- -

Characteristics of meat, pet, and research rabbit farms in Brazil: An overview based on twelve farms

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Characteristics of meat, pet, and research rabbit farms in Brazil: An overview based on twelve farms

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Silva, Kassy Gomes da es_ES
dc.contributor.author Borges, Tâmara Duarte es_ES
dc.contributor.author Costa, Leandro Batista es_ES
dc.contributor.author Sotomaior, Cristina Santos es_ES
dc.coverage.spatial east=-51.92528; north=-14.235004; name=Brasil es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-06T07:40:16Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-06T07:40:16Z
dc.date.issued 2021-06-30
dc.identifier.issn 1257-5011
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/168820
dc.description.abstract [EN] Rabbit production has great growth potential in a country where animal production is very important. However, there is little data about this industry in Southern and Southeast Brazil. The aim of this study was to describe Brazilian rabbit farms that provide meat, pets and animals for learning or research. Three pet farms, four meat farms and five research rabbit farms were visited, and the production and farm characteristics data were collected between June 2018 and March 2019. A total of 1170 rabbits and 617 cages were evaluated. Most farms had 21 to 60 (58.3%) does. Considering all farms, the farmers reported an average rate of conception of 71.8%, prolificacy rate of 6.7 kits per parturition, average interval between parturitions of 65 d and 6.3 parturitions/doe yr. The mean mortality rate for breeding rabbits was 10.4%, compared to 1.7% for growing rabbits (rabbits post-weaning until slaughter or sale). The average area of a cage was 0.43±0.1 m², with an average stocking density for growing rabbits of 3 rabbits/m². The most common cage system used by farmers was a flat-deck (66.7% of farms) system with a wire cage (91.7%). Metal (41.7%) and clay (33.3%) feeders were the most common types of feeders, and automatic nipple drinkers were present in 75% of the farms. Dirt accumulation was observed in 11.2% of the cages and 5.7% of the drinkers, but not in feeders. A total of 4.1% of the cages were considered unsafe, and 0.8% had problems with the drinkers. The farms studied ranged from small to medium in size, used an extensive reproductive rhythm and followed basic production techniques. Animal health and management aspects need to be reviewed by the farmer if the rabbit production conditions are to improve. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship : This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brazil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. We especially thank all the farmers who agreed to participate in this study. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof World Rabbit Science es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa) es_ES
dc.subject Brazil es_ES
dc.subject Facilities es_ES
dc.subject Rabbitry es_ES
dc.subject Reproductive performance es_ES
dc.subject Structural characterization es_ES
dc.title Characteristics of meat, pet, and research rabbit farms in Brazil: An overview based on twelve farms es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wrs.2021.14125
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CAPES//001/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Silva, KGD.; Borges, TD.; Costa, LB.; Sotomaior, CS. (2021). Characteristics of meat, pet, and research rabbit farms in Brazil: An overview based on twelve farms. World Rabbit Science. 29(2):115-123. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2021.14125 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2021.14125 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 115 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 123 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 29 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-8886
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\14125 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Coordenaçao de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil es_ES
dc.description.references ACBC. 2020a. Venda de coelhos pet aumenta durante pandemia. Associação Científica Brasileira de Cunicultura (ACBC). Bambuí, May 30, 2020. es_ES
dc.description.references ACBC. 2020b. ACBC manifesta preocupação com a situação de cunicultores frente aos preços das rações. Associação Científica Brasileira de Cunicultura (ACBC). Bambuí, October, 22, 2020. es_ES
dc.description.references Andrea B.S. 2014. Rabbit production in Costa Rica: breaking with tradition. In: Pérez Y.E.F. (ed). Investigación em la cunicultura de las Américas (Rabbit Research in the Americas). Universidad Antónoma del Estado de México (UAEM), Toluca, México, 324-332. es_ES
dc.description.references Becerril-Pérez C.M. 2006 A reflection on rabbit production in emergent countries: the case of Mexico. In Proc.: 3rd Rabbit Congress of the Americas, 21-23 August, Maringá, Brazil. 1: 16 p. es_ES
dc.description.references Bonamigo A., Winck C.A., Sehnem S. 2015. Diagnóstico da produção e comércio cunícula do Estado de Santa Catarina. Rev. Bras. Cunicult., 7: 13-38. http://www.rbc.acbc.org.br/images/Diagn%C3%B3stico_produ%C3%A7%C3%A3o_pronto.pdf Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references Colin M., Lebas F. 1996. Rabbit meat production in the world. A proposal for every country. In Proc.: 6th World Rabbit Congress, 9-12 July, Toulouse, France. 3: 323-330. es_ES
dc.description.references http://world-rabbit-science.com/WRSA-Proceedings/Congress-1996-Toulouse/Papers-pdf/09-Management-&-Production/COLIN(1).pdf Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references Cuttis L.E.D., Ponce de Léon R.E. 2006. The Cuban rabbit production, an alternative for the meat production. Nowadays situation. In Proc.: 3rd Rabbit Congress of the Americas, 21-23 August, Maringá, Brazil. es_ES
dc.description.references Cortazar G., Martinez M. 2006. An approach towards the rabbit production in Colombia. In Proc.: 3rd Rabbit Congress of the Americas, 21-23 August, Maringá, Brazil. es_ES
dc.description.references EFSA. 2005. The impact of the current housing and husbandry systems on the health and welfare of farmed domestic rabbits. EFSA J., 267: 1-31. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.267 Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references EFSA. AHAW Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare). 2020. Scientific Opinion on the health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems. EFSA J.,18: 5944. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944 es_ES
dc.description.references El-Raffa A.M. 2004. Rabbit production in hot climates. In Proc.: 8th World Rabbit Congress, 7-10 September 2004. Puebla, México. 1: 1172-1180. es_ES
dc.description.references FAOSTAT. 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ Accessed June 2020. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferreira, W.M., Machado, L.C., Jaruche, Y.G., Carvalho G.G., Oliveira C.E.A., Souza J.D.S., Caríssimo A.P.G. 2012. Manual prático de cunicultura. Author ed., Bambuí, Brazil. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferreira W.M., Machado L.C., Ramirez M.A., Ferreira S.R.A. 2010. The rabbit production in Brazil. In Proc.: 4th American Rabbit Congress, 24-26 September 2010. Córdoba, Argentina. es_ES
dc.description.references Heker M.M. 2015. Opinião: a cunicultura pet no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Cunicult., 7: 1-8. http://www.rbc.acbc.org.br/images/opini%C3%A3o_pet.pdf Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references IBGE. 2017. Agricultural census of 2017, Brazil. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/censo-agropecuario/censo-agropecuario-2017#cna Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references Khalil B.A. 2018. Effect of season on Californian rabbit performance. Curr. Sci. Int., 7: 79-82. Machado L.C. 2015. Pesquisas de preferência, divulgação da atividade de cunicultura e mercado pet cunícula brasileiro. es_ES
dc.description.references Rev. Bras. Cunicult., 8: 1-12. http://www.rbc.acbc.org.br/images/Pesquisa_e_divulga%C3%A7%C3%A3o_em_Cunicultura.pdf Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references Machado L.C.M., Ferreira W.M. 2014. Opinião: Organização e estratégias da cunicultura brasileira - buscando soluções. Rev. Bras. Cunicult., 6: 1-31. http://www.rbc.acbc.org.br/images/Opini%C3%A3o_Estrat%C3%A9gias_da_cunicultura_-_buscando_solu%C3%A7%C3%B5es.pdf Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references Marciano L.E.A., Rodrigues G.R.A., Bessa A.F.O., Azevedo P.C.A., Neto P.J.R., Moura M.T., Moreira G.R., Costa M.L.L. 2018. Characterization of reproductive parameters of the lionhead breed. In Proc: 6th American Rabbit Congress, 27-29 August 2018. Goiânia, Brazil. es_ES
dc.description.references Marai, I.F., Habeeb A.A., Gad, A. 2002. Rabbits' productive, reproductive, and physiological performance traits are affected by heat stress: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 78: 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00091-X es_ES
dc.description.references Moura A.S.A.M.T. Rabbit production in Latin America. 2010. In Proc.: 4th American Rabbit Congress, 24-26 September 2010. Córdoba, Argentina. es_ES
dc.description.references Osechas, D., Sánchez, L.M.B. 2006. Producción y mercadeo de carne de conejo em el Estado Trujillo, Venezuela. Rev. Cient. (Maracaibo), 16: 129-135. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?pid=S0798-22592006000200006&script=sci_arttext Accessed February 2021. es_ES
dc.description.references Quagliariello S.G., 2014. Strategies for collective action: production-cooperative "conejos andinos de Mendoza" In: Pérez et al. (ed). Investigación em la cunicultura de las Américas (Rabbit Research in the Americas). Universidad Antónoma del Estado de México (UAEM), Toluca, Mexico, 334-372. es_ES
dc.description.references Ribeiro B.P.V.B., Machado L.C. 2011. Panorama do primeiro ano de funcionamento do setor de Cunicultura do IFMG-Bambuí. In Proc.: 4th Semana de Ciência e Tecnologia IFMG- campus Bambuí, 6-9 December 2011. Bambuí, Brazil, 1:1-5. es_ES
dc.description.references Rivera J., Losada H., Cortés J., Vargas J. 2011. Caracterización de la producción de conejos de pequena escala em la zona de los volcanes próxima a la Ciudad de México. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 23: 140. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/6/rive23140.htm es_ES
dc.description.references Salas P.F. 2006. La cunicultura em equador. In Proc.: 3rd Rabbit Congress of the Americas, 21-23 August, Maringá, Brazil. es_ES
dc.description.references Silva K.G., Sotomaior C.S., Cost, L.B. 2017. Produtividade de coelhas Nova Zelândia Branco: estudo retrospectivo. Rev. Bras. Cunicult., 12: 37-44. http://www.rbc.acbc.org.br/images/Estudo_retrospectivo.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Tůma J., Tůmová E., Valášek V. 2010. The effect of season and parity es_ES
dc.description.references order on fertility of rabbit does and kit growth. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 55: 330-336. https://doi.org/10.17221/317/2009-CJAS es_ES
dc.description.references Valentim J.K., Machado L.C., Lopes V.L., Paula K.L.C., Bittencourt T.M., Rodrigues R.F.M., Roberto C.H.V., Dallago G.M. 2018. Perfil dos criadores de coelho pet no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Cunicult., 13: 27-45. http://www.rbc.acbc.org.br/images/Perfil_dos_cunicultores_PET.pdf es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem