- -

LES Eulerian diffuse-interface modeling of fuel dense sprays near- and far-field

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

LES Eulerian diffuse-interface modeling of fuel dense sprays near- and far-field

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Desantes Fernández, José Mª es_ES
dc.contributor.author García-Oliver, José M es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pastor Enguídanos, José Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Olmeda-Ramiro, Iván es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pandal, A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Naud, B. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-16T03:31:27Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-16T03:31:27Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0301-9322 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/169345
dc.description.abstract [EN] Engine fuel spray modeling still remains a challenge, especially in the dense near-nozzle region. This region is difficult to experimentally access and also to model due to the complex and rapid liquid and gas interaction. Modeling approaches based on Lagrangian particle tracking have failed in this area, while Eulerian modeling has proven to be particularly useful. Interface resolved methods are still limited to primary atomization academic configurations due to excessive computational requirements. To overcome those limitations, the single-fluid diffuse interface model known as Sigma-Y, arises as a single-framework for spray simulations. Under the assumption of scale separation at high Reynolds and Weber numbers, liquid dispersion is modeled as turbulent mixing of a variable density flow. The concept of surface area density is used for representing liquid structures, regardless of the complexity of the interface. In this work, a LES based implementation of the Sigma-Y model in the OpenFOAM CFD library is applied to simulate the ECN Spray A configuration. Model assessment is performed for both near- and far-field spray development regions using different experimental diagnostics available from ECN database. The CFD model is able to capture near-nozzle fuel mass distribution and, after Sigma equation constant calibration, interfacial surface area. Accurate predictions of spray far-field evolution in terms of liquid and vapor tip penetration and local velocity can be simultaneously achieved. Model accuracy is lower when compared to mixture fraction axial evolution, despite radial distribution profiles are well captured. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work was partially funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad within the frame of the CHEST (TRA2017-89139-C2-1-R) project. The computations were partially performed on the Tirant III cluster of the Servei d'Informatica of the University of Valencia (vlc38-FI-2018-2-0006). Authors acknowledge the computer resources at Picasso and the technical support provided by Universidad de Malaga (UMA) (RES-FI-2018-1-0039). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Multiphase Flow es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Large eddy simulation es_ES
dc.subject Eulerian es_ES
dc.subject Diesel spray es_ES
dc.subject Atomization es_ES
dc.subject Engine Combustion Network (ECN) es_ES
dc.subject OpenFOAM es_ES
dc.subject.classification MAQUINAS Y MOTORES TERMICOS es_ES
dc.title LES Eulerian diffuse-interface modeling of fuel dense sprays near- and far-field es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103272 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UMA//RES-FI-2018-1-0039/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/TRA2017-89139-C2-1-R/ES/DESARROLLO DE MODELOS DE COMBUSTION Y EMISIONES HPC PARA EL ANALISIS DE PLANTAS PROPULSIVAS DE TRANSPORTE SOSTENIBLES/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Máquinas y Motores Térmicos - Departament de Màquines i Motors Tèrmics es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Desantes Fernández, JM.; García-Oliver, JM.; Pastor Enguídanos, JM.; Olmeda-Ramiro, I.; Pandal, A.; Naud, B. (2020). LES Eulerian diffuse-interface modeling of fuel dense sprays near- and far-field. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 127:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103272 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103272 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 13 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 127 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\408265 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universidad de Málaga es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agencia Estatal de Investigación es_ES
dc.description.references Andreini, A., Bianchini, C., Puggelli, S., & Demoulin, F. X. (2016). Development of a turbulent liquid flux model for Eulerian–Eulerian multiphase flow simulations. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 81, 88-103. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.02.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Anez, J., Ahmed, A., Hecht, N., Duret, B., Reveillon, J., & Demoulin, F. X. (2019). Eulerian–Lagrangian spray atomization model coupled with interface capturing method for diesel injectors. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 113, 325-342. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.10.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Baldwin, E. T., Grover, R. O., Parrish, S. E., Duke, D. J., Matusik, K. E., Powell, C. F., … Schmidt, D. P. (2016). String flash-boiling in gasoline direct injection simulations with transient needle motion. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 87, 90-101. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Bardi, M., Payri, R., Malbec, L. M., Bruneaux, G., Pickett, L. M., Manin, J., … Genzale, C. (2012). ENGINE COMBUSTION NETWORK: COMPARISON OF SPRAY DEVELOPMENT, VAPORIZATION, AND COMBUSTION IN DIFFERENT COMBUSTION VESSELS. Atomization and Sprays, 22(10), 807-842. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2013005837 es_ES
dc.description.references Battistoni, M., Som, S., & Powell, C. F. (2019). Highly resolved Eulerian simulations of fuel spray transients in single and multi-hole injectors: Nozzle flow and near-exit dynamics. Fuel, 251, 709-729. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.076 es_ES
dc.description.references Beheshti, N., Burluka, A. A., & Fairweather, M. (2007). Assessment of Σ−Y liq model predictions for air-assisted atomisation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 21(5), 381-397. doi:10.1007/s00162-007-0052-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Chesnel, J., Reveillon, J., Menard, T., & Demoulin, F.-X. (2011). LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF LIQUID JET ATOMIZATION. Atomization and Sprays, 21(9), 711-736. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2012003740 es_ES
dc.description.references CMT, 2018. Virtual injection rate generator. es_ES
dc.description.references Crua, C., Heikal, M. R., & Gold, M. R. (2015). Microscopic imaging of the initial stage of diesel spray formation. Fuel, 157, 140-150. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.041 es_ES
dc.description.references Crua, C., Manin, J., & Pickett, L. M. (2017). On the transcritical mixing of fuels at diesel engine conditions. Fuel, 208, 535-548. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.091 es_ES
dc.description.references Dahms, R. N., Manin, J., Pickett, L. M., & Oefelein, J. C. (2013). Understanding high-pressure gas-liquid interface phenomena in Diesel engines. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34(1), 1667-1675. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.169 es_ES
dc.description.references Demoulin, F.-X., Beau, P.-A., Blokkeel, G., Mura, A., & Borghi, R. (2007). A NEW MODEL FOR TURBULENT FLOWS WITH LARGE DENSITY FLUCTUATIONS: APPLICATION TO LIQUID ATOMIZATION. Atomization and Sprays, 17(4), 315-345. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.v17.i4.20 es_ES
dc.description.references Demoulin, F.-X., Reveillon, J., Duret, B., Bouali, Z., Desjonqueres, P., & Menard, T. (2013). TOWARD USING DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO IMPROVE PRIMARY BREAK-UP MODELING. Atomization and Sprays, 23(11), 957-980. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2013007439 es_ES
dc.description.references Desantes, J. M., García-Oliver, J. M., Pastor, J. M., Pandal, A., Baldwin, E., & Schmidt, D. P. (2016). Coupled/decoupled spray simulation comparison of the ECN spray a condition with the -Y Eulerian atomization model. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 80, 89-99. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.12.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Dukowicz, J. K. (1980). A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays. Journal of Computational Physics, 35(2), 229-253. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(80)90087-x es_ES
dc.description.references Duret, B., Reveillon, J., Menard, T., & Demoulin, F. X. (2013). Improving primary atomization modeling through DNS of two-phase flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 55, 130-137. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references ECN, 2014. LVF data archive. es_ES
dc.description.references ECN, 2018. Engine combustion network data archive. es_ES
dc.description.references Garcia-Oliver, J. M., Pastor, J. M., Pandal, A., Trask, N., Baldwin, E., & Schmidt, D. P. (2013). DIESEL SPRAY CFD SIMULATIONS BASED ON THE Σ-Υ EULERIAN ATOMIZATION MODEL. Atomization and Sprays, 23(1), 71-95. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2013007198 es_ES
dc.description.references Gorokhovski, M., & Herrmann, M. (2008). Modeling Primary Atomization. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 40(1), 343-366. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102200 es_ES
dc.description.references Hussein, H. J., Capp, S. P., & George, W. K. (1994). Velocity measurements in a high-Reynolds-number, momentum-conserving, axisymmetric, turbulent jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 258, 31-75. doi:10.1017/s002211209400323x es_ES
dc.description.references Ilavsky, J., & Jemian, P. R. (2009). Irena: tool suite for modeling and analysis of small-angle scattering. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 42(2), 347-353. doi:10.1107/s0021889809002222 es_ES
dc.description.references Jasak, H., Weller, H. G., & Gosman, A. D. (1999). High resolution NVD differencing scheme for arbitrarily unstructured meshes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 31(2), 431-449. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19990930)31:2<431::aid-fld884>3.0.co;2-t es_ES
dc.description.references Kastengren, A., Ilavsky, J., Viera, J. P., Payri, R., Duke, D. J., Swantek, A., … Powell, C. F. (2017). Measurements of droplet size in shear-driven atomization using ultra-small angle x-ray scattering. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 92, 131-139. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.03.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Kastengren, A. L., Tilocco, F. Z., Powell, C. F., Manin, J., Pickett, L. M., Payri, R., & Bazyn, T. (2012). ENGINE COMBUSTION NETWORK (ECN): MEASUREMENTS OF NOZZLE GEOMETRY AND HYDRAULIC BEHAVIOR. Atomization and Sprays, 22(12), 1011-1052. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2013006309 es_ES
dc.description.references Kastengren, A. L., Tilocco,F. Z., Duke, D. J., Powell, C. F., Seoksu, M., Xusheng, Z., 2012b. Time-resolved x-ray radiography of diesel injectors from the engine combustion network. ICLASS Paper (1369). es_ES
dc.description.references Kastengren, A. L., Powell, C. F., Wang, Y., Im, K.-S., & Wang, J. (2009). X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS OF DIESEL SPRAY STRUCTURE AT ENGINE-LIKE AMBIENT DENSITY. Atomization and Sprays, 19(11), 1031-1044. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.v19.i11.30 es_ES
dc.description.references Klein, M., Sadiki, A., & Janicka, J. (2003). A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 186(2), 652-665. doi:10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00090-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Kraichnan, R. H. (1970). Diffusion by a Random Velocity Field. Physics of Fluids, 13(1), 22. doi:10.1063/1.1692799 es_ES
dc.description.references Lacaze, G., Misdariis, A., Ruiz, A., & Oefelein, J. C. (2015). Analysis of high-pressure Diesel fuel injection processes using LES with real-fluid thermodynamics and transport. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 35(2), 1603-1611. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.072 es_ES
dc.description.references Lebas, R., Menard, T., Beau, P. A., Berlemont, A., & Demoulin, F. X. (2009). Numerical simulation of primary break-up and atomization: DNS and modelling study. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 35(3), 247-260. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.11.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Ma, P. C., Wu, H., Jaravel, T., Bravo, L., & Ihme, M. (2019). Large-eddy simulations of transcritical injection and auto-ignition using diffuse-interface method and finite-rate chemistry. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 37(3), 3303-3310. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.063 es_ES
dc.description.references Macian, V., Bermudez, V., Payri, R., & Gimeno, J. (2003). NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINATION OF INTERNAL GEOMETRY OF A DIESEL NOZZLE WITH THE USE OF SILICONE METHODOLOGY. Experimental Techniques, 27(2), 39-43. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1567.2003.tb00107.x es_ES
dc.description.references Manin, J., Bardi, M., Pickett, L. M., & Manin, J. (2012). SP2-4 Evaluation of the liquid length via diffused back-illumination imaging in vaporizing diesel sprays(SP: Spray and Spray Combustion,General Session Papers). The Proceedings of the International symposium on diagnostics and modeling of combustion in internal combustion engines, 2012.8(0), 665-673. doi:10.1299/jmsesdm.2012.8.665 es_ES
dc.description.references Matheis, J., & Hickel, S. (2018). Multi-component vapor-liquid equilibrium model for LES of high-pressure fuel injection and application to ECN Spray A. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 99, 294-311. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.11.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Naber, J., Siebers, D., 1996. Effects of gas density and vaporization on penetration and dispersion of diesel sprays. SAE Technical Paper (960034). es_ES
dc.description.references Nicoud, F., Toda, H. B., Cabrit, O., Bose, S., & Lee, J. (2011). Using singular values to build a subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations. Physics of Fluids, 23(8), 085106. doi:10.1063/1.3623274 es_ES
dc.description.references Oefelein, J., Dahms, R., & Lacaze, G. (2012). Detailed Modeling and Simulation of High-Pressure Fuel Injection Processes in Diesel Engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 5(3), 1410-1419. doi:10.4271/2012-01-1258 es_ES
dc.description.references Pandal, A., Pastor, J. M., Payri, R., Kastengren, A., Duke, D., Matusik, K., … Schmidt, D. (2017). Computational and Experimental Investigation of Interfacial Area in Near-Field Diesel Spray Simulation. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 10(2), 423-431. doi:10.4271/2017-01-0859 es_ES
dc.description.references Pandal, A., Payri, R., García-Oliver, J. M., & Pastor, J. M. (2017). Optimization of spray break-up CFD simulations by combining Σ-Y Eulerian atomization model with a response surface methodology under diesel engine-like conditions (ECN Spray A). Computers & Fluids, 156, 9-20. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.06.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Pastor, J. V., Garcia-Oliver, J. M., Pastor, J. M., & Vera-Tudela, W. (2015). ONE-DIMENSIONAL DIESEL SPRAY MODELING OF MULTICOMPONENT FUELS. Atomization and Sprays, 25(6), 485-517. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2014010370 es_ES
dc.description.references Pickett, L. M., Manin, J., Genzale, C. L., Siebers, D. L., Musculus, M. P. B., & Idicheria, C. A. (2011). Relationship Between Diesel Fuel Spray Vapor Penetration/Dispersion and Local Fuel Mixture Fraction. SAE International Journal of Engines, 4(1), 764-799. doi:10.4271/2011-01-0686 es_ES
dc.description.references Pickett, L. M., Manin, J., Kastengren, A., & Powell, C. (2014). Comparison of Near-Field Structure and Growth of a Diesel Spray Using Light-Based Optical Microscopy and X-Ray Radiography. SAE International Journal of Engines, 7(2), 1044-1053. doi:10.4271/2014-01-1412 es_ES
dc.description.references Poinsot, T. ., & Lelef, S. . (1992). Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 101(1), 104-129. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)90046-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Pope, S. B. (2004). Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New Journal of Physics, 6, 35-35. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/035 es_ES
dc.description.references Poursadegh, F., Lacey, J. S., Brear, M. J., & Gordon, R. L. (2017). On the Fuel Spray Transition to Dense Fluid Mixing at Reciprocating Engine Conditions. Energy & Fuels, 31(6), 6445-6454. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00050 es_ES
dc.description.references Ricou, F. P., & Spalding, D. B. (1961). Measurements of entrainment by axisymmetrical turbulent jets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 11(1), 21-32. doi:10.1017/s0022112061000834 es_ES
dc.description.references Robert, A., Martinez, L., Tillou, J., & Richard, S. (2013). Eulerian – Eulerian Large Eddy Simulations Applied to Non-Reactive Transient Diesel Sprays. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, 69(1), 141-154. doi:10.2516/ogst/2013140 es_ES
dc.description.references Schmidt, D. P., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Jasak, H. (2010). Multi-dimensional simulation of thermal non-equilibrium channel flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 36(4), 284-292. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.11.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Shin, D., Sandberg, R. D., & Richardson, E. S. (2017). Self-similarity of fluid residence time statistics in a turbulent round jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 823, 1-25. doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.304 es_ES
dc.description.references Shinjo, J., & Umemura, A. (2010). Simulation of liquid jet primary breakup: Dynamics of ligament and droplet formation. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 36(7), 513-532. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2010.03.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Taub, G. N., Lee, H., Balachandar, S., & Sherif, S. A. (2013). A direct numerical simulation study of higher order statistics in a turbulent round jet. Physics of Fluids, 25(11), 115102. doi:10.1063/1.4829045 es_ES
dc.description.references Trask, N., Schmidt, D. P., Lightfoot, M., & Danczyk, S. (2012). Compressible Modeling of the Internal Two-Phase Flow in a Gas-Centered Swirl Coaxial Fuel Injector. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 28(4), 685-693. doi:10.2514/1.b34102 es_ES
dc.description.references Wehrfritz, A., Kaario, O., Vuorinen, V., & Somers, B. (2016). Large Eddy Simulation of n-dodecane spray flames using Flamelet Generated Manifolds. Combustion and Flame, 167, 113-131. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.019 es_ES
dc.description.references Weller, H. G., Tabor, G., Jasak, H., & Fureby, C. (1998). A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques. Computers in Physics, 12(6), 620. doi:10.1063/1.168744 es_ES
dc.description.references Xue, Q., Battistoni, M., Powell, C. F., Longman, D. E., Quan, S. P., Pomraning, E., … Som, S. (2015). An Eulerian CFD model and X-ray radiography for coupled nozzle flow and spray in internal combustion engines. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 70, 77-88. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.11.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Xue, Q., Som, S., Senecal, P. K., & Pomraning, E. (2013). LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF FUEL-SPRAY UNDER NON-REACTING IC ENGINE CONDITIONS. Atomization and Sprays, 23(10), 925-955. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2013008320 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem