- -

Propagators for Quantum-Classical Models: Commutator-Free Magnus Methods

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Propagators for Quantum-Classical Models: Commutator-Free Magnus Methods

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Gómez Pueyo, A.; Blanes Zamora, S.; Castro, A. (2020). Propagators for Quantum-Classical Models: Commutator-Free Magnus Methods. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 16(3):1420-1430. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01031

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/163475

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Propagators for Quantum-Classical Models: Commutator-Free Magnus Methods
Autor: Gómez Pueyo, Adrián Blanes Zamora, Sergio Castro, Alberto
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Matemática Aplicada - Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] We consider the numerical propagation of models that combine both quantum and classical degrees of freedom, usually, electrons and nuclei, respectively. We focus, in our computational examples, on the case in which ...[+]
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. (issn: 1549-9618 )
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01031
Editorial:
American Chemical Society
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01031
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//MTM2016-77660-P/ES/NUEVOS RETOS EN INTEGRACION NUMERICA: FUNDAMENTOS ALGEBRAICOS, METODOS DE ESCISION, METODOS DE MONTECARLO Y OTRAS APLICACIONES/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UKRI//EP%2FR014604%2F1/GB/Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/FIS2017-82426-P/ES/OPTIMIZACION Y MODELOS MICROSCOPICOS DESDE PRIMEROS PRINCIPIOS/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU//PRX19%2F00295/
Agradecimientos:
A.C. acknowledges support from the MINECO FIS2017-82426-P grant. S.B. acknowledges the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences for support and hospitality during the program "Geometry, compatibility and structure ...[+]
Tipo: Artículo

References

Molner, S. P. (1999). The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation (Rapaport, D. C.). Journal of Chemical Education, 76(2), 171. doi:10.1021/ed076p171

Fermi, E.; Pasta, J.; Ulam, S. Studies of Nonlinear Problems I, Los Alamos Report LA 1940; Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1955; reproduced in Nonlinear Wave Motion. Providence, RI, 1974.

Alder, B. J., & Wainwright, T. E. (1959). Studies in Molecular Dynamics. I. General Method. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 31(2), 459-466. doi:10.1063/1.1730376 [+]
Molner, S. P. (1999). The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation (Rapaport, D. C.). Journal of Chemical Education, 76(2), 171. doi:10.1021/ed076p171

Fermi, E.; Pasta, J.; Ulam, S. Studies of Nonlinear Problems I, Los Alamos Report LA 1940; Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1955; reproduced in Nonlinear Wave Motion. Providence, RI, 1974.

Alder, B. J., & Wainwright, T. E. (1959). Studies in Molecular Dynamics. I. General Method. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 31(2), 459-466. doi:10.1063/1.1730376

Bornemann, F. A., Nettesheim, P., & Schütte, C. (1996). Quantum‐classical molecular dynamics as an approximation to full quantum dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 105(3), 1074-1083. doi:10.1063/1.471952

DOLTSINIS, N. L., & MARX, D. (2002). FIRST PRINCIPLES MOLECULAR DYNAMICS INVOLVING EXCITED STATES AND NONADIABATIC TRANSITIONS. Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, 01(02), 319-349. doi:10.1142/s0219633602000257

Runge, E., & Gross, E. K. U. (1984). Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems. Physical Review Letters, 52(12), 997-1000. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.997

Marques, M. A. L., Maitra, N. T., Nogueira, F. M. S., Gross, E. K. U., & Rubio, A. (Eds.). (2012). Fundamentals of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23518-4

Verlet, L. (1967). Computer «Experiments» on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules. Physical Review, 159(1), 98-103. doi:10.1103/physrev.159.98

Hairer, E., & Wanner, G. (1996). Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05221-7

Castro, A., Marques, M. A. L., & Rubio, A. (2004). Propagators for the time-dependent Kohn–Sham equations. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 121(8), 3425-3433. doi:10.1063/1.1774980

Schleife, A., Draeger, E. W., Kanai, Y., & Correa, A. A. (2012). Plane-wave pseudopotential implementation of explicit integrators for time-dependent Kohn-Sham equations in large-scale simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 137(22), 22A546. doi:10.1063/1.4758792

Russakoff, A., Li, Y., He, S., & Varga, K. (2016). Accuracy and computational efficiency of real-time subspace propagation schemes for the time-dependent density functional theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 144(20), 204125. doi:10.1063/1.4952646

Kidd, D., Covington, C., & Varga, K. (2017). Exponential integrators in time-dependent density-functional calculations. Physical Review E, 96(6). doi:10.1103/physreve.96.063307

Dewhurst, J. K., Krieger, K., Sharma, S., & Gross, E. K. U. (2016). An efficient algorithm for time propagation as applied to linearized augmented plane wave method. Computer Physics Communications, 209, 92-95. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.09.001

Akama, T., Kobayashi, O., & Nanbu, S. (2015). Development of efficient time-evolution method based on three-term recurrence relation. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 142(20), 204104. doi:10.1063/1.4921465

Kolesov, G., Grånäs, O., Hoyt, R., Vinichenko, D., & Kaxiras, E. (2015). Real-Time TD-DFT with Classical Ion Dynamics: Methodology and Applications. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 12(2), 466-476. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00969

Schaffhauser, P., & Kümmel, S. (2016). Using time-dependent density functional theory in real time for calculating electronic transport. Physical Review B, 93(3). doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.035115

O’Rourke, C., & Bowler, D. R. (2015). Linear scaling density matrix real time TDDFT: Propagator unitarity and matrix truncation. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(10), 102801. doi:10.1063/1.4919128

Oliveira, M. J. T., Mignolet, B., Kus, T., Papadopoulos, T. A., Remacle, F., & Verstraete, M. J. (2015). Computational Benchmarking for Ultrafast Electron Dynamics: Wave Function Methods vs Density Functional Theory. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 11(5), 2221-2233. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00167

Zhu, Y., & Herbert, J. M. (2018). Self-consistent predictor/corrector algorithms for stable and efficient integration of the time-dependent Kohn-Sham equation. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 148(4), 044117. doi:10.1063/1.5004675

Rehn, D. A., Shen, Y., Buchholz, M. E., Dubey, M., Namburu, R., & Reed, E. J. (2019). ODE integration schemes for plane-wave real-time time-dependent density functional theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 150(1), 014101. doi:10.1063/1.5056258

Gómez Pueyo, A., Marques, M. A. L., Rubio, A., & Castro, A. (2018). Propagators for the Time-Dependent Kohn–Sham Equations: Multistep, Runge–Kutta, Exponential Runge–Kutta, and Commutator Free Magnus Methods. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 14(6), 3040-3052. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00197

Stoer, J., & Bulirsch, R. (2002). Introduction to Numerical Analysis. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21738-3

Blanes, S., & Casas, F. (2017). A Concise Introduction to Geometric Numerical Integration. doi:10.1201/b21563

Flocard, H., Koonin, S. E., & Weiss, M. S. (1978). Three-dimensional time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculations: Application toO16+O16collisions. Physical Review C, 17(5), 1682-1699. doi:10.1103/physrevc.17.1682

Chen, R., & Guo, H. (1999). The Chebyshev propagator for quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications, 119(1), 19-31. doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(98)00179-9

Hochbruck, M., & Lubich, C. (1997). On Krylov Subspace Approximations to the Matrix Exponential Operator. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 34(5), 1911-1925. doi:10.1137/s0036142995280572

Frapiccini, A. L., Hamido, A., Schröter, S., Pyke, D., Mota-Furtado, F., O’Mahony, P. F., … Piraux, B. (2014). Explicit schemes for time propagating many-body wave functions. Physical Review A, 89(2). doi:10.1103/physreva.89.023418

Caliari, M., Kandolf, P., Ostermann, A., & Rainer, S. (2016). The Leja Method Revisited: Backward Error Analysis for the Matrix Exponential. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 38(3), A1639-A1661. doi:10.1137/15m1027620

Schaefer, I., Tal-Ezer, H., & Kosloff, R. (2017). Semi-global approach for propagation of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for time-dependent and nonlinear problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 343, 368-413. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.04.017

Trotter, H. F. (1959). On the product of semi-groups of operators. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 10(4), 545-545. doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1959-0108732-6

Strang, G. (1968). On the Construction and Comparison of Difference Schemes. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 5(3), 506-517. doi:10.1137/0705041

Feit, M. ., Fleck, J. ., & Steiger, A. (1982). Solution of the Schrödinger equation by a spectral method. Journal of Computational Physics, 47(3), 412-433. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(82)90091-2

Suzuki, M. (1990). Fractal decomposition of exponential operators with applications to many-body theories and Monte Carlo simulations. Physics Letters A, 146(6), 319-323. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90962-n

Suzuki, M. (1992). General theory of higher-order decomposition of exponential operators and symplectic integrators. Physics Letters A, 165(5-6), 387-395. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)90335-j

Yoshida, H. (1990). Construction of higher order symplectic integrators. Physics Letters A, 150(5-7), 262-268. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90092-3

Sugino, O., & Miyamoto, Y. (1999). Density-functional approach to electron dynamics: Stable simulation under a self-consistent field. Physical Review B, 59(4), 2579-2586. doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.2579

McLachlan, R. I., & Quispel, G. R. W. (2002). Splitting methods. Acta Numerica, 11, 341-434. doi:10.1017/s0962492902000053

Ascher, U. M., Ruuth, S. J., & Wetton, B. T. R. (1995). Implicit-Explicit Methods for Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 32(3), 797-823. doi:10.1137/0732037

Cooper, G. J., & Sayfy, A. (1983). Additive Runge-Kutta methods for stiff ordinary differential equations. Mathematics of Computation, 40(161), 207-218. doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1983-0679441-1

Hochbruck, M., Lubich, C., & Selhofer, H. (1998). Exponential Integrators for Large Systems of Differential Equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 19(5), 1552-1574. doi:10.1137/s1064827595295337

Hochbruck, M., & Ostermann, A. (2005). Exponential Runge–Kutta methods for parabolic problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 53(2-4), 323-339. doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2004.08.005

Hochbruck, M., & Ostermann, A. (2005). Explicit Exponential Runge--Kutta Methods for Semilinear Parabolic Problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 43(3), 1069-1090. doi:10.1137/040611434

Hochbruck, M., & Ostermann, A. (2010). Exponential integrators. Acta Numerica, 19, 209-286. doi:10.1017/s0962492910000048

Houston, W. V. (1940). Acceleration of Electrons in a Crystal Lattice. Physical Review, 57(3), 184-186. doi:10.1103/physrev.57.184

Chen, Z., & Polizzi, E. (2010). Spectral-based propagation schemes for time-dependent quantum systems with application to carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B, 82(20). doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.205410

Sato, S. A., & Yabana, K. (2014). Efficient basis expansion for describing linear and nonlinear electron dynamics in crystalline solids. Physical Review B, 89(22). doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.224305

Wang, Z., Li, S.-S., & Wang, L.-W. (2015). Efficient Real-Time Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Method and its Application to a Collision of an Ion with a 2D Material. Physical Review Letters, 114(6). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.063004

Magnus, W. (1954). On the exponential solution of differential equations for a linear operator. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 7(4), 649-673. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160070404

Blanes, S., Casas, F., Oteo, J. A., & Ros, J. (2009). The Magnus expansion and some of its applications. Physics Reports, 470(5-6), 151-238. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.11.001

Nettesheim, P., Bornemann, F. A., Schmidt, B., & Schütte, C. (1996). An explicit and symplectic integrator for quantum-classical molecular dynamics. Chemical Physics Letters, 256(6), 581-588. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(96)00471-x

Hochbruck, M., & Lubich, C. (1999). A Bunch of Time Integrators for Quantum/Classical Molecular Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 421-432. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58360-5_24

Hochbruck, M., & Lubich, C. (1999). Bit Numerical Mathematics, 39(4), 620-645. doi:10.1023/a:1022335122807

Nettesheim, P., & Reich, S. (1999). Symplectic Multiple-Time-Stepping Integrators for Quantum-Classical Molecular Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 412-420. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58360-5_23

Nettesheim, P., & Schütte, C. (1999). Numerical Integrators for Quantum-Classical Molecular Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 396-411. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58360-5_22

Reich, S. (1999). Multiple Time Scales in Classical and Quantum–Classical Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 151(1), 49-73. doi:10.1006/jcph.1998.6142

Jiang, H., & Zhao, X. S. (2000). New propagators for quantum-classical molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 113(3), 930-935. doi:10.1063/1.481873

Grochowski, P., & Lesyng, B. (2003). Extended Hellmann–Feynman forces, canonical representations, and exponential propagators in the mixed quantum-classical molecular dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 119(22), 11541-11555. doi:10.1063/1.1624062

Blanes, S., & Moan, P. C. (2006). Fourth- and sixth-order commutator-free Magnus integrators for linear and non-linear dynamical systems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 56(12), 1519-1537. doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2005.11.004

Bader, P., Blanes, S., & Kopylov, N. (2018). Exponential propagators for the Schrödinger equation with a time-dependent potential. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 148(24), 244109. doi:10.1063/1.5036838

Marques, M. (2003). octopus: a first-principles tool for excited electron–ion dynamics. Computer Physics Communications, 151(1), 60-78. doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00686-0

Castro, A., Appel, H., Oliveira, M., Rozzi, C. A., Andrade, X., Lorenzen, F., … Rubio, A. (2006). octopus: a tool for the application of time-dependent density functional theory. physica status solidi (b), 243(11), 2465-2488. doi:10.1002/pssb.200642067

Schwerdtfeger, P. (2011). The Pseudopotential Approximation in Electronic Structure Theory. ChemPhysChem, 12(17), 3143-3155. doi:10.1002/cphc.201100387

Alonso, J. L., Castro, A., Clemente-Gallardo, J., Cuchí, J. C., Echenique, P., & Falceto, F. (2011). Statistics and Nosé formalism for Ehrenfest dynamics. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(39), 395004. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/39/395004

Iserles, A., & Nørsett, S. P. (1999). On the solution of linear differential equations in Lie groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 357(1754), 983-1019. doi:10.1098/rsta.1999.0362

Munthe–Kaas, H., & Owren, B. (1999). Computations in a free Lie algebra. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 357(1754), 957-981. doi:10.1098/rsta.1999.0361

Alvermann, A., & Fehske, H. (2011). High-order commutator-free exponential time-propagation of driven quantum systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 230(15), 5930-5956. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.04.006

Blanes, S., & Moan, P. C. (2000). Splitting methods for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Physics Letters A, 265(1-2), 35-42. doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00866-x

Auer, N., Einkemmer, L., Kandolf, P., & Ostermann, A. (2018). Magnus integrators on multicore CPUs and GPUs. Computer Physics Communications, 228, 115-122. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.02.019

Thalhammer, M. (2006). A fourth-order commutator-free exponential integrator for nonautonomous differential equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 44(2), 851-864. doi:10.1137/05063042

Bader, P., Blanes, S., Ponsoda, E., & Seydaoğlu, M. (2017). Symplectic integrators for the matrix Hill equation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 316, 47-59. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2016.09.041

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem