- -

Evolutionary gaming approach for decision making of Tier-3 Internet service provider networks migration to SoDIP6 networks

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Evolutionary gaming approach for decision making of Tier-3 Internet service provider networks migration to SoDIP6 networks

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Dawadi, BR.; Rawat, DB.; Joshi, SR.; Manzoni, P. (2020). Evolutionary gaming approach for decision making of Tier-3 Internet service provider networks migration to SoDIP6 networks. International Journal of Communication Systems. 33(11):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4399

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/163482

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Dawadi;Rawat;Joshi ...
Tamaño: 1.549Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir/Preview
[Cerrado]
Nombre: dac.4399.pdf
Tamaño: 4.027Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Evolutionary gaming approach for decision making of Tier-3 Internet service provider networks migration to SoDIP6 networks
Autor: Dawadi, Babu R. Rawat, Danda B. Joshi, Shashidhar R. Manzoni, Pietro
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Informática de Sistemas y Computadores - Departament d'Informàtica de Sistemes i Computadors
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] With the increasing number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, current networking world is suffering in terms of management and operations with lack of IPv4 addresses leading to issues like network address translation ...[+]
Palabras clave: Evolutionary gaming , IPv6 network , ISP network migration , SoDIP6 , Software-defined network
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
International Journal of Communication Systems. (issn: 1074-5351 )
DOI: 10.1002/dac.4399
Editorial:
John Wiley & Sons
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4399
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/Erasmus+/KA107/EU/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//1828811/US/HBCU-RISE: Security Engineering for Resilient Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//1650831/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UGC//FRG%2F74_75%2FEngg-1/
Descripción: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Dawadi, BR, Rawat, DB, Joshi, SR, Manzoni, P. Evolutionary gaming approach for decision making of Tier-3 Internet service provider networks migration to SoDIP6 networks. Int J Commun Syst. 2020; 33:e4399, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4399. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Agradecimientos:
ERASMUS+, Grant/Award Number: KA107; UGC-NP, Grant/Award Number: FRG-074/75-Engg-01; NTNU-EnPE-MSESSD; US National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Numbers: CNS 1650831, HRD 1828811; NAST
Tipo: Artículo

References

Livadariu, I., Elmokashfi, A., & Dhamdhere, A. (2017). On IPv4 transfer markets: Analyzing reported transfers and inferring transfers in the wild. Computer Communications, 111, 105-119. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2017.07.012

Dawadi, B. R., Rawat, D. B., & Joshi, S. R. (2019). Software Defined IPv6 Network: A New Paradigm for Future Networking. Journal of the Institute of Engineering, 15(2), 1-13. doi:10.3126/jie.v15i2.27636

Rizvi, S. N., Raumer, D., Wohlfart, F., & Carle, G. (2015). Towards carrier grade SDNs. Computer Networks, 92, 218-226. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.09.029 [+]
Livadariu, I., Elmokashfi, A., & Dhamdhere, A. (2017). On IPv4 transfer markets: Analyzing reported transfers and inferring transfers in the wild. Computer Communications, 111, 105-119. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2017.07.012

Dawadi, B. R., Rawat, D. B., & Joshi, S. R. (2019). Software Defined IPv6 Network: A New Paradigm for Future Networking. Journal of the Institute of Engineering, 15(2), 1-13. doi:10.3126/jie.v15i2.27636

Rizvi, S. N., Raumer, D., Wohlfart, F., & Carle, G. (2015). Towards carrier grade SDNs. Computer Networks, 92, 218-226. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.09.029

Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., … Rao, N. (2013). Are we ready for SDN? Implementation challenges for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7), 36-43. doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6553676

ONF TR‐506.SDN migration considerations and use cases.;2014.https://www.opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sb-sdn-migration-use-cases.pdf.

Raza, M. H., Sivakumar, S. C., Nafarieh, A., & Robertson, B. (2014). A Comparison of Software Defined Network (SDN) Implementation Strategies. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 1050-1055. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.532

Wu, P., Cui, Y., Wu, J., Liu, J., & Metz, C. (2013). Transition from IPv4 to IPv6: A State-of-the-Art Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(3), 1407-1424. doi:10.1109/surv.2012.110112.00200

Contreras, L. M., Doolan, P., Lønsethagen, H., & López, D. R. (2015). Operational, organizational and business challenges for network operators in the context of SDN and NFV. Computer Networks, 92, 211-217. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.016

Sandhya, Sinha, Y., & Haribabu, K. (2017). A survey: Hybrid SDN. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 100, 35-55. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.10.003

ON.LAB.Driving SDN adoption in service provider networks.;2014.http://onosproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Whitepaper-Service-Provider-SDN-final.pdf.

SANDVINE. Carrier grade NAT: Mitigate IPv4 address exhaustion while maintaining network visibility.https://www.sandvine.com/hubfs/Procera_Live_Site_Files/PDF_Live_Site/Solutions_brief/SB_CGNAT.pdf. Published2018. .

F5. Carrier‐grade NAT (CGNAT) for service providers.https://www.f5.com/services/resources/use-cases/carrier-grade-nat-for-service-providers. Accessed September 20 2019.

Trinh, T. A., Gyarmati, L., & Sallai, G. (2010). Migrating to IPv6: A game-theoretic perspective. IEEE Local Computer Network Conference. doi:10.1109/lcn.2010.5735739

Nikkhah, M. (2016). Maintaining the progress of IPv6 adoption. Computer Networks, 102, 50-69. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2016.02.027

Hu, T., Yi, P., Zhang, J., & Lan, J. (2018). A distributed decision mechanism for controller load balancing based on switch migration in SDN. China Communications, 15(10), 129-142. doi:10.1109/cc.2018.8485475

TaoP YingC SunZ TanS WangP SunZ.The controller placement of software‐defined networks based on minimum delay and load balancing. In:2018 IEEE 16th Intl Conf on Dependable Autonomic and Secure Computing 16th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing 4th Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech).;2018:310‐313.

Wang, K.-Y., Kao, S.-J., & Kao, M.-T. (2018). An efficient load adjustment for balancing multiple controllers in reliable SDN systems. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI). doi:10.1109/icasi.2018.8394323

Xu, H., Li, X.-Y., Huang, L., Deng, H., Huang, H., & Wang, H. (2017). Incremental Deployment and Throughput Maximization Routing for a Hybrid SDN. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(3), 1861-1875. doi:10.1109/tnet.2017.2657643

Khorramizadeh, M., & Ahmadi, V. (2018). Capacity and load-aware software-defined network controller placement in heterogeneous environments. Computer Communications, 129, 226-247. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2018.07.037

LanW LiF LiuX QiuY.A dynamic load balancing mechanism for distributed controllers in software‐defined networking. In:2018 10th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA).;2018:259‐262.

TR‐506 O.SDN Migration considerations and use cases.;2014.

Kobayashi, M., Seetharaman, S., Parulkar, G., Appenzeller, G., Little, J., van Reijendam, J., … McKeown, N. (2014). Maturing of OpenFlow and Software-defined Networking through deployments. Computer Networks, 61, 151-175. doi:10.1016/j.bjp.2013.10.011

BabikerH NikolovaI ChittimaneniKK.Deploying IPv6 in the Google Enterprise Network. Lessons learned. In:Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Large Installation System Administration.;2011:10.

APNIC. IPv6 capability measurement.https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6. Accessed February 15 2020.

Google Incl. IPv6 user access status.https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html. Accessed February 16 2020.

Abdullah, S. A. (2019). SEUI-64, bits an IPv6 addressing strategy to mitigate reconnaissance attacks. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22(2), 667-672. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2018.11.012

KreutzD RamosF VerissimoP RothenbergCE AzodolmolkyS UhligS.Software‐defined networking: A comprehensive survey.arXiv Prepr arXiv14060440.2014.

DawadiBR RawatDB JoshiSR KeitschMM.Recommendations for energy efficient SoDIP6 network deployment at the early stage rural ICT expansion of Nepal. In: 2019International Conference on Computing Networking and Communications ICNC 2019.;2019.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNC.2019.8685567

WintherM.Tier 1 isps: what they are and why they are important. IDC White Pap2006:1‐13.

DawadiBR RawatDB JoshiSR.Evolutionary dynamics of service provider legacy network migration to software defined IPv6 network. In:International Conference on Computing and Information Technology;2019:245‐257.

BriainDÓ DenieffeD KavanaghY OkelloD.A proposed architecture for distributed Internet eXchange Points in developing countries. In:2018 IST‐Africa Week Conference (IST‐Africa).;2018:Page‐‐1.

ChatzisN SmaragdakisG FeldmannA.On the importance of Internet eXchange Points for today's Internet ecosystem.arXiv Prepr arXiv13075264.2013.

RyanPS GersonJ.A primer on Internet exchange points for policymakers and non‐engineers.Available SSRN 2128103.2012.

BogineniK.Introducing ONOS: A SDN network operating system for service providers.White Pap.2014.

Karakus, M., & Durresi, A. (2018). Economic Viability of Software Defined Networking (SDN). Computer Networks, 135, 81-95. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.02.015

Shakkottai, S., & Srikant, R. (2006). Economics of Network Pricing With Multiple ISPs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14(6), 1233-1245. doi:10.1109/tnet.2006.886393

Weiss, M. B., & Shin, S. (2002). Internet Interconnection Economic Model and its Analysis: Peering and Settlement. Communication Systems, 215-231. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35600-6_10

De Souza, E. P., Ferreira, E. M., & Neves, A. G. M. (2018). Fixation probabilities for the Moran process in evolutionary games with two strategies: graph shapes and large population asymptotics. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 78(4), 1033-1065. doi:10.1007/s00285-018-1300-4

Klimek, P., Thurner, S., & Hanel, R. (2010). Evolutionary dynamics from a variational principle. Physical Review E, 82(1). doi:10.1103/physreve.82.011901

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem