- -

An evaluation of the environmental factors for supply chain strategy decisions using grey systems and composite indicators

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

An evaluation of the environmental factors for supply chain strategy decisions using grey systems and composite indicators

Show full item record

Alfaro Saiz, JJ.; Bas, M.; Giner-Bosch, V.; Rodríguez Rodríguez, R.; Verdecho Sáez, MJ. (2020). An evaluation of the environmental factors for supply chain strategy decisions using grey systems and composite indicators. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 79:490-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.048

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165808

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: An evaluation of the environmental factors for supply chain strategy decisions using grey systems and composite indicators
Author: Alfaro Saiz, Juan José Bas, M.C. Giner-Bosch, Vicent Rodríguez Rodríguez, Raúl Verdecho Sáez, María José
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] The purpose of this work is to assess the importance of environmental factors in a supply chain with four partners as a preliminary step to select the competitive strategies and objectives. To achieve this purpose, a ...[+]
Subjects: Grey system theory , Composite indicator , Supply chain , Environmental factors , Environmental uncertainty
Copyrigths: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Source:
Applied Mathematical Modelling. (issn: 0307-904X )
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.048
Publisher:
Elsevier
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.048
Project ID:
UPV/PAID-00-15
Thanks:
The research was conducted with the support of the R&D Support Program (PAID-00-15) of the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.
Type: Artículo

References

Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00113-3

Stonebraker, P. W., & Liao, J. (2004). Environmental turbulence, strategic orientation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 1037-1054. doi:10.1108/01443570410558067

Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2016). Managing supply chain uncertainty with emerging ethical issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(10), 1272-1307. doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2014-0599 [+]
Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00113-3

Stonebraker, P. W., & Liao, J. (2004). Environmental turbulence, strategic orientation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 1037-1054. doi:10.1108/01443570410558067

Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2016). Managing supply chain uncertainty with emerging ethical issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(10), 1272-1307. doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2014-0599

Otley, D. (2012). Performance management under conditions of uncertainty: some valedictory reflections. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(3), 247-261. doi:10.1108/01140581211283869

MacCarthy, B. L., Blome, C., Olhager, J., Srai, J. S., & Zhao, X. (2016). Supply chain evolution – theory, concepts and science. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(12), 1696-1718. doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2016-0080

Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2012). Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4493-4523. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.613864

Vecchiato, R. (2012). Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making: An integrated study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 436-447. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.010

Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A. de, Salerno, M. S., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. R. (2018). How entrepreneurs manage collective uncertainties in innovation ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 164-185. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.016

Flynn, B. B., Koufteros, X., & Lu, G. (2016). On Theory in Supply Chain Uncertainty and its Implications for Supply Chain Integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 3-27. doi:10.1111/jscm.12106

Gordon, L. A., & Narayanan, V. K. (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 33-47. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(84)90028-x

Huo, B., Ye, Y., Zhao, X., Wei, J., & Hua, Z. (2018). Environmental uncertainty, specific assets, and opportunism in 3PL relationships: A transaction cost economics perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 154-163. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.031

Hoque, Z. (2004). A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: impact on organizational performance. International Business Review, 13(4), 485-502. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.003

Lonbani, M., Sofian, S., & Baroto, M. B. (2016). Balanced Scorecard Implementation in SMEs: Addressing the Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 35(3), 58-66. doi:10.1002/joe.21671

Yi, C. Y., Ngai, E. W. T., & Moon, K. (2011). Supply chain flexibility in an uncertain environment: exploratory findings from five case studies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 271-283. doi:10.1108/13598541111139080

Boyle, E., Humphreys, P., & McIvor, R. (2008). Reducing supply chain environmental uncertainty through e-intermediation: An organisation theory perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(1), 347-362. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.01.010

Agami, N., Saleh, M., & Rasmy, M. (2014). An Innovative Fuzzy Logic Based Approach for Supply Chain Performance Management. IEEE Systems Journal, 8(2), 336-342. doi:10.1109/jsyst.2012.2219913

Arrive, J. T., & Feng, M. (2018). The complexity of the environment, management control and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1347-1354. doi:10.1002/bse.2183

Huang, M.-C., Yen, G.-F., & Liu, T.-C. (2014). Reexamining supply chain integration and the supplier’s performance relationships under uncertainty. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 64-78. doi:10.1108/scm-04-2013-0114

Ansoff, H. I. (1991). Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management’. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 449-461. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120605

Nummela, N., Saarenketo, S., Jokela, P., & Loane, S. (2014). Strategic Decision-Making of a Born Global: A Comparative Study From Three Small Open Economies. Management International Review, 54(4), 527-550. doi:10.1007/s11575-014-0211-x

Yu, X., Tao, Y., Tao, X., Xia, F., & Li, Y. (2018). Managing uncertainty in emerging economies: The interaction effects between causation and effectuation on firm performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 121-131. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.017

Durbach, I. N., & Stewart, T. J. (2012). Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(1), 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038

Jahantigh, F. F., Malmir, B., & Avilaq, B. A. (2016). An integrated approach for prioritizing the strategic objectives of balanced scorecard under uncertainty. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(6), 227-236. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2509-z

Chen, M.-F., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(13), 1473-1490. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006

Tseng, M.-L. (2009). A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7738-7748. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.011

Vinodh, S., Prasanna, M., & Hari Prakash, N. (2014). Integrated Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS for selecting the best plastic recycling method: A case study. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(19-20), 4662-4672. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.007

Lima Junior, F. R., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194-209. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014

Ju-Long, D. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1(5), 288-294. doi:10.1016/s0167-6911(82)80025-x

Yin, M.-S. (2013). Fifteen years of grey system theory research: A historical review and bibliometric analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(7), 2767-2775. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.11.002

Wei, J., Zhou, L., Wang, F., & Wu, D. (2015). Work safety evaluation in Mainland China using grey theory. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(2), 924-933. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2014.06.017

Rajesh, R., Ravi, V., & Venkata Rao, R. (2014). Selection of risk mitigation strategy in electronic supply chains using grey theory and digraph-matrix approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 238-257. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.948579

Huang, B., Bai, L., Roy, A., & Ma, N. (2018). A multi-criterion partner selection problem for virtual manufacturing enterprises under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 68-81. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.024

Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(2), 307-323. doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2005.00350.x

Sellitto, M. A., Pereira, G. M., Borchardt, M., da Silva, R. I., & Viegas, C. V. (2015). A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 4917-4926. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1005251

Marketwatch. Footwear market: global industry size, share, trends, growth, demand and forecast 2018-2026. https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/footwear-market-global-industry-size-share-trends-growth-demand-and-forecast-2018-2026 (2018).

CBI. Which trends present opportunities on the european footwear market? ministry of foreign affairs, netherlands enterprise agency (2016). https://www.cbi.eu/market-information/footwear/trends.

CESCE. Informe sectorial de la economía española (2018). https://www.cesce.com.

R.Rocamora. The challenges of footwear by 2020: flexibility, sustainable innovation and renewable materials. (2017). https://valenciaplaza.com/Losdesafosdelcalzadohacia2020.

AVECAL. Valencian association of footwear entrepreneurs. (2019) https://www.avecal.es/.

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record