- -

Influence in the political Twitter sphere: Authority and retransmission in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Influence in the political Twitter sphere: Authority and retransmission in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections

Show full item record

Baviera, T. (2018). Influence in the political Twitter sphere: Authority and retransmission in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections. European Journal of Communication. 33(3):321-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118763910

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/153465

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Influence in the political Twitter sphere: Authority and retransmission in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections
Author: Baviera, Tomás
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] Candidates, parties, media and citizens have the same ability to post tweets. For this reason, mapping the dynamics of interaction among users is essential to evaluate the processes of influence in an electoral campaign. ...[+]
Subjects: 2015 Spanish General Election , 2016 Spanish General Election , Influence , Political communication , Social network analysis , Twitter
Copyrigths: Reserva de todos los derechos
Source:
European Journal of Communication. (issn: 0267-3231 )
DOI: 10.1177/0267323118763910
Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118763910
Project ID:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2013-43960-R/ES/LOS FLUJOS DE COMUNICACION EN LOS PROCESOS DE MOVILIZACION POLITICA: MEDIOS, BLOGS Y LIDERES DE OPINION/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2016-77331-C2-1-R/ES/ESTRATEGIAS, AGENDAS Y DISCURSOS EN LAS CIBERCAMPAÑAS ELECTORALES: MEDIOS DE COMUNICACION Y CIUDADANOS/
Thanks:
This study would have been impossible if not for the assistance of Emilio Giner, who helped the author in the Twitter mining process. This work was supported by the Spanish Government's Ministry for the Economy and ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting From Left to Right. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620

Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008

Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113-120. doi:10.1080/0022250x.1972.9989806 [+]
Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting From Left to Right. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620

Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008

Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113-120. doi:10.1080/0022250x.1972.9989806

Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378-397. doi:10.1177/1940161216645340

Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001

Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317-332. doi:10.1111/jcom.12084

Congosto, M. L. (2015). European Elections 2014: Virality of messages on Twitter. Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 26(1), 23. doi:10.5565/rev/redes.529

Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363-380. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12124

Dang-Xuan, L., Stieglitz, S., Wladarsch, J., & Neuberger, C. (2013). AN INVESTIGATION OF INFLUENTIALS AND THE ROLE OF SENTIMENT IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ON TWITTER DURING ELECTION PERIODS. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 795-825. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.783608

Drezner, D. W., & Farrell, H. (2004). Web of Influence. Foreign Policy, (145), 32. doi:10.2307/4152942

Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The Multiple Facets of Influence. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260-1277. doi:10.1177/0002764214527088

Freelon, D., & Karpf, D. (2014). Of big birds and bayonets: hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 390-406. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.952659

Freeman, L. C. (1977). A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35. doi:10.2307/3033543

Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2015). The Power of Message Networks: A Big-Data Analysis of the Network Agenda Setting Model and Issue Ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557-576. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300

Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1197-1216. doi:10.2307/1962585

Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1991). Discussant Effects on Vote Choice: Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence. The Journal of Politics, 53(1), 122-158. doi:10.2307/2131724

Jungherr, A. (2014). The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239-259. doi:10.1111/jcom.12087

Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131-139. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025

López García, G., Gamir Ríos, J. V., García Ull, F. J., Llorca Abad, G., Cano Orón, L., & González Esteban, J. L. (2015). El debate sobre Europa en Twitter. Discursos y estrategias de los candidatos de las elecciones al Parlamento Europeo de 2014 en España. Revista de Estudios Políticos, (170), 213-246. doi:10.18042/cepc/rep.170.07

Newman, M. (2010). Networks. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001

Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1641-1648. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044

Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and Online Social Networking as Campaign Tools in the 2010 General Elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 399-419. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12023

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442. doi:10.1038/30918

Weimann, G., Tustin, D. H., van Vuuren, D., & Joubert, J. P. R. (2007). Looking for Opinion Leaders: Traditional vs. Modern Measures in Traditional Societies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(2), 173-190. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm005

Xu, W. W., Sang, Y., Blasiola, S., & Park, H. W. (2014). Predicting Opinion Leaders in Twitter Activism Networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1278-1293. doi:10.1177/0002764214527091

Zarzalejos, J. (2016). Populism in Spain: An Analysis of Podemos. European View, 15(2), 183-191. doi:10.1007/s12290-016-0408-4

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record