Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Cuesta-Fernández, Iván | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Belda-Miquel, Sergio | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Calabuig Tormo, Carola | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-10T03:30:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-10T03:30:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04-02 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1351-1610 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/169056 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Over the last decade, grassroots challengers to the Spanish electricity regime have grown in number and diversity. But whilst 'newer' renewable actors have attracted increasing scholarly attention, 'older', affordability-oriented challengers remain under-studied, despite their evolution. Prompted by an interest in potential coalitions of challengers in Spain, we draw inspiration from the Multi-Level Perspective to explore how traditional, community-owned electricity distribution cooperatives 'read' the energy transition and act accordingly. Our analysis traces the evolution of one such cooperative, the Cooperativa Electrica d'Alginet (CEA), and draws on 16 interviews, secondary literature and media reports. We scrutinise how CEA frames changes in the landscape, windows of opportunity in the regime, and the evolution of challengers. Our key finding is a growing alignment of CEA with the frames espoused by the younger renewable cooperatives. This rapprochement invites further research about emerging political coalitions between extant and novel challengers in national electricity regimes. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia [Grant Number CCD ADSIDEO 2016]. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial (by-nc) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Energy transition | es_ES |
dc.subject | Coalitions | es_ES |
dc.subject | Multi-level perspective | es_ES |
dc.subject | Challengers | es_ES |
dc.subject | Spain | es_ES |
dc.subject | Electricity distribution cooperatives | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA | es_ES |
dc.title | Challengers in energy transitions beyond renewable energy cooperatives: community-owned electricity distribution cooperatives in Spain | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13511610.2020.1732197 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Cuesta-Fernández, I.; Belda-Miquel, S.; Calabuig Tormo, C. (2020). Challengers in energy transitions beyond renewable energy cooperatives: community-owned electricity distribution cooperatives in Spain. Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research. 33(2):140-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1732197 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1732197 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 140 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 159 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 33 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 2 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\406515 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Universitat Politècnica de València | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2018). Renewables. doi:10.7551/mitpress/11112.001.0001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., & Holstenkamp, L. (2016). What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 136-147. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Becker, S., Kunze, C., & Vancea, M. (2017). Community energy and social entrepreneurship: Addressing purpose, organisation and embeddedness of renewable energy projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 25-36. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.048 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611-639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bos, B., & Grin, J. (2008). «Doing» Reflexive Modernization in Pig Husbandry. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(4), 480-507. doi:10.1177/0162243907306697 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bosman, R., Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Pistorius, T. (2014). Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 45-59. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Capellán-Pérez, I., Campos-Celador, Á., & Terés-Zubiaga, J. (2018). Renewable Energy Cooperatives as an instrument towards the energy transition in Spain. Energy Policy, 123, 215-229. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.064 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ciarreta, A., Espinosa, M. P., & Pizarro-Irizar, C. (2014). Is green energy expensive? Empirical evidence from the Spanish electricity market. Energy Policy, 69, 205-215. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.025 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fuchs, G., & Hinderer, N. (2016). One or many transitions: local electricity experiments in Germany. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 320-336. doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1188683 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Garrués-Irurzun, J. (2010). Market power versus regulatory power in the Spanish electricity system, 1973–1996. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2), 655-666. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495-510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21-40. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., … Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896-913. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463-479. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gómez, A., Dopazo, C., & Fueyo, N. (2016). The «cost of not doing» energy planning: The Spanish energy bubble. Energy, 101, 434-446. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Haas, T. (2019). Struggles in European Union energy politics: A gramscian perspective on power in energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 48, 66-74. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.011 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Sáez, L., Allur, E., & Morandeira, J. (2018). The emergence of renewable energy cooperatives in Spain: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 1036-1043. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.049 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hess, D. J. (2018). Energy democracy and social movements: A multi-coalition perspective on the politics of sustainability transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 177-189. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hess, D. J. (2019). Coalitions, framing, and the politics of energy transitions: Local democracy and community choice in California. Energy Research & Social Science, 50, 38-50. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.013 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Islar, M., & Busch, H. (2016). «We are not in this to save the polar bears!» – the link between community renewable energy development and ecological citizenship. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 303-319. doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1188684 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change – Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215-237. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Munoz, L. A. H., Huijben, J. C. C. M., Verhees, B., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2014). The power of grid parity: A discursive approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 179-190. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.012 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pellicer-Sifres, V., Belda-Miquel, S., Cuesta-Fernandez, I., & Boni, A. (2018). Learning, transformative action, and grassroots innovation: Insights from the Spanish energy cooperative Som Energia. Energy Research & Social Science, 42, 100-111. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Romero-Rubio, C., & de Andrés Díaz, J. R. (2015). Sustainable energy communities: a study contrasting Spain and Germany. Energy Policy, 85, 397-409. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.012 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rosenbloom, D., Berton, H., & Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada. Research Policy, 45(6), 1275-1290. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.012 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15-31. doi:10.1108/14636680110803003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rubio-Mondéjar, J. A., & Garrués-Irurzun, J. (2015). Economic and Social Power in Spain: corporate networks of banks, utilities and other large companies (1917–2009). Business History, 58(6), 858-879. doi:10.1080/00076791.2015.1115483 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Scoones, I., Leach, M., & Newell, P. (Eds.). (2015). The Politics of Green Transformations. doi:10.4324/9781315747378 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014). A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 21-44. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., & Smith, A. (2013). A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 61, 977-989. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Smith, A. (2007). Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427-450. doi:10.1080/09537320701403334 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Smith, A., Fressoli, M., Abrol, D., Arond, E., & Ely, A. (2016). Grassroots Innovation Movements. doi:10.4324/9781315697888 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435-448. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464. doi:10.2307/2095581 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Stenzel, T., & Frenzel, A. (2008). Regulating technological change—The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets. Energy Policy, 36(7), 2645-2657. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Szarka, J. (2010). Bringing interests back in: using coalition theories to explain European wind power policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 836-853. doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.486988 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813245 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Vancea, M., Becker, S., & Kunze, C. (2017). El arraigo local en proyectos energéticos comunitarios. Una perspectiva de emprendimiento social. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 75(4), 077. doi:10.3989/ris.2017.75.4.17.03 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Verbong, G. P. J., & Geels, F. W. (2010). Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1214-1221. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2655-2663. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055 | es_ES |