- -

Promotional rhetorical strategies in topic generalizations of increasing specificity

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Promotional rhetorical strategies in topic generalizations of increasing specificity

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: BaibatyrovaZharky ...
Tamaño: 234.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Baibatyrova, Aigul A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Zharkynbekova, Sholpan K. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-12T06:57:54Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-12T06:57:54Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07-08
dc.identifier.issn 1886-2438
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/169077
dc.description.abstract [EN] This study explores the rhetorical strategies employed in topic generalizations of increasing specificity in the introductions from the leading peer-reviewed journals. Specifically, we identified the substeps in Move1-Step1, which show how the writers promote the significance of the research area. The qualitative approach enabled us to distinguish eight substeps provisionally outlining the common patterning of the discourse and to analyze the linguistic choices enhancing the persuasiveness of claims. Citation, attitude markers, boosters and hedges have been found the most effective devices for preserving balance between assertion and concession. The quantitative analysis of the texts defined the frequency rate of the substeps discerned including their total sum of occurrences and percentages per introduction. The substep level analysis has contributed to scrutinizing the subtle communicative functions of the rhetorical strategies in the textual structure. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Rhetoric es_ES
dc.subject Move es_ES
dc.subject Step es_ES
dc.subject Strategy es_ES
dc.subject Discourse es_ES
dc.subject Metadiscourse es_ES
dc.title Promotional rhetorical strategies in topic generalizations of increasing specificity es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/rlyla.2021.14445
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Baibatyrova, AA.; Zharkynbekova, SK. (2021). Promotional rhetorical strategies in topic generalizations of increasing specificity. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 16(1):25-35. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2021.14445 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2021.14445 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 25 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 35 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 16 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1886-6298
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\14445 es_ES
dc.description.references Afros, E. & Schryer, C.F. (2009). "Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies", English for Specific Purposes, 28/1, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.09.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. M. Holquist (Eds.), trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Basturkmen, H. (2009.) "Commenting on results in published research articles and masters' dissertations in Language Teaching", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Basturkmen, H. (2012). "A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin. T.N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. https://doi.org/10.2307/358302 es_ES
dc.description.references Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.2307/358302 es_ES
dc.description.references Brett, P. (1994). "A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles", English for Specific Purposes, 13, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Chang, P. & Schleppegrell, M. (2011). "Taking an effective stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 140- 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Cotos, E., Huffman S. & Link, S. (2015). "Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 52-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Cotos, E., Huffman S. & Link, S. (2017). "A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating Rigour and Credibility", English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Crismore A., Markkanen, R. & Steffensen, M.S. (1993). "Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish university students", Written Communication, 10, 39-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002 es_ES
dc.description.references Dahl, T. (2008). "Contributing to the academic conversation: a study of new knowledge claims in economics and linguistics", Journal of Pragmatics, 40/7, 1184-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Dahl, T. (2009). "The linguistic representation of rhetorical function: a study of how economists present their knowledge claims", Written Communication, 26/4, 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309341241 es_ES
dc.description.references Haggan, M. (2004). "Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: dimensions of attraction", Journal of Pragmatics, 36/2, 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00090-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Harwood, N. (2005). "'Nowhere has anyone attempted… in this article I aim to do just that': a corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines", Journal of Pragmatics, 37/8, 1207-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Holmes, R. (1997). "Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines", English for Specific Purposes, 16/4, 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662 es_ES
dc.description.references Hunston, S. (1989). Evaluation in experimental research articles. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Department of English, University of Birmingham. es_ES
dc.description.references Hunston, S. & Thompson G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (1998). "Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge", Text, 18/3, 349-382. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (1999). "Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles", in C.N. Candlin, & K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, Processes And Practices. London: Longman, 99-121. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840390-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Pearson. es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum. es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2005b). "Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse", Discourse Studies 7/2, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2010). "Metadiscourse: Mapping interaction in academic writing", Nordic Journal of English Studies 9/2, 125-145. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220 es_ES
dc.description.references Kwan, B.S.C. (2017). "A cross-paradigm macro-structure analysis of research articles in Information System", English for Specific Purposes, 45, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Kwan, B.S.C. & Chan H. (2014). "An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical articles in Information Systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Lindeberg, A.-Ch. (2004). Promotion and Politeness: Conflicting scholarly rhetoric in three disciplines. Albo, Finland: Abo Akademi University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Lin, L. & Evans, S. (2012). "Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study", English for Specific Purposes, 31, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim, J.M.-H. (2006). "Method sections of management research articles: a pedagogically motivated qualitative study", English for Specific Purposes, 25/3, 282-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim, J.M.-H. (2010). "Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genrebased investigation", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 94/4, 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.10.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim, J.M.-H. (2011). "Paving the way for research findings': Writers' rhetorical choices in education and applied linguistics", Discourse Studies, 13/6, 725-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421364 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim, J.M.-H. (2012). "How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers' rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim, J.M.-H. (2019). "Explicit and implicit justifications of experimental procedures in language education: Pedagogical implications of studying expert writers' communicative resources", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.10.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Loi, Ch.K. (2010). "Research article introductions in Chinese and English: A comparative genre-based study", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9/4, 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, P. & León Pérez, I.K. (2014). "Convincing peers of the value of one's research: a genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts", English for Specific Purposes, 34, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.09.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, J.R. & White P.R.R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 es_ES
dc.description.references Moreno, A.I. & Swales J.M. (2018). "Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap", English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Oztürk, I. (2007). "The textual organization of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline", English for Specific Purposes, 26/1, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Peacock, M. (2002). "Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles", System, 30/4, 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Samraj, B. (2002). "Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines", English for Specific Purposes, 21/1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Samraj, B. (2008). "A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7/1, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Shaw, Ph. (2003). "Evaluation and promotion across languages", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2/4, 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00050-X es_ES
dc.description.references Shehzad, W. (2008). "Move two: establishing a niche", Ibérica, 15, 25-50. es_ES
dc.description.references Sheldon, E. (2011). "Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers", English for Academic Purposes, 10, 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres. Exploration and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 es_ES
dc.description.references Swales, J.M. & Feak C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Wang, W. & Yang, Ch. (2015). "Claiming centrality as promotion in applied linguistics research article introductions", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Yang, R. & Allison D. (2003). "Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions", English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem