- -

Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Marin-GarciaGarci ...
Tamaño: 1.083Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Marin-Garcia, Juan A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Garcia-Sabater, Jose P. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Maheut, Julien Philippe Dominique es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-12T10:58:03Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-12T10:58:03Z
dc.date.issued 2022-07-05
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/184027
dc.description.abstract [EN] Objective: To provide a working guide which facilitates the accuracy, transparency, and usefulness for academics and practitioners of case report papers as an article type which are fit for publishing in impact journals. In this way, we aim to increase the use and dissemination of recommendations in aid of the writing and publication of case study and action research. Theoretical framework: A case report paper presents a story in narrative form and includes current individual or organisational concerns, situational diagnoses, interventions, outcomes including adverse events, and follow-up. The narrative should include a discussion of the rationale for any conclusions and lessons learned. Method: We analysed the prevalence of these type of articles in publications as indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and in Scopus; we explain how we customised the case report guidelines (CAse REport or CARE) to optimise them for the scientific field of Management focussing particularly on Operations Management and Human Resources Management. We shared for discussion and feedback the adapted proposal among a group of academics and professionals in the field of Management. Outcomes/Implications: Robust reporting guidelines help to improve research performance, reduce bias risk, provide information on the implementation of management practices, support the training of management professionals, and enable informed editorial decisions by journal editors and reviewers. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] Objetivo: proporcionar una guía de trabajo que facilite la precisión, transparencia y, sobre todo, utilidad para académicos y profesionales de los case report papers como tipología de articulo publicable en revistas de impacto. De este modo, pretendemos incrementar el uso y difusión de las recomendaciones para ayudar a la redacción y publicación de informes de casos e investigación en acción. Marco teórico: los case report papers cuentan una historia en un formato narrativo que incluye las preocupaciones actuales de una persona o una organización, diagnósticos de situación, intervenciones, resultados (incluidos los eventos adversos) y seguimiento. La narrativa debe incluir una discusión de la justificación de cualquier conclusión y lecciones aprendidas. Método: analizaremos la prevalencia de este tipo de artículos en las publicaciones indexadas en Web Of Science (WOS) y Scopus; explicaremos como hemos hecho la adaptación de los case reports (CARE) guidelines para que sean aplicables en el área científica de Management (especialmente en Operations Management y Human Resources Management). Debatiremos la propuesta adaptada con un grupo de académicos y profesionales del área de Management. Resultados/Implicaciones: las guías de reporte  (reporting guidelines) ayudan a mejorar la investigación realizada, reducir el riesgo de sesgo, proporciona información sobre la implantación de prácticas de gestión, favorece la formación de profesionales en gestión y permite tomar decisiones editoriales informadas a las personas que actúan como editoras de revistas o revisoras. es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Case report es_ES
dc.subject Case study es_ES
dc.subject Action research es_ES
dc.subject Grounded theory es_ES
dc.subject Reporting guidelines es_ES
dc.subject Operations management es_ES
dc.subject Human resources management es_ES
dc.subject Evidence-based management es_ES
dc.title Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management es_ES
dc.title.alternative Case report papers guidelines: Recomendaciones para el informe de estudios de caso o investigaciones en acción en el área de Gestión de Empresas es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wpom.16244
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Marin-Garcia, JA.; Garcia-Sabater, JP.; Maheut, JPD. (2022). Case report papers guidelines: Recommendations for the reporting of case studies or action research in Business Management. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management. 13(2):108-137. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.16244 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.16244 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 108 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 137 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 13 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9068
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\16244 es_ES
dc.description.references Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334 es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro-Tanco, J. A., Avella, L., Moscoso, P., & Näslund, D. (2021). An Evaluation Framework for the Dual Contribution of Action Research: Opportunities and Challenges in the Field of Operations Management. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211017636. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211017636 es_ES
dc.description.references Armstrong, J. S., & Pagell, R. (2003). The ombudsman: Reaping benefits from management research: Lessons from the forecasting principles project. Interfaces, 33(6), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.6.91.25180 es_ES
dc.description.references Baig, M., Sayedalamin, Z., Almouteri, O., Algarni, M., & Allam, H. (2016). Perceptions, perceived barriers and practices of physicians' towards Evidence-Based Medicine. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(1), 49-54. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000369318000012 es_ES
dc.description.references Bigelow, B., & Arndt, M. (2003). Teaching evidence-based management: where do we go from here? The Journal of health administration education, 20(4), 305-312. <Go to ISI>://MEDLINE:14717519 es_ES
dc.description.references Bleijenbergh, I., van Mierlo, J., & Bondarouk, T. (2021). Closing the gap between scholarly knowledge and practice: Guidelines for HRM action research. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100764 es_ES
dc.description.references Bonache, J. (1999). El estudio de casos como estrategia de construcción teórica: características, críticas y defensas. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 3, 123-140. es_ES
dc.description.references Booth, A., Carroll, C., Ilott, I., Low, L. L., & Cooper, K. (2013). Desperately seeking dissonance: Identifying the disconfirming case in qualitative evidence synthesis [Review]. Qualitative Health Research, 23(1), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312466295 es_ES
