Bal, M. 2002. “Conceptos viajeros en las humanidades” En Travelling Concepts in the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 30–31.
Brandi, C. 2011. Teoría de la restauración. Madrid: Alianza Forma, 24–29.
Breuil, M. H. 2014. Personal Communication in an Interview Conducted in Marseille on 7 February 2014, Published in Llamas, R. (2015). “Obsolescence, Materials and Authenticity. The Opinion of Cécile Dazord and Marie-Hélène Breuil”, Arché, n° 8, 9 y 10: 11–16.
[+]
Bal, M. 2002. “Conceptos viajeros en las humanidades” En Travelling Concepts in the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 30–31.
Brandi, C. 2011. Teoría de la restauración. Madrid: Alianza Forma, 24–29.
Breuil, M. H. 2014. Personal Communication in an Interview Conducted in Marseille on 7 February 2014, Published in Llamas, R. (2015). “Obsolescence, Materials and Authenticity. The Opinion of Cécile Dazord and Marie-Hélène Breuil”, Arché, n° 8, 9 y 10: 11–16.
Dykstra, S. W. (1996). The Artist’s Intentions and the Intentional Fallacy in Fine Arts Conservation. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 35(3), 197-218. doi:10.1179/019713696806113676
Kapelouzou, I. 2010. “Contemplating Integration: Modern Art and the Conservation System.” In Art and Science Volume VIII. Proceedings of a Special Focus Symposium in Art and Science, 22nd International Conference on System Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, 2–6 August 2010, Baden Baden, Lasker, G.E., Schinzel, H., and Boullart, K. (eds). 39–44. Tecumseh: IIAS (The International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systemic Research and Cybernetics).
Laurenson, P. 2006. “Authenticity, Change and Loss in the Conservation of Time-Based Media Installations”. Tate Papers. Accesible en: https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/06/authenticity-change-and-loss-conservation-of-time-based-media-installations, acceso 30 de octubre de 2019.
Llamas Pacheco, R. 2014. Arte contemporáneo y restauración. O cómo investigar entre lo material, lo esencial y lo simbólico. Madrid, Tecnos, 36–73.
Martore, P. 2009. “The Contemporary Artwork Between Meaning and Cultural Identity.” CeROArt [Online], 4 | 2009, Online since 14 October 2009, connection on 10 October 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/1287. doi:10.4000/ceroart.1287.
Schinzel, H. 2003. “La intención artística y las posibilidades de la restauración”, en Restauración de pintura contemporánea. Tendencias, Materiales, Técnicas, Madrid, Akal, 45–64.
Szmelter, I. 2013. “New Values of Cultural Heritage and the Need for a New Paradigm Regarding its Care.” CeROArt [Online], HS | 2013, Online since 30 October 2013, Connection on 10 October 2019. http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/3647. doi:10.4000/ceroart.3647.
Van de Vall , R. (2017). Documentando dilemas. Sobre la relevancia de los casos éticamente ambiguos. Sin Objeto, (00), 83. doi:10.18239/sinobj_2017.00.05
Verbeeck, M. 2019a. “Brandi y la restauración del arte contemporáneo. De un lado y del otro de la teoría”, en: Conversaciones con Cesare Brandi y Giulio Carlo Argán, México, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, ICCROM, n° 7, 194–209.
Verbeeck, M. 2019b. “De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?” CeROArt [Online], HS | 2018, Online since 15 January 2019, connection on 10 October 2019. http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/6020. doi:10.4000/ceroart.602.
[-]