- -

Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

García Alvarez-Coque, JM.; Saini, E.; Esteban-Rodrigo, E.; Mas Verdú, F. (2020). Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (Online). 18(4):1-15. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020184-16883

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/176299

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system
Autor: García Alvarez-Coque, José María Saini, Eugenia Esteban-Rodrigo, Esther Mas Verdú, Francisco
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Aim of study: Governance and the knowledge and innovation system (KIS) are interrelated concepts. Knowledge management best practices are linked to KIS performance. This article explores the governance of the leading ...[+]
Palabras clave: Agriculture and agri-food research , National institutes for agriculture and agri-food research , Knowledge and innovation systems , R&D resources , Thematic analysis
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento (by)
Fuente:
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (Online). (eissn: 2171-9292 )
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2020184-16883
Editorial:
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020184-16883
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093791-B-C22/ES/FORTALECIENDO LAS POLITICAS DE INNOVACION EN EL SECTOR AGROALIMENTARIO/
Agradecimientos:
American Development Bank and the Knowledge Partnership Korea Fund for Technology and Innovation (KPK). Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain and ERDF (European Commission). RTI2018-093791-B-C22
Tipo: Artículo

References

Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A, 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 37-59.

Borras S, 2009. The widening and deepening of innovation policy: what conditions provide for effective governance? (No. 2009/2). Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research, and Competences in the Learning Economy.

Borrás S, Edler J (eds), 2014. The governance of socio-technical systems. Explaining change. Edward Elgar Publ, Cheltenham. [+]
Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A, 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 37-59.

Borras S, 2009. The widening and deepening of innovation policy: what conditions provide for effective governance? (No. 2009/2). Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research, and Competences in the Learning Economy.

Borrás S, Edler J (eds), 2014. The governance of socio-technical systems. Explaining change. Edward Elgar Publ, Cheltenham.

Borrás S, Edler J, 2020. The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems' transformation. Research Policy 49 (5): 103971.

Bortagaray I, 2016. Políticas de ciencia, tecnología, e innovación sustentable e inclusiva en América Latina. UNESCO, Oficina de Montevideo.

Braun V, Clarke V, 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2): 77-101.

Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Campbell DF, Meissner D, Stamati D, 2018. The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional coopetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Manage 48(1): 148-162.

Chema SG, Roseboom JE, 2003. A review of key issues and recent experiences in reforming agricultural research in Africa. Res Rep 24. ISNAR, The Hague.

Choi J, Lee J, 2017. Repairing the R&D market failure: public R&D Subsidy and the composition of private R&D. Research Policy 46 (8): 1465-1478.

Datta A, 2018. Strengthening research systems: concepts, actions, and actors, K4D Helpdesk Report. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.

David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA, 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29: 497-529.

Delvenne P, Thoreau F, 2017. Dancing without listening to the music: learning from some failures of the 'national innovation systems' in Latin America. In: Research handbook on innovation governance for emerging economies. pp: 37-58. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Devaux A, Torero M, Donovan J, Horton D, 2018. Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ 8 (1): 99-123.

Díaz-Bonilla E, Saini E, Henry G, Creamer B, Trigo E, 2014. Global strategic trends and agricultural research and development in Latin America and the Caribbean: A framework for analysis. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Cali, Colombia.

Dutrénit G, Natera JM, 2017. Procesos de diálogo para la formulación de políticas de CTI en América Latina y España. CLACSO, Buenos Aires.

Edler J, Fagerberg J, 2017. Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 33 (1): 2-23.

Esquivel P, Orjuela A, Barros MP, Osorio C, 2017. Potential opportunities and challenges for research collaboration with Latin America in agriculture and food science. J Agr Food Chem 65 (37): 8096-8098.

Francis JA, Van Huis A, 2016. Introduction. Why focus on innovation systems: implications for research and policy. In: Innovation systems, pp. 8-13. The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Wageningen.

Geldes C, Heredia J, Felzensztein C, Mora M, 2017. Proximity as determinant of business cooperation for technological and non-technological innovations: a study of an agribusiness cluster. J Bus Ind Market 31 (1): 168-179.

Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE, 2011. Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publ, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Hartwich F, Alexaki A, Baptista R, 2007. Innovation systems governance in Bolivia: Lessons for agricultural innovation policies. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00732, December 2007. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.

Havas A, Weber KM, 2017. The 'fit' between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115: 327-337.

Hillman K, Nilsson M, Rickne A, Magnusson T, 2011. Fostering sustainable technologies: a framework for analyzing the governance of innovation systems. Sci Publ Policy 38 (5): 403-415.

Howlett M, 2009. Governance modes, policy regimes, and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci 42: 73-89.

Jaramillo H, Lugones F, Salazar M, 2000. Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe: Manual de Bogotá, Doc. 21557, CO-BAC, Bogotá.

Kilelu CW, Klerk L, Leeuwis C, 2013. Unraveling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development program. Agr Syst 118: 65-77.

Lupova-Henry E, Dotti NF, 2019. Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the 'who-how-what' framework. J Clean Prod 210: 738-748.

Marino M, Lhuillery S, Parrotta P, Sala D, 2016. Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D Subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy 45 (9): 1715-1730.

Mas-Verdu F, Ortiz-Miranda D, García-Álvarez-Coque JM, 2016. Examining organizational innovations in different regional settings. J Bus Res 69 (11): 5324-5329.

McCluskey JJ, 2019. Why diversity and expectations matter. Agr Econ 50: 107-111.

OECD, 1999. Managing innovation systems. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf [March 2020].

Norton GW, 2011. Impact assessment of the IFPRI agricultural science and technology indicators (ASTI) project. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.

Pound B, Conroy C, 2017. The innovation systems approach to agricultural research and development. In: Agricultural systems. Agroecology and rural innovation for development; Snapp S, Pound B (eds). Academic Press, Elsevier, London, pp: 371-405.

Ruttan VW, 2001. Technology, growth, and development: an induced innovation perspective. Oxford Univ Press, NY.

Schot J, Steinmueller W, 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47 (9): 1554-1567.

Spielman DJ, 2005. Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: A critical review. ISNAR Discussion paper No. 591-2016-39898. Int Policy Res Inst, Washington DC.

Stads GJ, Beintema N, Pérez S, Flaherty K, Falconi C, 2016. Investigación agropecuaria en Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Un analisis de las instituciones, la inversion y las capacidades entre países. Inst Int Invest Pol Alim Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington DC:

Steurer R, 2007. From government strategies to strategic public management: an exploratory outlook on the pursuit of cross‐sectoral policy integration. Eur Environ 17(3): 201-214.

UNDP, 2004. Strategy note on governance for human development. United Nations Development Program, New York.

Villalobos VM, García M, Avila F, 2017. La innovación para el logro de una agricultura competitiva, sustentable e inclusiva, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, San José. Fundación Colegio de Postgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas, México.

Waddington H, White H, 2014. Farmer field schools: from agricultural extension to adult education, systematica review summary. Int Init for Impact Eval, Washington DC.

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem