universities in Malaysia. Annals of Operations Research, 250(1), 65-84. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1854-0 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: a DEA analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1282-1297. doi:10.1057/jors.2010.68 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., & Zhu, Q. (2016). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 571-579. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.042 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kwon, H.-B., & Lee, J. (2015). Two-stage production modeling of large U.S. banks: A DEA-neural network approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(19), 6758-6766. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.062 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tao, L., Liu, X., & Chen, Y. (2012). Online banking performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis and axiomatic fuzzy set clustering. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 1259-1273. doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9767-3 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tsolas, I. E., & Charles, V. (2015). Incorporating risk into bank efficiency: A satisficing DEA approach to assess the Greek banking crisis. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(7), 3491-3500. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.033 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wanke, P., & Barros, C. (2014). Two-stage DEA: An application to major Brazilian banks. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(5), 2337-2344. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.031 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Aristovnik, A., Seljak, J., & Mencinger, J. (2014). Performance measurement of police forces at the local level: A non-parametric mathematical programming approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1647-1653. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.061 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fang, L., & Li, H. (2015). Centralized resource allocation based on the cost–revenue analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85, 395-401. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.018 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Du, J., Cook, W. D., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2014). Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 206-214. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lozano, S. (2015). A joint-inputs Network DEA approach to production and pollution-generating technologies. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7960-7968. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.023 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Woo, C., Chung, Y., Chun, D., Seo, H., & Hong, S. (2015). The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: A Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 367-376. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.070 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Azadeh, A., Motevali Haghighi, S., Zarrin, M., & Khaefi, S. (2015). Performance evaluation of Iranian electricity distribution units by using stochastic data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 73, 919-931. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.06.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Omrani, H., Gharizadeh Beiragh, R., & Shafiei Kaleibari, S. (2015). Performance assessment of Iranian electricity distribution companies by an integrated cooperative game data envelopment analysis principal component analysis approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64, 617-625. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.045 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Escorcia Caballero, R., Visbal Cadavid, D., & Agudelo Toloza, J. M. (2015). Eficiencia en las instituciones educativas públicas de la ciudad de Santa Marta (Colombia) mediante "Análisis Envolvente de Datos. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 23(4), 579-593. doi:10.4067/s0718-33052015000400009 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K., & Taylor, L. L. (2014). Applied efficiency analysis in education. Economics and Business Letters, 3(1), 19. doi:10.17811/ebl.3.1.2014.19-26 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huguenin, J.-M. (2015). Determinants of school efficiency. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(5), 539-562. doi:10.1108/ijem-12-2013-0183 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Avilés Sacoto, S., Güemes Castorena, D., Cook, W. D., & Cantú Delgado, H. (2015). Time-staged outputs in DEA. Omega, 55, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.019 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | De Witte, K., & Rogge, N. (2011). Accounting for exogenous influences in performance evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 641-653. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.02.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00407-5 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253. doi:10.2307/2343100 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Scheel, H., & Scholtes, S. (2003). Continuity of DEA Efficiency Measures. Operations Research, 51(1), 149-159. doi:10.1287/opre.51.1.149.12803 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264. doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fang, H.-H., Lee, H.-S., Hwang, S.-N., & Chung, C.-C. (2013). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: An alternative approach. Omega, 41(4), 731-734. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2012.10.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567-578. doi:10.1057/jors.1994.84 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(32), 73-105. doi:10.1002/ev.1441 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yang, G., Yang, J., Liu, W., & Li, X. (2013). Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2), 393-404. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.017 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zerafat Angiz, M., Mustafa, A., & Kamali, M. J. (2013). Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1-2), 398-405. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.038 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Banker, R. D., & Chang, H. (2006). The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 1311-1320. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.028 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Thanassoulis, E., Shiraz, R. K., & Maniadakis, N. (2015). A cost Malmquist productivity index capturing group performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 796-805. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wijesiri, M., & Meoli, M. (2015). Productivity change of microfinance institutions in Kenya: A bootstrap Malmquist approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 25, 115-121. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.04.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Eskelinen, J. (2017). Comparison of variable selection techniques for data envelopment analysis in a retail bank. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 778-788. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.009 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jenkins, L., & Anderson, M. (2003). A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 51-61. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00243-6 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Land, K. C., Knox Lovell, C. A., & Thore, S. (1994). Productive efficiency under capitalism and state socialism: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46(2), 139-152. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(94)90022-1 | es_ES |