Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Ferrer Sapena, Antonia | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez Pérez, Enrique Alfonso | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-12T21:02:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-12T21:02:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0972-0502 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/158841 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Impact indices used for joint evaluation of research items coming from different scientific fields must be comparable. Often a linear transformation -a normalization or another basic operation-is considered to be enough for providing the correct translation to a unified setting in which all the fields are adequately treated. In this paper it is shown that this is not always true. The attention is centered in the case of the h-index. It is proved that it that cannot be translated by means of direct normalization preserving its genuine meaning. According to the universality of citation distribution, it is shown that a slight variant of the h-index is necessary for this notion to produce comparable values when applied to different scientific fields. A complete example concerning a group of top scientists is shown. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The first author was supported by Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad under Research Grant CSO2015-65594-C2-1R Y 2R (MINECO/FEDER, UE). The second author was suported by Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad and FEDER under Research Grant MTM2016-77054-C2-1-P | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | H-index | es_ES |
dc.subject | Mathematical transform | es_ES |
dc.subject | Research evaluation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Inter-field | es_ES |
dc.subject | Non-linear map | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | BIBLIOTECONOMIA Y DOCUMENTACION | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | MATEMATICA APLICADA | es_ES |
dc.title | Inter-field nonlinear transformation of journal impact indicators: The case of the h-index | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09720502.2019.1616913 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//MTM2016-77054-C2-1-P/ES/ANALISIS NO LINEAL, INTEGRACION VECTORIAL Y APLICACIONES EN CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2015-65594-C2-2-R/ES/ODELOS PARA PUBLICAR, CONSUMIR Y MEDIR LA REUTILIZACION DE LOS DATOS DERIVADOS DE LA INVESTIGACION: MAS ALLA DE LAS FRONTERAS INSTITUCIONALES Y GEOGRAFICAS/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CSO2015-65594-C2-1-R/ES/MODELOS PARA PUBLICAR, CONSUMIR Y MEDIR LA REUTILIZACION DE LOS DATOS DERIVADOS DE LA INVESTIGACION: MAS ALLA DE LAS FRONTERAS INSTITUCIONALES Y GEOGRAFICAS/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Matemática Aplicada - Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Comunicación Audiovisual, Documentación e Historia del Arte - Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual, Documentació i Història de l'Art | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Ferrer Sapena, A.; Sánchez Pérez, EA. (2019). Inter-field nonlinear transformation of journal impact indicators: The case of the h-index. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics. 22(2):177-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2019.1616913 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2019.1616913 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 177 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 199 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 22 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 2 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\406158 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | European Regional Development Fund | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geuna, A., & Piolatto, M. (2016). Research assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while). Research Policy, 45(1), 260-271. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Egghe, L. (2010). The Hirsch index and related impact measures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 65-114. doi:10.1002/aris.2010.1440440109 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research assessment purposes. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 157-160. doi:10.3152/095820208x319175 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273-289. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Imperial, J., & Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2007). Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics, 71(2), 271-282. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1665-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Aoun, S. G., Bendok, B. R., Rahme, R. J., Dacey, R. G., & Batjer, H. H. (2013). Standardizing the Evaluation of Scientific and Academic Performance in Neurosurgery—Critical Review of the «h» Index and its Variants. World Neurosurgery, 80(5), e85-e90. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.01.052 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2011). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406-415. doi:10.1002/asi.21678 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rousseau, R., García-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2013). The h-bubble. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 294-300. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.012 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Burrell, Q. L. (2013). The h-index: A case of the tail wagging the dog? Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 774-783. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.06.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schreiber, M. (2013). How relevant is the predictive power of the h-index? A case study of the time-dependent Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 325-329. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Khan, N. R., Thompson, C. J., Taylor, D. R., Gabrick, K. S., Choudhri, A. F., Boop, F. R., & Klimo, P. (2013). Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor. World Neurosurgery, 80(6), 766-774. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.011 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schreiber, M. (2013). A case study of the arbitrariness of the h-index and the highly-cited-publications indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 379-387. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. doi:10.1038/520429a | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dienes, K. R. (2015). Completing h. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 385-397. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ayaz, S., & Afzal, M. T. (2016). Identification of conversion factor for completing-h index for the field of mathematics. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1511-1524. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2122-z | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 263-271. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2008). An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 770-780. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Iglesias, J. E., & Pecharromán, C. (2007). Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73(3), 303-320. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1805-x | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Egghe, L. (2008). Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 136-148. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.12.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schreiber, M. (2015). Restricting the h-index to a publication and citation time window: A case study of a timed Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 150-155. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.005 | es_ES |