- -

Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Gujarro;Tsnaslands ...
Tamaño: 3.225Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Guijarro, Francisco es_ES
dc.contributor.author Tsinaslanidis, Prodromos es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-03T03:32:59Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-03T03:32:59Z
dc.date.issued 2020-04 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/167219
dc.description.abstract [EN] Environmental valuation refers to a variety of techniques to assign monetary values to environmental impacts, especially non-market impacts. It has experienced a steady growth in the number of publications on the subject in the last 30 years. We performed a search for papers containing the term "environmental valuation" in the title, abstract, or keywords. The search was conducted with an online literature search engine of the Web of Science (WoS) electronic databases. A search of this database revealed that the term "environmental valuation" appeared for the first time in 1987. Since then a large number of studies have been published, including significant breakthroughs in theory and applications. In the present work 661 publications were selected for a review of the literature on environmental valuation over the period 1987-2019. This paper analyzes the evolution of the leading methodologies and authors, highlights the preference for the choice experiment method over the contingent valuation method, and shows that relatively few papers have had a strong impact on the researchers in this area es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online) es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Environmental valuation es_ES
dc.subject Literature survey es_ES
dc.subject Willingness to pay es_ES
dc.subject Choice experiment es_ES
dc.subject Contingent valuation es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDAD es_ES
dc.title Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/ijerph17072386 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Guijarro, F.; Tsinaslanidis, P. (2020). Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online). 17(7):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072386 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072386 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 14 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 17 es_ES
dc.description.issue 7 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1660-4601 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 32244553 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC7178272 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\406611 es_ES
dc.description.references Nyborg, K. (2000). Project analysis as input to public debate: Environmental valuation versus physical unit indicators. Ecological Economics, 34(3), 393-408. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00180-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Christie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., & Kenter, J. O. (2012). An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 83, 67-78. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Remoundou, K., & Koundouri, P. (2009). Environmental Effects on Public Health: An Economic Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(8), 2160-2178. doi:10.3390/ijerph6082160 es_ES
dc.description.references Niemeyer, S., & Spash, C. L. (2001). Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 567-585. doi:10.1068/c9s es_ES
dc.description.references Baranzini, A., & Ramirez, J. V. (2005). Paying for Quietness: The Impact of Noise on Geneva Rents. Urban Studies, 42(4), 633-646. doi:10.1080/00420980500060186 es_ES
dc.description.references Guijarro, F. (2019). Assessing the Impact of Road Traffic Externalities on Residential Price Values: A Case Study in Madrid, Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5149. doi:10.3390/ijerph16245149 es_ES
dc.description.references Thorne, R., & Shepherd, D. (2013). Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(7), 2741-2759. doi:10.3390/ijerph10072741 es_ES
dc.description.references Hanemann, W. M. (2003). Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Reply. American Economic Review, 93(1), 464-464. doi:10.1257/000282803321455449 es_ES
dc.description.references Adamowicz, W. L., Bhardwaj, V., & Macnab, B. (1993). Experiments on the Difference between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept. Land Economics, 69(4), 416. doi:10.2307/3146458 es_ES
dc.description.references Plottu, E., & Plottu, B. (2007). The concept of Total Economic Value of environment: A reconsideration within a hierarchical rationality. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 52-61. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.027 es_ES
dc.description.references Aznar, J., Guijarro, F., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2009). Mixed valuation methods: a combined AHP-GP procedure for individual and group multicriteria agricultural valuation. Annals of Operations Research, 190(1), 221-238. doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0527-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Adamowicz, W. L. (2004). What’s it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation*. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48(3), 419-443. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00258.x es_ES
dc.description.references Hoyos, D. (2010). The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1595-1603. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Is Choice Experiment Becoming More Popular Than Contingent Valuation? A Systematic Review in Agriculture, Environment and Healthhttps://econpapers.repec.org/paper/faewpaper/2014.12.htm es_ES
dc.description.references Boxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421-446. doi:10.1023/a:1021351721619 es_ES
dc.description.references Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making. PharmacoEconomics, 26(8), 661-677. doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 es_ES
dc.description.references Hanley, N., Mourato, S., & Wright, R. E. (2002). Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435-462. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00145 es_ES
dc.description.references Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3/4), 413-428. doi:10.1023/a:1008287310583 es_ES
dc.description.references Turner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., & Georgiou, S. (2003). Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 493-510. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00189-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 277-286. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00120-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Boxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L., Swait, J., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics, 18(3), 243-253. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(96)00039-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrini, S., & Scarpa, R. (2007). Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3), 342-363. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1997). Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 65-84. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0957 es_ES
dc.description.references Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57-70. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-s es_ES
dc.description.references Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 64-75. doi:10.2307/3180269 es_ES
dc.description.references Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(3), 271-292. doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1017 es_ES
dc.description.references Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157. doi:10.1086/259131 es_ES
dc.description.references Ščasný, M., Zvěřinová, I., Czajkowski, M., Kyselá, E., & Zagórska, K. (2016). Public acceptability of climate change mitigation policies: a discrete choice experiment. Climate Policy, 17(sup1), S111-S130. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1248888 es_ES
dc.description.references Streimikiene, Balezentis, Alisauskaite-Seskiene, Stankuniene, & Simanaviciene. (2019). A Review of Willingness to Pay Studies for Climate Change Mitigation in the Energy Sector. Energies, 12(8), 1481. doi:10.3390/en12081481 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem