Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Baviera, Tomás | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-29T04:32:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-29T04:32:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06-01 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0267-3231 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/153465 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Candidates, parties, media and citizens have the same ability to post tweets. For this reason, mapping the dynamics of interaction among users is essential to evaluate the processes of influence in an electoral campaign. However, characterising these aspects requires methodologies that consider the interconnections generated by users globally. The discipline of social network analysis provides the concepts of centrality and modularity, both very suitable for the context of network communication. This article analyses the political conversation on Twitter during the 2015 and 2016 General Elections in Spain, in which four candidates with significant popularity in the electorate participated. Two corpora of 8.9¿million and 9.7¿million tweets were collected from each campaign, respectively, to analyse the networks of mentions and retweets. The network of mentions appears more blurred than that of retweets, allowing us to better estimate users¿ partisan preference. The graphs of the network of retweets show a strong internal activity within clusters, and the proximity between them reflects the ideological axis of each party. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study would have been impossible if not for the assistance of Emilio Giner, who helped the author in the Twitter mining process. This work was supported by the Spanish Government's Ministry for the Economy and Competitiveness, with Grants CSO2013-43960-R ('Communication flows in the political mobilisation processes: media, blogs, and opinion leaders') and CSO2016-77331-C2-1-R ('Strategies, agendas and discourse in electoral cyber campaigns: media and citizens'). | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Communication | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | 2015 Spanish General Election | es_ES |
dc.subject | 2016 Spanish General Election | es_ES |
dc.subject | Influence | es_ES |
dc.subject | Political communication | es_ES |
dc.subject | Social network analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | es_ES | |
dc.subject.classification | COMERCIALIZACION E INVESTIGACION DE MERCADOS | es_ES |
dc.title | Influence in the political Twitter sphere: Authority and retransmission in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0267323118763910 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2013-43960-R/ES/LOS FLUJOS DE COMUNICACION EN LOS PROCESOS DE MOVILIZACION POLITICA: MEDIOS, BLOGS Y LIDERES DE OPINION/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2016-77331-C2-1-R/ES/ESTRATEGIAS, AGENDAS Y DISCURSOS EN LAS CIBERCAMPAÑAS ELECTORALES: MEDIOS DE COMUNICACION Y CIUDADANOS/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Baviera, T. (2018). Influence in the political Twitter sphere: Authority and retransmission in the 2015 and 2016 Spanish General Elections. European Journal of Communication. 33(3):321-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118763910 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118763910 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 321 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 337 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 33 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 3 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\357250 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting From Left to Right. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113-120. doi:10.1080/0022250x.1972.9989806 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378-397. doi:10.1177/1940161216645340 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317-332. doi:10.1111/jcom.12084 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Congosto, M. L. (2015). European Elections 2014: Virality of messages on Twitter. Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 26(1), 23. doi:10.5565/rev/redes.529 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363-380. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12124 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dang-Xuan, L., Stieglitz, S., Wladarsch, J., & Neuberger, C. (2013). AN INVESTIGATION OF INFLUENTIALS AND THE ROLE OF SENTIMENT IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ON TWITTER DURING ELECTION PERIODS. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 795-825. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.783608 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Drezner, D. W., & Farrell, H. (2004). Web of Influence. Foreign Policy, (145), 32. doi:10.2307/4152942 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The Multiple Facets of Influence. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260-1277. doi:10.1177/0002764214527088 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Freelon, D., & Karpf, D. (2014). Of big birds and bayonets: hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 390-406. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.952659 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Freeman, L. C. (1977). A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35. doi:10.2307/3033543 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2015). The Power of Message Networks: A Big-Data Analysis of the Network Agenda Setting Model and Issue Ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557-576. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1197-1216. doi:10.2307/1962585 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1991). Discussant Effects on Vote Choice: Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence. The Journal of Politics, 53(1), 122-158. doi:10.2307/2131724 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jungherr, A. (2014). The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239-259. doi:10.1111/jcom.12087 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131-139. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | López García, G., Gamir Ríos, J. V., García Ull, F. J., Llorca Abad, G., Cano Orón, L., & González Esteban, J. L. (2015). El debate sobre Europa en Twitter. Discursos y estrategias de los candidatos de las elecciones al Parlamento Europeo de 2014 en España. Revista de Estudios Políticos, (170), 213-246. doi:10.18042/cepc/rep.170.07 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Newman, M. (2010). Networks. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1641-1648. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and Online Social Networking as Campaign Tools in the 2010 General Elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 399-419. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12023 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442. doi:10.1038/30918 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Weimann, G., Tustin, D. H., van Vuuren, D., & Joubert, J. P. R. (2007). Looking for Opinion Leaders: Traditional vs. Modern Measures in Traditional Societies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(2), 173-190. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm005 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Xu, W. W., Sang, Y., Blasiola, S., & Park, H. W. (2014). Predicting Opinion Leaders in Twitter Activism Networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1278-1293. doi:10.1177/0002764214527091 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zarzalejos, J. (2016). Populism in Spain: An Analysis of Podemos. European View, 15(2), 183-191. doi:10.1007/s12290-016-0408-4 | es_ES |