- -

Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Marin-Garcia, JA.; Garcia-Sabater, JP.; Maheut, JPD. (2022). Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management. 13(2):108-137. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.16244

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/184027

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management
Otro titulo: Case report papers guidelines: Recomendaciones para el informe de estudios de caso o investigaciones en acción en el área de Gestión de Empresas
Autor: Marin-Garcia, Juan A. Garcia-Sabater, Jose P. Maheut, Julien Philippe Dominique
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Objective: To provide a working guide which facilitates the accuracy, transparency, and usefulness for academics and practitioners of case report papers as an article type which are fit for publishing in impact journals. ...[+]


[ES] Objetivo: proporcionar una guía de trabajo que facilite la precisión, transparencia y, sobre todo, utilidad para académicos y profesionales de los case report papers como tipología de articulo publicable en revistas ...[+]
Palabras clave: Case report , Case study , Action research , Grounded theory , Reporting guidelines , Operations management , Human resources management , Evidence-based management
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento (by)
Fuente:
WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management. (eissn: 1989-9068 )
DOI: 10.4995/wpom.16244
Editorial:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.16244
Tipo: Artículo

References

Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334

Alfaro-Tanco, J. A., Avella, L., Moscoso, P., & Näslund, D. (2021). An Evaluation Framework for the Dual Contribution of Action Research: Opportunities and Challenges in the Field of Operations Management. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211017636. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211017636

Armstrong, J. S., & Pagell, R. (2003). The ombudsman: Reaping benefits from management research: Lessons from the forecasting principles project. Interfaces, 33(6), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.6.91.25180 [+]
Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334

Alfaro-Tanco, J. A., Avella, L., Moscoso, P., & Näslund, D. (2021). An Evaluation Framework for the Dual Contribution of Action Research: Opportunities and Challenges in the Field of Operations Management. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211017636. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211017636

Armstrong, J. S., & Pagell, R. (2003). The ombudsman: Reaping benefits from management research: Lessons from the forecasting principles project. Interfaces, 33(6), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.6.91.25180

Baig, M., Sayedalamin, Z., Almouteri, O., Algarni, M., & Allam, H. (2016). Perceptions, perceived barriers and practices of physicians' towards Evidence-Based Medicine. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(1), 49-54. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000369318000012

Bigelow, B., & Arndt, M. (2003). Teaching evidence-based management: where do we go from here? The Journal of health administration education, 20(4), 305-312. <Go to ISI>://MEDLINE:14717519

Bleijenbergh, I., van Mierlo, J., & Bondarouk, T. (2021). Closing the gap between scholarly knowledge and practice: Guidelines for HRM action research. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100764

Bonache, J. (1999). El estudio de casos como estrategia de construcción teórica: características, críticas y defensas. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 3, 123-140.

Booth, A., Carroll, C., Ilott, I., Low, L. L., & Cooper, K. (2013). Desperately seeking dissonance: Identifying the disconfirming case in qualitative evidence synthesis [Review]. Qualitative Health Research, 23(1), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312466295

Bootsma, P. A. J., Hendriks, I., & European Org, Q. (1997, 1997 Jun 18-19). Cleaning up the management toolkit. [41st annual eoq congress, proceedings vol 3]. 41st Annual EOQ Congress on Quality - A Critical Factor in the Past, Present and Future, Trondheim, Norway.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Callaghan, C. W. (2019). Lakatos revisited: Innovation and ? Novel facts? as a foundational logic for the social sciences in an era of ?Post-truth? and pseudoscience. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1672489

Claudio, D., Cosgriff, V., Nino, V., & Valladares, L. (2021). An agile standardized work procedure for cleaning the operating room [Operating room, agile standardized work procedure, agile, lean healthcare, turnover]. 2021, 14(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3440

De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007

de Regt, A., Montecchi, M., & Ferguson, S. L. (2020). A false image of health: how fake news and pseudo-facts spread in the health and beauty industry. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(2), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2180

Dobusch, L., & Heimstaedt, M. (2019). Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review. Management learning, 50(5), 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619878820

Elg, M., Gremyr, I., Halldorsson, A., & Wallo, A. (2020). Service action research: review and guidelines. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2018-0350

Elsahn, Z., Callagher, L., Husted, K., Korber, S., & Siedlok, F. (2020). Are rigor and transparency enough? Review and future directions for case studies in technology and innovation Management. R & D Management, 50(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12412

Erro-Garcés, A., & Alfaro-Tanco, J. A. (2020). Action Research as a Meta-Methodology in the Management Field. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920917489

France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A. S., Jepson, R. G., Maxwell, M., Roberts, R. J., Turley, R. L., Booth, A., Britten, N., Flemming, K., Gallagher, I., Garside, R., Hannes, K., Lewin, S., Noblit, G. W., Pope, C., Thomas, J., Vanstone, M., Higginbottom, G. M. A., & Noyes, J. (2019). Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance [Article]. BMC medical research methodology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0

Gagnier, J. J., Kienle, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Sox, H., Riley, D., & Group, C. (2013). The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-201554

González de Dios, J., Flores Canoura, Á., Jiménez Villa, J., & Gutiérrez Fuentes, J. A. (2011). Qué revistas médicas españolas leen y cómo se informan los médicos de atención primaria. Atención Primaria, 43(12), 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2010.11.008

Grawitch, M. J., & Ballard, D. W. (2019). Pseudoscience won't create a psychologically healthy workplace. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113427.00009

Grimshaw, J. M., Eccles, M. P., Walker, A. E., & Thomas, R. E. (2002). Changing physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. The Journal of continuing education in the health professions, 22(4), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340220408

Guise, J.-M., Butler, M., Chang, C., Viswanathan, M., Pigott, T., & Tugwell, P. (2017). AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 90, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.017

Hamlin, B. (2002). Towards evidence-based management and research-informed HRD practice: an empirical study. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 2(1-2), 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2002.001023

Heart Views. (2017). Guidelines To Writing A Clinical Case Report. Heart Views, 18(3), 104-105. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.217857

https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.217857

Hirst, A., & Altman, D. G. (2012). Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035621

Hubbard, R., Vetter, D. E., & Little, E. L. (1998). Replication in strategic management: Scientific testing for validity, generalizability, and usefulness. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<243::AID-SMJ951>3.0.CO;2-0

Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning toward enhancing mathematical thinking: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(4), 3548-3561. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000697583000051

Kahneman, D. (2011). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.

kahneman, D., Rosenfeld, A. M., Gandhi, L., & Blaser, T. (2016). Noise: How to Overcome the High, Hidden Cost of Inconsistent Decision Making. Algorithmic judgment is more efficient than the human variety. . Harvard Bussines Review(October), 38-46. https://hbr.org/2016/10/noise

Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004

Kratochwill, T., & Levin, J. (2010). Enhancing the Scientific Credibility of Single-Case Intervention Research: Randomization to the Rescue. Psychological Methods, 15, 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017736

Leonard, K. L., & Masatu, M. C. (2010). Using the Hawthorne effect to examine the gap between a doctor's best possible practice and actual performance. Journal of Development Economics, 93(2), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.11.001

Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2011). Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments. American Economic Journal-Applied Economics, 3(1), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.1.224

Lewin, S., Glenton, C., Munthe-Kaas, H., Carlsen, B., Colvin, C. J., Gülmezoglu, M., Noyes, J., Booth, A., Garside, R., & Rashidian, A. (2015). Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) [Article]. PLoS Medicine, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895

Losilla, J.-M., Oliveras, I., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Vives, J. (2018). Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology(101), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021

Manchón, E. (2021). Homeopatía para empresas: los 'gurús' que ganan millones vendiendo incompetencia. In. https://blogs.elconfidencial.com/tecnologia/tribuna/2021-12-27/homeopatiaplacebos-gurus-consultoria-productividad_3350078/: El Confidencial. 27/12/2021 - Actualizado: 28/12/2021.

Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2015). Publishing in two phases for focused research by means of "research collaborations". WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 6(2), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4459

Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2021). Publishing in three stages to support evidence based management practice. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 12(2), 56-95. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.11755

Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2021). Teaching experiences based on action research: a guide to publishing in scientific journals. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 12(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.7243

Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. J., & Maheut, J. (2018). Protocol: action planning for action research about kaizen in public organizations. The case of higher education. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8990

Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Ruiz, A., Maheut, J., & Garcia-Sabater, J. J. (2020). Operations Management at the service of health care management: Example of a proposal for action research to plan and schedule health resources in scenarios derived from the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3190

McCutcheon, D. M., & Meredith, J. R. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 239-256. http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0027654507&partner=40&rel=R4.0.0 https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7

Nino, V., Claudio, D., Valladares, L., & Harris, S. (2020). An Enhanced Kaizen Event in a Sterile Processing Department of a Rural Hospital: A Case Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238748

Nylenna, M. (1991). Reading habits of Norwegian physicians. Nordisk medicin, 106(2), 53-55. <Go to ISI>://MEDLINE:2006095

O'Connor, K. (2009). Medical journals What are they good for? Australian Family Physician, 38(6), 433-+. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000266848000015

Oliva, R. (2019). Intervention as a research strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 65(7), 710-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1065

Pacewicz, J. (2022). What Can You Do With a Single Case? How to Think About Ethnographic Case Selection Like a Historical Sociologist. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(3), 931-962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119901213

Perea, E., & Brady, M. (2017). Research rigor and the gap between academic journals and business practitioners. Journal of management development, 36(8), 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0332

Raelin, J. A. (2020). Toward a methodology for studying leadership-as-practice. Leadership, 16(4), 480-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019882831

Riley, D. S., Barber, M. S., Kienle, G. S., Aronson, J. K., von Schoen-Angerer, T., Tugwell, P., Kiene, H., Helfand, M., Altman, D. G., Sox, H., Werthmann, P. G., Moher, D., Rison, R. A., Shamseer, L., Koch, C. A., Sun, G. H., Hanaway, P., Sudak, N. L., Kaszkin-Bettag, M., Carpenter, J. E., & Gagnier, J. J. (2017). CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026

Ru, B., Wang, X., & Yao, L. (2017). Evaluation of the informatician perspective: determining types of research papers preferred by clinicians. Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0463-z

Saint, S., Christakis, D. A., Saha, S., Elmore, J. G., Welsh, D. E., Baker, P., & Koepsell, T. D. (2000). Journal reading habits of internists. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15(12), 881-884. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.00202.x

Shani, A. B., & Coghlan, D. (2021). Action research in business and management: A reflective review. Action Research, 19(3), 518-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319852147

Small, M. L. (2009). 'How many cases do I need?':On science and the logic of case selection in fieldbased research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586

Stroke, G. W. (1994). Science versus pseudo-science - from economics to environment - some basic facts and reflections. Optoelectronics-Devices and Technologies, 9(3), 414-415. <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1994PR91600013

Suárez-Barraza, M. F., & Miguel-Davila, J. A. (2020). Kaizen-Kata, a Problem-Solving Approach to Public Service Health Care in Mexico. A Multiple-Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3297. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3297 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093297

Sulkowski, L. (2019). On bullshit management - the critical management studies perspective. Economics & Sociology, 12(1), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2019/12-1/18

Swanepoel, M. J. (2019). MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH: GUIDELINES FOR USING A HYBRID OF THE GROUNDED THEORY AND CASE STUDY APPROACHES. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.33

Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Clarke, M. T., Na, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95(1), 56-63. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000243733500009

Thaler, A. D., & Shiffman, D. (2015). Fish tales: Combating fake science in popular media. Ocean & Coastal Management, 115, 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.005

Thoms, U. (2014). "What do physicians really read?" Medical journals and pharma-marketing between 1900 and the late 1970s. Medizinhistorisches Journal, 49(4), 287-329. <Go to ISI>://MEDLINE:26288923

Tight, M. (2017). Understanding Case Study Research. Small-scale Research with Meaning. Sage Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920118

Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414329

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem