- -

Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis

Show full item record

Lo, F.; Rey-Marti, A.; Botella-Carrubi, D. (2020). Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research. 115:221-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165968

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis
Author: Lo, Fang-Yi Rey-Marti, Andrea Botella-Carrubi, Dolores
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] Research in the social sciences is built on either quantitative or qualitative analysis, depending on the research context. Using both quantitative and qualitative analyses in the same study presents major obstacles. ...[+]
Subjects: Business , FsQCA , Qualitative analysis , Quantitative analysis , Research methods
Copyrigths: Cerrado
Source:
Journal of Business Research. (issn: 0148-2963 )
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003
Publisher:
Elsevier
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003
Thanks:
The guest editors of this special issue thank the participants of the Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Knowledge Academy 2019 Conference (INEKA), held at University of Verona, Verona, Italy, from June 11 to 13, 2019. ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Huarng, K.-H., & Yu, T. H.-K. (2015). Forecasting ICT development through quantile confidence intervals. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2295-2298. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.014 [+]
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Huarng, K.-H., & Yu, T. H.-K. (2015). Forecasting ICT development through quantile confidence intervals. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2295-2298. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.014

Huarng, K.-H., Rey-Martí, A., & Miquel-Romero, M.-J. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis in business. Journal of Business Research, 89, 171-174. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.032

Huarng, K. -H. (2015). Re-examining the Consistency in fsQCA. Paper presented at the annual conference of the global innovation and knowledge academy.

Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602. doi:10.2307/2392366

Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15-23. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002

Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2004). Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141-157. doi:10.1002/smj.437

Venkatraman, N., & Prescott, J. E. (1990). Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 1-23. doi:10.1002/smj.4250110102

Venkatraman, N. (1989). The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279078

Woodside, A. G., Ko, E., & Huan, T. (T. C. . (2012). The new logic in building isomorphic theory of management decision realities. Management Decision, 50(5), 765-777. doi:10.1108/00251741211227429

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record