New modeling strategies for analyzing lateral-torsional buckling in class-4 steel structural members at elevated temperatures using beam-type elements

Abstract

[EN] Fire is one of the main hazards that can affect steel buildings and bridges and was responsible, e.g., for the collapse of the Plasco building in Tehran, Iran, and the I-65 bridge in Birmingham, Alabama, USA. This vulnerability has motivated the development of advanced computational models to predict the response of steel structures to fire accurately. The mechanical response of slender steel members to fire is especially important because they fail prematurely by buckling at load values below their elastic strength. However, the structural analysis of these members typically requires advanced and complex FE models with shell elements, including initial geometric and material imperfections. These shell models are computationally expensive, complicating the carrying out of parametric and probabilistic studies. Therefore, there is a need to develop simple, accurate, and low-cost computational models as reliable as shell-type models. To overcome this knowledge gap, this paper presents two new modeling strategies that simulate the mechanical response of class-4 steel members subjected to lateral-torsional buckling in fire using Timoshenko beam-type finite elements, which significantly simplify the structural modeling. These strategies are called Fiber Beam Model (FBM) and Cruciform Frame Model (CFM) and include initial geometric and material imperfections and thermal strains. In the FBM, the steel member is represented by a single fiber of I-section beam elements, whereas in the CFM, a cruciform arrangement of rectangular beam finite element fibers idealizes it, making the CFM more complex to build than FBM. Both strategies were satisfactorily validated with experimental and numerical results of Test-1 and Test-3 carried out in the ¿Fire design of steel members with welded or hot-rolled class-4 cross-section¿ (FIDESC4) research project on a slender beam of class-4 section. Although both FBM and CFM correctly captured the LTB resistance of the tested beam, CFM can, in addition, adequately reproduce the local buckling failure and significantly reduced the computational time. That means complex fire engineering problems such as probabilistic and optimization analyses of thin-walled beams can be addressed more easily and accurately, representing an important step towards applying performance-based approaches in slender steel structures under fire.