dc.description.references Bootsma, P. A. J., Hendriks, I., & European Org, Q. (1997, 1997 Jun 18-19). Cleaning up the management toolkit. [41st annual eoq congress, proceedings vol 3]. 41st Annual EOQ Congress on Quality - A Critical Factor in the Past, Present and Future, Trondheim, Norway. es_ES
dc.description.references Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Callaghan, C. W. (2019). Lakatos revisited: Innovation and ? Novel facts? as a foundational logic for the social sciences in an era of ?Post-truth? and pseudoscience. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1672489 es_ES
dc.description.references Claudio, D., Cosgriff, V., Nino, V., & Valladares, L. (2021). An agile standardized work procedure for cleaning the operating room [Operating room, agile standardized work procedure, agile, lean healthcare, turnover]. 2021, 14(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3440 es_ES
dc.description.references De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007 es_ES
dc.description.references de Regt, A., Montecchi, M., & Ferguson, S. L. (2020). A false image of health: how fake news and pseudo-facts spread in the health and beauty industry. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(2), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2180 es_ES
dc.description.references Dobusch, L., & Heimstaedt, M. (2019). Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review. Management learning, 50(5), 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619878820 es_ES
dc.description.references Elg, M., Gremyr, I., Halldorsson, A., & Wallo, A. (2020). Service action research: review and guidelines. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2018-0350 es_ES
dc.description.references Elsahn, Z., Callagher, L., Husted, K., Korber, S., & Siedlok, F. (2020). Are rigor and transparency enough? Review and future directions for case studies in technology and innovation Management. R & D Management, 50(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12412 es_ES
dc.description.references Erro-Garcés, A., & Alfaro-Tanco, J. A. (2020). Action Research as a Meta-Methodology in the Management Field. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920917489 es_ES
dc.description.references France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A. S., Jepson, R. G., Maxwell, M., Roberts, R. J., Turley, R. L., Booth, A., Britten, N., Flemming, K., Gallagher, I., Garside, R., Hannes, K., Lewin, S., Noblit, G. W., Pope, C., Thomas, J., Vanstone, M., Higginbottom, G. M. A., & Noyes, J. (2019). Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance [Article]. BMC medical research methodology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Gagnier, J. J., Kienle, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Sox, H., Riley, D., & Group, C. (2013). The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-201554 es_ES
dc.description.references González de Dios, J., Flores Canoura, Á., Jiménez Villa, J., & Gutiérrez Fuentes, J. A. (2011). Qué revistas médicas españolas leen y cómo se informan los médicos de atención primaria. Atención Primaria, 43(12), 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2010.11.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Grawitch, M. J., & Ballard, D. W. (2019). Pseudoscience won't create a psychologically healthy workplace. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113427.00009 es_ES
dc.description.references Grimshaw, J. M., Eccles, M. P., Walker, A. E., & Thomas, R. E. (2002). Changing physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. The Journal of continuing education in the health professions, 22(4), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340220408 es_ES
dc.description.references Guise, J.-M., Butler, M., Chang, C., Viswanathan, M., Pigott, T., & Tugwell, P. (2017). AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 90, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Hamlin, B. (2002). Towards evidence-based management and research-informed HRD practice: an empirical study. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 2(1-2), 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2002.001023 es_ES
dc.description.references Heart Views. (2017). Guidelines To Writing A Clinical Case Report. Heart Views, 18(3), 104-105. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.217857 es_ES
dc.description.references https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.217857 es_ES
dc.description.references Hirst, A., & Altman, D. G. (2012). Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035621 es_ES
dc.description.references Hubbard, R., Vetter, D. E., & Little, E. L. (1998). Replication in strategic management: Scientific testing for validity, generalizability, and usefulness. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<243::AID-SMJ951>3.0.CO;2-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning toward enhancing mathematical thinking: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(4), 3548-3561. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000697583000051 es_ES
dc.description.references Kahneman, D. (2011). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial. es_ES
dc.description.references kahneman, D., Rosenfeld, A. M., Gandhi, L., & Blaser, T. (2016). Noise: How to Overcome the High, Hidden Cost of Inconsistent Decision Making. Algorithmic judgment is more efficient than the human variety. . Harvard Bussines Review(October), 38-46. https://hbr.org/2016/10/noise es_ES
dc.description.references Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Kratochwill, T., & Levin, J. (2010). Enhancing the Scientific Credibility of Single-Case Intervention Research: Randomization to the Rescue. Psychological Methods, 15, 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017736 es_ES
dc.description.references Leonard, K. L., & Masatu, M. C. (2010). Using the Hawthorne effect to examine the gap between a doctor's best possible practice and actual performance. Journal of Development Economics, 93(2), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.11.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2011). Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments. American Economic Journal-Applied Economics, 3(1), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.1.224 es_ES
dc.description.references Lewin, S., Glenton, C., Munthe-Kaas, H., Carlsen, B., Colvin, C. J., Gülmezoglu, M., Noyes, J., Booth, A., Garside, R., & Rashidian, A. (2015). Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) [Article]. PLoS Medicine, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895 es_ES
dc.description.references Losilla, J.-M., Oliveras, I., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Vives, J. (2018). Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology(101), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021 es_ES
dc.description.references Manchón, E. (2021). Homeopatía para empresas: los 'gurús' que ganan millones vendiendo incompetencia. In. https://blogs.elconfidencial.com/tecnologia/tribuna/2021-12-27/homeopatiaplacebos-gurus-consultoria-productividad_3350078/: El Confidencial. 27/12/2021 - Actualizado: 28/12/2021. es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2015). Publishing in two phases for focused research by means of "research collaborations". WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 6(2), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4459 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2021). Publishing in three stages to support evidence based management practice. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 12(2), 56-95. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.11755 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2021). Teaching experiences based on action research: a guide to publishing in scientific journals. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 12(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.7243 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. J., & Maheut, J. (2018). Protocol: action planning for action research about kaizen in public organizations. The case of higher education. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8990 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Ruiz, A., Maheut, J., & Garcia-Sabater, J. J. (2020). Operations Management at the service of health care management: Example of a proposal for action research to plan and schedule health resources in scenarios derived from the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3190 es_ES
dc.description.references McCutcheon, D. M., & Meredith, J. R. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 239-256. http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0027654507&partner=40&rel=R4.0.0 https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Nino, V., Claudio, D., Valladares, L., & Harris, S. (2020). An Enhanced Kaizen Event in a Sterile Processing Department of a Rural Hospital: A Case Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238748 es_ES
dc.description.references Nylenna, M. (1991). Reading habits of Norwegian physicians. Nordisk medicin, 106(2), 53-55. <Go to ISI>://MEDLINE:2006095 es_ES
dc.description.references O'Connor, K. (2009). Medical journals What are they good for? Australian Family Physician, 38(6), 433-+. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000266848000015 es_ES
dc.description.references Oliva, R. (2019). Intervention as a research strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 65(7), 710-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1065 es_ES
dc.description.references Pacewicz, J. (2022). What Can You Do With a Single Case? How to Think About Ethnographic Case Selection Like a Historical Sociologist. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(3), 931-962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119901213 es_ES
dc.description.references Perea, E., & Brady, M. (2017). Research rigor and the gap between academic journals and business practitioners. Journal of management development, 36(8), 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0332 es_ES
dc.description.references Raelin, J. A. (2020). Toward a methodology for studying leadership-as-practice. Leadership, 16(4), 480-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019882831 es_ES
dc.description.references Riley, D. S., Barber, M. S., Kienle, G. S., Aronson, J. K., von Schoen-Angerer, T., Tugwell, P., Kiene, H., Helfand, M., Altman, D. G., Sox, H., Werthmann, P. G., Moher, D., Rison, R. A., Shamseer, L., Koch, C. A., Sun, G. H., Hanaway, P., Sudak, N. L., Kaszkin-Bettag, M., Carpenter, J. E., & Gagnier, J. J. (2017). CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026 es_ES
dc.description.references Ru, B., Wang, X., & Yao, L. (2017). Evaluation of the informatician perspective: determining types of research papers preferred by clinicians. Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0463-z es_ES
dc.description.references Saint, S., Christakis, D. A., Saha, S., Elmore, J. G., Welsh, D. E., Baker, P., & Koepsell, T. D. (2000). Journal reading habits of internists. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15(12), 881-884. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.00202.x es_ES
dc.description.references Shani, A. B., & Coghlan, D. (2021). Action research in business and management: A reflective review. Action Research, 19(3), 518-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319852147 es_ES
dc.description.references Small, M. L. (2009). 'How many cases do I need?':On science and the logic of case selection in fieldbased research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586 es_ES
dc.description.references Stroke, G. W. (1994). Science versus pseudo-science - from economics to environment - some basic facts and reflections. Optoelectronics-Devices and Technologies, 9(3), 414-415. <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1994PR91600013 es_ES
dc.description.references Suárez-Barraza, M. F., & Miguel-Davila, J. A. (2020). Kaizen-Kata, a Problem-Solving Approach to Public Service Health Care in Mexico. A Multiple-Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3297. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3297 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093297 es_ES
dc.description.references Sulkowski, L. (2019). On bullshit management - the critical management studies perspective. Economics & Sociology, 12(1), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2019/12-1/18 es_ES
dc.description.references Swanepoel, M. J. (2019). MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH: GUIDELINES FOR USING A HYBRID OF THE GROUNDED THEORY AND CASE STUDY APPROACHES. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.33 es_ES
dc.description.references Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Clarke, M. T., Na, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95(1), 56-63. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000243733500009 es_ES
dc.description.references Thaler, A. D., & Shiffman, D. (2015). Fish tales: Combating fake science in popular media. Ocean & Coastal Management, 115, 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Thoms, U. (2014). "What do physicians really read?" Medical journals and pharma-marketing between 1900 and the late 1970s. Medizinhistorisches Journal, 49(4), 287-329. <Go to ISI>://MEDLINE:26288923 es_ES
dc.description.references Tight, M. (2017). Understanding Case Study Research. Small-scale Research with Meaning. Sage Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920118 es_ES
dc.description.references Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414329 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem