- -

Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author García Alvarez-Coque, José María es_ES
dc.contributor.author Saini, Eugenia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Esteban-Rodrigo, Esther es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mas Verdú, Francisco es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-05T14:07:43Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-05T14:07:43Z
dc.date.issued 2020 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/176299
dc.description.abstract [EN] Aim of study: Governance and the knowledge and innovation system (KIS) are interrelated concepts. Knowledge management best practices are linked to KIS performance. This article explores the governance of the leading research, development, and innovation institutes in Ibero-American agriculture, food, and agro-industry sector. The paper reports mapping of the governance of 20 agricultural research institutes. Area of study: Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal. Material and methods: In total, 51 strategic objectives for effective governance were identified. Self-evaluation by the National Agricultural Research Institutes (NARIs) was validated at a workshop backed by FONTAGRO, a cooperation mechanism amongst Latin American and the Caribbean countries, Portugal and Spain, and the Ibero-American Network of NARIs. Main results: As a strength, the key dimension of NARIs appears to be coordination and cooperation. This result was acknowledged in the internal and external evaluations and supports previous research on the relevance of innovation networks in Latin America. By contrast, as a challenge, the key dimension appears to be demand articulation, followed closely by capacity building. Most of the institutes are also well-positioned to develop deeper ties with social and environmental challenges. Research highlights: In the medium and long term, NARIs should make efforts to improve the processes of organizational evaluation and learning, demand articulation, and strategic direction of the institutions. Improvement in management processes, in addition to best practices for social responsibility and gender equality, appear to be short-term priorities. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship American Development Bank and the Knowledge Partnership Korea Fund for Technology and Innovation (KPK). Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain and ERDF (European Commission). RTI2018-093791-B-C22 es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (Online) es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Agriculture and agri-food research es_ES
dc.subject National institutes for agriculture and agri-food research es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge and innovation systems es_ES
dc.subject R&D resources es_ES
dc.subject Thematic analysis es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.5424/sjar/2020184-16883 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093791-B-C22/ES/FORTALECIENDO LAS POLITICAS DE INNOVACION EN EL SECTOR AGROALIMENTARIO/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation García Alvarez-Coque, JM.; Saini, E.; Esteban-Rodrigo, E.; Mas Verdú, F. (2020). Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (Online). 18(4):1-15. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020184-16883 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020184-16883 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 15 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 18 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2171-9292 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\427858 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION es_ES
dc.description.references Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A, 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 37-59. es_ES
dc.description.references Borras S, 2009. The widening and deepening of innovation policy: what conditions provide for effective governance? (No. 2009/2). Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research, and Competences in the Learning Economy. es_ES
dc.description.references Borrás S, Edler J (eds), 2014. The governance of socio-technical systems. Explaining change. Edward Elgar Publ, Cheltenham. es_ES
dc.description.references Borrás S, Edler J, 2020. The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems' transformation. Research Policy 49 (5): 103971. es_ES
dc.description.references Bortagaray I, 2016. Políticas de ciencia, tecnología, e innovación sustentable e inclusiva en América Latina. UNESCO, Oficina de Montevideo. es_ES
dc.description.references Braun V, Clarke V, 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2): 77-101. es_ES
dc.description.references Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Campbell DF, Meissner D, Stamati D, 2018. The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional coopetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Manage 48(1): 148-162. es_ES
dc.description.references Chema SG, Roseboom JE, 2003. A review of key issues and recent experiences in reforming agricultural research in Africa. Res Rep 24. ISNAR, The Hague. es_ES
dc.description.references Choi J, Lee J, 2017. Repairing the R&D market failure: public R&D Subsidy and the composition of private R&D. Research Policy 46 (8): 1465-1478. es_ES
dc.description.references Datta A, 2018. Strengthening research systems: concepts, actions, and actors, K4D Helpdesk Report. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK. es_ES
dc.description.references David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA, 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29: 497-529. es_ES
dc.description.references Delvenne P, Thoreau F, 2017. Dancing without listening to the music: learning from some failures of the 'national innovation systems' in Latin America. In: Research handbook on innovation governance for emerging economies. pp: 37-58. Edward Elgar Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Devaux A, Torero M, Donovan J, Horton D, 2018. Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ 8 (1): 99-123. es_ES
dc.description.references Díaz-Bonilla E, Saini E, Henry G, Creamer B, Trigo E, 2014. Global strategic trends and agricultural research and development in Latin America and the Caribbean: A framework for analysis. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Cali, Colombia. es_ES
dc.description.references Dutrénit G, Natera JM, 2017. Procesos de diálogo para la formulación de políticas de CTI en América Latina y España. CLACSO, Buenos Aires. es_ES
dc.description.references Edler J, Fagerberg J, 2017. Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 33 (1): 2-23. es_ES
dc.description.references Esquivel P, Orjuela A, Barros MP, Osorio C, 2017. Potential opportunities and challenges for research collaboration with Latin America in agriculture and food science. J Agr Food Chem 65 (37): 8096-8098. es_ES
dc.description.references Francis JA, Van Huis A, 2016. Introduction. Why focus on innovation systems: implications for research and policy. In: Innovation systems, pp. 8-13. The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Wageningen. es_ES
dc.description.references Geldes C, Heredia J, Felzensztein C, Mora M, 2017. Proximity as determinant of business cooperation for technological and non-technological innovations: a study of an agribusiness cluster. J Bus Ind Market 31 (1): 168-179. es_ES
dc.description.references Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE, 2011. Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publ, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. es_ES
dc.description.references Hartwich F, Alexaki A, Baptista R, 2007. Innovation systems governance in Bolivia: Lessons for agricultural innovation policies. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00732, December 2007. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC. es_ES
dc.description.references Havas A, Weber KM, 2017. The 'fit' between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115: 327-337. es_ES
dc.description.references Hillman K, Nilsson M, Rickne A, Magnusson T, 2011. Fostering sustainable technologies: a framework for analyzing the governance of innovation systems. Sci Publ Policy 38 (5): 403-415. es_ES
dc.description.references Howlett M, 2009. Governance modes, policy regimes, and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci 42: 73-89. es_ES
dc.description.references Jaramillo H, Lugones F, Salazar M, 2000. Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe: Manual de Bogotá, Doc. 21557, CO-BAC, Bogotá. es_ES
dc.description.references Kilelu CW, Klerk L, Leeuwis C, 2013. Unraveling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development program. Agr Syst 118: 65-77. es_ES
dc.description.references Lupova-Henry E, Dotti NF, 2019. Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the 'who-how-what' framework. J Clean Prod 210: 738-748. es_ES
dc.description.references Marino M, Lhuillery S, Parrotta P, Sala D, 2016. Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D Subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy 45 (9): 1715-1730. es_ES
dc.description.references Mas-Verdu F, Ortiz-Miranda D, García-Álvarez-Coque JM, 2016. Examining organizational innovations in different regional settings. J Bus Res 69 (11): 5324-5329. es_ES
dc.description.references McCluskey JJ, 2019. Why diversity and expectations matter. Agr Econ 50: 107-111. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD, 1999. Managing innovation systems. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf [March 2020]. es_ES
dc.description.references Norton GW, 2011. Impact assessment of the IFPRI agricultural science and technology indicators (ASTI) project. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC. es_ES
dc.description.references Pound B, Conroy C, 2017. The innovation systems approach to agricultural research and development. In: Agricultural systems. Agroecology and rural innovation for development; Snapp S, Pound B (eds). Academic Press, Elsevier, London, pp: 371-405. es_ES
dc.description.references Ruttan VW, 2001. Technology, growth, and development: an induced innovation perspective. Oxford Univ Press, NY. es_ES
dc.description.references Schot J, Steinmueller W, 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47 (9): 1554-1567. es_ES
dc.description.references Spielman DJ, 2005. Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: A critical review. ISNAR Discussion paper No. 591-2016-39898. Int Policy Res Inst, Washington DC. es_ES
dc.description.references Stads GJ, Beintema N, Pérez S, Flaherty K, Falconi C, 2016. Investigación agropecuaria en Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Un analisis de las instituciones, la inversion y las capacidades entre países. Inst Int Invest Pol Alim Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington DC: es_ES
dc.description.references Steurer R, 2007. From government strategies to strategic public management: an exploratory outlook on the pursuit of cross‐sectoral policy integration. Eur Environ 17(3): 201-214. es_ES
dc.description.references UNDP, 2004. Strategy note on governance for human development. United Nations Development Program, New York. es_ES
dc.description.references Villalobos VM, García M, Avila F, 2017. La innovación para el logro de una agricultura competitiva, sustentable e inclusiva, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, San José. Fundación Colegio de Postgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas, México. es_ES
dc.description.references Waddington H, White H, 2014. Farmer field schools: from agricultural extension to adult education, systematica review summary. Int Init for Impact Eval, Washington DC. es_ES
dc.subject.ods 17.- Fortalecer los medios de ejecución y reavivar la alianza mundial para el desarrollo sostenible es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem