- -

Where Should I Submit My Work for Publication? An Asymmetrical Classification Model to Optimize Choice

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Where Should I Submit My Work for Publication? An Asymmetrical Classification Model to Optimize Choice

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Ferrer Sapena, A.; Calabuig, JM.; García-Raffi, LM.; Sánchez Pérez, EA. (2020). Where Should I Submit My Work for Publication? An Asymmetrical Classification Model to Optimize Choice. Journal of Classification. 37:490-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-019-09331-7

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/169642

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Where Should I Submit My Work for Publication? An Asymmetrical Classification Model to Optimize Choice
Autor: Ferrer Sapena, Antonia Calabuig, J. M. García-Raffi, L. M. Sánchez Pérez, Enrique Alfonso
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Comunicación Audiovisual, Documentación e Historia del Arte - Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual, Documentació i Història de l'Art
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Matemática Aplicada - Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Choosing a journal to publish a work is a task that involves many variables. Usually, the authors' experience allows them to classify journals into categories, according to their suitability and the characteristics ...[+]
Palabras clave: Scientific publication , Best choice of journal , Model , Asymmetric distribution
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
Journal of Classification. (issn: 0176-4268 )
DOI: 10.1007/s00357-019-09331-7
Editorial:
Springer-Verlag
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-019-09331-7
Tipo: Artículo

References

Althouse, B.M., West, J.D., Bergstrom, C.T., Bergstrom, T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 27–34.

Black, S. (2012). How much do core journals change over a decade? Library Resources and Technical Services, 56, 80–93.

Bradshaw, C.J., & Brook, B.W. (2016). How to rank journals. PloS One, 11 (3), e0149852. [+]
Althouse, B.M., West, J.D., Bergstrom, C.T., Bergstrom, T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 27–34.

Black, S. (2012). How much do core journals change over a decade? Library Resources and Technical Services, 56, 80–93.

Bradshaw, C.J., & Brook, B.W. (2016). How to rank journals. PloS One, 11 (3), e0149852.

Ferrer-Sapena, A., Diaz-Novillo, S., Sánchez-Pérez, E.A. (2017). Measuring time-dynamics and time-stability of Journal Rankings in Mathematics and Physics by Means of Fractional p-Variations. Publications, 5(3), 21.

Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E.A., González, L.M., Peset, F., Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). Mathematical properties of weighted impact factors based on measures of prestige of the citing journals. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2089–2108.

Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E.A., González, L.M., Peset, F., Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2016). The impact factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 306–314.

Gastel, B., & Day, R.A. (2016). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

Gibbs, A. (2016). Improving publication: advice for busy higher education academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 255–258.

Grabisch, M.M., Marichal, J.L., Mesiar, R., Pap, E. (2009). Aggregation functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haghdoost, A., Zare, M., Bazrafshan, A. (2014). How variable are the journal impact measures?. Online Information Review, 38, 723–737.

Hol, E.M. (2013). Empirical studies on volatility in international stock markets. Berlin: Springer.

Kelly, J.L. Jr. (2011). A new interpretation of information rate. Manuscript. Reprinted in: The Kelly capital growth investment criterion: theory and practice (pp. 25–34).

Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E. (2000). Triangular norms. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E. (2001). Uniform approximation of associative copulas by strict and non-strict copulas. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 45 (4), 1393–1400.

Lawrence, P.A. (2003). The politics of publication. Nature, 422(6929), 259–261.

Lu, J., Wu, D., Mao, M., Wang, W., Zhang, G. (2015). Recommender system application developments: a survey. Decision Support Systems, 74, 12–32.

Mansilla, R., Köppen, E., Cocho, G., Miramontes, P. (2007). On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 155–160.

Murtagh, F., Orlov, M., Mirkin, B. (2018). Qualitative judgement of research impact: Domain taxonomy as a fundamental framework for judgement of the quality of research. Journal of Classification, 35, 5–28.

Neff, B.D., & Olden, J.D. (2010). Not so fast: inflation in impact factors contributes to apparent improvements in journal quality. BioScience, 60(6), 455–459.

Nelsen, R.B. (1999). An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.

Pajić, D. (2015). On the stability of citation-based journal rankings. Journal of Informetric, 9, 990–1006.

Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. Reprinted in: ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(1)(2001), 3-55.

Xu, H., Martin, E., Mahidadia, A. (2014). Contents and time sensitive document ranking of scientific literature. Journal of Informetrics, 8, 546–561.

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem