- -

Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation

Show full item record

Guijarro, F.; Tsinaslanidis, P. (2020). Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online). 17(7):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072386

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/167219

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation
Author: Guijarro, Francisco Tsinaslanidis, Prodromos
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] Environmental valuation refers to a variety of techniques to assign monetary values to environmental impacts, especially non-market impacts. It has experienced a steady growth in the number of publications on the ...[+]
Subjects: Environmental valuation , Literature survey , Willingness to pay , Choice experiment , Contingent valuation
Copyrigths: Reconocimiento (by)
Source:
International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online). (eissn: 1660-4601 )
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072386
Publisher:
MDPI AG
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072386
Type: Artículo

References

Nyborg, K. (2000). Project analysis as input to public debate: Environmental valuation versus physical unit indicators. Ecological Economics, 34(3), 393-408. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00180-4

Christie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., & Kenter, J. O. (2012). An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 83, 67-78. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012

Remoundou, K., & Koundouri, P. (2009). Environmental Effects on Public Health: An Economic Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(8), 2160-2178. doi:10.3390/ijerph6082160 [+]
Nyborg, K. (2000). Project analysis as input to public debate: Environmental valuation versus physical unit indicators. Ecological Economics, 34(3), 393-408. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00180-4

Christie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., & Kenter, J. O. (2012). An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 83, 67-78. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012

Remoundou, K., & Koundouri, P. (2009). Environmental Effects on Public Health: An Economic Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(8), 2160-2178. doi:10.3390/ijerph6082160

Niemeyer, S., & Spash, C. L. (2001). Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 567-585. doi:10.1068/c9s

Baranzini, A., & Ramirez, J. V. (2005). Paying for Quietness: The Impact of Noise on Geneva Rents. Urban Studies, 42(4), 633-646. doi:10.1080/00420980500060186

Guijarro, F. (2019). Assessing the Impact of Road Traffic Externalities on Residential Price Values: A Case Study in Madrid, Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5149. doi:10.3390/ijerph16245149

Thorne, R., & Shepherd, D. (2013). Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(7), 2741-2759. doi:10.3390/ijerph10072741

Hanemann, W. M. (2003). Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Reply. American Economic Review, 93(1), 464-464. doi:10.1257/000282803321455449

Adamowicz, W. L., Bhardwaj, V., & Macnab, B. (1993). Experiments on the Difference between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept. Land Economics, 69(4), 416. doi:10.2307/3146458

Plottu, E., & Plottu, B. (2007). The concept of Total Economic Value of environment: A reconsideration within a hierarchical rationality. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 52-61. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.027

Aznar, J., Guijarro, F., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2009). Mixed valuation methods: a combined AHP-GP procedure for individual and group multicriteria agricultural valuation. Annals of Operations Research, 190(1), 221-238. doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0527-2

Adamowicz, W. L. (2004). What’s it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation*. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48(3), 419-443. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00258.x

Hoyos, D. (2010). The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1595-1603. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Is Choice Experiment Becoming More Popular Than Contingent Valuation? A Systematic Review in Agriculture, Environment and Healthhttps://econpapers.repec.org/paper/faewpaper/2014.12.htm

Boxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421-446. doi:10.1023/a:1021351721619

Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making. PharmacoEconomics, 26(8), 661-677. doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004

Hanley, N., Mourato, S., & Wright, R. E. (2002). Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435-462. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00145

Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3/4), 413-428. doi:10.1023/a:1008287310583

Turner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., & Georgiou, S. (2003). Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 493-510. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00189-7

Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 277-286. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00120-1

Boxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L., Swait, J., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics, 18(3), 243-253. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(96)00039-0

Ferrini, S., & Scarpa, R. (2007). Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3), 342-363. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007

Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1997). Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 65-84. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0957

Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57-70. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-s

Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 64-75. doi:10.2307/3180269

Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(3), 271-292. doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1017

Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157. doi:10.1086/259131

Ščasný, M., Zvěřinová, I., Czajkowski, M., Kyselá, E., & Zagórska, K. (2016). Public acceptability of climate change mitigation policies: a discrete choice experiment. Climate Policy, 17(sup1), S111-S130. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1248888

Streimikiene, Balezentis, Alisauskaite-Seskiene, Stankuniene, & Simanaviciene. (2019). A Review of Willingness to Pay Studies for Climate Change Mitigation in the Energy Sector. Energies, 12(8), 1481. doi:10.3390/en12081481

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record