Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Llamas-Pacheco, Rosario | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-11T03:30:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-11T03:30:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-16 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0039-3630 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/172134 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] This article analyzes different ontological categories and how they relate to the conservation of contemporary art. Faced with the necessity of apprehending the work of art from an ontological point of view, a theoretical approach is made on the concepts that most affect the conservation of contemporary art: quiddity, truth-authenticity, identity, quality, consistency, and interpretation. These are analyzed from an empirical perspective, based on the experience of conservation and restoration. Since conserving and restoring require making decisions that will affect the material and conceptual plane of the works, several possible paradigms that must be introduced into the deontological code of the profession are analyzed. In addition, the study of a new paradigm is provided, that of the death of the work of art. This paradigm can serve as a frame of reference, given the impossibility of bringing the `Truth¿ of the artwork into the world of the sensitive. This may occur due to different conditioning factors and limitations of a material, technical, or intentional type, which affect issues that were once established as essential to the entity. On the other hand, different types of time that are related to the conservation of contemporary art are studied: biological time, the eternal present of the work, time as a constructor agent, and destructive time as a facilitator of the appearance of ruin or ruin-relic in the work of art. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Maney Publishing | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Studies in Conservation | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Theory | es_ES |
dc.subject | Conservation-restoration | es_ES |
dc.subject | Contemporary art | es_ES |
dc.subject | Quiddity | es_ES |
dc.subject | Authenticity | es_ES |
dc.subject | Paradigm of death | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ontological categories | es_ES |
dc.subject | Identity | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | PINTURA | es_ES |
dc.title | Some theory for conservation of contemporary art | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00393630.2020.1733790 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Conservación y Restauración de Bienes Culturales - Departament de Conservació i Restauració de Béns Culturals | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Llamas-Pacheco, R. (2020). Some theory for conservation of contemporary art. Studies in Conservation. 65(8):487-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2020.1733790 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2020.1733790 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 487 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 498 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 65 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 8 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\425037 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bal, M. 2002. “Conceptos viajeros en las humanidades” En Travelling Concepts in the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 30–31. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Brandi, C. 2011. Teoría de la restauración. Madrid: Alianza Forma, 24–29. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Breuil, M. H. 2014. Personal Communication in an Interview Conducted in Marseille on 7 February 2014, Published in Llamas, R. (2015). “Obsolescence, Materials and Authenticity. The Opinion of Cécile Dazord and Marie-Hélène Breuil”, Arché, n° 8, 9 y 10: 11–16. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dykstra, S. W. (1996). The Artist’s Intentions and the Intentional Fallacy in Fine Arts Conservation. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 35(3), 197-218. doi:10.1179/019713696806113676 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kapelouzou, I. 2010. “Contemplating Integration: Modern Art and the Conservation System.” In Art and Science Volume VIII. Proceedings of a Special Focus Symposium in Art and Science, 22nd International Conference on System Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, 2–6 August 2010, Baden Baden, Lasker, G.E., Schinzel, H., and Boullart, K. (eds). 39–44. Tecumseh: IIAS (The International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systemic Research and Cybernetics). | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Laurenson, P. 2006. “Authenticity, Change and Loss in the Conservation of Time-Based Media Installations”. Tate Papers. Accesible en: https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/06/authenticity-change-and-loss-conservation-of-time-based-media-installations, acceso 30 de octubre de 2019. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Llamas Pacheco, R. 2014. Arte contemporáneo y restauración. O cómo investigar entre lo material, lo esencial y lo simbólico. Madrid, Tecnos, 36–73. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Martore, P. 2009. “The Contemporary Artwork Between Meaning and Cultural Identity.” CeROArt [Online], 4 | 2009, Online since 14 October 2009, connection on 10 October 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/1287. doi:10.4000/ceroart.1287. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schinzel, H. 2003. “La intención artística y las posibilidades de la restauración”, en Restauración de pintura contemporánea. Tendencias, Materiales, Técnicas, Madrid, Akal, 45–64. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Szmelter, I. 2013. “New Values of Cultural Heritage and the Need for a New Paradigm Regarding its Care.” CeROArt [Online], HS | 2013, Online since 30 October 2013, Connection on 10 October 2019. http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/3647. doi:10.4000/ceroart.3647. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Van de Vall , R. (2017). Documentando dilemas. Sobre la relevancia de los casos éticamente ambiguos. Sin Objeto, (00), 83. doi:10.18239/sinobj_2017.00.05 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Verbeeck, M. 2019a. “Brandi y la restauración del arte contemporáneo. De un lado y del otro de la teoría”, en: Conversaciones con Cesare Brandi y Giulio Carlo Argán, México, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, ICCROM, n° 7, 194–209. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Verbeeck, M. 2019b. “De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?” CeROArt [Online], HS | 2018, Online since 15 January 2019, connection on 10 October 2019. http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/6020. doi:10.4000/ceroart.602. | es_ES |