- -

Inter-field nonlinear transformation of journal impact indicators: The case of the h-index

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Inter-field nonlinear transformation of journal impact indicators: The case of the h-index

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Ferrer Sapena, Antonia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Sánchez Pérez, Enrique Alfonso es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-12T21:02:41Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-12T21:02:41Z
dc.date.issued 2019 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0972-0502 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/158841
dc.description.abstract [EN] Impact indices used for joint evaluation of research items coming from different scientific fields must be comparable. Often a linear transformation -a normalization or another basic operation-is considered to be enough for providing the correct translation to a unified setting in which all the fields are adequately treated. In this paper it is shown that this is not always true. The attention is centered in the case of the h-index. It is proved that it that cannot be translated by means of direct normalization preserving its genuine meaning. According to the universality of citation distribution, it is shown that a slight variant of the h-index is necessary for this notion to produce comparable values when applied to different scientific fields. A complete example concerning a group of top scientists is shown. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The first author was supported by Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad under Research Grant CSO2015-65594-C2-1R Y 2R (MINECO/FEDER, UE). The second author was suported by Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad and FEDER under Research Grant MTM2016-77054-C2-1-P es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject H-index es_ES
dc.subject Mathematical transform es_ES
dc.subject Research evaluation es_ES
dc.subject Inter-field es_ES
dc.subject Non-linear map es_ES
dc.subject.classification BIBLIOTECONOMIA Y DOCUMENTACION es_ES
dc.subject.classification MATEMATICA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Inter-field nonlinear transformation of journal impact indicators: The case of the h-index es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/09720502.2019.1616913 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//MTM2016-77054-C2-1-P/ES/ANALISIS NO LINEAL, INTEGRACION VECTORIAL Y APLICACIONES EN CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2015-65594-C2-2-R/ES/ODELOS PARA PUBLICAR, CONSUMIR Y MEDIR LA REUTILIZACION DE LOS DATOS DERIVADOS DE LA INVESTIGACION: MAS ALLA DE LAS FRONTERAS INSTITUCIONALES Y GEOGRAFICAS/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2015-65594-C2-1-R/ES/MODELOS PARA PUBLICAR, CONSUMIR Y MEDIR LA REUTILIZACION DE LOS DATOS DERIVADOS DE LA INVESTIGACION: MAS ALLA DE LAS FRONTERAS INSTITUCIONALES Y GEOGRAFICAS/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Matemática Aplicada - Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Comunicación Audiovisual, Documentación e Historia del Arte - Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual, Documentació i Història de l'Art es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Ferrer Sapena, A.; Sánchez Pérez, EA. (2019). Inter-field nonlinear transformation of journal impact indicators: The case of the h-index. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics. 22(2):177-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2019.1616913 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2019.1616913 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 177 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 199 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 22 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\406158 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Geuna, A., & Piolatto, M. (2016). Research assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while). Research Policy, 45(1), 260-271. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 es_ES
dc.description.references Egghe, L. (2010). The Hirsch index and related impact measures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 65-114. doi:10.1002/aris.2010.1440440109 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research assessment purposes. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 157-160. doi:10.3152/095820208x319175 es_ES
dc.description.references Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273-289. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Imperial, J., & Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2007). Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics, 71(2), 271-282. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1665-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Aoun, S. G., Bendok, B. R., Rahme, R. J., Dacey, R. G., & Batjer, H. H. (2013). Standardizing the Evaluation of Scientific and Academic Performance in Neurosurgery—Critical Review of the «h» Index and its Variants. World Neurosurgery, 80(5), e85-e90. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.01.052 es_ES
dc.description.references Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2011). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406-415. doi:10.1002/asi.21678 es_ES
dc.description.references Rousseau, R., García-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2013). The h-bubble. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 294-300. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Burrell, Q. L. (2013). The h-index: A case of the tail wagging the dog? Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 774-783. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.06.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Schreiber, M. (2013). How relevant is the predictive power of the h-index? A case study of the time-dependent Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 325-329. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Khan, N. R., Thompson, C. J., Taylor, D. R., Gabrick, K. S., Choudhri, A. F., Boop, F. R., & Klimo, P. (2013). Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor. World Neurosurgery, 80(6), 766-774. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Schreiber, M. (2013). A case study of the arbitrariness of the h-index and the highly-cited-publications indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 379-387. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. doi:10.1038/520429a es_ES
dc.description.references Dienes, K. R. (2015). Completing h. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 385-397. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Ayaz, S., & Afzal, M. T. (2016). Identification of conversion factor for completing-h index for the field of mathematics. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1511-1524. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2122-z es_ES
dc.description.references Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 263-271. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2008). An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 770-780. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Iglesias, J. E., & Pecharromán, C. (2007). Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73(3), 303-320. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1805-x es_ES
dc.description.references Egghe, L. (2008). Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 136-148. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.12.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Schreiber, M. (2015). Restricting the h-index to a publication and citation time window: A case study of a timed Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 150-155. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.005 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem