Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Lo, Fang-Yi | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Rey-Marti, Andrea | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Botella-Carrubi, Dolores | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-05T03:33:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-05T03:33:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0148-2963 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165968 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Research in the social sciences is built on either quantitative or qualitative analysis, depending on the research context. Using both quantitative and qualitative analyses in the same study presents major obstacles. In the real business world, empirical studies could benefit from using multiple research methodologies. Thus, this editorial presents an overview of the literature on quantitative and qualitative research methods in business research to clarify some key issues on the subject. The following section introduces the papers included in the special issue on "Research Methods in Business: Quantitative and Qualitative Comparative Analysis" and highlights several novel ideas, emerging trends, and uncharted territory for future research. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The guest editors of this special issue thank the participants of the Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Knowledge Academy 2019 Conference (INEKA), held at University of Verona, Verona, Italy, from June 11 to 13, 2019. Special thanks go to Naveen Donthu, Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Business Research, for offering a special issue on "Research Methods in Business: Quantitative and Qualitative Comparative Analysis." We thank all reviewers for providing constructive comments and suggestions to help the authors improve their papers. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Business Research | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Business | es_ES |
dc.subject | FsQCA | es_ES |
dc.subject | Qualitative analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Quantitative analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Research methods | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS | es_ES |
dc.title | Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Cerrado | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Lo, F.; Rey-Marti, A.; Botella-Carrubi, D. (2020). Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research. 115:221-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 221 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 224 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 115 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\425994 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huarng, K.-H., & Yu, T. H.-K. (2015). Forecasting ICT development through quantile confidence intervals. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2295-2298. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.014 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huarng, K.-H., Rey-Martí, A., & Miquel-Romero, M.-J. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis in business. Journal of Business Research, 89, 171-174. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.032 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huarng, K. -H. (2015). Re-examining the Consistency in fsQCA. Paper presented at the annual conference of the global innovation and knowledge academy. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602. doi:10.2307/2392366 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15-23. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2004). Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141-157. doi:10.1002/smj.437 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Venkatraman, N., & Prescott, J. E. (1990). Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 1-23. doi:10.1002/smj.4250110102 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Venkatraman, N. (1989). The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279078 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Woodside, A. G., Ko, E., & Huan, T. (T. C. . (2012). The new logic in building isomorphic theory of management decision realities. Management Decision, 50(5), 765-777. doi:10.1108/00251741211227429 | es_ES |