- -

Influence of the balanced scorecard on the science and innovation performance of Latin American universities

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Influence of the balanced scorecard on the science and innovation performance of Latin American universities

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Peris-Ortiz;Garcí ...
Tamaño: 656.5Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Influence of the ...
Tamaño: 1.208Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Peris-Ortiz, Marta es_ES
dc.contributor.author García-Hurtado, Dayanis es_ES
dc.contributor.author Devece Carañana, Carlos Alberto es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-30T04:31:34Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-30T04:31:34Z
dc.date.issued 2019-10-02 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1477-8238 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/160300
dc.description This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Knowledge Management Research & Practice on 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14778238.2019.1569488 es_ES
dc.description.abstract [EN] Pressure on the education system to meet society's needs has led some universities to adopt organisational performance measurement systems as strategic control tools. One of the most commonly used systems in business is the balanced scorecard (BSC). For Latin American universities, the urgent task of increasing the quantity and quality of research and innovation has led these universities to update their essential processes. A suitable control system is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of these new policies. Based on strategic management theory, this study focuses on the implementation of a BSC method in Latin American public universities. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of BSC implementation on universities? research and innovation performance. The results reveal similar patterns of indicators to measure performance in public universities. Furthermore, these indicators develop favourably following implementation of the BSC. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Knowledge Management Research & Practice es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Management indicators es_ES
dc.subject Balanced scorecard es_ES
dc.subject Higher education es_ES
dc.subject Research es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Latin America es_ES
dc.subject Public universities es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Influence of the balanced scorecard on the science and innovation performance of Latin American universities es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/14778238.2019.1569488 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Peris-Ortiz, M.; García-Hurtado, D.; Devece Carañana, CA. (2019). Influence of the balanced scorecard on the science and innovation performance of Latin American universities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 17(4):373-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1569488 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1569488 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 373 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 383 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 17 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\380538 es_ES
dc.description.references Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2012). Design issues in Balanced Scorecards: The «what» and «how» of control. European Management Journal, 30(4), 327-339. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2012.02.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Al-Ashaab, A., Flores, M., Doultsinou, A., & Magyar, A. (2011). A balanced scorecard for measuring the impact of industry–university collaboration. Production Planning & Control, 22(5-6), 554-570. doi:10.1080/09537287.2010.536626 es_ES
dc.description.references Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance management systems: A conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 283-295. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, S., Yang, C., & Shiau, J. (2006). The application of balanced scorecard in the performance evaluation of higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18(2), 190-205. doi:10.1108/09544780610647892 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Franceschini, F., & Turina, E. (2011). Quality improvement and redesign of performance measurement systems: an application to the academic field. Quality & Quantity, 47(1), 465-483. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9530-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465-1474. doi:10.1002/smj.722 es_ES
dc.description.references Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Randall, T. (2003). Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7-8), 715-741. doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(03)00033-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147-160. doi:10.2308/acch.2001.15.2.147 es_ES
dc.description.references Khalid, S., Knouzi, N., Tanane, O., & Talbi, M. (2014). Balanced Scoreboard, the Performance Tool in Higher Education: Establishment of Performance Indicators. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4552-4558. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.984 es_ES
dc.description.references Kraus, K., & Lind, J. (2010). The impact of the corporate balanced scorecard on corporate control—A research note. Management Accounting Research, 21(4), 265-277. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2010.08.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207-232. doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(95)00040-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Lawrence, S., & Sharma, U. (2002). Commodification of Education and Academic LABOUR—Using the Balanced Scorecard in a University Setting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5-6), 661-677. doi:10.1006/cpac.2002.0562 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, B., Collier, P. M., & Cullen, J. (2007). Reflections on the use of case studies in the accounting, management and organizational disciplines. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 2(3), 169-178. doi:10.1108/17465640710835337 es_ES
dc.description.references Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116. doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 es_ES
dc.description.references Philbin, S. (2008). Process model for university‐industry research collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 488-521. doi:10.1108/14601060810911138 es_ES
dc.description.references Pritchard, R. D., Roth, P. L., Jones, S. D., & Roth, P. G. (1990). Implementing feedback systems to enhance productivity: A practical guide. National Productivity Review, 10(1), 57-67. doi:10.1002/npr.4040100107 es_ES
dc.description.references Ridwan, R., Harun, H., An, Y., & Fahmid, I. M. (2013). The Impact of the Balanced Scorecard on Corporate Performance: The Case of an Australian Public Sector Enterprise. International Business Research, 6(10). doi:10.5539/ibr.v6n10p103 es_ES
dc.description.references Sayed, N. (2013). Ratify, reject or revise: balanced scorecard and universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(3), 203-220. doi:10.1108/09513541311306440 es_ES
dc.description.references Spender, J.-C. (2014). Business Strategy. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686544.001.0001 es_ES
dc.description.references Tangen, S. (2005). Analysing the requirements of performance measurement systems. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(4), 46-54. doi:10.1108/13683040510634835 es_ES
dc.description.references Villarreal Larrinaga, O., & Landeta Rodríguez, J. (2010). EL ESTUDIO DE CASOS COMO METODOLOGÍA DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA EN DIRECCIÓN Y ECONOMÍA DE LA EMPRESA. UNA APLICACIÓN A LA INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16(3), 31-52. doi:10.1016/s1135-2523(12)60033-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Wiersma, E. (2009). For which purposes do managers use Balanced Scorecards? Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 239-251. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2009.06.001 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem