- -

New Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding Using Continuous Synthetic Simulation Supported by Regional Precipitation and Non-Systematic Flood Data

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

New Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding Using Continuous Synthetic Simulation Supported by Regional Precipitation and Non-Systematic Flood Data

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Beneyto, Carles es_ES
dc.contributor.author Aranda Domingo, José Ángel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Benito, Gerardo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Francés, F. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-25T04:31:37Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-25T04:31:37Z
dc.date.issued 2020-11 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 2073-4441 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/164218
dc.description.abstract [EN] Stochastic weather generators combined with hydrological models have been proposed for continuous synthetic simulation to estimate return periods of extreme floods. Yet, this approach relies upon the length and spatial distribution of the precipitation input data series, which often are scarce, especially in arid and semiarid regions. In this work, we present a new approach for the estimation of extreme floods based on the continuous synthetic simulation method supported with inputs of (a) a regional study of extreme precipitation to improve the calibration of the weather generator (GWEX), and (b) non-systematic flood information (i.e., historical information and/or palaeoflood records) for the validation of the generated discharges with a fully distributed hydrological model (TETIS). The results showed that this complementary information of extremes allowed for a more accurate implementation of both the weather generator and the hydrological model. This, in turn, improved the flood quantile estimates, especially for those associated with return periods higher than 50 years but also for higher quantiles (up to approximately 500 years). Therefore, it has been proved that continuous synthetic simulation studies focused on the estimation of extreme floods should incorporate a generalized representation of regional extreme rainfall and/or non-systematic flood data, particularly in regions with scarce hydrometeorological records. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the research projects TETISCHANGE (RTI2018-093717-B-100) and EPHIMED (CGL2017-86839-C3-1-R), both cofounded with FEDER European funds. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Water es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Weather generator es_ES
dc.subject Palaeoflood es_ES
dc.subject Regional extreme precipitation study es_ES
dc.subject Ephemeral river es_ES
dc.subject Fully distributed hydrology es_ES
dc.subject Flood quantiles es_ES
dc.subject Rambla de la Viuda es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA es_ES
dc.subject.classification EXPRESION GRAFICA EN LA INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title New Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding Using Continuous Synthetic Simulation Supported by Regional Precipitation and Non-Systematic Flood Data es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/w12113174 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CGL2017-86839-C3-1-R/ES/EVALUACION Y MODELACION DE LA RESPUESTA ECO-HIDROLOGICA Y SEDIMENTARIA EN CUENCAS MEDITERRANEAS PARA LA ADAPTACION AL CAMBIO CLIMATICO Y AMBIENTAL/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093717-B-I00/ES/MEJORAS DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y DE LAS CAPACIDADES DE MODELIZACION PARA LA PROGNOSIS DE LOS EFECTOS DEL CAMBIO GLOBAL EN UNA CUENCA HIDROLOGICA/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente - Institut Universitari d'Enginyeria de l'Aigua i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica - Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Beneyto, C.; Aranda Domingo, JÁ.; Benito, G.; Francés, F. (2020). New Approach to Estimate Extreme Flooding Using Continuous Synthetic Simulation Supported by Regional Precipitation and Non-Systematic Flood Data. Water. 12(11):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113174 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113174 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 16 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 12 es_ES
dc.description.issue 11 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\421779 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agencia Estatal de Investigación es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Stedinger, J. R., & Griffis, V. W. (2008). Flood Frequency Analysis in the United States: Time to Update. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13(4), 199-204. doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2008)13:4(199) es_ES
dc.description.references Francés, F. (1998). Using the TCEV distribution function with systematic and non-systematic data in a regional flood frequency analysis. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 12(4), 267-283. doi:10.1007/s004770050021 es_ES
dc.description.references Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2009). Process controls on the statistical flood moments - a data based analysis. Hydrological Processes, 23(5), 675-696. doi:10.1002/hyp.7168 es_ES
dc.description.references Stedinger, J. R., & Cohn, T. A. (1986). Flood Frequency Analysis With Historical and Paleoflood Information. Water Resources Research, 22(5), 785-793. doi:10.1029/wr022i005p00785 es_ES
dc.description.references Botero, B. A., & Francés, F. (2010). Estimation of high return period flood quantiles using additional non-systematic information with upper bounded statistical models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(12), 2617-2628. doi:10.5194/hess-14-2617-2010 es_ES
dc.description.references Cohn, T. A., England, J. F., Berenbrock, C. E., Mason, R. R., Stedinger, J. R., & Lamontagne, J. R. (2013). A generalized Grubbs-Beck test statistic for detecting multiple potentially influential low outliers in flood series. Water Resources Research, 49(8), 5047-5058. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20392 es_ES
dc.description.references Emmanuel, I., Payrastre, O., Andrieu, H., & Zuber, F. (2017). A method for assessing the influence of rainfall spatial variability on hydrograph modeling. First case study in the Cevennes Region, southern France. Journal of Hydrology, 555, 314-322. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Pathiraja, S., Westra, S., & Sharma, A. (2012). Why continuous simulation? The role of antecedent moisture in design flood estimation. Water Resources Research, 48(6). doi:10.1029/2011wr010997 es_ES
dc.description.references Grimaldi, S., Nardi, F., Piscopia, R., Petroselli, A., & Apollonio, C. (2021). Continuous hydrologic modelling for design simulation in small and ungauged basins: A step forward and some tests for its practical use. Journal of Hydrology, 595, 125664. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125664 es_ES
dc.description.references Cameron, D. ., Beven, K. ., Tawn, J., Blazkova, S., & Naden, P. (1999). Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty). Journal of Hydrology, 219(3-4), 169-187. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(99)00057-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Eagleson, P. S. (1972). Dynamics of flood frequency. Water Resources Research, 8(4), 878-898. doi:10.1029/wr008i004p00878 es_ES
dc.description.references Brocca, L., Liersch, S., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., & Volk, M. (2013). Application of a model-based rainfall-runoff database as efficient tool for flood risk management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(8), 3159-3169. doi:10.5194/hess-17-3159-2013 es_ES
dc.description.references Cowpertwait, P., Ocio, D., Collazos, G., de Cos, O., & Stocker, C. (2013). Regionalised spatiotemporal rainfall and temperature models for flood studies in the Basque Country, Spain. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(2), 479-494. doi:10.5194/hess-17-479-2013 es_ES
dc.description.references Boughton, W., & Droop, O. (2003). Continuous simulation for design flood estimation—a review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18(4), 309-318. doi:10.1016/s1364-8152(03)00004-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Soltani, A., & Hoogenboom, G. (2003). Minimum data requirements for parameter estimation of stochastic weather generators. Climate Research, 25, 109-119. doi:10.3354/cr025109 es_ES
dc.description.references Verdin, A., Rajagopalan, B., Kleiber, W., & Katz, R. W. (2014). Coupled stochastic weather generation using spatial and generalized linear models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29(2), 347-356. doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0911-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Cavanaugh, N. R., Gershunov, A., Panorska, A. K., & Kozubowski, T. J. (2015). The probability distribution of intense daily precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(5), 1560-1567. doi:10.1002/2015gl063238 es_ES
dc.description.references Furrer, E. M., & Katz, R. W. (2008). Improving the simulation of extreme precipitation events by stochastic weather generators. Water Resources Research, 44(12). doi:10.1029/2008wr007316 es_ES
dc.description.references Evin, G., Favre, A.-C., & Hingray, B. (2018). Stochastic generation of multi-site daily precipitation focusing on extreme events. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(1), 655-672. doi:10.5194/hess-22-655-2018 es_ES
dc.description.references Metzger, A., Marra, F., Smith, J. A., & Morin, E. (2020). Flood frequency estimation and uncertainty in arid/semi-arid regions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125254. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125254 es_ES
dc.description.references Zaman, M. A., Rahman, A., & Haddad, K. (2012). Regional flood frequency analysis in arid regions: A case study for Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 475, 74-83. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.054 es_ES
dc.description.references Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2008). Flood frequency hydrology: 1. Temporal, spatial, and causal expansion of information. Water Resources Research, 44(8). doi:10.1029/2007wr006744 es_ES
dc.description.references Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2008). Flood frequency hydrology: 2. Combining data evidence. Water Resources Research, 44(8). doi:10.1029/2007wr006745 es_ES
dc.description.references Benito, G., Sanchez-Moya, Y., Medialdea, A., Barriendos, M., Calle, M., Rico, M., … Machado, M. (2020). Extreme Floods in Small Mediterranean Catchments: Long-Term Response to Climate Variability and Change. Water, 12(4), 1008. doi:10.3390/w12041008 es_ES
dc.description.references Baker, V. R. (1987). Paleoflood hydrology and extraordinary flood events. Journal of Hydrology, 96(1-4), 79-99. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(87)90145-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballesteros-Cánovas, J. A., Sanchez-Silva, M., Bodoque, J. M., & Díez-Herrero, A. (2013). An Integrated Approach to Flood Risk Management: A Case Study of Navaluenga (Central Spain). Water Resources Management, 27(8), 3051-3069. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0332-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Frances, F., Salas, J. D., & Boes, D. C. (1994). Flood frequency analysis with systematic and historical or paleoflood data based on the two-parameter general extreme value models. Water Resources Research, 30(6), 1653-1664. doi:10.1029/94wr00154 es_ES
dc.description.references Stedinger, J. R., & Baker, V. R. (1987). Surface water hydrology: Historical and paleoflood information. Reviews of Geophysics, 25(2), 119. doi:10.1029/rg025i002p00119 es_ES
dc.description.references Simón, J. L., Pérez-Cueva, A. J., & Calvo-Cases, A. (2013). Tectonic beheading of fluvial valleys in the Maestrat grabens (eastern Spain): Insights into slip rates of Pleistocene extensional faults. Tectonophysics, 593, 73-84. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2013.02.026 es_ES
dc.description.references Camarasa Belmonte, A. M., & Segura Beltrán, F. (2001). Flood events in Mediterranean ephemeral streams (ramblas) in Valencia region, Spain. CATENA, 45(3), 229-249. doi:10.1016/s0341-8162(01)00146-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Llasat, M. C., & Puigcerver, M. (1990). Cold air pools over Europe. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 42(3-4), 171-177. doi:10.1007/bf01314823 es_ES
dc.description.references Herrera, S., Fernández, J., & Gutiérrez, J. M. (2015). Update of the Spain02 gridded observational dataset for EURO-CORDEX evaluation: assessing the effect of the interpolation methodology. International Journal of Climatology, 36(2), 900-908. doi:10.1002/joc.4391 es_ES
dc.description.references Machado, M. J., Medialdea, A., Calle, M., Rico, M. T., Sánchez-Moya, Y., Sopeña, A., & Benito, G. (2017). Historical palaeohydrology and landscape resilience of a Mediterranean rambla (Castellón, NE Spain): Floods and people. Quaternary Science Reviews, 171, 182-198. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.07.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Francés, F., Vélez, J. I., & Vélez, J. J. (2007). Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 332(1-2), 226-240. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.032 es_ES
dc.description.references Papastathopoulos, I., & Tawn, J. A. (2013). Extended generalised Pareto models for tail estimation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 143(1), 131-143. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2012.07.001 es_ES
dc.description.references El Libro de la Provincia de Castellonhttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/14914 es_ES
dc.description.references Cunnane, C. (1978). Unbiased plotting positions — A review. Journal of Hydrology, 37(3-4), 205-222. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(78)90017-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Gringorten, I. I. (1963). A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. Journal of Geophysical Research, 68(3), 813-814. doi:10.1029/jz068i003p00813 es_ES
dc.description.references Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282-290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 es_ES
dc.description.references HAKTANIR, T., & HORLACHER, H. B. (1993). Evaluation of various distributions for flood frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 38(1), 15-32. doi:10.1080/02626669309492637 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, X., & Hossain, F. (2019). Understanding Future Safety of Dams in a Changing Climate. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(8), 1395-1404. doi:10.1175/bams-d-17-0150.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Lamb, R., Faulkner, D., Wass, P., & Cameron, D. (2016). Have applications of continuous rainfall–runoff simulation realized the vision for process‐based flood frequency analysis? Hydrological Processes, 30(14), 2463-2481. doi:10.1002/hyp.10882 es_ES
dc.description.references Benito, G., & Thorndycraft, V. R. (2005). Palaeoflood hydrology and its role in applied hydrological sciences. Journal of Hydrology, 313(1-2), 3-15. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Lam, D., Thompson, C., Croke, J., Sharma, A., & Macklin, M. (2017). Reducing uncertainty with flood frequency analysis: The contribution of paleoflood and historical flood information. Water Resources Research, 53(3), 2312-2327. doi:10.1002/2016wr019959 es_ES
dc.description.references Fuller, W. E. (1914). Flood Flows. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 77(1), 564-617. doi:10.1061/taceat.0002552 es_ES
dc.description.references Applied hydrology. (1968). Journal of Hydrology, 6(2), 224-225. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(68)90169-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Sangal, B. P. (1983). Practical Method of Estimating Peak Flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109(4), 549-563. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1983)109:4(549) es_ES
dc.description.references Fathzadeh, A., Jaydari, A., & Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R. (2016). Comparison of different methods for reconstruction of instantaneous peak flow data. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 23(1), 41-49. doi:10.1080/10798587.2015.1120991 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem